{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,3]],"date-time":"2026-11-03T19:30:39Z","timestamp":1793734239021,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":9,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,22]],"date-time":"2017-09-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1506038400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.cambridge.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Camb Q Healthc Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Deep brain stimulation has been of considerable interest to bioethicists, in large part because of the effects that the intervention can occasionally have on central features of the recipient\u2019s personality. These effects raise questions regarding the philosophical concept of authenticity. In this article, we expand on our earlier work on the concept of authenticity in the context of deep brain stimulation by developing a diachronic, value-based account of authenticity. Our account draws on both existentialist and essentialist approaches to authenticity, and Laura Waddell Ekstrom\u2019s coherentist approach to personal autonomy. In developing our account, we respond to Sven Nyholm and Elizabeth O\u2019Neill\u2019s synchronic approach to authenticity, and explain how the diachronic approach we defend can have practical utility, contrary to Alexandre Erler and Tony Hope\u2019s criticism of autonomy-based approaches to authenticity. Having drawn a distinction between the authenticity of an individual\u2019s traits and the authenticity of that person\u2019s values, we consider how our conception of authenticity applies to the context of anorexia nervosa in comparison to other prominent accounts of authenticity. We conclude with some reflections on the prudential value of authenticity, and by highlighting how the language of authenticity can be invoked to justify covert forms of paternalism that run contrary to the value of individuality that seems to be at the heart of authenticity.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0963180117000147","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,22]],"date-time":"2017-09-22T10:21:19Z","timestamp":1506075679000},"page":"640-657","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/policypage","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":58,"title":["Deep Brain Stimulation, Authenticity and Value"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"JONATHAN","family":"PUGH","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"HANNAH","family":"MASLEN","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"JULIAN","family":"SAVULESCU","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0963180117000147_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8519.2009.01725.x"},{"key":"S0963180117000147_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12152-016-9260-0"},{"key":"S0963180117000147_ref2","first-page":"647","article-title":"Nyholm S, O\u2019Neill E. Deep brain stimulation, continuity over time, and the true self","volume":"25","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics"},{"key":"S0963180117000147_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12152-015-9240-9"},{"key":"S0963180117000147_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12152-011-9137-1"},{"key":"S0963180117000147_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12152-015-9230-y"},{"key":"S0963180117000147_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"474","DOI":"10.4103\/0028-3886.44830","article-title":"Hypersexuality following subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson\u2019s disease","volume":"56","author":"Doshi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Neurology India"},{"key":"S0963180117000147_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/21507740.2015.1094561"},{"key":"S0963180117000147_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2108082"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1017\/s096318011700069x","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,7]],"date-time":"2017-11-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1510012800000}}],"container-title":["Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0963180117000147","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,16]],"date-time":"2019-04-16T18:53:54Z","timestamp":1555440834000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0963180117000147\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,22]]},"references-count":9,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0963180117000147"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0963180117000147","relation":{"correction":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1017\/S096318011700069X","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0963-1801","1469-2147"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0963-1801","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-2147","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 Cambridge University Press 2017\u00a0This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.","name":"license","label":"License","group":{"name":"copyright_and_licensing","label":"Copyright and Licensing"}}]}}