{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T11:07:07Z","timestamp":1792062427259,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,9]],"date-time":"2017-02-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1486598400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,9]],"date-time":"2017-02-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1486598400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Perinatol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,5]]},"DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2016.260","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,9]],"date-time":"2017-02-09T14:02:14Z","timestamp":1486648934000},"page":"480-483","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Is the Bishop-score significant in predicting the success of labor induction in multiparous women?"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"37","author":[{"given":"D","family":"Navve","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"N","family":"Orenstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R","family":"Ribak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Y","family":"Daykan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"G","family":"Shechter-Maor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T","family":"Biron-Shental","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2, Part 1","key":"BFjp2016260_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5","volume":"114","author":"ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics.","year":"2009","unstructured":"ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics.. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (2, Part 1):386\u2013397.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp2016260_CR2","unstructured":"National Collaborating Centre for Women\u2019s and Children\u2019s HealthInduction of Labor\u2014Clinical Guideline for NICE by NHS, July 2008."},{"key":"BFjp2016260_CR3","first-page":"266","volume":"24","author":"EH Bishop","year":"1964","unstructured":"Bishop EH . Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964; 24: 266.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"BFjp2016260_CR4","first-page":"600","volume":"94","author":"ST Seyb","year":"1999","unstructured":"Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL . Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94 (4): 600\u2013607.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"BFjp2016260_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","volume":"105","author":"FPJM Vrouenraets","year":"2005","unstructured":"Vrouenraets FPJM, Roumen FJME, Dehing CJG, Van Den Akker ESA, Aarts MJB, Scheve EJT . Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (4): 690\u2013697.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"BFjp2016260_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1511","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.07.001","volume":"191","author":"DA Luthy","year":"2004","unstructured":"Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW . Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (5): 1511\u20131515.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"BFjp2016260_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","volume":"105","author":"A Vahratian","year":"2005","unstructured":"Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK . Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (4): 698\u2013704.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6, Part 1","key":"BFjp2016260_CR8","first-page":"917","volume":"95","author":"AS Maslow","year":"2000","unstructured":"Maslow AS, Sweeny AL . Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95 (6, Part 1): 917\u2013922.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"BFjp2016260_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000210528.32940.c6","volume":"107","author":"MK Hoffman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hoffman MK, Vahratian A, Sciscione AC, Troendle JF, Zhang J . Comparison of labor progression between induced and noninduced multiparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107 (5): 1029\u20131034.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"BFjp2016260_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70265-6","volume":"180","author":"JD Yeast","year":"1999","unstructured":"Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M . Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180 (3): 628\u2013633.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp2016260_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1690","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91558-R","volume":"166","author":"JA Macer","year":"1992","unstructured":"Macer JA, Macer CL, Chan LS . Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 1690\u20131697.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"BFjp2016260_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.106748","volume":"183","author":"S Dublin","year":"2000","unstructured":"Dublin S, Lydon-Rochelle M, Kaplan RC, Watts D, Critchlow CW . Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183 (4): 986\u2013994.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp2016260_CR13","first-page":"399","volume":"47","author":"EM Heinberg","year":"2002","unstructured":"Heinberg EM, Wood RA, Chambers RB . Elective induction of labor in multiparous women. Does it increase the risk of cesarean section? J Reprod Med 2002; 47: 399\u2013403.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"BFjp2016260_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000255668.20639.40","volume":"109","author":"E Declercq","year":"2007","unstructured":"Declercq E, Barger M, Cabral HJ, Evans SR, Kotelchuck M, Simon C et al. Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109 (3): 669\u2013677.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"BFjp2016260_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1094","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01213.x","volume":"90","author":"M Thorsell","year":"2011","unstructured":"Thorsell M, Lyren\u00e4s S, Andolf E, Kaijser M . Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90 (10): 1094\u20131099.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"12","key":"BFjp2016260_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1232","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.864274","volume":"27","author":"LD Levine","year":"2013","unstructured":"Levine LD, Hirshberg A, Srinivas SK . Term induction of labor and risk of cesarean delivery by parity. J Matern-Fetal Neonat Med 2013; 27 (12):1232\u20131236.","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonat Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"BFjp2016260_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.5468\/ogs.2015.58.5.346","volume":"58","author":"HR Lee","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lee HR, Kim M-N, You JY, Choi S-J, Oh S-Y, Roh C-R et al. Risk of cesarean section after induced versus spontaneous labor at term gestation. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2015; 58 (5): 346.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Sci"},{"issue":"9","key":"BFjp2016260_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"776","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30479-5","volume":"36","author":"L Gaudet","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gaudet L, Wen SW, Walker M . The combined effect of maternal obesity and fetal macrosomia on pregnancy outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014; 36 (9): 776\u2013784.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"BFjp2016260_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.06.007","volume":"203","author":"J Ivars","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ivars J, Garabedian C, Devos P, Therby D, Carlier S, Deruelle P et al. Simplified Bishop score including parity predicts successful induction of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 203: 309\u2013314.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"BFjp2016260_CR20","first-page":"137","volume":"60","author":"AP Lange","year":"1982","unstructured":"Lange AP, Secher NJ, Westergaard JG, Skovg\u00e5rd I . Prelabor evaluation of inducibility. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60 (2): 137\u2013147.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"BFjp2016260_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182114ad2","volume":"117","author":"SK Laughon","year":"2011","unstructured":"Laughon SK, Zhang J, Troendle J, Sun L, Reddy UM . Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117 (4): 805\u2013811.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp2016260.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp2016260","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/doifinder\/10.1038\/jp.2016.260","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp2016260.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,18]],"date-time":"2022-03-18T14:26:52Z","timestamp":1647613612000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp2016260"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,9]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,5]]}},"alternative-id":["BFjp2016260"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/jp.2016.260","relation":{},"ISSN":["0743-8346","1476-5543"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0743-8346","type":"print"},{"value":"1476-5543","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 June 2016","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 December 2016","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 December 2016","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 February 2017","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}