{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,10]],"date-time":"2026-04-10T19:49:09Z","timestamp":1775850549596,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]],"date-time":"2026-03-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774224000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]],"date-time":"2026-03-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774224000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Hum Hypertens"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Effects of antihypertensive therapy are estimated in clinical trials. There is a need to prioritize the endpoints according to patients\u2019 preferences. 26 patients from two regions of Germany rated in 2019 their preferences regarding the importance of various endpoints of hypertension treatment (Mortality, Myocardial infarction, Stroke, Heart failure, and subdivided Adverse events) by a pairwise comparison of individual endpoints. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision analysis method was used to generate relative weights for each endpoint. The robustness of the results was defined by means of consistency. The elicitation yielded the following aggregated group weights: Stroke 0.320, Mortality 0.297, Myocardial infarction 0.202, Heart failure 0.119, and Adverse events 0.062, subdivided in Dyspnea, Pain, Edema, and Cough. The overall consistency reached for efficacy endpoints a consistency ratio below 0.1 (safety endpoints = 0.04) without exceeding established limits. In all sensitivity analyses but one, no rank reversal was observed, and Stroke was rated highest. Individual weights varied extensively. Some participants weighted Mortality (0.021\u20130.686) higher than Stroke (0.078\u20130.615) and Heart failure (0,021\u20130,469) higher than Myocardial infarction (0,047\u20130.431). Individual inconsistency exceeded the limits in almost half of the cases, with gender, therapy duration, and therapeutic scheme being explaining variables for inconsistency within binary logistic regression models. AHP can be used to obtain preferences of patients with primary hypertension for effectiveness and safety endpoints. Preference elicitation could provide important information for drug assessment (group weights) and shared decision-making (individual weights) following the concept of patient-centeredness at system and patient level.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41371-026-01135-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]],"date-time":"2026-03-23T10:52:30Z","timestamp":1774263150000},"page":"333-341","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["How do patients with primary hypertension assess different endpoints of their treatment? a survey using analytic hierarchy process"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"40","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3469-092X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Charalabos-Markos","family":"Dintsios","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nadezda","family":"Chernyak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"1135_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1803180","volume":"381","author":"AC Flint","year":"2019","unstructured":"Flint AC, Conell C, Ren X, Banki NM, Chan SL, Rao VA, et al. Effect of systolic and diastolic blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:243\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1803180","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"1135_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(20)30752-2","volume":"396","author":"CJL Murray","year":"2020","unstructured":"Murray CJL, Aravkin AY, Zheng P, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi-Kangevari M, et al. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. The Lancet. 2020;396:1223\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(20)30752-2","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"key":"1135_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3912","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehae178","volume":"45","author":"JW McEvoy","year":"2024","unstructured":"McEvoy JW, McCarthy CP, Bruno RM, Brouwers S, Canavan MD, Ceconi C, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension: developed by the task force on the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension of the european society of cardiology (ESC) and endorsed by the european society of endocrinology (ESE) and the european stroke organisation (ESO). European Heart Journal. 2024;45:3912\u20134018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehae178","journal-title":"European Heart Journal"},{"key":"1135_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.2165\/11539470-000000000-00000","volume":"3","author":"JG Dolan","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dolan JG. Multi-criteria clinical decision support: A primer on the use of multiple criteria decision making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare. The patient. 2010;3:229\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2165\/11539470-000000000-00000","journal-title":"The patient"},{"key":"1135_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1016\/S0097-5990(16)30570-X","volume":"18","author":"JG Dolan","year":"1992","unstructured":"Dolan JG, Bordley DR. Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to develop and disseminate guidelines. QRB - Quality Review Bulletin. 