{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T17:11:08Z","timestamp":1787677868205,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,24]],"date-time":"2017-07-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1500854400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.cambridge.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Econom. Theory"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Statistical models of unobserved heterogeneity are typically formalized as mixtures of simple parametric models and interest naturally focuses on testing for homogeneity versus general mixture alternatives. Many tests of this type can be interpreted as<jats:italic>C<\/jats:italic>(<jats:italic>\u03b1<\/jats:italic>) tests, as in Neyman (1959), and shown to be locally asymptotically optimal. These<jats:italic>C<\/jats:italic>(<jats:italic>\u03b1<\/jats:italic>) tests will be contrasted with a new approach to likelihood ratio testing for general mixture models. The latter tests are based on estimation of general nonparametric mixing distribution with the Kiefer and Wolfowitz (1956) maximum likelihood estimator. Recent developments in convex optimization have dramatically improved upon earlier EM methods for computation of these estimators, and recent results on the large sample behavior of likelihood ratios involving such estimators yield a tractable form of asymptotic inference. Improvement in computation efficiency also facilitates the use of a bootstrap method to determine critical values that are shown to work better than the asymptotic critical values in finite samples. Consistency of the bootstrap procedure is also formally established. We compare performance of the two approaches identifying circumstances in which each is preferred.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0266466617000299","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,24]],"date-time":"2017-07-24T03:55:35Z","timestamp":1500868535000},"page":"850-895","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/policypage","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["TESTING FOR HOMOGENEITY IN MIXTURE MODELS"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Jiaying","family":"Gu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roger","family":"Koenker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stanislav","family":"Volgushev","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4757-2545-2"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802256"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1137\/1120092"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref44","unstructured":"Saunders M.A . (2003) PDCO: A Primal-Dual interior solver for convex optimization. Available at: http:\/\/www.stanford.edu\/group\/SOL\/software\/pdco.html."},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref43","first-page":"314","article-title":"A Generalization of the method of maximum likelihood: Estimating a mixing distribution (abstract)","volume":"21","author":"Robbins","year":"1950","journal-title":"The Annals of Mathematical Statistics"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1214\/cbms\/1462106013","author":"Lindsay","year":"1995","journal-title":"Mixture Models: Theory, Geometry and Applications"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1214\/aos\/1176324464"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref19","first-page":"897","volume-title":"Annales de l\u2019Institut Henri Poincare (B) Probability and Statistics","volume":"vol. 38","author":"Gassiat","year":"2002"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1214\/08-AOS651"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref4","first-page":"83","volume-title":"Statistics and Probability: A Raghu Raj Bahadur Festschrift","author":"Bickel","year":"1993"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/60.1.79"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1051\/ps:2008010"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1214\/08-AOS638"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref42","first-page":"213","volume-title":"Probability and Statistics, the Harald Cramer Volume","author":"Neyman","year":"1959"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1214\/aos\/1056562463","article-title":"Asymptotics for likelihood ratio tests under loss of identifiability","volume":"31","author":"Liu","year":"2003","journal-title":"Annals of Statistics"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9469.2007.00588.x"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref40","first-page":"318","article-title":"On bootstrapping likelihood ratio test statistics for the number of components in a normal mixture","volume":"36","author":"McLachlan","year":"1987","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asp011"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asv067"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2532756"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266466615000249"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref18","unstructured":"Friberg H.A . (2012) Rmosek: The R-to-MOSEK Optimization Interface, R package version 1.2.3."},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1214\/11-AOS890"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2014.986272"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1198\/jasa.2010.tm09032"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1214\/aos\/1176346059"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref1","unstructured":"Andersen E.D . (2010) The MOSEK Optimization Tools Manual, Version 6.0. Available at http:\/\/www.mosek.com."},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3150\/bj\/1161614946"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/1911188"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref7","first-page":"71","article-title":"On optimal asymptotic tests of composite hypotheses with several constraints","volume":"5","author":"B\u00fchler","year":"1966","journal-title":"Probability Theory and Related Fields"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref24","first-page":"807","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Berkeley Conference in Honor of Jerzy Neyman and Jack Kiefer","author":"Hartigan","year":"1985"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9868.00273"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/cjs.11274"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeconom.2014.04.010"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0262.2007.00809.x"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/3316073"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1198\/jasa.2011.tm11181"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266466612000655"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Koenker R . (2013) REBayes: Empirical Bayes Estimation and Inference in R, R package version 0.41.","DOI":"10.32614\/CRAN.package.REBayes"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-20212-4"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jspi.2004.04.003"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-4076(84)90075-7"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1992.10475182"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1214\/aoms\/1177728066"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2013.869224"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1978.10480103"},{"key":"S0266466617000299_ref36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-8552-0_8"}],"container-title":["Econometric Theory"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0266466617000299","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,25]],"date-time":"2024-06-25T18:45:26Z","timestamp":1719341126000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0266466617000299\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,24]]},"references-count":47,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0266466617000299"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0266466617000299","relation":{},"ISSN":["0266-4666","1469-4360"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0266-4666","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-4360","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 Cambridge University Press 2017\u00a0","name":"license","label":"License","group":{"name":"copyright_and_licensing","label":"Copyright and Licensing"}}]}}