{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T20:45:46Z","timestamp":1786999546727,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2000,6,1]],"date-time":"2000-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":959817600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Epidemiol. Infect."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2000,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Close contacts of cases of meningococcal disease are at increased risk of disease themselves. \nWe identified household-like contacts of index cases, to investigate whether relevant target \ngroups are informed, receive and follow recommended chemoprophylaxis and vaccination, and \nto ascertain the time delay for implementation of these measures. A telephone interview of 172 \nhouseholds of index cases and a questionnaire survey among 634 parents of contacts of cases \nin institutions were carried out. Results were compared with reports from Medical Officers of \nHealth. In 21% of the cases, Medical Officers reported fewer household-like contacts than were \nidentified in this study. Written information was effective. However, 59% of households, and \n36% of parents of contacts in institutions felt a lack of information about how the disease is \nacquired, the risk and signs of illness. For household-like contacts the coverage rate for \nchemoprophylaxis with an appropriate drug was 90% and for vaccination 59%. No secondary \ncases occurred among those treated with chemoprophylaxis, but among those not treated, there \nwere two secondary cases. The study design provided a useful audit methodology to evaluate \nthe completeness of implementation and the success of prophylactic measures for \nmeningococcal disease.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0950268899003775","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2002,7,27]],"date-time":"2002-07-27T09:23:42Z","timestamp":1027761822000},"page":"433-440","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Prevention of secondary cases of meningococcal disease in Denmark"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"124","author":[{"given":"S.","family":"SAMUELSSON","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E. T.","family":"HANSEN","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"OSLER","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B.","family":"JEUNE","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2000,6,1]]},"container-title":["Epidemiology and Infection"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0950268899003775","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,2]],"date-time":"2019-09-02T12:19:36Z","timestamp":1567426776000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0950268899003775\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2000,6]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2000,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0950268899003775"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0950268899003775","relation":{},"ISSN":["0950-2688","1469-4409"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0950-2688","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-4409","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2000,6]]}}}