{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,17]],"date-time":"2026-01-17T22:43:38Z","timestamp":1768689818273,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,8,1]],"date-time":"2009-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1249084800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Econom. Theory"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>In this paper we develop a simple procedure that delivers tests for the presence of a broken trend in a univariate time series that do not require knowledge of the form of serial correlation in the data and are robust as to whether the shocks are generated by an<jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>(0) or an<jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>(1) process. Two trend break models are considered: the first holds the level fixed while allowing the trend to break, while the latter allows for a simultaneous break in level and trend. For the known break date case, our proposed tests are formed as a weighted average of the optimal tests appropriate for<jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>(0) and<jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>(1) shocks. The weighted statistics are shown to have standard normal limiting null distributions and to attain the Gaussian asymptotic local power envelope, in each case regardless of whether the shocks are<jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>(0) or<jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>(1). In the unknown break date case, we adopt the method of Andrews (1993) and take a weighted average of the statistics formed as the supremum over all possible break dates, subject to a trimming parameter, in both the<jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>(0) and<jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>(1) environments. Monte Carlo evidence suggests that our tests are in most cases more powerful, often substantially so, than the robust broken trend tests of Sayginsoy and Vogelsang (2004). An empirical application highlights the practical usefulness of our proposed tests.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0266466608090385","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,3,6]],"date-time":"2009-03-06T13:38:47Z","timestamp":1236346727000},"page":"995-1029","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":84,"title":["SIMPLE, ROBUST, AND POWERFUL TESTS OF THE BREAKING TREND HYPOTHESIS"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"David I.","family":"Harvey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stephen J.","family":"Leybourne","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A.M. Robert","family":"Taylor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,8,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2999618"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2527353"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref23","unstructured":"Stock J. & Watson M.W. , (2005) Implications of dynamic factor analysis for VAR models. NBER Working paper #11467."},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref20","unstructured":"Sayginsoy O. & Vogelsang T. (2004) Powerful tests of structural change that are robust to strong serial correlation. Working paper 04\/08, SUNY at Albany."},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeconom.2004.09.004"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref16","unstructured":"Park J.Y. & Choi B. (1988) A new approach to testing for a unit root. CAE Working paper 88\u201323, Cornell University."},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0084.00076"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-4076(01)00139-7"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jae.659"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2998540"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2998543"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref7","first-page":"321","article-title":"Tests for parameter instability in regressions with I(1) processes","volume":"10","author":"Hansen","year":"1992","journal-title":"Journal of Business and Economic Statistics"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2951753"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/1913712"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref12","unstructured":"Marsh P.W.N . (2005) A measure of distance for the unit root hypothesis. Mimeo, University of York."},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008682814171"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref8","unstructured":"Harvey D.I. , Leybourne S.J. , & Taylor A.M.R. (2006) Simple, robust and powerful tests of the breaking trend hypothesis. Discussion paper 06\/11, University of Nottingham."},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref22","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Cointegration, Causality and Forecasting: A Festschrift in Honour of Clive W.J. Granger","author":"Stock","year":"1999"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9892.2006.00517.x"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0264-9993(92)90017-V"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-4076(92)90104-Y"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2951764"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1080\/07350015.1996.10524626","article-title":"Evidence on structural instability in macroeconomic time series relations","volume":"14","author":"Stock","year":"1996","journal-title":"Journal of Business and Economic Statistics"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266466602186087"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1080\/07350015.1992.10509904","article-title":"Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis","volume":"10","author":"Zivot","year":"1992","journal-title":"Journal of Business and Economic Statistics"},{"key":"S0266466608090385_ref15","volume-title":"Advances in Econometrics: Cointegration, Spurious Regression and Unit Roots","author":"Park","year":"1990"}],"container-title":["Econometric Theory"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0266466608090385","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,8]],"date-time":"2025-02-08T02:07:23Z","timestamp":1738980443000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0266466608090385\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,8]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0266466608090385"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0266466608090385","relation":{},"ISSN":["0266-4666","1469-4360"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0266-4666","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-4360","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,8]]}}}