1992;18:440\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0097-5990(16)30570-X","journal-title":"QRB - Quality Review Bulletin"},{"key":"1135_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1214","DOI":"10.1017\/s0266462300103253","volume":"16","author":"MJ Hummel","year":"2000","unstructured":"Hummel MJ, van Rossum W, Verkerke GJ, Rakhorst G. Assessing medical technologies in development. A new paradigm of medical technology assessment. International journal of technology assessment in health care. 2000;16:1214\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0266462300103253","journal-title":"International journal of technology assessment in health care"},{"key":"1135_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-015-0234-7","volume":"15","author":"K Schmidt","year":"2015","unstructured":"Schmidt K, Aumann I, Hollander I, Damm K, von der Schulenburg JM. Applying the analytic hierarchy process in healthcare research: a systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015;15:112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12911-015-0234-7","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"key":"1135_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1186\/s13075-020-02391-w","volume":"22","author":"KS Bywall","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bywall KS, Kihlbom U, Hansson M, Falahee M, Raza K, Baecklund E, et al. Patient preferences on rheumatoid arthritis second-line treatment: a discrete choice experiment of Swedish patients. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2020;22:288. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13075-020-02391-w","journal-title":"Arthritis Research & Therapy"},{"key":"1135_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1007\/s10198-016-0763-8","volume":"18","author":"AC M\u00fchlbacher","year":"2017","unstructured":"M\u00fchlbacher AC, Bridges JFP, Bethge S, Dintsios CM, Schwalm A, Gerber-Grote A, et al. Preferences for antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: a discrete choice experiment. The European Journal of Health Economics. 2017;18:155\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10198-016-0763-8","journal-title":"The European Journal of Health Economics"},{"key":"1135_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0329743","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0329743","volume":"20","author":"AK Fischer","year":"2025","unstructured":"Fischer AK, Sadler A, Mathey E, M\u00fchlbacher A. Analysis of patients preferences in type 2 diabetes mellitus second-line drug treatment: A discrete choice experiment. PLoS One. 2025;20:e0329743. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0329743","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"1135_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-50244-6_4","volume-title":"The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies","author":"TL Saaty","year":"1989","unstructured":"Saaty TL. Group decision making and the AHP. In: Golden BL, Wasil EA, Harker PT, editors. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1989. p. 59\u201367."},{"key":"1135_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Melillo P, Pecchia L, editors. What is the appropriate sample size to run analytic hierarchy process in a survey-based research. Proceedings of the international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process; 2016. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13033\/isahp.y2016.130","DOI":"10.13033\/isahp.y2016.130"},{"key":"1135_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1742-7924.2010.00147.x","volume":"7","author":"Y Kitamura","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kitamura Y. Decision-making process of patients with gynecological cancer regarding their cancer treatment choices using the analytic hierarchy process. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2010;7:148\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1742-7924.2010.00147.x","journal-title":"Jpn J Nurs Sci"},{"key":"1135_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03262495","volume":"5","author":"MJ Hummel","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hummel MJ, Volz F, van Manen JG, Danner M, Dintsios CM, Ijzerman MJ, et al. Using the analytic hierarchy process to elicit patient preferences: prioritizing multiple outcome measures of antidepressant drug treatment. The patient. 2012;5:225\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF03262495","journal-title":"The patient"},{"key":"1135_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1389","DOI":"10.1007\/s10916-010-9601-1","volume":"36","author":"N Basoglu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Basoglu N, Daim TU, Topacan U. Determining patient preferences for remote monitoring. J Med Syst. 2012;36:1389\u2013401. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10916-010-9601-1","journal-title":"J Med Syst"},{"key":"1135_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6947-13-91","volume":"13","author":"MS Lambooij","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lambooij MS, Hummel MJ. Differentiating innovation priorities among stakeholder in hospital care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:91. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1472-6947-13-91","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"key":"1135_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1477","DOI":"10.1017\/s0950268814002246","volume":"143","author":"M Kadohira","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kadohira M, Hill G, Yoshizaki R, Ota S, Yoshikawa Y. Stakeholder prioritization of zoonoses in Japan with analytic hierarchy process method. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143:1477\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0950268814002246","journal-title":"Epidemiol Infect"},{"key":"1135_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1548932","volume":"78","author":"AC M\u00fchlbacher","year":"2016","unstructured":"M\u00fchlbacher AC, Juhnke C, Kaczynski A. [Patients\u2019 priorities in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours: an analytical hierarchy process]. Gesundheitswesen. 