{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,5]],"date-time":"2022-04-05T01:25:57Z","timestamp":1649121957429},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1999,4,1]],"date-time":"1999-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":922924800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Camb Q Healthc Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1999,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>A recent issue of <jats:italic>Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare \nEthics<\/jats:italic> provides a fascinating look into the uncertainties \nsurrounding the subject of human cloning. As Nelkin and \nLindee point out, for example, the popular assumption is \nthat this technology will lead to individual immortality. \n\u201cAgain and again media stories predict that cloning \nwill allow the resurrection of the dead \u2026 life everlasting \nfor the deserving.\u201d This is not an attitude reserved \nto popular imagination, however. As John Harris noted in \nhis contribution, for example, even the World Health Organization \n(WHO) \u201cconsiders the use of cloning for the replication \nof human individuals to be ethically unacceptable.\u201d<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0963180199002145","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2002,7,27]],"date-time":"2002-07-27T09:47:49Z","timestamp":1027763269000},"page":"241-245","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Response to Special Section: Cloning: Technology, Policy, \nand Ethics (CQ Vol 7, No 2)"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Tom","family":"Koch","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mary","family":"Rowell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1999,4,1]]},"container-title":["Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0963180199002145","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,2]],"date-time":"2019-09-02T12:14:43Z","timestamp":1567426483000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0963180199002145\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":["Humanness, Personhood, and a Lamb \nNamed Dolly"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1999,4]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1999,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S0963180199002145"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0963180199002145","relation":{},"ISSN":["0963-1801","1469-2147"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0963-1801","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-2147","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1999,4]]}}}