{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,12]],"date-time":"2025-12-12T13:19:43Z","timestamp":1765545583621},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,12,1]],"date-time":"2009-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1259625600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Econom. Theory"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>A number of tests have been suggested for the test of the null of no cointegration. Under this null, correlations are spurious in the sense of Granger and Newbold (1974) and Phillips (1986). We examine a set of models local to the null of no cointegration and derive tests with optimality properties in order to examine the efficiency of available tests. We find that, for a sufficiently tight weighting over potential cointegrating vectors, commonly employed full system tests have power that can, in some situations, be quite far from the power bounds for the models examined.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s026646660999034x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,10,26]],"date-time":"2009-10-26T14:57:29Z","timestamp":1256569049000},"page":"1829-1850","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["TESTING THE NULL OF NO COINTEGRATION WHEN COVARIATES ARE KNOWN TO HAVE A UNIT ROOT"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"Graham","family":"Elliott","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Elena","family":"Pesavento","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,12,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2171846"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0165-1889(88)90041-3"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2171789"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0262.00447"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0084.1986.mp48003005.x"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-4076(93)01560-9"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-4076(86)90001-1"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jansson M . (2007) Semiparmetric Power Envelopes for Tests of the Unit Root Hypothesis. Mimeo, UC Berkeley.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.1149960"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266466600163054"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/64.2.247"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1214\/aos\/1176348666"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9892.2006.00501.x"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/07474938708800129"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2951753"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeconom.2003.10.025"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0084.1992.tb00005.x"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref5","first-page":"33","article-title":"Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative","volume":"74","author":"Davies","year":"1987","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/0198774508.001.0001"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-4076(03)00093-9"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1198\/073500104000000307"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/1913236"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-4076(74)90034-7"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref18","unstructured":"Mueller U.K . (2007) An Alternative Sense of Asymptotic Efficiency. Mimeo, Princeton University."},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2938339"},{"key":"S026646660999034X_ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-4076(97)00040-7"}],"container-title":["Econometric Theory"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S026646660999034X","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,23]],"date-time":"2019-05-23T10:59:21Z","timestamp":1558609161000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S026646660999034X\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,12]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S026646660999034X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s026646660999034x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0266-4666","1469-4360"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0266-4666","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-4360","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,12]]}}}