{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,20]],"date-time":"2026-05-20T05:23:29Z","timestamp":1779254609980,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,23]],"date-time":"2022-08-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1661212800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,23]],"date-time":"2022-08-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1661212800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"The corresponding author belongs to Seoul National University Hospital now, and the publication fee will be waived."}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["npj Digit. Med."],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The aim of this study is to evaluate cosmetic outcomes of the reconstructed breast in breast cancer patients, using anomaly score (AS) detected by generative adversarial network (GAN) deep learning algorithm. A total of 251 normal breast images from patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery were used for training anomaly GAN network. GAN-based anomaly detection was used to calculate abnormalities as an AS, followed by standardization by using z-score. Then, we reviewed 61 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy followed by reconstruction with autologous tissue or tissue expander. All patients were treated with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after reconstruction and computed tomography (CT) was performed at three-time points with a regular follow-up; before RT (Pre-RT), one year after RT (Post-1Y), and two years after RT (Post-2Y). Compared to Pre-RT, Post-1Y and Post-2Y demonstrated higher AS, indicating more abnormal cosmetic outcomes (Pre-RT vs. Post-1Y, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.015 and Pre-RT vs. Post-2Y, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.011). Pre-RT AS was higher in patients having major breast complications (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.016). Patients with autologous reconstruction showed lower AS than those with tissue expander both at Pre-RT (2.00 vs. 4.19, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.008) and Post-2Y (2.89 vs. 5.00, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.010). Linear mixed effect model revealed that days after baseline were associated with increased AS (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.007). Also, tissue expander was associated with steeper rise of AS, compared to autologous tissue (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.015). Fractionation regimen was not associated with the change of AS (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.389). AS detected by deep learning might be feasible in predicting cosmetic outcomes of RT-treated patients with breast reconstruction. AS should be validated in prospective studies.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-022-00671-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,23]],"date-time":"2022-08-23T10:03:43Z","timestamp":1661249023000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Feasibility of anomaly score detected with deep learning in irradiated breast cancer patients with reconstruction"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"Dong-Yun","family":"Kim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2083-5916","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Soo Jin","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eun-Kyu","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eunyoung","family":"Kang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chan Yeong","family":"Heo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4642-5560","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jae Hoon","family":"Jeong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yujin","family":"Myung","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"In Ah","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7064-9855","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bum-Sup","family":"Jang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"671_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.3857\/roj.2020.00738","volume":"38","author":"G Yang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yang, G. et al. Post-mastectomy radiation therapy in breast reconstruction: A patterns of care study of the korean radiation oncology group. Radiat. Oncol. J. 38, 236\u2013243 (2020).","journal-title":"Radiat. Oncol. J."},{"key":"671_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cps.2017.08.001","volume":"45","author":"MSF See","year":"2018","unstructured":"See, M. S. F. & Farhadi, J. Radiation therapy and immediate breast reconstruction: Novel approaches and evidence base for radiation effects on the reconstructed breast. Clin. Plast. Surg. 45, 13\u201324 (2018).","journal-title":"Clin. Plast. Surg."},{"key":"671_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/jncics\/pky062","volume":"2","author":"JL Caswell-Jin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Caswell-Jin, J. L. et al. Change in survival in metastatic breast cancer with treatment advances: Meta-analysis and systematic review. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2, 1\u201310 (2018).","journal-title":"JNCI Cancer Spectr."},{"key":"671_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0193099","volume":"13","author":"PJ Ho","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ho, P. J. et al. Determinants of satisfaction with cosmetic outcome in breast cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 13, 1\u201311 (2018).","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"671_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djx148","volume":"110","author":"R Jagsi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jagsi, R. et al. Impact of radiotherapy on complications and patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstruction. