{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,14]],"date-time":"2026-01-14T15:31:44Z","timestamp":1768404704129,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Hogrefe Publishing Group","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Media Psychology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> Abstract. This study tests the effects of camera distance and camera angle on emotional response across four categories of pictures covering a large emotional range (positive and negative miscellanea, erotica, and threat), using the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) \u2013a large database of emotionally evocative photographs. We content analyzed 722 images for the content category and camera framing (distance and angle), employing these as independent factors in analyses, and used the IAPS\u2019 pre-existing normative average ratings of emotional valence, arousal, and dominance as dependent variables. As hypothesized, affective responses were generally increased by closer framing and high and low angles (compared to straight angles), but the content of the picture played an important role in determining effect strength and direction. In particular, closeness increased arousal for all picture groups but had the opposite effect on positive miscellaneous pictures, straight angles decreased the emotional response for the two miscellanea groups, and low angles increased the emotional response for threatening pictures. This study is the first to show that previously found camera framing effects apply to pictures of high emotional intensity (e.g., erotica and threat). We suggest that future work should consider formal manipulations alongside message content. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1027\/1864-1105\/a000295","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,28]],"date-time":"2021-05-28T07:57:58Z","timestamp":1622188678000},"page":"42-48","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Danger, Sex, and Everything Else"],"prefix":"10.1027","volume":"34","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6422-2775","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Luc\u00eda","family":"Cores-Sarr\u00eda","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The Media School, Indiana University Bloomington, \t\t\t\t\t\tIN, USA"}]},{"given":"Brent J.","family":"Hale","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Communication, University of Southern \t\t\t\t\tMississippi, MS, USA"}]},{"given":"Annie","family":"Lang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Media School, Indiana University Bloomington, \t\t\t\t\t\tIN, USA"}]}],"member":"101","reference":[{"key":"c1","volume-title":"The reality of illusion: An ecological approach to cognitive film theory","author":"Anderson J. D.","year":"1998"},{"key":"c2","volume-title":"The effect of vertical camera angle on the perceived credibility of a televised speaker","author":"Avery R. K.","year":"1976"},{"key":"c3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.poetic.2020.101480"},{"key":"c4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0276237417710762"},{"key":"c5","volume-title":"Film art: An introduction","author":"Bordwell D.","year":"2016","edition":"11"},{"key":"c6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0005-7916(94)90063-9"},{"key":"c7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/1528-3542.1.3.276"},{"key":"c8","unstructured":"Canini,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tL., \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tBenini,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tS. & \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tLeonardi,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tR. \t\t\t\t\t\t(2011, September). Affective \t\t\t\t\t\tanalysis on patterns of shot types in movies. In \t\t\t\t\t\tIEEE. \t\t\t\t\t\t\t(Ed.), 2011 7th \t\t\t\t\t\t\tInternational Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis \t\t\t\t\t\t\t(ISPA) (pp. \t\t\t\t\t\t253\u2013258). \t\t\t\t\t\tIEEE."},{"key":"c9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Detenber, B.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tH. & \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tLang,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tA. \t\t\t\t\t\t(2010). The influence of form and presentation \t\t\t\t\t\tattributes of media on emotion. In K. Doveling, \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tC. von Scheve, & \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tE. A. Konijn \t\t\t\t\t\t(Eds.), The Routledge handbook \t\t\t\t\t\t\tof emotions and mass media (pp. \t\t\t\t\t\t275\u2013293). \t\t\t\t\t\tRoutledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780203885390","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203885390"},{"key":"c10","volume-title":"Understanding movies","author":"Giannetti L. D.","year":"1999","edition":"9"},{"key":"c11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15213269.2011.620541"},{"key":"c12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hochberg,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tJ. \t\t\t\t\t\t(2007). The Psychophysics of Pictorial \t\t\t\t\t\tPerception. In M. A. Peterson, & \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tH. A. Sedgwick \t\t\t\t\t\t(Eds.), In the mind\u2019s \t\t\t\t\t\t\teye: Julian Hochberg on the perception of pictures, films, and the \t\t\t\t\t\t\tworld (pp. \t\t\t\t\t30\u201356). Oxford University \t\t\t\t\t\tPress.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195176919.003.0005"},{"key":"c13","unstructured":"Kepplinger, H.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tM. & \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDonsbach,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tW. \t\t\t\t\t\t(1987). The influence of camera perspectives on \t\t\t\t\t\tthe perception of a politician by supporters, opponents, and neutral \t\t\t\t\t\tviewers. In D. L. Paletz \t\t\t\t\t\t(Ed.), Political communication \t\t\t\t\t\t\tresearch: Approaches, studies, assessments (pp. \t\t\t\t\t\t62\u201372). Ablex \t\t\t\t\t\tPublishing Corporation."},{"key":"c14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03197032"},{"key":"c15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01972243.2013.856364"},{"key":"c16","volume-title":"International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual","author":"Lang P. J.","year":"2008"},{"key":"c17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/08838157309363698"},{"key":"c18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/3172711"},{"key":"c19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S000305540707044X"},{"key":"c20","volume-title":"The measurement of meaning (No. 47)","author":"Osgood C. E.","year":"1957"},{"key":"c21","volume-title":"Faces on the screen: Pictures or natural experience","author":"Reeves B.","year":"1992"},{"key":"c22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15213269.2015.1030083"},{"key":"c23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5334\/pb-46-3-199"},{"key":"c24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/08838157009363614"}],"container-title":["Journal of Media Psychology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/econtent.hogrefe.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1027\/1864-1105\/a000295","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,21]],"date-time":"2023-12-21T10:57:10Z","timestamp":1703156230000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/econtent.hogrefe.com\/doi\/10.1027\/1864-1105\/a000295"}},"subtitle":["A Comparison of Camera Angle and Camera Distance Effects Across Pictures \t\t\t\t\tof Varied Emotional Content"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1027\/1864-1105\/a000295"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1027\/1864-1105\/a000295","relation":{},"ISSN":["1864-1105","2151-2388"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1864-1105","type":"print"},{"value":"2151-2388","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]}}}