{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,20]],"date-time":"2025-05-20T11:40:07Z","timestamp":1747741207119,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2-3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2000,9,1]],"date-time":"2000-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":967766400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2000,9,1]],"date-time":"2000-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":967766400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2000,9]]},"DOI":"10.1023\/a:1008344203269","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2002,12,22]],"date-time":"2002-12-22T14:41:38Z","timestamp":1040568098000},"page":"115-135","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["A dialogical theory of legal discussions:Pragma-dialectical analysis and evaluation of legalargumentation"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Eveline T.","family":"Feteris","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"235720_CR1","volume-title":"A Theory of Legal Argumentation.The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification","author":"R. Alexy","year":"1989","unstructured":"Alexy, R. 1989. A Theory of Legal Argumentation.The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Clarendon Press, Oxford. (Translation of Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begr\u00fcndung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M. (1978).)"},{"key":"235720_CR2","first-page":"9","volume-title":"Argument and Critical Practices.Proceedings of the Fifth SCA\/AFA Conference on Argumentation","author":"F. H. v. Eemeren","year":"1987","unstructured":"Eemeren, F. H. van 1987. \u2018Argumentation studies' five estates\u2019. In Wenzel (ed.), Argument and Critical Practices.Proceedings of the Fifth SCA\/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Speech Communication Association, Annandale (VA), pp. 9\u201324."},{"key":"235720_CR3","volume-title":"Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies","author":"F. H. v. Eemeren","year":"1992","unstructured":"Eemeren, F. H. van and Grootendorst, R. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. Erlbaum, New York."},{"key":"235720_CR4","volume-title":"Argumenteren voor juristen.Het analyseren en schrijven van juridische betogen en beleidsteksten","author":"F. H. v. Eemeren","year":"1991","unstructured":"Eemeren, F. H. van, Feteris, E. T., Grootendorst, R., van Haaften, T., den Harder, W., Kloosterhuis, H., Kruiger, T., Plug, J. 1991. Argumenteren voor juristen.Het analyseren en schrijven van juridische betogen en beleidsteksten. (Argumentation for lawyers) (second edition, first edition 1987) Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.","edition":"second edition"},{"key":"235720_CR5","volume-title":"Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies.A Pragma-dialectical Perspective","author":"F. H. v. Eemeren","year":"1992","unstructured":"Eemeren, F. H. van and Grootendorst, R. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies.A Pragma-dialectical Perspective. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ."},{"key":"235720_CR6","first-page":"335","volume-title":"Argument and Critical Practices.Proceedings of the Fifth SCA\/AFA Conference on Argumentation","author":"E. T. Feteris","year":"1987","unstructured":"Feteris, E. T. 1987. \u2018The dialectical role of the judge in a Dutch legal process\u2019. In J. W. Wenzel (ed.), Argument and Critical Practices.Proceedings of the Fifth SCA\/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Speech Communication Association, Annandale (VA), pp. 335\u2013339."},{"key":"235720_CR7","volume-title":"Discussieregels in het recht.Een pragma-dialectische analyse van het burgerlijk proces en het strafproces","author":"E. T. Feteris","year":"1989","unstructured":"Feteris, E. T. 1989. Discussieregels in het recht.Een pragma-dialectische analyse van het burgerlijk proces en het strafproces. Foris, Dordrecht."},{"issue":"3","key":"235720_CR8","first-page":"108","volume":"26","author":"E. T. Feteris","year":"1990","unstructured":"Feteris, E. T. 1990. \u2018Conditions and rules for rational discussion in a legal process: A pragmadialectical perspective\u2019. Argumentation and Advocacy.Journal of the American Forensic Association\n26(3), 108\u2013117.","journal-title":"Argumentation and Advocacy. Journal of the American Forensic Association"},{"key":"235720_CR9","first-page":"768","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation, June 19\u201322 1990","author":"E. T. Feteris","year":"1991","unstructured":"Feteris, E. T. 1991. \u2018Normative reconstruction of legal discussions\u2019. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation, June 19\u201322 1990. SICSAT, Amsterdam, pp. 768\u2013775."},{"key":"235720_CR10","first-page":"476","volume-title":"Argument and the Postmodern Challenge.Proceedings of the Eighth SCA\/AFA Conference on Argumentation","author":"E. T. Feteris","year":"1993","unstructured":"Feteris, E. T. 1993a. \u2018The judge as a critical antagonist in a legal process: a pragma-dialectical perspective\u2019. In R. E. McKerrow (ed.), Argument and the Postmodern Challenge.Proceedings of the Eighth SCA\/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Speech Communication Association, tAnnandale, pp. 476\u2013480."},{"issue":"3","key":"235720_CR11","first-page":"179","volume":"XV","author":"E. T. Feteris","year":"1993","unstructured":"Feteris, E. T. 1993b. \u2018Rationality in legal discussions: A pragma-dialectical perspective\u2019. Informal Logic\nXV(3), 179\u2013188.