{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T02:33:15Z","timestamp":1792636395362,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]],"date-time":"2020-09-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1599436800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]],"date-time":"2020-09-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1599436800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Debate still exists for the management of choledocholithiasis. The purpose of this study is to quantify the rate of recurrent choledocholithiasis post choledochoscopic bile duct exploration (CBDE) in comparison to ERCP and\u00a0sphincterotomy, and to demonstrate the feasibility of this approach in a busy metropolitan hospital. Data of patients undergoing CBDE from 2009\u20132014 at the Northern Hospital, Victoria, Australia, was collected retrospectively. Primary outcomes were bile duct clearance rate and rate of recurrent stones post-clearance. Secondary outcomes measured were post-operative complications, laparoscopic to open conversion rate and operative time. Data of patients undergoing ERCP at the same institution was collected and compared. In total, there were 4,091 cholecystectomy cases performed from 2009\u20132014, of which 260 (6.3%) of patients had an intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) indicating a common bile duct (CBD) stone. Two hundred and forty-eight patients (95.3%) had a CBDE. The remaining 12 patients (4.6%) had radiological clearance, which were excluded from the study. The overall clearance rate for patients undergoing CBDE was 84% (209\/248). The risk of recurrent stones up to 8\u00a0years post clearance was 2% (4\/209). In the same institution, and between 1998\u20132012,\u00a0a total of 1,148 patients underwent ERCP, of which 571 had endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). Forty-three patients required a repeat ERCP for recurrent CBD stones with a complication rate of 7.5%. Time to recurrence ranged from 6\u00a0months to 10\u00a0years with a mean of 4.5\u00a0years. The rate of recurrence was lower in the CBDE group compared to the patients who had an ERCP (8.9% vs. 2%). CBDE is a feasible and effective method for clearance of CBD stones at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This approach, although not widely used, reduces the need for ERCP, which has inherent complications. In the longer term, this series showed a significant reduction in the rate of CBD stone recurrence.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-71731-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]],"date-time":"2020-09-07T10:02:52Z","timestamp":1599472972000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["Retrospective comparative analysis of choledochoscopic bile duct exploration versus ERCP for bile duct stones"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Y.","family":"Al-Habbal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"I.","family":"Reid","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Tiang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"N.","family":"Houli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B.","family":"Lai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"McQuillan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Bird","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Yong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"71731_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1972.04180040098017","volume":"104","author":"GS Kakos","year":"1972","unstructured":"Kakos, G. S., Tompkins, R. K., Turnipseed, W. & Zollinger, R. M. Operative cholangiography during routine cholecystectomy: a review of 3,012 cases. Arch. Surg. 104, 484\u2013488 (1972).","journal-title":"Arch. Surg."},{"key":"71731_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1186\/s12876-018-0765-3","volume":"18","author":"TC Nzenza","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nzenza, T. C. et al. Recurrent common bile duct stones as a late complication of endoscopic sphincterotomy. BMC Gastroenterol 18, 39. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12876-018-0765-3 (2018).","journal-title":"BMC Gastroenterol"},{"key":"71731_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-014-2467-7","volume":"18","author":"G Ding","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ding, G., Cai, W. & Qin, M. Single-stage vs two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 18, 947\u2013951. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-014-2467-7 (2014).","journal-title":"J. Gastrointest. Surg."},{"key":"71731_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9610(87)90265-0","volume":"154","author":"M Tanaka","year":"1987","unstructured":"Tanaka, M., Ikeda, S., Yoshimoto, H. & Matsumoto, S. The long-term fate of the gallbladder after endoscopic sphincterotomy: complete follow-up study of 122 patients. Am. J. Surg. 154, 505\u2013509. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9610(87)90265-0 (1987).","journal-title":"Am. J. Surg."},{"key":"71731_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.2298\/sarh1512681p","volume":"143","author":"T Pejovic","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pejovic, T. & Stojadinovic, M. M. Scoring system development and validation for prediction choledocholithiasis before open cholecystectomy. Srp. Arh. Celok. Lek 143, 681\u2013687. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2298\/sarh1512681p (2015).","journal-title":"Srp. Arh. Celok. Lek"},{"key":"71731_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.12341","volume":"85","author":"DG Croagh","year":"2015","unstructured":"Croagh, D. G. et al. Management of CBD stones in patients having laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a private setting in Australia. ANZ J. Surg. 85, 53\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ans.12341 (2015).","journal-title":"ANZ J. Surg."},{"key":"71731_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1016\/s0016-5107(96)70045-7","volume":"44","author":"JJ Bergman","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bergman, J. J. et al. Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age. Gastrointest. Endosc. 44, 643\u2013649. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0016-5107(96)70045-7 (1996).","journal-title":"Gastrointest. Endosc."},{"key":"71731_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1136\/gut.40.6.697","volume":"40","author":"TC Tham","year":"1997","unstructured":"Tham, T. C., Carr-Locke, D. L. & Collins, J. S. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in the young patient: is there cause for concern?. Gut 40, 697\u2013700. