{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,6]],"date-time":"2026-06-06T07:29:38Z","timestamp":1780730978979,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,16]],"date-time":"2020-11-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1605484800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,16]],"date-time":"2020-11-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1605484800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005150","name":"Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["CAMS-2017-I2M-1-002"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["CAMS-2017-I2M-1-002"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005150","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study aims to reveal the risk factors associated with recurrence or new-onset high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) or more severe lesions (HSILs\u2009+) and analyze obstetrical outcomes in patients with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or stage IA1 cervical cancer patients after conization. A retrospective cohort study was developed from January 1, 2002, and July 1, 2018, in a single center, where all patients with AIS or stage IA1 cervical cancer who accepted conization for primary surgery were reviewed and followed up until July 1, 2019, for the pathological findings of HSILs\u2009+\u2009and obstetric outcomes. Two hundred and seventeen patients were identified, including 114 cases of AIS, 76 cases of stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 27 cases of stage IA1 adenocarcinoma (ADC). A total of 88 (40.6%) patients had an intact uterus without radiotherapy. Five patients experienced HSIL+ recurrence. The cumulative 3-, 5- and 10-year incidence rates of HSILs\u2009+\u2009were 1.0%, 1.5% and 2.0%, respectively. No significant risk factors, including primary disease, margin status and hysterectomy, were associated with recurrence. Twenty (66.7%) of 30 patients who attempted pregnancy had 23 successful pregnancies, which result in 7 miscarriages, 16 live births and 5 preterm births. Age at conization was the only independent risk factor associated with pregnancy, live births and preterm births. In conclusion, conization is safe for young women with AIS, stage IA1 SCC and ADC who desire future fertility, and the associated HSIL recurrence rate is low. Increased age significantly lowered the conception or live birth rate.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-75512-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,16]],"date-time":"2020-11-16T11:04:49Z","timestamp":1605524689000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Oncologic and obstetric outcomes after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ or stage IA1 cervical cancer"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Xiaoyu","family":"Wang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yalan","family":"Bi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Huanwen","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ming","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lei","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"75512_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21332","volume":"66","author":"RL Siegel","year":"2016","unstructured":"Siegel, R. L. et al. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 66, 7\u201330 (2016).","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin."},{"key":"75512_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21338","volume":"66","author":"W Chen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chen, W. et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J. Clin. 66, 115\u2013132 (2016).","journal-title":"CA Cancer J. Clin."},{"key":"75512_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1101","DOI":"10.1634\/theoncologist.2013-0123","volume":"18","author":"S Li","year":"2013","unstructured":"Li, S. et al. Changes in prevalence and clinical characteristics of cervical cancer in the People\u2019s Republic of China: A study of 10,012 cases from a nationwide working group. Oncologist 18, 1101\u20131107 (2013).","journal-title":"Oncologist"},{"key":"75512_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)32470-X","volume":"393","author":"PA Cohen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cohen, P. A. et al. Cervical cancer. Lancet 393, 169\u2013182 (2019).","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"75512_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-8258(92)90310-F","volume":"45","author":"LJ Copeland","year":"1992","unstructured":"Copeland, L. J. et al. Superficially invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol. Oncol. 45, 307\u2013312 (1992).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"75512_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e50","DOI":"10.1111\/ajco.12691","volume":"14","author":"H Yahata","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yahata, H. et al. Surgical treatment and outcome of early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix (FIGO stage IA1). Asia Pac. J. Clin. Oncol. 14, e50\u2013e53 (2018).","journal-title":"Asia Pac. J. Clin. Oncol."},{"issue":"332","key":"75512_CR7","first-page":"e331","volume":"217","author":"LM Bean","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bean, L. M. et al. Survival of women with microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix is not improved by radical surgery. Am, J, Obstet, Gynecol. 217(332), e331-332, e336 (2017).","journal-title":"Am, J, Obstet, Gynecol."},{"issue":"182","key":"75512_CR8","first-page":"e181","volume":"200","author":"R Salani","year":"2009","unstructured":"Salani, R. et al. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: A metaanalysis of 1278 patients evaluating the predictive value of conization margin status. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 200(182), e181-185 (2009).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"75512_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0000000000000374","volume":"22","author":"RC Nicholson","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nicholson, R. C. et al. Management of early cervical stromal invasion FIGO Stage 1A1 when margins are involved with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J. Low Genit. Tract. Dis. 22, 129\u2013131 (2018).","journal-title":"J. Low Genit. Tract. Dis."},{"key":"75512_CR10","unstructured":"NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines\u00ae). Cervical Cancer. Version 1.2020\u2014January 14, 2020. https:\/\/www.nccn.org\/professionals\/physician_gls\/pdf\/cervical.pdf.)."},{"issue":"625","key":"75512_CR11","first-page":"e621","volume":"211","author":"K Papakonstantinou","year":"2014","unstructured":"Papakonstantinou, K. et al. Management of stage Ia1 squamous cervical cancer and the importance of excision margins: a retrospective study of long-term outcome after 25 years of follow-up. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 211(625), e621-626 (2014).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"75512_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e240","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(16)30032-8","volume":"17","author":"E Bentivegna","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bentivegna, E. et al. Oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: A systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 17, e240\u2013e253 (2016).","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol."},{"key":"75512_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1097\/PAS.0000000000000986","volume":"42","author":"S Stolnicu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Stolnicu, S. et al. International endocervical adenocarcinoma criteria and classification (IECC): A new pathogenetic classification for invasive adenocarcinomas of the endocervix. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 42, 214\u2013226 (2018).","journal-title":"Am. J. Surg. Pathol."},{"key":"75512_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1692","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6605705","volume":"102","author":"JY Park","year":"2010","unstructured":"Park, J. Y. et al. Outcomes after radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix. Br. J. Cancer 102, 1692\u20131698 (2010).","journal-title":"Br. J. Cancer"},{"key":"75512_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1640","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0b013e3182262059","volume":"21","author":"A Baalbergen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Baalbergen, A. et al. Conservative therapy in microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix is justified: an analysis of 59 cases and a review of the literature. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 21, 1640\u20131645 (2011).","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer."},{"issue":"80","key":"75512_CR16","first-page":"e81","volume":"206","author":"L Spoozak","year":"2012","unstructured":"Spoozak, L. et al. Microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 206(80), e81-86 (2012).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"75512_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1150","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f74062","volume":"116","author":"EA Reynolds","year":"2010","unstructured":"Reynolds, E. A. et al. Analysis of outcomes of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix by treatment type. Obstet. Gynecol. 116, 1150\u20131157 (2010).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"75512_CR18","first-page":"2847","volume":"11","author":"M Kyrgiou","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kyrgiou, M. et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 11, 2847 (2017).","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev."},{"key":"75512_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19114","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-019-55786-4","volume":"9","author":"X Wang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wang, X. et al. The effects of different instruments and suture methods of conization for cervical lesions. Sci. Rep. 9, 19114 (2019).","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"75512_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0b013e31824ca9d5","volume":"16","author":"D Saslow","year":"2012","unstructured":"Saslow, D. et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. J. Low Genit. Tract. Dis. 16, 175\u2013204 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Low Genit. Tract. Dis."},{"key":"75512_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1206","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2012.01847.x","volume":"38","author":"G Kir","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kir, G. et al. Endocervical glandular involvement, positive endocervical surgical margin and multicentricity are more often associated with high-grade than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 38, 1206\u20131210 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res."},{"key":"75512_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1759","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.31202","volume":"142","author":"FL Sand","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sand, F. L. et al. Long-term risk of cervical cancer following conization of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3\u2014A Danish nationwide cohort study. Int. J. Cancer. 142, 1759\u20131766 (2018).","journal-title":"Int. J. Cancer."},{"key":"75512_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.01.015","volume":"186","author":"L Giannella","year":"2015","unstructured":"Giannella, L. et al. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 186, 68\u201374 (2015).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"key":"75512_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.32752","volume":"147","author":"FL Sand","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sand, F. L. et al. Risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse after conization in relation to HPV vaccination status. Int. J. Cancer. 147, 641\u2013647 (2020).","journal-title":"Int. J. Cancer."},{"key":"75512_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.09.006","volume":"124","author":"N van Hanegem","year":"2012","unstructured":"van Hanegem, N. et al. Fertility-sparing treatment in younger women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. Gynecol. Oncol. 124, 72\u201377 (2012).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"75512_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(96)00083-X","volume":"88","author":"JK Wolf","year":"1996","unstructured":"Wolf, J. K. et al. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: significance of cone biopsy margins. Obstet. Gynecol. 88, 82\u201386 (1996).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"75512_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1995.1118","volume":"57","author":"EA Poynor","year":"1995","unstructured":"Poynor, E. A. et al. Management and follow-up of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Gynecol. Oncol. 57, 158\u2013164 (1995).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"75512_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1995.0003","volume":"59","author":"DD Im","year":"1995","unstructured":"Im, D. D. et al. Adequacy of conization margins in adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix as a predictor of residual disease. Gynecol. Oncol. 59, 179\u2013182 (1995).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"75512_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1093\/ajcp\/109.6.727","volume":"109","author":"NS Goldstein","year":"1998","unstructured":"Goldstein, N. S. et al. The status and distance of cone biopsy margins as a predictor of excision adequacy for endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 109, 727\u2013732 (1998).","journal-title":"Am. J. Clin. Pathol."},{"key":"75512_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1543","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000000260","volume":"24","author":"A Baalbergen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Baalbergen, A. et al. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix\u2014A systematic review. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 24, 1543\u20131548 (2014).","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer"},{"issue":"366","key":"75512_CR31","first-page":"e361","volume":"210","author":"KE Tierney","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tierney, K. E. et al. Cervical conization of adenocarcinoma in situ: A predicting model of residual disease. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 210(366), e361-365 (2014).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"75512_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2005.04.013","volume":"98","author":"DE Cohn","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cohn, D. E. et al. Invasive cervical adenocarcinoma immediately following a cone biopsy for adenocarcinoma in situ with negative margins. Gynecol. Oncol. 98, 158\u2013160 (2005).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"75512_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.11.039","volume":"124","author":"S Costa","year":"2012","unstructured":"Costa, S. et al. Factors predicting the outcome of conservatively treated adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: An analysis of 166 cases. Gynecol. Oncol. 124, 490\u2013495 (2012).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"75512_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-00009577-200501000-00014","volume":"15","author":"F Raspagliesi","year":"2005","unstructured":"Raspagliesi, F. et al. Prognostic factors in microinvasive cervical squamous cell cancer: Long-term results. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 15, 88\u201393 (2005).","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer."},{"key":"75512_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1097\/00004347-199307000-00001","volume":"12","author":"AG Ostor","year":"1993","unstructured":"Ostor, A. G. Studies on 200 cases of early squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 12, 193\u2013207 (1993).","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol."},{"key":"75512_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1111\/IGC.0b013e3181a1a297","volume":"19","author":"SJ Lee","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lee, S. J. et al. Conization using electrosurgical conization and cold coagulation for international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IA1 squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 19, 407\u2013411 (2009).","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer"},{"key":"75512_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340802596009","volume":"88","author":"SW Lee","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lee, S. W. et al. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 88, 209\u2013215 (2009).","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"key":"75512_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.07.062","volume":"107","author":"KCHM Bisseling","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bisseling, K. C. H. M. et al. Treatment of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: A retrospective study and review of the literature. Gynecol. Oncol. 107, 424\u2013430 (2007).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"75512_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4799-0","volume":"298","author":"Y Feng","year":"2018","unstructured":"Feng, Y. et al. The safety of fertility preservation for microinvasive cervical adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 298, 465\u2013475 (2018).","journal-title":"Arch. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"key":"75512_CR40","first-page":"219","volume":"93","author":"JO Schorge","year":"1999","unstructured":"Schorge, J. O. et al. Stage IA1 cervical adenocarcinoma: definition and treatment. Obstet. Gynecol. 93, 219\u2013222 (1999).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"75512_CR41","first-page":"565","volume":"30","author":"LA Hefler","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hefler, L. A. et al. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: A series of 156 cases and a review of the literature. Anticancer Res. 30, 565\u2013568 (2010).","journal-title":"Anticancer Res."},{"key":"75512_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-8258(03)00268-3","volume":"90","author":"S Costa","year":"2003","unstructured":"Costa, S. et al. Factors predicting human papillomavirus clearance in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions treated by conization. Gynecol. Oncol. 90, 358\u2013365 (2003).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"75512_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2013.09.002","volume":"131","author":"CF Gosvig","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gosvig, C. F. et al. Persistence and reappearance of high-risk human papillomavirus after conization. Gynecol. Oncol. 131, 661\u2013666 (2013).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"75512_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"580","DOI":"10.1007\/s10147-015-0929-x","volume":"21","author":"A Kudoh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kudoh, A. et al. Human papillomavirus type-specific persistence and reappearance after successful conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 21, 580\u2013587 (2016).","journal-title":"Int. J. Clin. Oncol."},{"key":"75512_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02437.x","volume":"117","author":"A van de Vijver","year":"2010","unstructured":"van de Vijver, A. et al. Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: A retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital. BJOG 117, 268\u2013273 (2010).","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"75512_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68181-6","volume":"367","author":"M Kyrgiou","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kyrgiou, M. et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 367, 489\u2013498 (2006).","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"75512_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(80)90556-6","volume":"136","author":"G Leiman","year":"1980","unstructured":"Leiman, G. et al. Pregnancy following conization of the cervix: complications related to cone size. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 136, 14\u201318 (1980).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-020-75512-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-020-75512-9","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-020-75512-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,6]],"date-time":"2022-12-06T23:10:23Z","timestamp":1670368223000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-020-75512-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,16]]},"references-count":47,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]}},"alternative-id":["75512"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-020-75512-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 May 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 October 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 November 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"The paper is not under consideration by another journal, and the results presented in this work have not been previously presented or published.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Statement of submission"}},{"value":"Retrospective cohort study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Study design"}}],"article-number":"19920"}}