{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T22:45:27Z","timestamp":1778107527103,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,16]],"date-time":"2015-07-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1437004800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,16]],"date-time":"2015-07-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1437004800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Perinatol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2015.75","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,16]],"date-time":"2015-07-16T13:44:37Z","timestamp":1437054277000},"page":"803-808","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Management of breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study of 10 years of experience"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"35","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9923-9403","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"J","family":"Burgos","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L","family":"Rodr\u00edguez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P","family":"Cobos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C","family":"Osuna","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M","family":"del Mar Centeno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R","family":"Larrieta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"T","family":"Mart\u00ednez-Astorquiza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L","family":"Fern\u00e1ndez-Llebrez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"BFjp201575_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","volume":"356","author":"ME Hannah","year":"2000","unstructured":"Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR . Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375\u20131383.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00317.x","volume":"112","author":"CC Rietberg","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Visser GH . The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG 2005; 112: 205\u2013209.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2009.01050.x","volume":"49","author":"EA Sullivan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sullivan EA, Moran K, Chapman M . Term breech singletons and caesarean section: a population study, Australia 1991-2005. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49: 456\u2013460.","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01143.x","volume":"90","author":"JE Hartnack Tharin","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hartnack Tharin JE, Rasmussen S, Krebs L . Consequences of the Term Breech Trial in Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011; 90: 767\u2013771.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand."},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34447-4","volume":"32","author":"BA Daviss","year":"2010","unstructured":"Daviss BA, Johnson KC, Lalonde AB . Evolving evidence since the term breech trial: Canadian response, European dissent, and potential solutions. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010; 32: 217\u2013224.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.01507.x","volume":"110","author":"CC Rietberg","year":"2003","unstructured":"Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Brand R, van Loon AJ, Van Hemel OJ, Visser GH . Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants. BJOG 2003; 110: 604\u2013609.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR7","first-page":"1115","volume":"99","author":"JC Hauth","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hauth JC, Cunningham FG . Vaginal breech delivery is still justified. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 1115\u20131116.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.056","volume":"191","author":"H Whyte","year":"2004","unstructured":"Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 864\u2013871.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.08.039","volume":"194","author":"M Glezerman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Glezerman M . Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 20\u201325.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","volume":"194","author":"F Goffinet","year":"2006","unstructured":"Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D et al. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 1002\u20131011.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR11","unstructured":"The Management of Breech Presentation. RCOG Guidelines, 2006. Available from http:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk (accessed 1 August 2014)."},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200607000-00058","volume":"108","author":"ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice","year":"2006","unstructured":"ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 235\u2013237.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34221-9","volume":"31","author":"A Kotaska","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kotaska A, Menticoglou S, Gagnon R, Farine D, Basso M, Bos H et al. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009; 31: 557\u2013566.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR14","unstructured":"Breech Delivery at Term. Protocolos SEGO, 2011. Available from http:\/\/www.sego.es\/ (accessed 1 August 2014)."},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR15","unstructured":"Management of Breech Presentation at Term. RANZCOG College Statement, 2013. Available from http:\/\/www.ranzcog.edu.au (accessed 1 August 2014)."},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR16","unstructured":"Breech Delivery and External Cephalic Version. Information for Patients. Hospital Universitario Cruces, 2003. Available from http:\/\/www.hospitalcruces.com\/pdfs\/maternidad\/FOLLETO%20PARTO%20castellano_peque.pdf (accessed 1 August 2014)."},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.07.023","volume":"112","author":"J Burgos","year":"2011","unstructured":"Burgos J, Melchor JC, Pijo\u00e1n JI, Cobos P, Fern\u00e1ndez-Llebrez L, Mart\u00ednez-Astorquiza T . A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 112: 48\u201351.