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"issue":"20","key":"235720_CR12","first-page":"134","volume":"VII","author":"E. T. Feteris","year":"1994","unstructured":"Feteris, E. T. 1994a. \u2018Recent developments in legal argumentation theory: dialectical approaches to legal argumentation\u2019. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, VII(20), 134\u2013153.","journal-title":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law"},{"key":"235720_CR13","volume-title":"Redelijkheid in juridische argumentatie.Een overzicht van theorie\u00ebn over het rechtvaardigen van juridische beslissingen","author":"E. T. Feteris","year":"1994","unstructured":"Feteris, E. T. 1994b. Redelijkheid in juridische argumentatie.Een overzicht van theorie\u00ebn over het rechtvaardigen van juridische beslissingen. Tjeenk Willink, Zwolle."},{"key":"235720_CR14","unstructured":"Feteris, E. T. 1995. \u2018The analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation from a pragma-dialectical perspective\u2019. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, and Ch. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol. IV, pp. 42\u201351."},{"key":"235720_CR15","first-page":"57","volume-title":"Proceedings of the First World Conference on New Trends in Criminal Investigation and Evidence","author":"E. T. Feteris","year":"1997","unstructured":"Feteris, E. T. 1997a. \u2018The analysis and evaluation of argumentation in Dutch criminal proceedings from a pragma-dialectical perspective\u2019. In J. F. Nijboer and J. M. Reijntjes (eds.), Proceedings of the First World Conference on New Trends in Criminal Investigation and Evidence, Koninklijke Vermande, Lelystad, pp. 57\u201362."},{"key":"235720_CR16","first-page":"98","volume-title":"Op goede gronden.Bijdragen aan het Tweede Symposium Juridische Argumentatie","author":"E. T. Feteris","year":"1997","unstructured":"Feteris, E. T. 1997b. \u2018De deugdelijkheid van pragmatische argumentatie: heiligt het doel de middelen?\u2019. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, and J. A. Pontier (eds.), Op goede gronden.Bijdragen aan het Tweede Symposium Juridische Argumentatie. Ars Aequi, Nijmegen, pp. 98\u2013107."},{"key":"235720_CR17","unstructured":"Feteris, E. T. (1998).'The soundness of \u2018pragmatic\u2019 or \u2018consequentialist\u2019 argumentation: does the end justify the means?\u2019. In H. Hansen and C. Tindale (eds.), Proceedings of the OSSA Conference on Argumentation and Rhetoric."},{"key":"235720_CR18","volume-title":"The Pleadings Game, an Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice","author":"T. F. Gordon","year":"1995","unstructured":"Gordon, Th. F. 1995. The Pleadings Game, an Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Kluwer, Dordrecht."},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"235720_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118493","volume":"4","author":"J. C. Hage","year":"1996","unstructured":"Hage, J. C. 1996. \u2018A model of legal reasoning and a logic to match\u2019. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4(3\u20134), 199\u2013273.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"235720_CR20","first-page":"90","volume-title":"Op goede gronden.Bijdragen aan het Tweede Symposium Juridische Argumentatie","author":"T. v. Haaften","year":"1997","unstructured":"Haaften, T. van 1997. \u2018Over de status van taalkundige argumenten in juridische betogen\u2019. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, and J. A. Pontier (eds.), Op goede gronden.Bijdragen aan het Tweede Symposium Juridische Argumentatie. Ars Aequi, Nijmegen, pp. 90\u201397."},{"key":"235720_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8873-7","volume-title":"Reasoning with Rules","author":"J. C. Hage","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hage, J. C. 1997. Reasoning with Rules. Kluwer, Dordrecht."},{"key":"235720_CR22","first-page":"135","volume-title":"Legal Knowledge Based Systems, Information Technology and Law. JURIX\u2019 92","author":"J. C. Hage","year":"1992","unstructured":"Hage, J. C., Span, G. P. J., and Lodder, A. R. 1992.\u2019 A dialogical model of legal reasoning', In C. A. F. M. Gr\u00fctters et al. (eds.), Legal Knowledge Based Systems, Information Technology and Law. JURIX\u2019 92. Koninklijke Vermande, Lelystad, pp. 135\u2013146."},{"key":"235720_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871759","volume":"2","author":"J. C. Hage","year":"1994","unstructured":"Hage, J. C., Leenes, R., and Lodder, A. 1994. \u2018Hard cases; a procedural approach\u2019. Artificial Intelligence and Law\n2, 113\u2013167.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"235720_CR24","first-page":"123","volume-title":"Op goede gronden.Bijdragen aan het Tweede Symposium Juridische Argumentatie","author":"H. Jansen","year":"1997","unstructured":"Jansen, H. 1997. \u2018Voorwaarden voor aanvaardbare a contrario-argumentatie\u2019. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, and J. A. Pontier (eds.), Op goede gronden.Bijdragen aan het Tweede Symposium Juridische Argumentatie. Ars Aequi, Nijmegen, pp. 123\u2013131."},{"key":"235720_CR25","first-page":"238","volume-title":"Studies in Pragma-dialectics","author":"H. Kloosterhuis","year":"1994","unstructured":"Kloosterhuis, H. 1994. \u2018Analysing analogy argumentation in judicial decisions\u2019. In F. H. van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst (eds.), Studies in Pragma-dialectics. Sic Sat, Amsterdam, pp. 238\u2013246."