{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,19]],"date-time":"2026-02-19T09:20:19Z","timestamp":1771492819975,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":54,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,12]],"date-time":"2023-07-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1689120000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,12]],"date-time":"2023-07-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1689120000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["npj Digit. Med."],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Digital health, including telemedicine, has increased access to abortion care. The convenience, flexibility of appointment times, and ensured privacy to abortion users may make abortion services via telemedicine preferable. This scoping review systematically mapped studies conducted on abortion services via telemedicine, including their effectiveness and acceptability for abortion users and providers. All published papers included abortion services via telemedicine in the United States were considered. Articles were searched in PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases in September 2022. The findings were synthesized narratively, and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines were used to report this study. Out of 757 retrieved articles, 33 articles were selected based on the inclusion criteria. These studies were published between 2011 and 2022, with 24 published in the last 3 years. The study found that telemedicine increased access to abortion care in the United States, especially for people in remote areas or those worried about stigma from in-person visits. The effectiveness of abortion services via telemedicine was comparable to in-clinic visits, with 6% or fewer abortions requiring surgical intervention. Both care providers and abortion seekers expressed positive perceptions of telemedicine-based abortion services. However, abortion users reported mixed emotions, with some preferring in-person visits. The most common reasons for choosing telemedicine included the distance to the abortion clinic, convenience, privacy, cost, flexibility of appointment times, and state laws imposing waiting periods or restrictive policies. Telemedicine offered a preferable option for abortion seekers and providers. The feasibility of accessing abortion services via telemedicine in low-resource settings needs further investigation.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-023-00871-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,12]],"date-time":"2023-07-12T04:02:11Z","timestamp":1689134531000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Medication abortion via digital health in the United States: a systematic scoping review"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"6","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6700-4810","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fekede Asefa","family":"Kumsa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Rameshwari","family":"Prasad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2047-4759","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Arash","family":"Shaban-Nejad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"871_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-018-0058-9","volume":"1","author":"A Shaban-Nejad","year":"2018","unstructured":"Shaban-Nejad, A., Michalowski, M. & Buckeridge, D. L. Health intelligence: how artificial intelligence transforms population and personalized health. npj Digit. Med. 1, 1\u20132 (2018).","journal-title":"npj Digit. Med."},{"key":"871_CR2","unstructured":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration. What is Digital Health? (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2020)."},{"key":"871_CR3","unstructured":"World Health Organization. Telemedicine: Opportunities and Developments in Member States: Report on the Second Global Survey on eHealth 2009 Vol. 2 (World Health Organization, 2010)."},{"key":"871_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2196\/24738","volume":"5","author":"N Ammar","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ammar, N., Bailey, J. E., Davis, R. L. & Shaban-Nejad, A. Using a Personal Health Library-Enabled mHealth recommender system for self-management of diabetes among underserved populations: use case for knowledge graphs and linked data. JMIR Form. Res. 5, 1\u201321 (2021).","journal-title":"JMIR Form. Res."},{"key":"871_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000498","volume":"30","author":"WK Fok","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fok, W. K. & Mark, A. Abortion through telemedicine. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 30, 394\u2013399 (2018).","journal-title":"Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"871_CR6","first-page":"1","volume":"10","author":"ARA Aiken","year":"2022","unstructured":"Aiken, A. R. A., Romanova, E. P., Morber, J. R. & Gomperts, R. Safety and effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion provided using online telemedicine in the United States: a population based study. The Lancet. 10, 1\u201318 (2022).","journal-title":"The Lancet."},{"key":"871_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"778","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002212","volume":"130","author":"D Grossman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Grossman, D. & Grindlay, K. Safety of medical abortion provided through telemedicine compared with in person. Obst. Gynecol. 130, 778\u2013782 (2017).","journal-title":"Obst. Gynecol."},{"key":"871_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"835","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004081","volume":"136","author":"ARA Aiken","year":"2020","unstructured":"Aiken, A. R. A. et al. Demand for self-managed online telemedicine abortion in the United States during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. Obstet. Gynecol. 