{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,25]],"date-time":"2026-09-25T22:33:17Z","timestamp":1790375597689,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":67,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,8]],"date-time":"2018-05-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1525737600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Br J Cancer"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,6]]},"DOI":"10.1038\/s41416-018-0080-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,3]],"date-time":"2018-05-03T18:29:38Z","timestamp":1525372178000},"page":"1559-1570","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":125,"title":["Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"118","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9597-645X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Matejka","family":"Rebolj","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Valentina","family":"Assi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adam","family":"Brentnall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dharmishta","family":"Parmar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stephen W.","family":"Duffy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"80_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1016\/S0033-8389(22)02494-0","volume":"30","author":"L Tabar","year":"1992","unstructured":"Tabar, L. et al. Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 30, 187\u2013210 (1992).","journal-title":"Radiol. Clin. North Am."},{"key":"80_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2205","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2013.177","volume":"108","author":"MG Marmot","year":"2013","unstructured":"Marmot, M. G. et al. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Br. J. Cancer 108, 2205\u20132240 (2013).","journal-title":"Br. J. Cancer"},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"80_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1258\/jms.2012.012078","volume":"19","author":"M Broeders","year":"2012","unstructured":"Broeders, M. et al. The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies. J. Med. Screen 19(Suppl. 1), 14\u201325 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Med. Screen"},{"key":"80_CR4","unstructured":"International Agency for research on Cancer. Breast Cancer Screening (IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention), Vol. 15 (IARC, Lyon, France, 2016). ."},{"key":"80_CR5","unstructured":"Perry, N. B. et al. (eds). European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 4th edn (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2006)."},{"key":"80_CR6","unstructured":"HSCIC. Breast Screening Programme, England, Statistics for 2014\u20132015. http:\/\/content.digital.nhs.uk\/catalogue\/PUB20018 (2016). Accessed 24 July 2017 ."},{"key":"80_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1038\/nrclinonc.2011.173","volume":"9","author":"V Assi","year":"2011","unstructured":"Assi, V., Warwick, J., Cuzick, J. & Duffy, S. W. Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 9, 33\u201340 (2011).","journal-title":"Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol."},{"key":"80_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12120621","volume":"265","author":"RJ Hooley","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hooley, R. J. et al. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 265, 59\u201369 (2012).","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"80_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.7326\/M16-0476","volume":"165","author":"A Trentham-Dietz","year":"2016","unstructured":"Trentham-Dietz, A. et al. Tailoring breast cancer screening intervals by breast density and risk for women aged 50 years or older: collaborative modeling of screening outcomes. Ann. Int. Med. 165, 700\u2013712 (2016).","journal-title":"Ann. Int. Med."},{"key":"80_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00003","volume":"155","author":"JT Schousboe","year":"2011","unstructured":"Schousboe, J. T., Kerlikowske, K., Loh, A. & Cummings, S. R. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness. Ann. Int. Med. 155, 10\u201320 (2011).","journal-title":"Ann. Int. Med."},{"key":"80_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2015141827","volume":"277","author":"MJ Emaus","year":"2015","unstructured":"Emaus, M. J. et al. MR imaging as an additional screening modality for the detection of breast cancer in women aged 50-75 years with extremely dense breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design. Radiology 277, 527\u2013537 (2015).","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"80_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1394","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2012.388","volume":"307","author":"WA Berg","year":"2012","unstructured":"Berg, W. A. et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307, 1394\u20131404 (2012).","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"80_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-014-2931-9","volume":"145","author":"DG Evans","year":"2014","unstructured":"Evans, D. G. et al. MRI breast screening in high-risk women: cancer detection and survival analysis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 145, 663\u2013672 (2014).","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res. Treat."},{"key":"80_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1314","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djt203","volume":"105","author":"S Saadatmand","year":"2013","unstructured":"Saadatmand, S. et al. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 105, 1314\u20131321 (2013).","journal-title":"J. Natl. Cancer Inst."},{"key":"80_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.14132832","volume":"274","author":"RF Brem","year":"2015","unstructured":"Brem, R. F. et al. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. Radiology 274, 663\u2013673 (2015).","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"80_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009","volume":"155","author":"PF Whiting","year":"2011","unstructured":"Whiting, P. F. et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann. Int. Med. 155, 529\u2013536 (2011).","journal-title":"Ann. Int. Med."