{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,3]],"date-time":"2026-10-03T07:41:54Z","timestamp":1791013314496,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]],"date-time":"2026-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779840000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]],"date-time":"2026-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779840000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Hum Hypertens"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    The study compared unattended(uAOBP), attended(aAOBP) and routine clinic systolic blood pressures (SBP) and investigated the role of BP measurement sequence and aAOBP threshold on SBP difference between aAOBP and uAOBP. Eligible patients were randomized to the order of aAOBP and uAOBP measurements during a single clinic visit. aAOBP and uAOBP measurements were obtained under standardised conditions using an Omron HEM907 BP-monitor. Routine clinic BP(CBP) from the same visit was also obtained. 85 patients (mean age 69.9\u2009\u00b1\u200916.4 years, 52.9% males) underwent aAOBP and uAOBP measurements. CBP was available in 78. uAOBP was significantly lower than both aAOBP (mean difference 4.12\u2009\u00b1\u2009SD7.91\u2009mmHg,\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u20090.001) and CBP (mean difference 6.67\u2009\u00b1\u2009SD6.67\u2009mmHg,\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u20090.001). When comparing randomised groups, mean BP difference was significant in only those who underwent aAOBP measurement first (6.30\u2009+\u20097.29\u2009mmHg;\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u20090.001), but not in those who underwent uAOBP measurement first (1.88\u2009+\u20097.98\u2009mmHg;\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u20090.134). In subgroup analysis by aAOBP \u2265130\u2009mmHg(vs.&lt;130\u2009mmHg), the mean BP difference was significant in only those with an aAOBPs \u2265130\u2009mmHg (6.13\u2009\u00b1\u20090.07\u2009mmHg,\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u2009001), but not in those with an aAOBPs &lt;130\u2009mmHg (1.63\u2009+\u20097.05\u2009mmHg,\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u20090.162). Correlation and Bland-Altman analyses revealed closer correlation between uAOBP and aAOBP(r\u2009=\u20090.925,\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u20090.001), with lower bias (4.12\u2009mmHg) and narrower 95% limits of agreement (LoA) (\u221211.38, 19.62\u2009mmHg), compared to clinic SBP (r\u2009=\u20090.784,\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u20090.001; Bias: 6.67\u2009mmHg; LoA:\u221220.67, 34.01\u2009mmHg. An aAOBP of 140\u2009mmHg corresponded to an uAOBP of 135.3\u2009mmHg. Both CBP and aAOBP significantly overestimate uAOBP. BP differences are partly attributable to the sequence of BP measurement and the level of aAOBP.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41371-026-01162-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]],"date-time":"2026-05-27T05:59:51Z","timestamp":1779861591000},"page":"569-575","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Comparison of unattended, attended and routine clinic systolic blood pressure measurements and determinants of blood pressure difference between attended and unattended BP"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"40","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7788-2107","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fraser","family":"Todd","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joseph","family":"Rushton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emily","family":"Hayashi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hannah","family":"Brown","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-3617-0027","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cynthia","family":"Nguyen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emmeline","family":"Lai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emily","family":"Schembri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gary","family":"Yip","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6024-7644","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mahesan","family":"Anpalahan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"1162_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/hr.2014.149","volume":"38","author":"M Gorostidi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gorostidi M, Vinyoles E, Banegas JR, de la Sierra A. Prevalence of white-coat and masked hypertension in national and international registries. Hypertens Res. 2015;38:1\u20137.","journal-title":"Hypertens Res"},{"key":"1162_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2103","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1511939","volume":"373","author":"JT Wright Jr","year":"2015","unstructured":"SPRINT Research Group, Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, Snyder JK, Sink KM, Rocco MV, et al. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103\u201316. Epub 2015 Nov 9. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2506. PMID: 26551272","journal-title":"N Engl J Med."