{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,17]],"date-time":"2026-02-17T17:05:26Z","timestamp":1771347926124,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]],"date-time":"2026-01-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1768867200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,17]],"date-time":"2026-02-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1771286400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":28,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["npj Digit. Med."],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Existing literature reveals shortcomings in reporting on digital health interventions (DHIs) development and evaluation, resulting in limited traceability and hampered knowledge growth. Despite existing health research reporting guidelines, a specific guideline for the participatory development and evaluation of DHIs is lacking. This study aimed to develop a consensus-based reporting guideline to increase the transparency and comparability of both the participatory development and evaluation of DHIs. Following the methodology recommended by the EQUATOR Network and Mohers et al., a web-based Delphi Study comprising three rounds (two surveys; one workshop) was conducted. An international panel of 66 experts from 23 countries agreed on 68 items for the final reporting guideline, derived from existing reporting guidelines and refined through expert consultation. The final consensus-based reporting guideline ParDE-DHI addresses a significant gap in the systematic reporting of participatory development and evaluation of DHIs. Tailored to the unique challenges of participatory design and research, it enhances the credibility and comparability of study designs and results. This is a crucial step towards promoting best practices and advancing methodological rigor in the field. International and interdisciplinary panel input ensures adaptability and relevance across digital health contexts, ultimately fostering improved participation and knowledge sharing within the research community.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-026-02355-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]],"date-time":"2026-01-20T18:15:29Z","timestamp":1768932929000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Consensus-based reporting guideline for participatory development and evaluation of digital health interventions"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Vera","family":"Weirauch","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Anne","family":"Mainz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Julia","family":"Nitsche","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Theresa Sophie","family":"Busse","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Sven","family":"Meister","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"2355_CR1","unstructured":"World Health Organization (WHO). Classification of Digital Interventions, Services and Applications in Health: a Shared Language to Describe the Uses of Digital Technology for Health, 2nd ed. (WHO, 2023)."},{"key":"2355_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1474","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2023.06.008","volume":"26","author":"M Haig","year":"2023","unstructured":"Haig, M., Main, C., Ch\u00e1vez, D. & Kanavos, P. A value framework to assess patient-facing digital health technologies that aim to improve chronic disease management: a Delphi approach. Value Health J. Int. Soc. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. 26, 1474\u20131484, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jval.2023.06.008 (2023).","journal-title":"Value Health J. Int. Soc. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res."},{"key":"2355_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-024-01385-1","volume":"7","author":"A Kilfoy","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kilfoy, A. et al. An umbrella review on how digital health intervention co-design is conducted and described. npj Digit. Med. 7, 374, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41746-024-01385-1 (2024).","journal-title":"npj Digit. Med."},{"key":"2355_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Agarwal, S. et al. Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist (2016).","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i1174"},{"key":"2355_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e46694","DOI":"10.2196\/46694","volume":"25","author":"C Perrin Franck","year":"2023","unstructured":"Perrin Franck, C. et al. iCHECK-DH: guidelines and checklist for the reporting on digital health implementations. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e46694, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/46694 (2023).","journal-title":"J. Med. Internet Res."},{"key":"2355_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e126","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.1923","volume":"13","author":"G Eysenbach","year":"2011","unstructured":"Eysenbach, G. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions. J. Med. Internet Res. 13, e126, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/jmir.1923 (2011).","journal-title":"J. Med. Internet Res."},{"key":"2355_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1007\/s00103-020-03143-6","volume":"63","author":"F Fischer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fischer, F. Digitale Interventionen in Pr\u00e4vention und Gesundheitsf\u00f6rderung: Welche Form der Evidenz haben wir und welche wird ben\u00f6tigt?. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 63, 674\u2013680, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00103-020-03143-6 (2020).","journal-title":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz"},{"key":"2355_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amepre.2016.06.008","volume":"51","author":"E Murray","year":"2016","unstructured":"Murray, E. et al. Evaluating digital health interventions: key questions and approaches. Am. J. Prev. Med. 51, 843\u2013851, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amepre.2016.06.008 (2016).","journal-title":"Am. J. Prev. Med."