{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,4]],"date-time":"2022-04-04T07:09:57Z","timestamp":1649056197219},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,4]],"date-time":"2016-02-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1454544000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.cambridge.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Epidemiol. Infect."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>SUMMARY<\/jats:title><jats:p>In 2003\/2004 a field trial was conducted in Northern Ireland to assess the diagnostic accuracy of six serological tests for bovine brucellosis caused by <jats:italic>Brucella abortus<\/jats:italic>. Whereas between-test comparisons have been used to calculate test performances so far, the present study used a latent class approach to estimate diagnostic test accuracy parameters in the absence of a gold standard for these six tests simultaneously and to estimate the true prevalence, while accounting for clustering in the study population and risk factors for true prevalence. Results obtained in this study with regard to prevalence, sensitivity and specificity were largely in accordance with previous findings. Screening tests (SAT and EDTA) appeared to be the most sensitive; however, at low prevalences the EDTA and CFT showed the highest positive predictive values of all investigated tests. The specificities and negative predictive values of all diagnostic tests were found to be very high. Differences of prevalence between three groups of the study population with different risk of exposure could be attributed to the mode of sampling indicating that a more risk-based sampling will result in a higher prevalence than a cross-sectional sampling mode. Age, dairy status and history of abortion were shown to influence the prediction of the latent true infection status.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0950268816000157","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,16]],"date-time":"2016-02-16T03:20:20Z","timestamp":1455592820000},"page":"1845-1856","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1017\/policypage","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Latent class regression models for simultaneously estimating test accuracy, true prevalence and risk factors for <i>Brucella abortus<\/i>"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"144","author":[{"given":"A.","family":"CAMPE","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"ABERNETHY","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"MENZIES","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"GREINER","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/vr.85.10.268"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref34","first-page":"989","article-title":"Serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: a review of test performance and cost comparison","volume":"23","author":"Gall","year":"2004","journal-title":"Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics)"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.4269\/ajtmh.2009.80.435","article-title":"Sensitivities and specificities of diagnostic tests and infection prevalence of Schistosoma haematobium estimated from data on adults in villages northwest of Accra, Ghana","volume":"80","author":"Koukounari","year":"2009","journal-title":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref30","unstructured":"Busch EL , Markers of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and colorectal cancer mortality: time-to-event and latent-class analysis (dissertation). Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina, 2015, 154 pp."},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ede.0000173042.07579.17"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2533555"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref23","unstructured":"SAS Institute Inc. SAS\/SAT User's Guide \u2013 version 9.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA, 2012."},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref40","first-page":"53","article-title":"Epidemiology of brucellosis in domestic animals caused by Brucella melitensis, Brucella suis and Brucella abortus","volume":"32","author":"Aparicio","year":"2013","journal-title":"Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics)"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-5877(01)00272-0"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-5877(00)00117-3"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref38","unstructured":"Abernethy DA . The epidemiology and management of bovine brucellosis in Northern Ireland (PhD thesis). Royal Veterinary College, University of London, England, 2008."},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tvjl.2011.03.008"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prevetmed.2013.06.006"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10705510701575602"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref4","first-page":"913","article-title":"Specificity dependence between serological tests for diagnosing bovine brucellosis in Brucella-free farms showing false positive serological reactions due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9","volume":"46","author":"Mainar-Jaime","year":"2005","journal-title":"Canadian Veterinary Journal"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prevetmed.2009.07.014"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1991.10475005"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prevetmed.2005.01.006"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-5877(00)00114-8"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref36","first-page":"199","article-title":"Epidemiosurveillance of brucellosis","volume":"32","author":"Adone","year":"2013","journal-title":"Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics)"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref19","first-page":"338","article-title":"Comission Decision amending the Annex C to Council Directive 64\/432\/EEC and Decision 2004\/226\/EC as regards diagnostic tests for bovine brucellosis","volume":"L 352","year":"2008","journal-title":"Official Journal of the European Union"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/vr.158.21.717"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref24","unstructured":"Lanza ST , PROC LCA and PROC LTA users' guide (version 1.3.0). University Park: The Methodology Center, Penn State (http:\/\/methodology.psu.edu). Accessed 1 September 2013."},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-985X.2008.00544.x"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref20","first-page":"1","article-title":"Scientific Opinion on \u2018Performance of brucellosis diagnostic methods for bovines, sheep, and goats\u2019","volume":"432","year":"2006","journal-title":"EFSA Journal"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref37","unstructured":"OIE \u2013 World Organisation for Animal Health. Registration of diagnostic kits \u2013 legal basis (http:\/\/www.oie.int\/our-scientific-expertise\/registration-of-diagnostic-kits\/background-information\/). Accessed 4 November 2015."},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vetmic.2007.05.012"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/biostatistics\/kxl038"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref3","first-page":"989","article-title":"Serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: a review of test performance and cost comparison","volume":"23","author":"Gall","year":"2004","journal-title":"Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics)"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2174\/1874318801004010072"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tvjl.2012.06.007"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2530508"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref26","volume-title":"Veterinary Epidemiologic Research","author":"Dohoo","year":"2009"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prevetmed.2007.11.005"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-5877(00)00120-3"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref22","unstructured":"PROC LCA and PROC LTA (version 1.3.2). University Park: The Methodology Center, Penn State (http:\/\/methodology.psu.edu), 2015."},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989X.9.1.93"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-5877(00)00119-7"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref8","volume-title":"Latent Structure Analysis","author":"Lazarsfeld","year":"1968"},{"key":"S0950268816000157_ref16","volume-title":"Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences","author":"Collins","year":"2010"}],"container-title":["Epidemiology and Infection"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0950268816000157","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,19]],"date-time":"2019-04-19T02:43:26Z","timestamp":1555641806000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0950268816000157\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,4]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S0950268816000157"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0950268816000157","relation":{},"ISSN":["0950-2688","1469-4409"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0950-2688","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-4409","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 Cambridge University Press 2016\u00a0","name":"license","label":"License","group":{"name":"copyright_and_licensing","label":"Copyright and Licensing"}}]}}