},{"key":"235720_CR26","first-page":"138","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation.Special Fields and Cases","author":"H. Kloosterhuis","year":"1995","unstructured":"Kloosterhuis, H. 1995. \u2018The study of analogy argumentation in law: Four pragma-dialectical starting points\u2019. In F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, and Ch. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation.Special Fields and Cases, Sic Sat, Amsterdam, pp. 138\u2013145."},{"key":"235720_CR27","first-page":"375","volume-title":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning","author":"H. Kloosterhuis","year":"1996","unstructured":"Kloosterhuis, H. 1996. \u2018The normative reconstruction of analogy argumentation in judicial decisions: a pragma-dialectical perspective\u2019. In D. M. Gabbay and H. J. Ohlbach (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning. Springer, Berlin, pp. 375\u2013383."},{"issue":"3","key":"235720_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00872529","volume":"3","author":"R. P. Loui","year":"1995","unstructured":"Loui, R. P. and Norman, J. 1995. \u2018Rationales and argument moves\u2019. Artificial Intelligence and Law\n3(3), pp. 159\u2013189.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"235720_CR29","first-page":"262","volume-title":"Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory","author":"N. MacCormick","year":"1978","unstructured":"MacCormick, N. 1978. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 262\u2013263"},{"key":"235720_CR30","volume-title":"Interpreting Statutes","author":"N. MacCormick","year":"1991","unstructured":"MacCormick, N. and Summers, R. 1991. Interpreting Statutes. Darthmouth, Aldershot."},{"key":"235720_CR31","first-page":"246","volume-title":"Studies in Pragma-dialectics","author":"H. J. Plug","year":"1994","unstructured":"Plug, H. J. 1994. \u2018Reconstructing complex argumentation in judicial decisions\u2019. In F. H. van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst (eds.), Studies in Pragma-dialectics. Sic Sat, Amsterdam, pp. 246\u2013255."},{"key":"235720_CR32","first-page":"61","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation.Special Fields and Cases","author":"H. J. Plug","year":"1995","unstructured":"Plug, H. J. 1995. \u2018The rational reconstruction of additional considerations in judicial decisions\u2019. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, and Ch.A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation.Special Fields and Cases, Sic Sat, Amsterdam, pp. 61\u201372."},{"key":"235720_CR33","first-page":"464","volume-title":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning","author":"H. J. Plug","year":"1996","unstructured":"Plug, H. J. 1996 \u2018Complex argumentation in judicial decisions. Analysing conflicting arguments\u2019. In D. M. Gabbay and H. J. Ohlbach (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning. Springer, Berlin, pp. 464\u2013479."},{"key":"235720_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken, H. 1993. Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. Dissertation. Amsterdam.","DOI":"10.1145\/158976.158977"},{"key":"235720_CR35","first-page":"165","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law","author":"H. Prakken","year":"1995","unstructured":"Prakken, H. 1995. \u2018From logic to dialectics in legal argument\u2019. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM, New York, pp. 165\u2013174."},{"key":"235720_CR36","first-page":"132","volume-title":"Op goede gronden.Bijdragen aan het Tweede Symposium Juridische Argumentatie","author":"H. Prakken","year":"1997","unstructured":"Prakken, H. 1997. \u2018Logica, debat en procedure in juridische argumentatie\u2019. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, and J. A. Pontier (eds.), Op goede gronden.Bijdragen aan het Tweede Symposium Juridische Argumentatie. Ars Aequi, Nijmegen, pp. 132\u2013138."},{"issue":"3\/4","key":"235720_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118496","volume":"4","author":"H. Prakken","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prakken, H. and Sartor, G. 1996. \u2018A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning\u2019. Artificial Intelligence and Law\n4(3\/4), 331\u2013368.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"235720_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9337.1994.tb00175.x","volume":"7","author":"G. Sartor","year":"1994","unstructured":"Sartor, G. 1994. \u2018A formal model of legal argumentation\u2019. Ratio Juris\n7, 177\u2013211.","journal-title":"Ratio Juris"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1023\/A:1008344203269.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1023\/A:1008344203269\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1023\/A:1008344203269.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,20]],"date-time":"2025-05-20T10:58:41Z","timestamp":1747738721000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1023\/A:1008344203269"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2000,9]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2-3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2000,9]]}},"alternative-id":["235720"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/a:1008344203269","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0924-8463"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1572-8382"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2000,9]]}}}