{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,2]],"date-time":"2026-01-02T16:57:09Z","timestamp":1767373029091,"version":"3.40.4"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,21]],"date-time":"2025-04-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1745193600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,21]],"date-time":"2025-04-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1745193600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000925","name":"National Health and Medical Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000925","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001782","name":"University of Melbourne","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001782","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100015988","name":"Norman Beischer Medical Research Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100015988","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["npj Digit. Med."],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telehealth and remote monitoring in obstetric care. This study assessed pregnant patients\u2019 perceptions before and after using a novel non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram (NI-FECG) device. The trial is prospectively registered on the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTRN12621001260819; submitted June 9th, 2021; approved September 17th, 2021). Seventy participants from 36 weeks\u2019 gestation completed pre- and post-use surveys. Interest in continuous and home fetal monitoring was high (79% and 90%, respectively). Post-use, 89% reported satisfaction; over 90% comfortable wearing and removing the sensor. Extended use was acceptable to 76%, and only 3% reported high skin irritation. Sentiment analysis highlighted themes of reassurance, convenience, and reduced anxiety. Some suggested smaller, wireless design. Analysis by natural language processing and clustering provided deeper insights. Findings support strong interest in at-home fetal monitoring; further refinement and education are needed to enhance acceptability. Future research should assess long-term effects on anxiety and clinical outcomes.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-025-01628-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,21]],"date-time":"2025-04-21T12:21:37Z","timestamp":1745238097000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Consumer insights from a feasibility study on remote and extended use of a novel non-invasive wearable fetal electrocardiogram monitor"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Debjyoti","family":"Karmakar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Tarini","family":"Paul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Emerson","family":"Keenan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Marimuthu","family":"Palaniswami","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Kaitlin","family":"Constable","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Erica","family":"Spessot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Fiona","family":"Brownfoot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"1628_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-023-05349-3","volume":"23","author":"R Kahankova","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kahankova, R. et al. Pregnancy in the time of COVID-19: towards fetal monitoring 4.0. BMC Preg. Childbirth 23, 33 (2023).","journal-title":"BMC Preg. Childbirth"},{"key":"1628_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)00668-1","volume":"398","author":"KR Palmer","year":"2021","unstructured":"Palmer, K. R. et al. Widespread implementation of a low-cost telehealth service in the delivery of antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis. Lancet 398, 41\u201352 (2021).","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"1628_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e202","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.9262","volume":"20","author":"JF Van Den Heuvel","year":"2018","unstructured":"Van Den Heuvel, J. F. et al. eHealth as the next-generation perinatal care: an overview of the literature. J. Med. Internet Res. 20, e202 (2018).","journal-title":"J. Med. Internet Res."},{"key":"1628_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e116","DOI":"10.1016\/S2589-7500(22)00231-X","volume":"5","author":"MN Bekker","year":"2023","unstructured":"Bekker, M. N. et al. Home telemonitoring versus hospital care in complicated pregnancies in the Netherlands: a randomised, controlled non-inferiority trial (HoTeL). Lancet Digit. Health 5, e116\u2013e124 (2023).","journal-title":"Lancet Digit. Health"},{"key":"1628_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hamm, R.F. et al. Use of a wireless monitoring device to perform nonstress tests from home: the patient perspective. Am. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. 6 (2014).","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101342"},{"key":"1628_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"410","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mehy.2014.07.009","volume":"83","author":"R Brown","year":"2014","unstructured":"Brown, R., Wijekoon, J. H., Fernando, A., Johnstone, E. D. & Heazell, A. E. Continuous objective recording of fetal heart rate and fetal movements could reliably identify fetal compromise, which could reduce stillbirth rates by facilitating timely management. Medical hypotheses 83, 410\u2013417 (2014).","journal-title":"Medical hypotheses"},{"key":"1628_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/41508","volume":"11","author":"S Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li, S., Yang, Q., Niu, S. & Liu, Y. Effectiveness of remote fetal monitoring on maternal-fetal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth 11, e41508 (2023).","journal-title":"JMIR mHealth uHealth"},{"key":"1628_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1680","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1059808","volume":"29","author":"R Brown","year":"2016","unstructured":"Brown, R., Johnstone, E. D. & Heazell, A. E. Professionals\u2019 views of fetal-monitoring support the development of devices to provide objective longer-term assessment of fetal wellbeing. J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 29, 1680\u20131686 (2016).","journal-title":"J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med."