{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T20:35:59Z","timestamp":1784752559417,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,13]],"date-time":"2017-04-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1492041600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,13]],"date-time":"2017-04-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1492041600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Perinatol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,7]]},"DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2017.50","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,13]],"date-time":"2017-04-13T13:21:27Z","timestamp":1492089687000},"page":"787-792","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Induction of labor by Foley catheter compared with spontaneous onset of labor after previous cesarean section: a cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"37","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0350-7088","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"H","family":"Kruit","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H","family":"Wilkman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Tekay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L","family":"Rahkonen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"BFjp201750_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"983","DOI":"10.1136\/jech-2013-203291","volume":"67","author":"J Zeitlin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zeitlin J, Mohangoo AD, Delnord M, Cuttini M, EURO-PERISTAT Scientific Committee. The second European Perinatal Health Report: documenting changes over 6 years in the health of mothers and babies in Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health 2013; 67: 983\u2013985.","journal-title":"J Epidemiol Community Health"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR2","first-page":"1","volume":"62","author":"JA Martin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Mathews TJ . Births: final data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2013; 62: 1\u201369 72.","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1819","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68704-7","volume":"367","author":"J Villar","year":"2006","unstructured":"Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006; 367: 1819\u20131829.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Laughon SK, Branch DW, Burkman R, et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 326.e1\u2013326.e10.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.058"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0b013e3182685870","volume":"67","author":"KP Rao","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rao KP, Belogolovkin V, Yankowitz J, Spinnato JA 2nd . Abnormal placentation: evidence-based diagnosis and management of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2012; 67: 503\u2013519.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"896","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349.2010.487893","volume":"89","author":"N Pallasmaa","year":"2010","unstructured":"Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Aitokallio-Tallberg A, Uotila J, Raudaskoski T, Ulander VM et al. Cesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89: 896\u2013902.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1656","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.04.002","volume":"193","author":"GA Macones","year":"2005","unstructured":"Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, Odibo A, Stevens EJ, Stamilio DM et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenterstudy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1656\u20131662.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3444-9","volume":"291","author":"AC Rossi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rossi AC, Prefumo F . Pregnancy outcomes of induced labor in women with previous cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 291: 273\u2013280.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70319-4","volume":"181","author":"CM Zelop","year":"1999","unstructured":"Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB, Lieberman E . Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 882\u2013886.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1176","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109037","volume":"183","author":"DJ Ravasia","year":"2000","unstructured":"Ravasia DJ, Wood SL, Pollard JK . Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 1176\u20131179.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","volume":"345","author":"M Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","unstructured":"Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP . Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 3\u20138.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","volume":"193","author":"MB Landon","year":"2005","unstructured":"Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1016\u20131023.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR13","first-page":"549","volume":"47","author":"DR Taylor","year":"2002","unstructured":"Taylor DR, Doughty AS, Kaufman H, Yang L, Iannucci TA . Uterine rupture with the use of PGE2 vaginal inserts for labor induction in women with previous cesarean sections. J Reprod Med 2002; 47: 549\u2013554.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR14","first-page":"828","volume":"91","author":"DA Wing","year":"1998","unstructured":"Wing DA, Lovett K, Paul RH . Disruption of prior uterine incision following misoprostol for labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 828\u2013830.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86S","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000447415.86317.00","volume":"123","author":"MN Zaki","year":"2014","unstructured":"Zaki MN, Leftwich HK, Penrod P, Hibbard JU . Intracervical ripening bulb for induction of labor in a trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 86S.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12320","volume":"93","author":"M Jozwiak","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jozwiak M, van de Lest HA, Burger NB, Dijksterhuis MG, De Leeuw JW . Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93: 296\u2013301.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109148.23082.C1","volume":"103","author":"E Bujold","year":"2004","unstructured":"Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Gauthier RJ . Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 18\u201323.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505","volume":"204","author":"S Kehl","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kehl S, Weiss C, Rath W . Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 204: 44\u201350.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","volume":"210","author":"AB Caughey","year":"2014","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Caughey AB, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Cahill AG, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Guise JM, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Rouse DJ . Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 179\u2013193.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816102b9","volume":"111","author":"BM Mercer","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mercer BM, Gilbert S, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ et al. Labor outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 285\u2013291.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR21","first-page":"652","volume":"98","author":"E Bujold","year":"2001","unstructured":"Bujold E, Gauthier RJ . Should we allow a trial of labor after a previous cesarean for dystocia in the second stage of labor? Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 652\u2013655.