{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T23:30:57Z","timestamp":1791415857377,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,5,3]],"date-time":"2005-05-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1115078400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Epidemiol. Infect."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>To estimate the incidence of Lyme borreliosis in France, describe its clinical presentations, and assess its potential risk factors, we conducted a nationwide prospective study in the French Sentinelles Network, consisting of 1178 general practitioners (GPs). Of these, 875 (74%), i.e. 1\u00b76% of all French GPs, participated in the study from May 1999 to April 2000. Eighty-six cases of Lyme disease were reported and validated, of which 77 (90%) consisted of erythema migrans. At national level, the incidence was estimated at 9\u00b74\/100000 inhabitants. Compared to the French general population, Lyme disease patients were older (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>&lt;10<jats:sup>\u22124<\/jats:sup>), more were living in rural areas (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>&lt;10<jats:sup>\u22123<\/jats:sup>), and amongst the working population, more were farmers (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>&lt;10<jats:sup>\u22123<\/jats:sup>) and fewer, salaried workers (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>&lt;0\u00b7005). Cervidae density correlated strongly with the estimated regional incidence of Lyme disease (<jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>=0\u00b782). Both incidence data and identified risk factors can help to target measures for its prevention and treatment.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0950268805004413","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,9,26]],"date-time":"2005-09-26T09:59:47Z","timestamp":1127728787000},"page":"935-942","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":55,"title":["Lyme disease in France: a primary care-based prospective study"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"133","author":[{"given":"L.","family":"LETRILLIART","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B.","family":"RAGON","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"HANSLIK","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"FLAHAULT","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,5,3]]},"container-title":["Epidemiology and Infection"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0950268805004413","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,3]],"date-time":"2019-05-03T19:57:09Z","timestamp":1556913429000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0950268805004413\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,5,3]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0950268805004413"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0950268805004413","relation":{},"ISSN":["0950-2688","1469-4409"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0950-2688","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-4409","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,5,3]]}}}