{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T11:30:19Z","timestamp":1761823819165},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"03","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["CJEM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:sec id=\"S148180350001366X_abs1\">\n               <jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>Using a simulated airway model, we compared ventilation performance by emergency medical services (EMS) providers using a traditional bag\u2013valve\u2013mask (Easy Grip<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>) resuscitator to their performance when using a new device, the SMART BAG<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> resuscitator, which has a pressure-responsive flow-limiting valve.<\/jats:p>\n            <\/jats:sec>\n            <jats:sec id=\"S148180350001366X_abs2\">\n               <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>We recruited EMS providers at an EMS educational forum and performed a randomized, non-blinded, prospective crossover comparison of ventilation with 2 devices on a non-intubated simulated airway model. Subjects were instructed to ventilate a Mini Ventilation Training Analyzer<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> as they would an 85-kg adult patient in respiratory arrest. After being randomized to order of device use, they performed ventilation for 1 minute with each device. Primary outcomes were ventilation rates and peak airway pressures. We also measured average tidal volume, gastric inflation volume, minute ventilation and inspiratory:expiratory (I:E) ratio, and compared our results to the American Heart Association standards (2005 edition).<\/jats:p>\n            <\/jats:sec>\n            <jats:sec id=\"S148180350001366X_abs3\">\n               <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>We observed statistically significant differences between the SMART BAG<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> and the traditional bag\u2013valve\u2013mask for respiratory rate (12 v. 14 breaths\/min), peak airway pressure (15.6 v. 18.9 cm H<jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>O), gastric inflation (239.6 v. 1598.4 mL), minute ventilation (7980 v. 8775 mL), and I:E ratio (1.3 v. 1.1). Average tidal volume was similar with both devices (679.6 v. 672.2 mL).<\/jats:p>\n            <\/jats:sec>\n            <jats:sec id=\"S148180350001366X_abs4\">\n               <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>The SMART BAG<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> provided ventilation performance that was more consistent with American Heart Association guidelines and delivered similar tidal volumes when compared with ventilation with a traditional bag\u2013valve\u2013mask resuscitator.<\/jats:p>\n            <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1017\/s148180350001366x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,15]],"date-time":"2016-07-15T05:56:29Z","timestamp":1468562189000},"page":"158-163","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Impact of A Pressure-Responsive Flow-Limiting Valve on Bag\u2013valve\u2013mask Ventilation in an Airway Model"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Jonnathan","family":"M. Busko","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Thomas H.","family":"Blackwell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref003","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.294.6581.1198"},{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref002","first-page":"133","volume":"48","year":"1993","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref001","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0196-0644(83)80254-6"},{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref014","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0300-9572(00)00349-X"},{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003246-199802000-00042"},{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref012","volume":"112","year":"2005","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/hc0102.101391"},{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref009","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03622.x"},{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref010","first-page":"88","volume":"8","year":"2004","journal-title":"Prehospital Emerg Care"},{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0300-9572(03)00032-7"},{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref007","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003246-198302000-00004"},{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0196-0644(95)70154-0"},{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref005","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.0000126594.79136.61"},{"key":"S148180350001366X_ref011","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000087064.29929.CE"}],"container-title":["CJEM"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S148180350001366X","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,31]],"date-time":"2020-12-31T23:43:23Z","timestamp":1609458203000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S148180350001366X\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,5]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"03","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S148180350001366X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s148180350001366x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1481-8035","1481-8043"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1481-8035","type":"print"},{"value":"1481-8043","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,5]]}}}