{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,25]],"date-time":"2026-01-25T22:42:18Z","timestamp":1769380938403,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"American Psychological Association (APA)","issue":"12","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["American Psychologist"],"DOI":"10.1037\/h0025628","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,6,7]],"date-time":"2006-06-07T23:25:21Z","timestamp":1149722721000},"page":"1051-1059","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":52,"title":["Some remarks concerning incest, the incest taboo, and psychoanalytic theory."],"prefix":"10.1037","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Gardner","family":"Lindzey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"15","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1967]]},"container-title":["American Psychologist"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/journals\/amp\/22\/12\/1051.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,6]],"date-time":"2024-02-06T21:51:54Z","timestamp":1707256314000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/doi.apa.org\/doi\/10.1037\/h0025628"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1967]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1967]]}},"alternative-id":["1968-09153-001","6077786"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0025628","relation":{},"ISSN":["1935-990X","0003-066X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1935-990X","type":"electronic"},{"value":"0003-066X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1967]]}}}