2016;78:651\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0035-1548932","journal-title":"Gesundheitswesen"},{"key":"1135_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-2496(77)90033-5","volume":"15","author":"TL Saaty","year":"1977","unstructured":"Saaty TL. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology. 1977;15:234\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0022-2496(77)90033-5","journal-title":"Journal of mathematical psychology"},{"key":"1135_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989x8900900108","volume":"9","author":"JG Dolan","year":"1989","unstructured":"Dolan JG, Isselhardt BJ, Cappuccio JD. The analytic hierarchy process in medical decision making:a tutorial. Medical Decision Making. 1989;9:40\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0272989x8900900108","journal-title":"Medical Decision Making"},{"key":"1135_CR21","volume-title":"Different antihypertensive drugs as first line therapy in patients with essential hypertension: Executive summary of final report A05-09, Version 1.0.","author":"IQWiG","year":"2005","unstructured":"IQWiG. Different antihypertensive drugs as first line therapy in patients with essential hypertension: Executive summary of final report A05-09, Version 1.0. Cologne, Germany: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG); 2005. Available from https:\/\/www.iqwig.de\/download\/a05-09_executive_summary_antihypertensive_drugs_as_first-line_therapy.pdf"},{"key":"1135_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"931","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989x14534533","volume":"34","author":"N Padilla-Garrido","year":"2014","unstructured":"Padilla-Garrido N, Aguado-Correa F, Cortijo-Gallego V, L\u00f3pez-Camacho F. Multicriteria decision making in health care using the analytic hierarchy process and Microsoft Excel. Med Decis Making. 2014;34:931\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0272989x14534533","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"1135_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2008.07.032","volume":"73","author":"JG Dolan","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dolan JG. Shared decision-making \u2013 transferring research into practice: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Patient Education and Counseling. 2008;73:418\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pec.2008.07.032","journal-title":"Patient Education and Counseling"},{"key":"1135_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.2165\/1312067-200801040-00008","volume":"1","author":"MJ Ijzerman","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ijzerman MJ, van Til JA, Snoek GJ. Comparison of two multi-criteria decision techniques for eliciting treatment preferences in people with neurological disorders. The patient. 2008;1:265\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2165\/1312067-200801040-00008","journal-title":"The patient"},{"key":"1135_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2007.09.030","volume":"89","author":"JA van Til","year":"2008","unstructured":"van Til JA, Renzenbrink GJ, Dolan JG, Ijzerman MJ. The use of the analytic hierarchy process to aid decision making in acquired equinovarus deformity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:457\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.apmr.2007.09.030","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"1135_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-019-1250-6","volume":"17","author":"HE Aschmann","year":"2019","unstructured":"Aschmann HE, Puhan MA, Robbins CW, Bayliss EA, Chan WV, Mularski RA, et al. Outcome preferences of older people with multiple chronic conditions and hypertension: a cross-sectional survey using best-worst scaling. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17:186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12955-019-1250-6","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"1135_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1721","DOI":"10.1161\/01.str.25.9.1721","volume":"25","author":"NA Solomon","year":"1994","unstructured":"Solomon NA, Glick HA, Russo CJ, Lee J, Schulman KA. Patient preferences for stroke outcomes. Stroke. 1994;25:1721\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/01.str.25.9.1721","journal-title":"Stroke"},{"key":"1135_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1093\/jssam\/smw024","volume":"5","author":"BT West","year":"2016","unstructured":"West BT, Blom AG. Explaining interviewer effects: a research synthesis. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. 2016;5:175\u2013211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jssam\/smw024","journal-title":"Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology"},{"key":"1135_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.36.3.249","volume":"36","author":"JS Dyer","year":"1990","unstructured":"Dyer JS. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management science. 1990;36:249\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1287\/mnsc.36.3.249","journal-title":"Management science"},{"key":"1135_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1336","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.1070.0838","volume":"54","author":"J Wallenius","year":"2008","unstructured":"Wallenius J, Fishburn PC, Zionts S, Dyer JS, Steuer RE, Deb K. Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Management Science. 