},{"key":"80_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.2307\/3001536","volume":"3","author":"MS Bartlett","year":"1947","unstructured":"Bartlett, M. S. The use of transformations. Biometrics 3, 39\u201352 (1947).","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"80_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","volume":"7","author":"R DerSimonian","year":"1986","unstructured":"DerSimonian, R. & Laird, N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin. Trials 7, 177\u2013188 (1986).","journal-title":"Control Clin. Trials"},{"key":"80_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"d4002","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d4002","volume":"343","author":"JA Sterne","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sterne, J. A. et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 343, d4002 (2011).","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"80_CR20","unstructured":"R. Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https:\/\/www.R-project.org (2017). Accessed 17 November 2017."},{"key":"80_CR21","unstructured":"Pasek J. Package \u2018weights\u2019. https:\/\/cran.r-project.org\/web\/packages\/weights\/weights.pdf (2016). Accessed 17 November 2017."},{"key":"80_CR22","unstructured":"Schwarzer G. Package \u2018meta\u2019. https:\/\/cran.r-project.org\/web\/packages\/meta\/meta.pdf (2017). Accessed 17 November 2017."},{"key":"80_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2407-9-335","volume":"9","author":"M Nothacker","year":"2009","unstructured":"Nothacker, M. et al. Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review. BMC Cancer 9, 335 (2009).","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"key":"80_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.7326\/M15-1789","volume":"164","author":"J Melnikow","year":"2016","unstructured":"Melnikow, J. et al. Supplemental screening for breast cancer in women with dense breasts: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Int. Med. 164, 268\u2013278 (2016).","journal-title":"Ann. Int. Med."},{"key":"80_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1021","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2010.12.002","volume":"47","author":"V Corsetti","year":"2011","unstructured":"Corsetti, V. et al. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. Eur. J. Cancer 47, 1021\u20131026 (2011).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Cancer"},{"key":"80_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2277","DOI":"10.7314\/APJCP.2013.14.4.2277","volume":"14","author":"FL Wang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wang, F. L. et al. Effects of age, breast density and volume on breast cancer diagnosis: a retrospective comparison of sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography in China\u2019s rural areas. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 14, 2277\u20132282 (2013).","journal-title":"Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev."},{"key":"80_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2251011667","volume":"225","author":"TM Kolb","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kolb, T. M., Lichy, J. & Newhouse, J. H. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225, 165\u2013175 (2002).","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"80_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1016\/S0887-2171(00)90027-1","volume":"21","author":"W Buchberger","year":"2000","unstructured":"Buchberger, W., Niehoff, A., Obrist, P., DeKoekkoek-Doll, P. & Dunser, M. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR 21, 325\u2013336 (2000).","journal-title":"Semin. Ultrasound CT MR"},{"key":"80_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1177\/0284185113507711","volume":"55","author":"P Korpraphong","year":"2014","unstructured":"Korpraphong, P. et al. Improving breast cancer detection using ultrasonography in asymptomatic women with non-fatty breast density. Acta Radiol. 55, 903\u2013908 (2014).","journal-title":"Acta Radiol."},{"key":"80_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"562","DOI":"10.1177\/030089160709300608","volume":"93","author":"B Brancato","year":"2007","unstructured":"Brancato, B. et al. Negligible advantages and excess costs of routine addition of breast ultrasonography to mammography in dense breasts. Tumori 93, 562\u2013566 (2007).","journal-title":"Tumori"},{"key":"80_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jus.2007.05.001","volume":"10","author":"C Felice De","year":"2007","unstructured":"De Felice, C. et al. Diagnostic utility of combined ultrasonography and mammography in the evaluation of women with mammographically dense breasts. J. Ultrasound 10, 143\u2013151 (2007).","journal-title":"J. Ultrasound"},{"key":"80_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.215.1.r00ap01267","volume":"215","author":"CK Kuhl","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kuhl, C. K. et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 215, 267\u2013279 (2000).","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"80_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2423051965","volume":"242","author":"F Sardanelli","year":"2007","unstructured":"Sardanelli, F. et al. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 242, 698\u2013715 (2007).","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"80_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1862","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1349-7006.2011.02034.x","volume":"102","author":"MS Bae","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bae, M. S. et al. Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms. Cancer Sci. 102, 1862\u20131867 (2011).","journal-title":"Cancer Sci."},{"key":"80_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1554","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2016.06.004","volume":"85","author":"B Wilczek","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wilczek, B., Wilczek, H. E., Rasouliyan, L. & Leifland, K. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program. Eur. J. Radiol. 85, 1554\u20131563 (2016).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Radiol."},{"key":"80_CR36","unstructured":"Tagliafico, A. S. et al. Adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interim report of a prospective comparative trial. J. Clin. Oncol. (2016); e-pub ahead of print 2016; pii: JCO634147."