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/gut.40.6.697 (1997).","journal-title":"Gut"},{"key":"71731_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2002-23632","volume":"34","author":"G Costamagna","year":"2002","unstructured":"Costamagna, G. et al. Long-term follow-up of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis, and risk factors for recurrence. Endoscopy 34, 273\u2013279. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-2002-23632 (2002).","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"71731_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5548","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v20.i18.5548","volume":"20","author":"PP Jin","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jin, P. P. et al. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis. World J. Gastroenterol. 20, 5548\u20135556. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v20.i18.5548 (2014).","journal-title":"World J. Gastroenterol."},{"key":"71731_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2006.10.013","volume":"5","author":"T Tsujino","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tsujino, T. et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone: immediate and long-term outcomes in 1000 patients. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5, 130\u2013137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cgh.2006.10.013 (2007).","journal-title":"Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol."},{"key":"71731_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.4240\/wjgs.v8.i5.376","volume":"8","author":"N Gupta","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gupta, N. Role of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in the management of choledocholithiasis. World J. Gastrointest. Surg. 8, 376\u2013381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4240\/wjgs.v8.i5.376 (2016).","journal-title":"World J. Gastrointest. Surg."},{"key":"71731_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01655700","volume":"17","author":"EH Phillips","year":"1993","unstructured":"Phillips, E. H., Carroll, B. J., Pearlstein, A. R., Daykhovsky, L. & Fallas, M. J. Laparoscopic choledochoscopy and extraction of common bile duct stones. World. J. Surg. 17, 22\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF01655700 (1993).","journal-title":"World. J. Surg."},{"key":"71731_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD003327","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003327.pub2","volume":"1","author":"DJ Martin","year":"2006","unstructured":"Martin, D. J., Vernon, D. R. & Toouli, J. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, CD003327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD003327.pub2 (2006).","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"key":"71731_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-199807000-00005","volume":"228","author":"IJ Martin","year":"1998","unstructured":"Martin, I. J. et al. Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann. Surg. 228, 29\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00000658-199807000-00005 (1998).","journal-title":"Ann. Surg."},{"key":"71731_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.1177\/1553350615594444","volume":"22","author":"E Phillips","year":"2015","unstructured":"Phillips, E., Berci, G., Barber, K. & Williams, J. The role of choledochoscopy: the eternal problem of how to remove a CBD stone. Surg. Innov. 22, 540\u2013545. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1553350615594444 (2015).","journal-title":"Surg. Innov."},{"key":"71731_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1053\/gast.1996.v110.pm8608900","volume":"110","author":"F Prat","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prat, F. et al. Biliary symptoms and complications more than 8 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Gastroenterology 110, 894\u2013899. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/gast.1996.v110.pm8608900 (1996).","journal-title":"Gastroenterology"},{"key":"71731_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-1004193","volume":"29","author":"ML Freeman","year":"1997","unstructured":"Freeman, M. L. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a review. Endoscopy 29, 288\u2013297. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-2007-1004193 (1997).","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"issue":"Suppl 3","key":"71731_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S57","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1440-1746.2009.06072.x","volume":"24","author":"J Toouli","year":"2009","unstructured":"Toouli, J. Sphincter of Oddi: function, dysfunction, and its management. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 24(Suppl 3), S57-62. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1440-1746.2009.06072.x (2009).","journal-title":"J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol."},{"key":"71731_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2317","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-007-9577-1","volume":"21","author":"B Topal","year":"2007","unstructured":"Topal, B., Aerts, R. & Penninckx, F. Laparoscopic common bile duct stone clearance with flexible choledochoscopy. Surg. Endosc. 21, 2317\u20132321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-007-9577-1 (2007).","journal-title":"Surg. Endosc."},{"key":"71731_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1007\/s13126-015-0246-x","volume":"87","author":"C Karaliotas","year":"2015","unstructured":"Karaliotas, C. et al. Laparoscopic transcystic or transcholedochal choledochoscopy during common bile duct exploration for stones? Differences and similarities. Hellen. J. Surg. 87, 394\u2013406 (2015).","journal-title":"Hellen. J. Surg."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-020-71731-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-020-71731-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-020-71731-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,6]],"date-time":"2022-12-06T19:34:25Z","timestamp":1670355265000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-020-71731-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]}},"alternative-id":["71731"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-020-71731-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"6 February 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 August 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 September 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"14736"}}