},{"key":"1162_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1987","DOI":"10.1111\/jch.14037","volume":"22","author":"EC Keeley","year":"2020","unstructured":"Keeley EC, Villanueva M, Chen YE, Gong Y, Handberg EM, Smith SM, et al. Attended vs unattended systolic blood pressure measurement: A randomized comparison in patients with cardiovascular disease. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020;22:1987\u201392.","journal-title":"J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)"},{"key":"1162_CR4","first-page":"596","volume":"36","author":"DM Rabi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rabi DM, McBrien KA, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Nakhla M, Ahmed SB, Dumanski SM, et al. Hypertension Canada\u2019s 2020 comprehensive guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment of hypertension in adults and children. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36:596\u2013624.","journal-title":"Can J Cardiol"},{"key":"1162_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3912","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehae178","volume":"45","author":"JW McEvoy","year":"2024","unstructured":"McEvoy JW, McCarthy CP, Bruno RM, Brouwers S, Canavan MD, Ceconi C, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:3912\u20134018. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2025 Apr 7;46(14):1300 PMID: 39210715","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"key":"1162_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05782","volume":"66","author":"MG Myers","year":"2015","unstructured":"Myers MG, Kaczorowski J, Paterson JM, Dolovich L, Tu K. Thresholds for diagnosing hypertension based on automated office blood pressure measurements and cardiovascular risk. Hypertension. 2015;66:489\u201395.","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"key":"1162_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07721","volume":"68","author":"MG Myers","year":"2016","unstructured":"Myers MG, Kaczorowski J, Dolovich L, Tu K, Paterson JM. Cardiovascular risk in hypertension in relation to achieved blood pressure using automated office blood pressure measurement. Hypertension. 2016;68:866\u201372.","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"key":"1162_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"736","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12187","volume":"73","author":"M Salvetti","year":"2019","unstructured":"Salvetti M, Paini A, Aggiusti C, Bertacchini F, Stassaldi D, Capellini S, et al. Unattended versus attended blood pressure measurement. Hypertension. 2019;73:736\u201342.","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"key":"1162_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10026","volume":"71","author":"F Bauer","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bauer F, Seibert FS, Rohn B, Bauer KAR, Rolshoven E, Babel N, et al. Attended versus unattended blood pressure measurement in a real life setting. Hypertension. 2018;71:243\u20139.","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"key":"1162_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1007\/s40292-019-00329-1","volume":"26","author":"EA Andreadis","year":"2019","unstructured":"Andreadis EA, Thomopoulos C, Geladari CV, Papademetriou V. Attended versus unattended automated office blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2019;26:293\u2013303.","journal-title":"High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev"},{"key":"1162_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1038\/s41371-021-00575-8","volume":"36","author":"E Fanelli","year":"2022","unstructured":"Fanelli E, Di Monaco S, Pappaccogli M, Eula E, Fasano C, Bertello C, et al. Comparison of nurse attended and unattended automated office blood pressure with conventional measurement techniques in clinical practice. J Hum Hypertens. 2022;36:833\u20138.","journal-title":"J Hum Hypertens"},{"key":"1162_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1111\/jch.14798","volume":"26","author":"S Bertram","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bertram S, Bauer F, Shadi R, Seidel M, Doevelaar A, Seibert F, et al. Prevalence of masked hypertension in attended versus unattended office blood pressure measurement. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024;26:615\u201323.","journal-title":"J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)"},{"key":"1162_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2050","DOI":"10.1080\/07853890.2021.1999493","volume":"53","author":"E Bartoloni","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bartoloni E, Angeli F, Marcucci E, Perricone C, Cafaro G, Riccini C, et al. Unattended compared to traditional blood pressure measurement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised cross-over study. Ann Med. 2021;53:2050\u20139.","journal-title":"Ann Med"},{"key":"1162_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2018.06.056","volume":"274","author":"A Paini","year":"2019","unstructured":"Paini A, Bertacchini F, Stassaldi D, Aggiusti C, Maruelli G, Arnoldi C, et al. Unattended versus attended blood pressure measurement: Mean values and determinants of the difference. Int J Cardiol. 