},{"key":"80_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1177\/0284185114538252","volume":"56","author":"JM Chang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chang, J. M., Koo, H. R. & Moon, W. K. Radiologist-performed hand-held ultrasound screening at average risk of breast cancer: results from a single health screening center. Acta Radiol. 56, 652\u2013658 (2015).","journal-title":"Acta Radiol."},{"key":"80_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.181.1.1810177","volume":"181","author":"P Crystal","year":"2003","unstructured":"Crystal, P., Strano, S. D., Shcharynski, S. & Koretz, M. J. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 181, 177\u2013182 (2003).","journal-title":"AJR Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"80_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2013.02.010","volume":"22","author":"V Girardi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Girardi, V., Tonegutti, M., Ciatto, S. & Bonetti, F. Breast ultrasound in 22,131 asymptomatic women with negative mammography. Breast 22, 806\u2013809 (2013).","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"80_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2213010364","volume":"221","author":"SS Kaplan","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kaplan, S. S. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 221, 641\u2013649 (2001).","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"80_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-010-1955-8","volume":"21","author":"JH Youk","year":"2011","unstructured":"Youk, J. H., Kim, E. K., Kim, M. J., Kwak, J. Y. & Son, E. J. Performance of hand-held whole-breast ultrasound based on BI-RADS in women with mammographically negative dense breast. Eur. Radiol. 21, 667\u2013675 (2011).","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"key":"80_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.47102\/annals-acadmedsg.V41N10p432","volume":"41","author":"LC Leong","year":"2012","unstructured":"Leong, L. C., Gogna, A., Pant, R., Ng, F. C. & Sim, L. S. Supplementary breast ultrasound screening in Asian women with negative but dense mammograms-a pilot study. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore 41, 432\u2013439 (2012).","journal-title":"Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore"},{"key":"80_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1352","DOI":"10.3349\/ymj.2015.56.5.1352","volume":"56","author":"JY Hwang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hwang, J. Y. et al. Screening ultrasound in women with negative mammography: outcome analysis. Yonsei Med. J. 56, 1352\u20131358 (2015).","journal-title":"Yonsei Med. J."},{"key":"80_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12003","volume":"18","author":"J Weigert","year":"2012","unstructured":"Weigert, J. & Steenbergen, S. The Connecticut experiment: the role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts. Breast J. 18, 517\u2013522 (2012).","journal-title":"Breast J."},{"key":"80_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12386","volume":"21","author":"J Weigert","year":"2015","unstructured":"Weigert, J. & Steenbergen, S. The Connecticut experiments second year: ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts. Breast J. 21, 175\u2013180 (2015).","journal-title":"Breast J."},{"key":"80_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6124","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2009.24.4277","volume":"27","author":"SP Weinstein","year":"2009","unstructured":"Weinstein, S. P. et al. Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort study. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 6124\u20136128 (2009).","journal-title":"J. Clin. Oncol."},{"key":"80_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12678","volume":"23","author":"JM Weigert","year":"2017","unstructured":"Weigert, J. M. The Connecticut experiment; the third installment: 4 years of screening women with dense breasts with bilateral ultrasound. Breast J. 23, 34\u201339 (2017).","journal-title":"Breast J."},{"key":"80_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e5279","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000005279","volume":"95","author":"SY Kim","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kim, S. Y., Kim, M. J., Moon, H. J., Yoon, J. H. & Kim, E. K. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts. Medicine (Baltimore) 95, e5279 (2016).","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"80_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.4103\/0971-3026.202962","volume":"27","author":"GA Klevos","year":"2017","unstructured":"Klevos, G. A., Collado-Mesa, F., Net, J. M. & Yepes, M. M. Utility of supplemental screening with breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with dense breast tissue who are not at high risk for breast cancer. Indian J. Radiol. Imaging 27, 52\u201358 (2017).","journal-title":"Indian J. Radiol. Imaging"},{"key":"80_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2511","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.14294","volume":"36","author":"S Destounis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Destounis, S., Arieno, A. & Morgan, R. New York State Breast Density Mandate: follow-up data with screening sonography. J. Ultrasound Med. 36, 2511\u20132517 (2017).","journal-title":"J. Ultrasound Med."},{"key":"80_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1159\/000321255","volume":"5","author":"H Lind","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lind, H., Svane, G., Kemetli, L. & Tornberg, S. Breast Cancer Screening Program in Stockholm County, Sweden - aspects of organization and quality assurance. Breast Care (Basel) 5, 353\u2013357 (2010).","journal-title":"Breast Care (Basel)"},{"key":"80_CR52","unstructured":"HSCIC. Breast Screening Programme, England, Statistics for 2015-2016. http:\/\/www.content.digital.nhs.uk\/catalogue\/PUB23376\/bres-scre-prog-eng-2015-16-rep.pdf (2017). Accessed 1 September 2017."},{"key":"80_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/dju255","volume":"106","author":"BL Sprague","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sprague, B. L. et al. Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 106, 1\u20136 (2014).","journal-title":"J. Natl. Cancer Inst."