{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,2]],"date-time":"2026-07-02T00:57:16Z","timestamp":1782953836937,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":8,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,3]],"date-time":"2021-06-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622678400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Behav. Cogn. Psychother."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec id=\"S1352465821000199_as1\"><jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title><jats:p>The 26-item version of the Metacognitive Anger Processing Scale (MAP) has shown good psychometric properties in previous studies. However, there is a need for a shorter version of the scale.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S1352465821000199_as2\"><jats:title>Aims:<\/jats:title><jats:p>The aim of the present study is to psychometrically evaluate the 9-item Metacognitive Anger Processing Scale \u2013 Short Version (MAP-SV) in comparison with the original, 26-item version.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S1352465821000199_as3\"><jats:title>Method:<\/jats:title><jats:p>The 26-item MAP includes three subscales: rumination, positive beliefs and negative beliefs. Three items from each subscale were selected based on clinical validity to constitute the 9-item MAP-SV. A previous sample used for validation of the 26-item MAP was used for clinimetric testing. The sample included psychiatric patients (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> = 88) and male forensic inpatients (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> = 54). The MAP-SV was assessed according to scalability, convergent validity with general metacognition, and concurrent validity with anger measures.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S1352465821000199_as4\"><jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title><jats:p>The scalability of the 9-item MAP-SV was comparable to that of the original 26-item MAP in most psychometric tests. The Loevinger\u2019s coefficient of homogeneity for the total score of the MAP-SV items was 0.29 for the combined sample compared with 0.36 in the original MAP, indicating close to acceptable scalability. The alpha coefficient for the MAP-SV total score was 0.79. For the combined sample, Pearson inter-correlations between the subscales of the MAP-SV were highly correlated with the MAP-SV total score (ranging from .66 to .84).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"S1352465821000199_as5\"><jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title><jats:p>The 9-item MAP-SV showed good psychometric properties and can be used as a reliable tool for assessing self-reported metacognitive anger processing.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1017\/s1352465821000199","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,3]],"date-time":"2021-06-03T06:45:59Z","timestamp":1622702759000},"page":"117-121","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["The Short Version of the Metacognitive Anger Processing Scale (MAP-SV) \u2013 initial psychometric testing"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"50","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5019-8065","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Stine Bjerrum","family":"Moeller","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sophie","family":"Juul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0889-4526","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ida-Marie T. P.","family":"Arendt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"S1352465821000199_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpsychores.2012.10.010"},{"key":"S1352465821000199_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352465815000272"},{"key":"S1352465821000199_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1521\/ijct.2013.6.2.186"},{"key":"S1352465821000199_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470713662"},{"key":"S1352465821000199_ref2","unstructured":"Cella, D. , Hahn, E. A. , Jensen, S. E. , Butt, Z. , Nowinski, C. J. , & Rothrock, N. (2013). Methodological issues in the selection, administration and use of patient-reported outcomes in performance measurement in health care settings. Paper presented at the National Quality Forum (NQF): Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Performance Measurement."},{"key":"S1352465821000199_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000493746"},{"key":"S1352465821000199_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352465818000140"},{"key":"S1352465821000199_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118511800"}],"container-title":["Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S1352465821000199","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,1]],"date-time":"2022-02-01T08:51:06Z","timestamp":1643705466000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S1352465821000199\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,3]]},"references-count":8,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S1352465821000199"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s1352465821000199","relation":{},"ISSN":["1352-4658","1469-1833"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1352-4658","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-1833","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,3]]}}}