{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T18:05:47Z","timestamp":1791396347680,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"American Psychological Association (APA)","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["American Psychologist"],"DOI":"10.1037\/h0040128","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,6,8]],"date-time":"2006-06-08T13:05:13Z","timestamp":1149771913000},"page":"421-423","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":237,"title":["Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram's \"Behavioral Study of Obedience.\""],"prefix":"10.1037","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Diana","family":"Baumrind","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"15","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1964,6]]},"container-title":["American Psychologist"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/journals\/amp\/19\/6\/421.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,6]],"date-time":"2024-02-06T21:57:02Z","timestamp":1707256622000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/doi.apa.org\/doi\/10.1037\/h0040128"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1964,6]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1964,6]]}},"alternative-id":["1965-00210-001"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0040128","relation":{},"ISSN":["1935-990X","0003-066X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1935-990X","type":"electronic"},{"value":"0003-066X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1964,6]]}}}