},{"key":"80_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3810","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-017-4757-4","volume":"27","author":"L Timmermans","year":"2017","unstructured":"Timmermans, L. et al. Screen-detected versus interval cancers: effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme. Eur. Radiol. 27, 3810\u20133819 (2017).","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"key":"80_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1773","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa052911","volume":"353","author":"ED Pisano","year":"2005","unstructured":"Pisano, E. D. et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1773\u20131783 (2005).","journal-title":"N. Engl. J. Med."},{"key":"80_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6604989","volume":"100","author":"AH Olsen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Olsen, A. H., Bihrmann, K., Jensen, M. B., Vejborg, I. & Lynge, E. Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study. Br. J. Cancer 100, 1205\u20131208 (2009).","journal-title":"Br. J. Cancer"},{"key":"80_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2015.11.030","volume":"85","author":"N Moshina","year":"2016","unstructured":"Moshina, N., Ursin, G., Roman, M., Sebuodegard, S. & Hofvind, S. Positive predictive values by mammographic density and screening mode in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Eur. J. Radiol. 85, 248\u2013254 (2016).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Radiol."},{"key":"80_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.12.10419","volume":"202","author":"B Seradour","year":"2014","unstructured":"Seradour, B., Heid, P. & Esteve, J. Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 202, 229\u2013236 (2014).","journal-title":"AJR Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"80_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034","volume":"15","author":"VA McCormack","year":"2006","unstructured":"McCormack, V. A. & dos Santos Silva, I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 15, 1159\u20131169 (2006).","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev."},{"key":"80_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.7326\/M14-1465","volume":"162","author":"K Kerlikowske","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kerlikowske, K. et al. Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study. Ann. Int. Med. 162, 673\u2013681 (2015).","journal-title":"Ann. Int. Med."},{"key":"80_CR61","unstructured":"Centre for Cancer Prevention. National Collation of Breast Screening Interval Cancer Data, Screening years 1st April 2006 - 31st March 2008. (Queen Mary University of London, London, UK, 2015)."},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"80_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1258\/jms.2012.012082","volume":"19","author":"D Puliti","year":"2012","unstructured":"Puliti, D. et al. Overdiagnosis in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review. J. Med. Screen. 19(Suppl. 1), 42\u201356 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Med. Screen."},{"key":"80_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1081","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/92.13.1081","volume":"92","author":"MT Mandelson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Mandelson, M. T. et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92, 1081\u20131087 (2000).","journal-title":"J. Natl. Cancer Inst."},{"key":"80_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.08.1706","volume":"192","author":"WA Berg","year":"2009","unstructured":"Berg, W. A. Tailored supplemental screening for breast cancer: what now and what next? AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 192, 390\u2013399 (2009).","journal-title":"AJR Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"80_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2061","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-013-2820-3","volume":"23","author":"P Skaane","year":"2013","unstructured":"Skaane, P. et al. Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration. Eur. Radiol. 23, 2061\u20132071 (2013).","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"key":"80_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2015142566","volume":"277","author":"FJ Gilbert","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gilbert, F. J. et al. Accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis for depicting breast cancer subgroups in a UK Retrospective Reading Study (TOMMY Trial). Radiology 277, 697\u2013706 (2015).","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"80_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.16.17518","volume":"209","author":"A Irshad","year":"2017","unstructured":"Irshad, A. et al. Changes in breast density reporting patterns of radiologists after publication of the 5th edition BI-RADS guidelines: a single institution experience. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 209, 943\u2013948 (2017).","journal-title":"AJR Am. J. Roentgenol."}],"container-title":["British Journal of Cancer"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41416-018-0080-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41416-018-0080-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41416-018-0080-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]],"date-time":"2025-07-04T03:28:06Z","timestamp":1751599686000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41416-018-0080-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,8]]},"references-count":67,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,6]]}},"alternative-id":["80"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41416-018-0080-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-0920","1532-1827"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-0920","type":"print"},{"value":"1532-1827","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 December 2017","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 March 2018","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 March 2018","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 May 2018","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"Ethical approval was not sought as the study was based entirely on previously published data.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"The study was based entirely on previously published data.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Availability of data and material"}}]}}