{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T06:10:17Z","timestamp":1789711817004,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":9,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1789689600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":260,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["cambridge.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Behav Brain Sci"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Jara-Ettinger and Dunham treat the \u201cmentalistic stance\u201d as theory-theory, leaving the institutional stance vulnerable to a familiar reply: the tacit theory can be context-tuned to fit the surprise cases. I argue that the institutional stance is best motivated by pairing it with simulation-based mindreading and scripts, which together reduce theory-theory\u2019s distinctive explanatory role and preserve the authors\u2019 appeal to computational economy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0140525x26105627","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T05:56:49Z","timestamp":1789711009000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/policypage","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["How much is left for the theory-theory to explain?"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"49","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8180-2467","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Joseph","family":"Cruz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Williams College"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0140525X26105627_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/0195138929.001.0001"},{"key":"S0140525X26105627_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0017.1992.tb00200.x"},{"key":"S0140525X26105627_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cobeha.2019.04.010"},{"key":"S0140525X26105627_ref8","author":"Todd","year":"2025","journal-title":"Trends in Cognitive Sciences"},{"key":"S0140525X26105627_ref2","first-page":"9","volume-title":"Encyclopedia of cognitive science","volume":"3","author":"Cruz","year":"2003"},{"key":"S0140525X26105627_ref5","first-page":"135","volume-title":"Language, mind and logic","author":"Heal","year":"1986"},{"key":"S0140525X26105627_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0017.1986.tb00324.x"},{"key":"S0140525X26105627_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2017.06.017"},{"key":"S0140525X26105627_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0017.00079"}],"container-title":["Behavioral and Brain Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0140525X26105627","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T05:56:50Z","timestamp":1789711010000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0140525X26105627\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"references-count":9,"alternative-id":["S0140525X26105627"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0140525x26105627","relation":{},"ISSN":["0140-525X","1469-1825"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0140-525X","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-1825","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"assertion":[{"value":"\u00a9 The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright","group":{"name":"copyright_and_licensing","label":"Copyright and Licensing"}}],"article-number":"e376"}}