{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,25]],"date-time":"2026-07-25T19:47:50Z","timestamp":1785008870609,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":3,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,8,22]],"date-time":"2005-08-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1124668800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Econom. Theory"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>This problem shows how the key ignorability-of-treatment assumption \nused in estimating treatment effects can be violated when certain factors \nare included among the covariates. The case considered is when there are \n<jats:italic>J<\/jats:italic> + 1 treatment levels, treatment is randomized with respect to \npotential outcomes, but the distribution of included covariates differs \nacross treatment levels.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0266466605050516","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,8,23]],"date-time":"2005-08-23T17:29:31Z","timestamp":1124818171000},"page":"1026-1028","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":73,"title":["VIOLATING IGNORABILITY OF TREATMENT BY CONTROLLING FOR TOO MANY \nFACTORS"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Jeffrey M.","family":"Wooldridge","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,8,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0266466605050516_ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heckman, J.J. , H. Ichimura , & P. Todd (1997)Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator.Review of Economic Studies 65,261\u2013294.","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-937X.00044"},{"key":"S0266466605050516_ref003","unstructured":"Wooldridge, J.M. (2002)Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.MIT Press."},{"key":"S0266466605050516_ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosenbaum, P.R. & D.B. Rubin (1983)The central role of the propensity score in observational studiesfor causal effects.Biometrika 70,41\u201355.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/70.1.41"}],"container-title":["Econometric Theory"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0266466605050516","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,21]],"date-time":"2025-06-21T04:44:49Z","timestamp":1750481089000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0266466605050516\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,8,22]]},"references-count":3,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0266466605050516"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0266466605050516","relation":{},"ISSN":["0266-4666","1469-4360"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0266-4666","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-4360","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,8,22]]}}}