{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T07:26:08Z","timestamp":1791444368379,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"American Psychological Association (APA)","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Psychological Methods"],"DOI":"10.1037\/met0000237","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,3]],"date-time":"2019-10-03T14:34:55Z","timestamp":1570113295000},"page":"576-577","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Consistency of effects is important in replication: Rejoinder to Mathur and VanderWeele (2019)."],"prefix":"10.1037","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Larry V.","family":"Hedges","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9041-7082","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jacob M.","family":"Schauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"15","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,10]]},"container-title":["Psychological Methods"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/journals\/met\/24\/5\/576.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,5]],"date-time":"2024-02-05T22:53:16Z","timestamp":1707173596000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/doi.apa.org\/doi\/10.1037\/met0000237"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,10]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,10]]}},"alternative-id":["2019-58850-002"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/met0000237","relation":{},"ISSN":["1939-1463","1082-989X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1939-1463","type":"electronic"},{"value":"1082-989X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,10]]}}}