},{"key":"1628_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1515","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13446","volume":"97","author":"A Crawford","year":"2018","unstructured":"Crawford, A. et al. A mixed-methods evaluation of continuous electronic fetal monitoring for an extended period. Acta Obstetr. Gynecol. Scand. 97, 1515\u20131523 (2018).","journal-title":"Acta Obstetr. Gynecol. Scand."},{"key":"1628_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1404","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13231","volume":"96","author":"A Crawford","year":"2017","unstructured":"Crawford, A., Hayes, D., Johnstone, E. D. & Heazell, A. E. Women\u2019s experiences of continuous fetal monitoring\u2013a mixed-methods systematic review. Acta Obstetr. Gynecol. Scand. 96, 1404\u20131413 (2017).","journal-title":"Acta Obstetr. Gynecol. Scand."},{"key":"1628_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.07.002","volume":"41","author":"A Philippe","year":"2012","unstructured":"Philippe, A. et al. Use of Monica AN24\u2122 for fetal monitoring during labour induction. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 41, 194\u2013197 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod."},{"key":"1628_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e28129","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0028129","volume":"6","author":"Z Rauf","year":"2011","unstructured":"Rauf, Z. et al. Home labour induction with retrievable prostaglandin pessary and continuous telemetric trans-abdominal fetal ECG monitoring. PLoS One 6, e28129 (2011).","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"1628_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0028-1098718","volume":"212","author":"J Reinhard","year":"2008","unstructured":"Reinhard, J., Hatzmann, H. & Schiermeier, S. Foetal electrocardiography (ECG) is an alternative to Doppler ultrasound cardiotocogram (CTG) for antenatal assessment of foetal well-being-preliminary results. Z.Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 212, 226\u2013229 (2008).","journal-title":"Z.Geburtshilfe Neonatol."},{"key":"1628_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e11458","DOI":"10.2196\/11458","volume":"7","author":"K Schramm","year":"2019","unstructured":"Schramm, K. et al. Women\u2019s attitudes toward self-monitoring of their pregnancy using noninvasive electronic devices: cross-sectional multicenter study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 7, e11458 (2019).","journal-title":"JMIR mHealth uHealth"},{"key":"1628_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-022-01923-5","volume":"22","author":"MM van Buchem","year":"2022","unstructured":"van Buchem, M. M. et al. Analyzing patient experiences using natural language processing: development and validation of the artificial intelligence patient-reported experience measure (AI-PREM). BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 22, 183 (2022).","journal-title":"BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak."},{"key":"1628_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-022-06705-y","volume":"308","author":"C Wakefield","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wakefield, C., Yao, L., Self, S. & Frasch, M. G. Wearable technology for health monitoring during pregnancy: an observational cross-sectional survey study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 308, 73\u201378 (2023).","journal-title":"Arch. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"key":"1628_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1017\/cts.2020.33","volume":"4","author":"JM Radin","year":"2020","unstructured":"Radin, J. M. et al. Pregnancy health in POWERMOM participants living in rural versus urban zip codes. J. Clin. Transl. Sci. 4, 457\u2013462 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Clin. Transl. Sci."},{"key":"1628_CR18","unstructured":"KaliHealthCare. https:\/\/www.kalihealthcare.com\/about\/."},{"key":"1628_CR19","unstructured":"Keenan, E. et al. A wearable device to monitor the fetal heart rate: artificial intelligence improves the reliability of fetal heart rate detection using non-invasive fetal ECG (2023)."},{"key":"1628_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2024.101619","volume":"37","author":"S Murray","year":"2024","unstructured":"Murray, S., Fox, D. J., Coddington, R. L. & Scarf, V. L. How does the use of continuous electronic fetal monitoring influence women\u2019s experiences of labour? A systematic integrative review of the literature from high-income countries. Women Birth 37, 101619 (2024).","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"key":"1628_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1306","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01533.x","volume":"91","author":"WR Cohen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cohen, W. R. et al. Accuracy and reliability of fetal heart rate monitoring using maternal abdominal surface electrodes. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 91, 1306\u20131313 (2012).","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."}],"container-title":["npj Digital Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-025-01628-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-025-01628-9","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-025-01628-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,21]],"date-time":"2025-04-21T12:21:39Z","timestamp":1745238099000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-025-01628-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,21]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1628"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41746-025-01628-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["2398-6352"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2398-6352","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 November 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 April 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 April 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"F.B. and E.K. are directors and shareholders of Kali Healthcare, a company that is commercializing a wearable fetal monitoring device. M.P. is a shareholder of Kali Healthcare. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"216"}}