2008;54:1336\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1287\/mnsc.1070.0838","journal-title":"Management Science"},{"key":"1135_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph18020455","volume":"18","author":"DH Byun","year":"2021","unstructured":"Byun DH, Chang RS, Park M-B, Son H-R, Kim C-B. Prioritizing community-based intervention programs for improving treatment compliance of patients with chronic diseases: applying an analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18:455. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph18020455","journal-title":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health"},{"key":"1135_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118731","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2025.118731","volume":"388","author":"T Gao","year":"2026","unstructured":"Gao T, Bernstein P, Zhou H. Interactive experience design evaluation of community emotional healing installations based on analytic hierarchy process method. Soc Sci Med. 2026;388:118731. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.socscimed.2025.118731","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"1135_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fpubh.2023.1120596","volume":"11","author":"Y Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li Y, Zhang Q, Fang X. Research on patient-centered design for post-stroke depression patients based on SEM and comprehensive evaluation. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1120596. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpubh.2023.1120596","journal-title":"Front Public Health"},{"key":"1135_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266462316000428","volume":"32","author":"AC M\u00fchlbacher","year":"2016","unstructured":"M\u00fchlbacher AC, Bethge S, Kaczynski A. Treatment after acute coronary syndrome: analysis of patient\u2019s priorities with analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2016;32:284\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0266462316000428","journal-title":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care"},{"key":"1135_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Peters MEC, Icks A, Dintsios C-M. Women\u2019s preferences in early pregnancy loss management: a focus on psychological considerations using the analytic hierarchy process. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2025. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40271-025-00793-z. Online ahead of print.","DOI":"10.1007\/s40271-025-00793-z"},{"key":"1135_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.53.100901.135213","volume":"53","author":"E Shafir","year":"2002","unstructured":"Shafir E, LeBoeuf RA. Rationality. Annual review of psychology. 2002;53:491\u2013517. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev.psych.53.100901.135213","journal-title":"Annual review of psychology"},{"key":"1135_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1007\/s40271-023-00625-y","volume":"16","author":"J Veldwijk","year":"2023","unstructured":"Veldwijk J, Marceta SM, Swait JD, Lipman SA, de Bekker-Grob EW. Taking the shortcut: simplifying heuristics in discrete choice experiments. The patient. 2023;16:301\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40271-023-00625-y","journal-title":"The patient"},{"key":"1135_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e75","DOI":"10.1017\/s0266462321000490","volume":"37","author":"K Marsh","year":"2021","unstructured":"Marsh K, de Bekker-Grob E, Cook N, Collacott H, Danyliv A. How to integrate evidence from patient preference studies into health technology assessment: a critical review and recommendations. International journal of technology assessment in health care. 2021;37:e75. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0266462321000490","journal-title":"International journal of technology assessment in health care"},{"key":"1135_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1309","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.0616","volume":"317","author":"ES Spatz","year":"2017","unstructured":"Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW. Prime time for shared decision making. JAMA. 2017;317:1309\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2017.0616","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"1135_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1361","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-012-2077-6","volume":"27","author":"G Elwyn","year":"2012","unstructured":"Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2012;27:1361\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11606-012-2077-6","journal-title":"Journal of General Internal Medicine"}],"container-title":["Journal of Human Hypertension"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41371-026-01135-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41371-026-01135-8","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41371-026-01135-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,10]],"date-time":"2026-04-10T19:02:31Z","timestamp":1775847751000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41371-026-01135-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]}},"alternative-id":["1135"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41371-026-01135-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1476-5527"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1476-5527","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 November 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 February 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 March 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 March 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"CMD is next to his academic affiliation employed by Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany. NC has no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Heinrich-Heine-University D\u00fcsseldorf. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}}]}}