{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T12:59:03Z","timestamp":1791205143845,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1998,2,1]],"date-time":"1998-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":886291200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Epidemiol. Infect."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1998,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Following the 1993 Milwaukee cryptosporidiosis outbreak, \n\nwe examined data from eight \n\nsources available during the time of the outbreak. Although \n\nthere was a remarkable temporal \n\ncorrespondence of surveillance peaks, the most timely data \n\ninvolved use of systems in which \n\npersonnel with existing close ties to public health programmes \n\nperceived the importance of \n\nproviding information despite workload constraints associated \n\nwith an outbreak. During the \n\ninvestigation, surveillance systems which could be easily \n\nlinked with laboratory data, were \n\nflexible in adding new variables, and which demonstrated low \n\nbaseline variability were most \n\nuseful. Geographically fixed nursing home residents served \n\nas an ideal population with non-confounded exposures. Use of \n\nsurrogate measurements of morbidity can trigger worthwhile \n\npublic health responses in advance of laboratory-confirmed \n\ndiagnosis and help reduce total \n\nmorbidity associated with an outbreak. This report describes \n\nthe relative strengths and \n\nweaknesses of these surveillance methods for community-wide \n\nwaterborne illness detection and \n\ntheir application in outbreak decision making.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0950268897008327","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2002,7,27]],"date-time":"2002-07-27T13:29:39Z","timestamp":1027776579000},"page":"43-54","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":50,"title":["Surveillance data for waterborne illness detection: an \n\nassessment following a massive waterborne outbreak of \n\n<i>Cryptosporidium<\/i> infection"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"120","author":[{"given":"M. E.","family":"PROCTOR","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K. A.","family":"BLAIR","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J. P.","family":"DAVIS","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1998,2,1]]},"container-title":["Epidemiology and Infection"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0950268897008327","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,2]],"date-time":"2019-09-02T16:19:25Z","timestamp":1567441165000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0950268897008327\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1998,2]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1998,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0950268897008327"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0950268897008327","relation":{},"ISSN":["0950-2688","1469-4409"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0950-2688","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-4409","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1998,2]]}}}