2019;274:305\u201310.","journal-title":"Int J Cardiol"},{"key":"1162_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.1038\/s41371-021-00593-6","volume":"36","author":"AMG Paiva","year":"2022","unstructured":"Paiva AMG, Mota-Gomes MA, Feitosa ADM, Azevedo TCP, Amorim NW, Mion D Jr, et al. Differences in the diagnosis of high blood pressure using unattended and attended automated office blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens. 2022;36:370\u20132.","journal-title":"J Hum Hypertens"},{"key":"1162_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2018.6551","volume":"179","author":"M Roerecke","year":"2019","unstructured":"Roerecke M, Kaczorowski J, Myers MG. Comparing automated office blood pressure readings with other methods of blood pressure measurement for identifying patients with possible hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:351\u201362.","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med"},{"key":"1162_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1111\/jch.13462","volume":"21","author":"A Kollias","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kollias A, Stambolliu E, Kyriakoulis KG, Gravvani A, Stergiou GS. Unattended versus attended automated office blood pressure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the same methodology for both methods. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019;21:148\u201355.","journal-title":"J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)"},{"key":"1162_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.118.008994","volume":"7","author":"EA Andreadis","year":"2018","unstructured":"Andreadis EA, Geladari CV, Angelopoulos ET, Savva FS, Georgantoni AI, Parademetriou V. Attended and unattended automated office blood pressure measurements have better agreement with ambulatory monitoring than conventional office readings. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008994.","journal-title":"J Am Heart Assoc"},{"key":"1162_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1411","DOI":"10.1111\/jch.13371","volume":"20","author":"V Papademetriou","year":"2018","unstructured":"Papademetriou V, Tsioufis C, Chung A, Geledari C, Andreadis EA. Unobserved automated office BP is similar to other clinic BP measurements: A prospective randomized study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018;20:1411\u20136.","journal-title":"J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)"},{"key":"1162_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1993","DOI":"10.1111\/jch.14031","volume":"22","author":"MG Myers","year":"2020","unstructured":"Myers MG. Attended automated office blood pressure re-visited. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020;22:1993\u20134.","journal-title":"J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)"},{"key":"1162_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1093\/fampra\/cmr113","volume":"29","author":"MG Myers","year":"2012","unstructured":"Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, Kiss A, Tobe SW, Kaczorowski J. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in the office (CAMBO) trial. Fam Pract. 2012;29:376\u201382.","journal-title":"Fam Pract"},{"key":"1162_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1093\/ajh\/hpae135","volume":"ume 38","author":"EE Lynn-Green","year":"2025","unstructured":"Lynn-Green EE, Cluett JL, Turkson-Ocran RN, Mukamal KJ, Li JX, Jaraschek SP. Clinical impact of 3- Vs. 5-minute delay and 30- Vs. 60-second intervals on unattended automated office blood pressure measurements. Am J Hypertens. 2025;ume 38:168\u201377.","journal-title":"Am J Hypertens"},{"key":"1162_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1111\/jch.13319","volume":"20","author":"TJF Colella","year":"2018","unstructured":"Colella TJF, Tahsinul A, Gatto H, Oh P, Myers MG. Antecedent rest may not be necessary for automated office blood pressure at lower treatment targets. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018;20:1160\u20134. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 29900674.","journal-title":"J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)"},{"key":"1162_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2209","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21510","volume":"80","author":"LC Desbiens","year":"2023","unstructured":"Desbiens LC, Nadeau-Fredette AC, Madore F, Agharazii M, Goupil R. Impact of successive office blood pressure measurements during a single visit on cardiovascular risk prediction: analysis of CARTaGENE. Hypertension. 2023;80:2209\u201317.","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"key":"1162_CR25","first-page":"1639","volume":"33","author":"F Rinfret","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rinfret F, Cloutier L, Wistaf R, Birnbaum LM, Cheong NN, Laskine M, et al. Comparison of different automated office blood pressure measurement devices: evidence of nonequivalence and clinical implications. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:1639\u201344.","journal-title":"Can J Cardiol"},{"key":"1162_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e223","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp14X677851","volume":"64","author":"CE Clark","year":"2014","unstructured":"Clark CE, Horvath IA, Taylor RS, Campbell JL. Doctors record higher blood pressures than nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64:e223\u201332.","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"1162_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1038\/jhh.2013.38","volume":"28","author":"SB Nikolic","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nikolic SB, Abhayaratna WP, Leano R, Stowasser M, Sharman JE. Waiting a few extra minutes before measuring blood pressure has potentially important clinical and research ramifications. J Hum Hypertens. 2014;28:56\u201361.","journal-title":"J Hum Hypertens"},{"key":"1162_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e212","DOI":"10.1161\/HYP.0000000000000257","volume":"82","author":"DW Jones","year":"2025","unstructured":"Jones DW, Ferdinand KC, Taler SJ, Johnson HM, Shimbo D, Abdalla M, et al. AHA\/ACC\/AANP\/AAPA\/ABC\/ACCP\/ACPM\/AGS\/AMA\/ASPC\/NMA\/PCNA\/SGIM Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology\/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2025;82:e212\u2013e316.","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"key":"1162_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1210","DOI":"10.1111\/jch.13090","volume":"19","author":"MG Myers","year":"2017","unstructured":"Myers MG, Kaczorowski J. Office blood pressure is lower than awake ambulatory blood pressure at lower targets for treatment. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017;19:1210\u20133.","journal-title":"J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)"},{"key":"1162_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1400","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.199562","volume":"60","author":"G Mancia","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mancia G, Parati G, Bilo G, Gao P, Fagard R, Redon J, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure values in the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET). Hypertension. 2012;60:1400\u20136.","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"key":"1162_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1377","DOI":"10.1097\/00004872-199512000-00003","volume":"13","author":"G Mancia","year":"1995","unstructured":"Mancia G, Sega R, Bravi C, De Vito G, Valagussa F, Cesana G, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure normality: results from the PAMELA study. J Hypertens. 1995;13:1377\u201390.","journal-title":"J Hypertens"},{"key":"1162_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1696","DOI":"10.1111\/jch.13409","volume":"20","author":"MG Myers","year":"2018","unstructured":"Myers MG, Matangi M, Kaczorowski J. Comparison of awake ambulatory blood pressure and automated office blood pressure using linear regression analysis in untreated patients in routine clinical practice. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018;20:1696\u2013702.","journal-title":"J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)"},{"key":"1162_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1097\/00126097-200302000-00008","volume":"8","author":"E Den Hond","year":"2003","unstructured":"Den Hond E, Celis H, Vandenhoven G, O\u2019Brien E, Staessen JA, THOP investigators. Determinants of white-coat syndrome assessed by ambulatory blood pressure or self-measured home blood pressure. Blood Press Monit. 2003;8:37\u201340.","journal-title":"Blood Press Monit"},{"key":"1162_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1007\/s40292-020-00402-0","volume":"27","author":"H Triantafyllidi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Triantafyllidi H, Voutsinos D, Sioula K, Schoinas A, Benas D, Birmpa D, et al. Are unattended blood pressure measurements necessary in all patients visiting an outpatient cardiology clinic? High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020;27:389\u201397.","journal-title":"High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev"}],"container-title":["Journal of Human Hypertension"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41371-026-01162-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41371-026-01162-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41371-026-01162-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,8]],"date-time":"2026-07-08T22:03:55Z","timestamp":1783548235000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41371-026-01162-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]}},"alternative-id":["1162"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41371-026-01162-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1476-5527"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1476-5527","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 November 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 May 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 May 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 May 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"The study was approved by the Eastern Health Human Research Ethics Committee (approval No LR23-056-101611) and was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrolment.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}