136, 835\u2013837 (2020).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"871_CR9","unstructured":"Jones, R. K., Nash, E., Cross, L., Philbin, J. & Kirstein, M. Medication Abortion Now Accounts for More Than Half of All US Abortions. (Guttmacher Institute, 2022)."},{"key":"871_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010","volume":"101","author":"S Daniel","year":"2020","unstructured":"Daniel, S., Raifman, S., Kaller, S. & Grossman, D. Characteristics of patients having telemedicine versus in-person informed consent visits before abortion in Utah. Contraception 101, 56\u201361 (2020).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"871_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2019.04.009","volume":"29","author":"K Ehrenreich","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ehrenreich, K., Kaller, S., Raifman, S. & Grossman, D. Women\u2019s experiences using telemedicine to attend abortion information visits in Utah: a qualitative study. Women\u2019s Health Issues 29, 407\u2013413 (2019).","journal-title":"Women\u2019s Health Issues"},{"key":"871_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.1177\/1357633X16659166","volume":"23","author":"K Grindlay","year":"2017","unstructured":"Grindlay, K. & Grossman, D. Telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Alaska: through the provider\u2019s lens. J. Telemed. Telecare 23, 680\u2013685 (2017).","journal-title":"J. Telemed. Telecare"},{"key":"871_CR13","unstructured":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Mifeprex (mifepristone) Information 2018. (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2018)."},{"key":"871_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.03.019","volume":"104","author":"E Chong","year":"2021","unstructured":"Chong, E. et al. Expansion of a direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States and experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contraception 104, 43\u201348 (2021).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"871_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.04.028","volume":"104","author":"C Kerestes","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kerestes, C. et al. \u201cIt was close enough, but it wasn\u2019t close enough\u201d: a qualitative exploration of the impact of direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion on access to abortion care. Contraception 104, 67\u201372 (2021).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"871_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.05.013","volume":"100","author":"E Raymond","year":"2019","unstructured":"Raymond, E. et al. TelAbortion: evaluation of a direct to patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States. Contraception 100, 173\u2013177 (2019).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"871_CR17","unstructured":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Questions and answers on Mifeprex. (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2021)."},{"key":"871_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2122320","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.22320","volume":"4","author":"UD Upadhyay","year":"2021","unstructured":"Upadhyay, U. D., Koenig, L. R. & Meckstroth, K. R. Safety and efficacy of telehealth medication abortions in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw. Open 4, e2122320 (2021).","journal-title":"JAMA Netw. Open"},{"key":"871_CR19","unstructured":"Kaiser Family Foundation. Women\u2019s Health Policy. The Availability and Use of Medication Abortion. (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2021)."},{"key":"871_CR20","unstructured":"Nash, E. & Ephross, P. State Policy Trends 2022: In a Devastating Year, US Supreme Court\u2019s Decision to Overturn Roe Leads to Bans, Confusion and Chaos. (Guttmacher Institute, 2022)."},{"key":"871_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1363\/psrh.12215","volume":"54","author":"RK Jones","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jones, R. K., Kirstein, M. & Philbin, J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2020. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health 54, 128\u2013141 (2022).","journal-title":"Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health"},{"key":"871_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-019-0759-9","volume":"16","author":"K Ehrenreich","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ehrenreich, K. & Marston, C. Spatial dimensions of telemedicine and abortion access: a qualitative study of women\u2019s experiences. Reprod. Health 16, 1\u201310 (2019).","journal-title":"Reprod. Health"},{"key":"871_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1370\/afm.2821","volume":"20","author":"AE Fiastro","year":"2022","unstructured":"Fiastro, A. E. et al. Remote delivery in reproductive health care: operation of direct-to-patient telehealth medication abortion services in diverse settings. Ann. Fam. Med. 20, 336\u2013342 (2022).","journal-title":"Ann. Fam. Med."},{"key":"871_CR24","unstructured":"Fix, L. et al. Telehealth leaders\u2019 attitudes toward telemedicine provision of medication abortion: a qualitative study. Ibis Reprod. Health. 1\u201310 (2018)."},{"key":"871_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.04.021","volume":"104","author":"EM Godfrey","year":"2021","unstructured":"Godfrey, E. M. et al. Factors associated with successful implementation of telehealth abortion in four United States clinical practice settings. Contraception 104, 82\u201391 (2021).