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2014.01.002","volume":"30","author":"AN Rosman","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rosman AN, Vlemmix F, Beuckens A, Rijnders ME, Opmeer BC, Mol BW et al. Facilitators and barriers to external cephalic version for breech presentation at term among health care providers in the Netherlands: a quantitative analysis. Midwifery 2014; 30: e145\u2013e150.","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01271.x","volume":"114","author":"S Collins","year":"2007","unstructured":"Collins S, Ellaway P, Harrington D, Pandit M, Impey L . The complications of external cephalic version: results from 805 consecutive attempts. BJOG 2007; 114: 636\u2013638.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR20","first-page":"CD000083","volume":"10","author":"GJ Hofmeyr","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R . External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10: CD000083.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"888","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12449","volume":"93","author":"F Vlemmix","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vlemmix F, Bergenhenegouwen L, Schaaf JM, Ensing S, Rosman AN, Ravelli AC et al. Term breech deliveries in the Netherlands: did the increased cesarean rate affect neonatal outcome? A population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93: 888\u2013896.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12278","volume":"120","author":"J Glavind","year":"2013","unstructured":"Glavind J, Kindberg SF, Uldbjerg N, Khalil M, M\u00f8ller AM, Mortensen BB et al. Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2013; 120: 1123\u20131132.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340601104054","volume":"86","author":"JM Schutte","year":"2007","unstructured":"Schutte JM, Steegers EA, Santema JG, Schuitemaker NW, van Roosmalen J . Maternal Mortality Committee Of The Netherlands Society Of Obstetrics. Maternal deaths after elective cesarean section for breech presentation in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 240\u2013243.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR24","first-page":"2207","volume":"149","author":"AT Verhoeven","year":"2005","unstructured":"Verhoeven AT, de Leeuw JP, Bruinse HW . Breech presentation at term: elective caesarean section is the wrong choice as a standard treatment because of too high risks for the mother and her future children. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005; 149: 2207\u20132210.","journal-title":"Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR25","first-page":"2211","volume":"149","author":"GHA Visser","year":"2005","unstructured":"Visser GHA, Rietberg CC, Oepkes D, Vandenbussche F . Stuitligging: kind versus moeder. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005; 149: 2211\u20132214.","journal-title":"Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR26","first-page":"1","volume":"27","author":"FG Cunningham","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cunningham FG, Bangdiwala SI, Brown SS, Dean TM, Frederiksen M, Rowland Hogue CJ et al. NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2010; 27: 1\u201342.","journal-title":"NIH Consens State Sci Statements"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02533.x","volume":"117","author":"I Al-Zirqi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Al-Zirqi I, Stray-Pedersen B, Fors\u00e9n L, Vangen S . Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section. BJOG 2010; 117: 809\u2013820.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181df925f","volume":"115","author":"JM Guise","year":"2010","unstructured":"Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C, Marshall N, Walker M, Fu R et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 1267\u20131278.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39118.483819.55","volume":"334","author":"GC Smith","year":"2007","unstructured":"Smith GC, Fleming KM, White IR . Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994-2003: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2007; 334: 576.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"778","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.013","volume":"191","author":"SW Wen","year":"2004","unstructured":"Wen SW, Fung Kee Fung K, Oppenheimer L, Demissie K, Yang Q, Walker M . Neonatal mortality in second twin according to cause of death, gestational age, and mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 778\u2013783.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201575_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.733752","volume":"26","author":"E Quintana","year":"2013","unstructured":"Quintana E, Burgos J, Eguiguren N, Melchor JC, Fern\u00e1ndez-Llebrez L, Mart\u00ednez-Astorquiza T . Influence of chorionicity in intra-partum management of twin deliveries. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26: 407\u2013411.","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"}],"container-title":["Journal of Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp201575.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp201575","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp201575.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,18]],"date-time":"2022-03-18T16:24:22Z","timestamp":1647620662000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp201575"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,16]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]}},"alternative-id":["BFjp201575"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/jp.2015.75","relation":{},"ISSN":["0743-8346","1476-5543"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0743-8346","type":"print"},{"value":"1476-5543","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 November 2014","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 May 2015","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 May 2015","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 July 2015","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}