{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,20]],"date-time":"2026-05-20T09:49:19Z","timestamp":1779270559853,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,2]],"date-time":"2016-06-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1464825600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,2]],"date-time":"2016-06-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1464825600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Perinatol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2016.89","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,2]],"date-time":"2016-06-02T13:03:25Z","timestamp":1464872605000},"page":"819-822","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"M N","family":"Zaki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Truong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Pyra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M A","family":"Kominiarek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"T","family":"Irwin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"BFjp201689_CR1","unstructured":"Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: Final Data for 2014. National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 64, no. 12. National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, USA, 2015.."},{"issue":"8","key":"BFjp201689_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.732","volume":"311","author":"CL Ogden","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM . Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA 2014; 311 (8): 806\u2013814.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"BFjp201689_CR3","unstructured":"World Health Organization (WHO). Obesity and Overweight Fact Sheet, No. 311, January 2015. Available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/mediacentre\/factsheets\/fs311\/en\/ (retrieved 28 April 2015)."},{"issue":"3","key":"BFjp201689_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.049","volume":"203","author":"MC Alanis","year":"2010","unstructured":"Alanis MC, Villers MS, Law TL, Steadman EM, Robinson CJ . Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (3): 271.e1\u2013271.e7.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"BFjp201689_CR5","first-page":"299","volume":"31","author":"SN Conner","year":"2014","unstructured":"Conner SN, Verticchio JC, Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG . Maternal obesity and risk of post-cesarean wound complications. Am J Perinatol 2014; 31 (4): 299\u2013304.","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"BFjp201689_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.043","volume":"209","author":"JD Dahlke","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Rouse DJ . Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (4): 294\u2013306.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201689_CR7","unstructured":"Quality and Safety in Women\u2019s Healthcare. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Women\u2019s Health Care Physicians; Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement, 2nd edn. www.acog.org."},{"issue":"285","key":"BFjp201689_CR8","first-page":"e1","volume":"203","author":"SL Basha","year":"2010","unstructured":"Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quinones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC . Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (285): e1\u2013e8.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"BFjp201689_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.018","volume":"204","author":"FS Clay","year":"2011","unstructured":"Clay FS, Walsh CA, Walsh SR . Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204 (5): 378\u2013383.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201689_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820ad61e","volume":"117","author":"MG Tuuli","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tuuli MG, Rampersad RM, Carbone JF, Stamilio D, Macones GA, Odibo AO . Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 682\u2013690.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"BFjp201689_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31827a072c","volume":"121","author":"D Figueroa","year":"2013","unstructured":"Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM . Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (1): 33\u201338.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"BFjp201689_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1169","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000227","volume":"123","author":"AD Mackeen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J . Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (6): 1169\u20131175.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"BFjp201689_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"621.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020","volume":"212","author":"AD Mackeen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V . Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 212 (5): 621.e1\u2013621.e10.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"BFjp201689_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.755509","volume":"26","author":"AD Mackeen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mackeen AD, Devaraj T, Baxter JK . Cesarean skin closure preferences: a survey of obstetricians. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26 (8): 753\u2013756.","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"}],"container-title":["Journal of Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp201689.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp201689","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp201689.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,18]],"date-time":"2022-03-18T16:16:56Z","timestamp":1647620216000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp201689"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,2]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]}},"alternative-id":["BFjp201689"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/jp.2016.89","relation":{},"ISSN":["0743-8346","1476-5543"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0743-8346","type":"print"},{"value":"1476-5543","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 November 2015","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 April 2016","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 April 2016","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 June 2016","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}