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"871_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e117","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2012.12.002","volume":"23","author":"K Grindlay","year":"2013","unstructured":"Grindlay, K., Lane, K. & Grossman, D. Women\u2019s and providers\u2019 experiences with medical abortion provided through telemedicine: a qualitative study. Women\u2019s Health Issues 23, e117\u2013e122 (2013).","journal-title":"Women\u2019s Health Issues"},{"key":"871_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssmqr.2021.100003","volume":"1","author":"DM Johnson","year":"2021","unstructured":"Johnson, D. M., Madera, M., Gomperts, R. & Aiken, A. R. A. The economic context of pursuing online medication abortion in the United States. SSM Qual. Res. Health 1, 1\u20138 (2021).","journal-title":"SSM Qual. Res. Health"},{"key":"871_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssmqr.2022.100075","volume":"2","author":"M Madera","year":"2022","unstructured":"Madera, M. et al. Experiences seeking, sourcing, and using abortion pills at home in the United States through an online telemedicine service. SSM Qual. Res. Health 2, 1\u20139 (2022).","journal-title":"SSM Qual. Res. Health"},{"key":"871_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.21037\/mhealth-22-12","volume":"8","author":"SP Ruggiero","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ruggiero, S. P. et al. Patient and provider experiences using a site-to-site telehealth model for medication abortion. mHealth 8, 1\u201310 (2022).","journal-title":"mHealth"},{"key":"871_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.11852","volume":"4","author":"ARA Aiken","year":"2021","unstructured":"Aiken, A. R. A., Starling, J. E. & Gomperts, R. Factors associated with use of an online telemedicine service to access self-managed medical abortion in the US. JAMA Netw. Open 4, 1\u201311 (2021).","journal-title":"JAMA Netw. Open"},{"key":"871_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e38","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200972","volume":"48","author":"KM Beardsworth","year":"2022","unstructured":"Beardsworth, K. M., Doshi, U., Raymond, E. & Baldwin, M. K. Miles and days until medical abortion via TelAbortion versus clinic in Oregon and Washington, USA. BMJ Sex. Reprod. Health 48, e38\u2013e43 (2022).","journal-title":"BMJ Sex. Reprod. Health"},{"key":"871_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2021.02.007","volume":"31","author":"S Kaller","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kaller, S., Daniel, S., Raifman, S., Biggs, M. A. & Grossman, D. Pre-abortion informed consent through telemedicine vs. in person: differences in patient demographics and visit satisfaction. Women\u2019s Health Issues 31, 227\u2013235 (2021).","journal-title":"Women\u2019s Health Issues"},{"key":"871_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1089\/tmj.2022.0101","volume":"29","author":"K Rivlin","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rivlin, K. et al. Provider mistrust and telemedicine abortion care preferences among patients in Ohio, West Virginia, and Kentucky. Telemed. J. E Health. 29, 414\u2013424 (2022).","journal-title":"Telemed. J. E Health."},{"key":"871_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.15530","volume":"4","author":"KMJ Thompson","year":"2021","unstructured":"Thompson, K. M. J., Sturrock, H. J. W., Foster, D. G. & Upadhyay, U. D. Association of travel distance to nearest abortion facility with rates of abortion. JAMA Netw. Open. 4, 1\u201311 (2021).","journal-title":"JAMA Netw. Open."},{"key":"871_CR35","first-page":"1","volume":"2","author":"UD Upadhyay","year":"2020","unstructured":"Upadhyay, U. D., Schroeder, R. & Roberts, S. C. M. Adoption of no-test and telehealth medication abortion care among independent abortion providers in response to COVID-19. Contraception: X. 2, 1\u20135 (2020).","journal-title":"Contraception: X."},{"key":"871_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2019.305369","volume":"110","author":"ARA Aiken","year":"2020","unstructured":"Aiken, A. R. A. et al. Demand for self-managed medication abortion through an online telemedicine service in the United States. Am. J. Public Health 110, 90\u201397 (2020).","journal-title":"Am. J. Public Health"},{"key":"871_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318224d110","volume":"118","author":"D Grossman","year":"2011","unstructured":"Grossman, D., Grindlay, K., Buchacker, T., Lane, K. & Blanchard, K. Effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion provided through telemedicine. Obstet. Gynecol. 118, 296\u2013303 (2011).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"871_CR38","first-page":"73","volume":"103","author":"DA Grossman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Grossman, D. A., Grindlay, K., Buchacker, T., Potter, J. E. & Schmertmann, C. P. Changes in service delivery patterns after introduction of telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Iowa. Res. Pract. 103, 73\u201378 (2013).","journal-title":"Res. Pract."},{"key":"871_CR39","first-page":"1","volume":"3","author":"N Kapp","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kapp, N. et al. Medical abortion at 13 or more weeks gestation provided through telemedicine: a retrospective review of services. Contraception 3, 1\u20135 (2021).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"871_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.03.025","volume":"104","author":"C Kerestes","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kerestes, C. et al. Provision of medication abortion in Hawai\u2018i during COVID-19: practical experience with multiple care delivery models. Contraception 104, 49\u201353 (2021).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"871_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2020.12.005","volume":"103","author":"JE Kohn","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kohn, J. E. et al. Introduction of telemedicine for medication abortion: changes in service delivery patterns in two U.S. states. Contraception 103, 151\u2013156 (2021).