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"954","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.051","volume":"191","author":"CP Durnwald","year":"2004","unstructured":"Durnwald CP, Ehrenberg HM, Mercer BM . The impact of maternal obesity and weight gain on vaginal birth after cesarean section success. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 954\u2013957.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1516","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.472","volume":"188","author":"CSS Carroll","year":"2003","unstructured":"Carroll CSS, Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Klauser CK, Morrison JC . Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: weight-based outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1516\u20131520.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)31030-1","volume":"25","author":"Y Brill","year":"2003","unstructured":"Brill Y, Windrim R . Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: review of antenatal predictors of success. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003; 25: 275\u2013286.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-3016.2007.00794.x","volume":"21","author":"SK Srinivas","year":"2007","unstructured":"Srinivas SK, Stamilio DM, Sammel MD, Stevens EJ, Peipert JF, Odibo AO et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: does maternal age affect safety and success? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007; 21: 114\u2013120.","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.055","volume":"190","author":"E Bujold","year":"2004","unstructured":"Bujold E, Hammoud AO, Hendler I, Berman S, Blackwell SC, Duperron L et al. Trial of labor in patients with a previous cesarean section: does maternal age influence the outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1113\u20131118.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1104","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115176","volume":"184","author":"TL Coleman","year":"2001","unstructured":"Coleman TL, Randall H, Graves W, Lindsay M . Vaginal birth after cesarean among women with gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 1104\u20131107.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR28","first-page":"140","volume":"7","author":"F Ziyauddin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ziyauddin F, Hakim S, Beriwal S . The transcervical foley catheter versus the vaginal prostaglandin e2 gel in the induction of labour in a previous one caesarean section - a clinical study. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7: 140\u2013143.","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3287-4","volume":"290","author":"N Sananes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sananes N, Rodriguez M, Stora C, Pinton A, Fritz G, Gaudineau A et al. Efficacy and safety of labour induction in patients with a single previous caesarean section: a proposal for a clinical protocol. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 290: 669\u2013676.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.03.023","volume":"151","author":"CH Weimar","year":"2010","unstructured":"Weimar CH, Lim AC, Bots ML, Bruinse HW, Kwee A . Risk factors for uterine rupture during a vaginal birth after one previous caesarean section: a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 151: 41\u201345.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2010.03.005","volume":"34","author":"MB Landon","year":"2010","unstructured":"Landon MB . Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Semin Perinatol 2010; 34: 267\u2013271.","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2010.03.004","volume":"34","author":"MT Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lydon-Rochelle MT, Cahill AG, Spong CY . Birth after previous cesarean delivery: short-term maternal outcomes. Semin Perinatol 2010; 34: 249\u2013257.","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.07.017","volume":"132","author":"A Kwee","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW . Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 132: 171\u2013176.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e60404","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0060404","volume":"8","author":"SJ Stock","year":"2013","unstructured":"Stock SJ, Ferguson E, Duffy A, Ford I, Chalmers J, Norman JE . Outcomes of induction of labour in women with previous caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study using a population database. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e60404.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.06.006","volume":"43","author":"M Sarreau","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sarreau M, Leufflen L, Monceau E, Tariel D, Villemonteix P, Morel O et al. Balloon catheter for cervical ripening on scarred uterus with unfavorable cervix: multicenter retrospective study of 151 patients. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2014; 43: 46\u201355.","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","volume":"351","author":"MB Landon","year":"2004","unstructured":"Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2581\u20132589.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1016\/S1526-9523(03)00088-6","volume":"48","author":"N O'brien-Abel","year":"2003","unstructured":"O'brien-Abel N . Uterine rupture during VBAC trial of labor: risk factors and fetal response. J Midwifery Womens Health 2003; 48: 249\u2013257.","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1580608","volume":"33","author":"H Kruit","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kruit H, Tihtonen K, Raudaskoski T, Ulander VM, Aitokallio-Tallberg A, Heikinheimo O et al. Foley catheter or oral misoprostol for induction of labor in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a randomized multicenter trial. Am J Perinatol 2016; 33: 866\u2013872.","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"686","DOI":"10.7556\/jaoa.2014.137","volume":"114","author":"AD Mackeen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mackeen AD, Walker L, Ruhstaller K, Schuster M, Sciscione A . Foley catheter vs prostaglandin as ripening agent in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2014; 114: 686\u2013692.","journal-title":"J Am Osteopath Assoc"},{"key":"BFjp201750_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1159\/000009986","volume":"46","author":"K Wolff","year":"1998","unstructured":"Wolff K, Swahn ML, Westgren M . Balloon catheter for induction of labor in nulliparous women with prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. A preliminary report. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1998; 46: 1\u20134.","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"}],"container-title":["Journal of Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp201750.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp201750","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/doifinder\/10.1038\/jp.2017.50","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp201750.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,18]],"date-time":"2022-03-18T14:27:48Z","timestamp":1647613668000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/jp201750"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,13]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,7]]}},"alternative-id":["BFjp201750"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/jp.2017.50","relation":{},"ISSN":["0743-8346","1476-5543"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0743-8346","type":"print"},{"value":"1476-5543","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"17 November 2016","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 February 2017","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 March 2017","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 April 2017","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}