},{"key":"2355_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e402","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.8578","volume":"19","author":"F Sieverink","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sieverink, F., Kelders, S. M. & van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. Clarifying the concept of adherence to ehealth technology: systematic review on when usage becomes adherence. J. Med. Internet Res. 19, e402, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/jmir.8578 (2017).","journal-title":"J. Med. Internet Res."},{"key":"2355_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.5334\/ijic.5529","volume":"21","author":"L Harst","year":"2021","unstructured":"Harst, L., Wollschlaeger, B., Birnstein, J., Fuchs, T. & Timpel, P. Evaluation is key: providing appropriate evaluation measures for participatory and user-centred design processes of healthcare IT. Int. J. Integr. Care 21, 24, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/ijic.5529 (2021).","journal-title":"Int. J. Integr. Care"},{"key":"2355_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"j3453","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.j3453","volume":"358","author":"S Staniszewska","year":"2017","unstructured":"Staniszewska, S. et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ (Clin. Res. ed.) 358, j3453, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.j3453 (2017).","journal-title":"BMJ (Clin. Res. ed.)"},{"key":"2355_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kernebeck, S. & Fischer, F. Theoretische, methodische und organisatorische Fragestellungen. In Partizipative Technikentwicklung im Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen, edited by S. Kernebeck & F. Fischer 25\u201336 (Hogrefe AG, Bern, 2024).","DOI":"10.1024\/86266-000"},{"key":"2355_CR13","unstructured":"International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). Position Paper 1: What is Participatory Health Research? Available at https:\/\/www.icphr.org\/position-papers--discussion-papers\/position-paper-no-1 (2013)."},{"key":"2355_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B\u00f8dker, S., Dindler, C., Iversen, O. S. & Smith, R. C. What Is Participatory Design? In Participatory Design Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics (2022), pp. 5\u201313.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-02235-7_2"},{"key":"2355_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Vargas, C., Whelan, J., Brimblecombe, J. & Allender, S. Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health - a perspective on definition and distinctions. Public Health Res. Pract. 32; https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17061\/phrp3222211 (2022).","DOI":"10.17061\/phrp3222211"},{"key":"2355_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/13780","volume":"22","author":"P Vandekerckhove","year":"2020","unstructured":"Vandekerckhove, P., de Mul, M., Bramer, W. M. & de Bont, A. A. Generative participatory design methodology to develop electronic health interventions: systematic literature review. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e13780. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/13780 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Med. Internet Res."},{"key":"2355_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Vaughn, L. M. & Jacquez, F. Participatory research methods \u2013 choice points in the research process. J. Particip. Res. Methods 1; https:\/\/doi.org\/10.35844\/001c.13244 (2020).","DOI":"10.35844\/001c.13244"},{"key":"2355_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nguyen, Q. Evaluation in participatory design \u2013 the whys and the nots, 161\u2013166; https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3537797.3537828 (2022).","DOI":"10.1145\/3537797.3537828"},{"key":"2355_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.invent.2024.100799","volume":"39","author":"A Messina","year":"2025","unstructured":"Messina, A. et al. Participatory methods in designing digital health interventions for informal caregivers of people with dementia. A systematic review. Internet Interv. 39, 100799. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.invent.2024.100799 (2025).","journal-title":"Internet Interv."},{"key":"2355_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e45598","DOI":"10.2196\/45598","volume":"10","author":"TS Busse","year":"2023","unstructured":"Busse, T. S. et al. Involving health care professionals in the development of electronic health records: scoping review. JMIR Hum. factors 10, e45598, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/45598 (2023).","journal-title":"JMIR Hum. factors"},{"key":"2355_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e55714","DOI":"10.2196\/55714","volume":"26","author":"V Weirauch","year":"2024","unstructured":"Weirauch, V., Soehnchen, C., Burmann, A. & Meister, S. Methods, indicators, and end-user involvement in the evaluation of digital health interventions for the public: scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 26, e55714, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/55714 (2024).","journal-title":"J. Med. Internet Res."},{"key":"2355_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1055\/a-1915-4371","volume":"85","author":"S Kernebeck","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kernebeck, S. et al. Digitale Gesundheitsinterventionen entwickeln, evaluieren und implementieren Teil II \u2013 Diskussionspapier der Arbeitsgruppe Digital Health des Deutschen Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung (DNVF). Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverb. Arzte Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes) 85, 65\u201370, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-1915-4371 (2023).","journal-title":"Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverb. Arzte Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes)"},{"key":"2355_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e16","DOI":"10.1093\/geront\/gny034","volume":"59","author":"S Merkel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Merkel, S. & Kucharski, A. Participatory design in gerontechnology: a systematic literature review. Gerontologist 59, e16\u2013e25, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/geront\/gny034 (2019).","journal-title":"Gerontologist"},{"key":"2355_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e033516","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-033516","volume":"10","author":"E Duncan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Duncan, E. et al. Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study. BMJ Open 10, e033516, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-033516 (2020).","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2355_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"g1687","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g1687","volume":"348","author":"TC Hoffmann","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hoffmann, T. C. et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ (Clin. Res. ed.) 348, g1687, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.g1687 (2014).","journal-title":"BMJ (Clin. Res. ed.)"},{"key":"2355_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0304651","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0304651","volume":"19","author":"M Niederberger","year":"2024","unstructured":"Niederberger, M. et al. Delphi studies in social and health sciences-recommendations for an interdisciplinary standardized reporting (DELPHISTAR). Results of a Delphi study. PloS One 19, e0304651, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0304651 (2024).","journal-title":"PloS One"},{"key":"2355_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1000217","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000217","volume":"7","author":"D Moher","year":"2010","unstructured":"Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Simera, I. & Altman, D. G. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLOS Med. 7, e1000217, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000217 (2010).","journal-title":"PLOS Med."},{"key":"2355_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weirauch, V., Mainz, A., Busse, T. S., Nitsche, J. & Meister, S. Development and consensus of a reporting guideline for the participatory evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Delphi Study Protocol. Delphi Study Protocol; https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17605\/OSF.IO\/8SWEK (2024).","DOI":"10.17605\/OSF.IO\/8SWEK"},{"key":"2355_CR29","unstructured":"EQUATOR Network. The EQUATOR Network register of reporting guidelines under development. Reporting guidelines under development for other study designs. Available at: https:\/\/www.equator-network.org\/library\/reporting-guidelines-under-development\/reporting-guidelines-under-development-for-other-study-designs\/#DigHealthInt (2025)."},{"key":"2355_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e067975","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2021-067975","volume":"376","author":"D Husereau","year":"2022","unstructured":"Husereau, D. et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. BMJ (Clin. Res. ed.) 376, e067975, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj-2021-067975 (2022).","journal-title":"BMJ (Clin. Res. ed.)"},{"key":"2355_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tong, A., Sainsbury, P. & Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007).","DOI":"10.1037\/t74064-000"},{"key":"2355_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008","volume":"61","author":"Elm","year":"2008","unstructured":"Elm et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 61, 344\u2013349, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 (2008).","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"2355_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1004326","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004326","volume":"21","author":"WT Gattrell","year":"2024","unstructured":"Gattrell, W. T. et al. ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): a reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi. PLOS Med. 21, e1004326, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004326 (2024).","journal-title":"PLOS Med."},{"key":"2355_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.zefq.2022.08.007","volume":"174","author":"M Niederberger","year":"2022","unstructured":"Niederberger, M. & Deckert, S. Das Delphi-Verfahren: Methodik, Varianten und Anwendungsbeispiele. Z. Evidenz Fortbild. Qualitat Gesundheitswesen 174, 11\u201319, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.zefq.2022.08.007 (2022).","journal-title":"Z. Evidenz Fortbild. Qualitat Gesundheitswesen"},{"key":"2355_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-023-00982-w","volume":"6","author":"C Jacob","year":"2023","unstructured":"Jacob, C. et al. A sociotechnical framework to assess patient-facing eHealth tools: results of a modified Delphi process. npj Digit. Med. 6, 232, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41746-023-00982-w (2023).","journal-title":"npj Digit. Med."},{"key":"2355_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.zefq.2023.05.022","volume":"182-183","author":"J Dieudonn\u00e9","year":"2023","unstructured":"Dieudonn\u00e9, J. et al. Was wird unter einer Public-Health-Intervention verstanden? Ergebnisse eines Delphi-Prozesses im deutschsprachigen Raum. Z. Evidenz. Fortbild.Qualitat. Gesundheitswesen 182-183, 89\u201397, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.zefq.2023.05.022 (2023).","journal-title":"Z. Evidenz. Fortbild.Qualitat. Gesundheitswesen"}],"container-title":["npj Digital Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-026-02355-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-026-02355-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-026-02355-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,17]],"date-time":"2026-02-17T16:07:04Z","timestamp":1771344424000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-026-02355-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2355"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41746-026-02355-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["2398-6352"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2398-6352","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 June 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 January 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 January 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"169"}}