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"871_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003357","volume":"134","author":"JE Kohn","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kohn, J. E. et al. Medication abortion provided through telemedicine in four U.S. States. Obstet. Gynecol. 134, 343\u2013350 (2019).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"871_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2022.12065","volume":"5","author":"EA Pleasants","year":"2022","unstructured":"Pleasants, E. A., Cartwright, A. F. & Upadhyay, U. D. Association between distance to an abortion facility and abortion or pregnancy outcome among a prospective cohort of people seeking abortion online. JAMA Netw. Open 5, 1\u201313 (2022).","journal-title":"JAMA Netw. Open"},{"key":"871_CR44","first-page":"1","volume":"2","author":"ER Wiebe","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wiebe, E. R., Campbell, M., Ramasamy, H. & Kelly, M. Comparing telemedicine to in-clinic medication abortions induced with mifepristone and misoprostol. Contraception: X. 2, 1\u20134 (2020).","journal-title":"Contraception: X."},{"key":"871_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.04.001","volume":"104","author":"KJ LaRoche","year":"2021","unstructured":"LaRoche, K. J., Jozkowski, K. N., Crawford, B. L. & Haus, K. R. Attitudes of US adults toward using telemedicine to prescribe medication abortion during COVID-19: a mixed methods study. Contraception 104, 104\u2013110 (2021).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"871_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.07.108","volume":"104","author":"HA Anger","year":"2021","unstructured":"Anger, H. A. et al. Clinical and service delivery implications of omitting ultrasound before medication abortion provided via direct-to-patient telemedicine and mail in the U.S. Contraception 104, 659\u2013665 (2021).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"871_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3389\/frph.2022.1040640","volume":"4","author":"S Larrea","year":"2022","unstructured":"Larrea, S., Pal\u00e8ncia, L., Assis, M. P. & Borrell, C. Social inequalities in utilization of a feminist telehealth abortion service in Brazil: a multilevel analysis. Front. Reprod. Health 4, 1\u201312 (2022).","journal-title":"Front. Reprod. Health"},{"key":"871_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1094","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15684","volume":"126","author":"M Endler","year":"2019","unstructured":"Endler, M. et al. Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review. BJOG 126, 1094\u20131102 (2019).","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"871_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000897","volume":"126","author":"MJ Chen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chen, M. J. & Creinin, M. D. Mifepristone with buccal misoprostol for medical abortion. A systematic review. Obstet. Gynecol. 126, 12\u201321 (2015).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"871_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000603","volume":"125","author":"UD Upadhyay","year":"2015","unstructured":"Upadhyay, U. D. et al. Incidence of emergency department visits and complications after abortion. Obstet. Gynecol. 125, 175\u2013183 (2015).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"871_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1464","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16668","volume":"128","author":"ARA Aiken","year":"2021","unstructured":"Aiken, A. R. A., Lohr, P. A., Lord, J., Ghosh, N. & Starling, J. E. Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy)provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study. Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 128, 1464\u20131474 (2021).","journal-title":"Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"871_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101793","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artmed.2020.101793","volume":"103","author":"A Shaban-Nejad","year":"2020","unstructured":"Shaban-Nejad, A., Michalowski, M., Peek, N., Brownstein, J. S. & Buckeridge, D. L. Seven pillars of precision digital health and medicine. Artif. Intell. Med. 103, 101793 (2020).","journal-title":"Artif. Intell. Med."},{"key":"871_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.7326\/M18-0850","volume":"169","author":"AC Tricco","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tricco, A. C. et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 169, 467\u2013473 (2018).","journal-title":"Ann. Intern. Med."},{"key":"871_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.11124\/JBIES-21-00458","volume":"20","author":"D Pollock","year":"2022","unstructured":"Pollock, D. et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid. Synth. 20, 1\u201314 (2022).","journal-title":"JBI Evid. Synth."}],"container-title":["npj Digital Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-023-00871-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-023-00871-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-023-00871-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,12]],"date-time":"2023-07-12T05:01:50Z","timestamp":1689138110000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-023-00871-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,12]]},"references-count":54,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["871"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41746-023-00871-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["2398-6352"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2398-6352","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 January 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 June 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 July 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"128"}}