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 110, 157\u2013165 (2018).","journal-title":"J. Natl Cancer Inst."},{"key":"671_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e31823aec6b","volume":"129","author":"SJ Cano","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cano, S. J., Klassen, A. F., Scott, A. M., Cordeiro, P. G. & Pusic, A. L. The BREAST-Q: Further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast. Reconstructive Surg. 129, 293\u2013302 (2012).","journal-title":"Plast. Reconstructive Surg."},{"key":"671_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3181aee807","volume":"124","author":"AL Pusic","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pusic, A. L. et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plast. Reconstructive Surg. 124, 345\u2013353 (2009).","journal-title":"Plast. Reconstructive Surg."},{"key":"671_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpra.2020.03.002","volume":"24","author":"Y Eltahir","year":"2020","unstructured":"Eltahir, Y., Bosma, E., Teixeira, N., Werker, P. M. N. & de Bock, G. H. Satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes of breast reconstruction: Investigations into the correlation between the patients\u2019 Breast-Q outcome and the judgment of panels. JPRAS Open 24, 60\u201370 (2020).","journal-title":"JPRAS Open"},{"key":"671_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13014-018-0998-x","volume":"13","author":"T Corica","year":"2018","unstructured":"Corica, T. et al. Cosmetic outcome as rated by patients, doctors, nurses and BCCT.core software assessed over 5 years in a subset of patients in the TARGIT-A Trial. Radiat. Oncol. 13, 1\u201310 (2018).","journal-title":"Radiat. Oncol."},{"key":"671_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.4143\/crt.2015.088","volume":"48","author":"T Yu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Yu, T. et al. Objective measurement of cosmetic outcomes of breast conserving therapy using BCCT.core. Cancer Res. Treat. 48, 491\u2013498 (2016).","journal-title":"Cancer Res. Treat."},{"key":"671_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1016\/S0360-3016(99)00215-1","volume":"45","author":"C Vrieling","year":"1999","unstructured":"Vrieling, C. et al. Validation of the methods of cosmetic assessment after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC \u201cboost versus no boost\u201d trial. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 45, 667\u2013676 (1999).","journal-title":"Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys."},{"key":"671_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2011.07.013","volume":"21","author":"J Heil","year":"2012","unstructured":"Heil, J. et al. Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: Subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation. Breast 21, 61\u201365 (2012).","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"671_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2012.05.012","volume":"21","author":"J Preuss","year":"2012","unstructured":"Preuss, J., Lester, L. & Saunders, C. BCCT.core - Can a computer program be used for the assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast reconstructive surgery? Breast 21, 597\u2013600 (2012).","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"671_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2018.06.008","volume":"41","author":"MJ Cardoso","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cardoso, M. J. et al. The value of 3D images in the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Results from a prospective multicentric clinical trial. Breast 41, 19\u201324 (2018).","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"671_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.media.2017.07.005","volume":"42","author":"G Litjens","year":"2017","unstructured":"Litjens, G. et al. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 42, 60\u201388 (2017).","journal-title":"Med. Image Anal."},{"key":"671_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fujioka, T. et al. Efficient anomaly detection with generative adversarial network for breast ultrasound imaging. Diagnostics 10, (2020).","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics10070456"},{"key":"671_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-89626-1","volume":"11","author":"A Swiecicki","year":"2021","unstructured":"Swiecicki, A., Konz, N., Buda, M. & Mazurowski, M. A. A generative adversarial network-based abnormality detection using only normal images for model training with application to digital breast tomosynthesis. Sci. Rep. 11, 1\u201313 (2021).","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"671_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.media.2019.01.010","volume":"54","author":"T Schlegl","year":"2019","unstructured":"Schlegl, T., Seeb\u00f6ck, P., Waldstein, S. M., Langs, G. & Schmidt-Erfurth, U. f-AnoGAN: Fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks. Med. Image Anal. 54, 30\u201344 (2019).","journal-title":"Med. Image Anal."},{"key":"671_CR19","unstructured":"Zenati, H., Foo, C. S., Lecouat, B., Manek, G. & Chandrasekhar, V. R. Efficient GAN-Based Anomaly Detection. (2018)."},{"key":"671_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2011.04.001","volume":"20","author":"DF Veiga","year":"2011","unstructured":"Veiga, D. F. et al. Evaluations of aesthetic outcomes of oncoplastic surgery by surgeons of different gender and specialty: A prospective controlled study. Breast 20, 407\u2013412 (2011).","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"671_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-85155-z","volume":"11","author":"Y Myung","year":"2021","unstructured":"Myung, Y. et al. Validating machine learning approaches for prediction of donor related complication in microsurgical breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study. Sci. Rep. 11, 1\u20139 (2021).","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"671_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e742","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(17)30617-4","volume":"18","author":"AY Ho","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ho, A. Y., Hu, Z. I., Mehrara, B. J. & Wilkins, E. G. Radiotherapy in the setting of breast reconstruction: types, techniques, and timing. Lancet Oncol. 18, e742\u2013e753 (2017).","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol."},{"key":"671_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/1073274818795489","volume":"25","author":"JH Yun","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yun, J. H., Diaz, R. & Orman, A. G. Breast Reconstruction and Radiation Therapy. Cancer Control 25, 1\u20137 (2018).","journal-title":"Cancer Control"},{"key":"671_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijrobp.2021.09.031","author":"DY Kim","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kim, D. Y. et al. Influence of Hypofractionated Versus Conventional Fractionated Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients With Reconstruction. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijrobp.2021.09.031 (2021).","journal-title":"Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys."},{"key":"671_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2020.11.020","volume":"55","author":"DY Kim","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kim, D. Y. et al. Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with reconstructed breast: Toxicity analysis. Breast 55, 37\u201344 (2021).","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"671_CR26","first-page":"1","volume":"11","author":"HH Lee","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lee, H. H. et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of postmastectomy radiotherapy between breast cancer patients with and without immediate flap reconstruction. PLoS ONE 11, 1\u201312 (2016).","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"671_CR27","first-page":"1","volume":"55","author":"JD Oliver","year":"2019","unstructured":"Oliver, J. D. et al. Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) before and after 2-stage expander-implant breast reconstruction: A systematic review. Med. (Lith.) 55, 1\u20138 (2019).","journal-title":"Med. (Lith.)"},{"key":"671_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1177\/1457496919826711","volume":"109","author":"N Sadok","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sadok, N., Krabbe-Timmerman, I. S., de Bock, G. H., Werker, P. M. N. & Jansen, L. The Effect of Smoking and Body Mass Index on The Complication Rate of Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction. Scand. J. Surg. 109, 143\u2013150 (2020).","journal-title":"Scand. J. Surg."},{"key":"671_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2021.06.059","volume":"45","author":"M Yoshino","year":"2021","unstructured":"Yoshino, M. et al. Higher body mass index is a more important risk factor than sarcopenia for complications in deep inferior epigastric perforator reconstruction. Asian J. Surg. 45, 360\u2013366 (2021).","journal-title":"Asian J. Surg."},{"key":"671_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2019.09.040","volume":"73","author":"NM Toyserkani","year":"2020","unstructured":"Toyserkani, N. M., J\u00f8rgensen, M. G., Tabatabaeifar, S., Damsgaard, T. & S\u00f8rensen, J. A. Autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes. J. Plast., Reconstructive Aesthetic Surg. 73, 278\u2013285 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Plast., Reconstructive Aesthetic Surg."},{"key":"671_CR31","first-page":"119","volume":"1","author":"WM Rozen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rozen, W. M. & Ashton, M. W. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: oncology, cosmesis and complications. Gland Surg. 1, 119\u2013127 (2012).","journal-title":"Gland Surg."}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-022-00688-5","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,7]],"date-time":"2022-09-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1662508800000}}],"container-title":["npj Digital Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-022-00671-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-022-00671-0","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-022-00671-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,25]],"date-time":"2022-11-25T08:16:18Z","timestamp":1669364178000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-022-00671-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,23]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["671"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41746-022-00671-0","relation":{"correction":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1038\/s41746-022-00688-5","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["2398-6352"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2398-6352","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 January 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 August 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 August 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 September 2022","order":4,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Correction","order":5,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"A Correction to this paper has been published:","order":6,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41746-022-00688-5","URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41746-022-00688-5","order":7,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"125"}}