{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,21]],"date-time":"2026-04-21T10:13:56Z","timestamp":1776766436400,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,2]],"date-time":"2021-12-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1638403200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,2]],"date-time":"2021-12-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1638403200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Radical surgery after cervical conization is a common approach for the treatment of cervical cancer. In some cases, disease progression is observed after positive margins at conization, but the effect of conization on disease progression remains unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of positive margins at conization in cervical cancer. A total of 101 patients who underwent cervical conization before radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection were considered eligible by reviewing medical records. The association between the positive margins and patient outcomes, including subsequent lymph node metastasis, was evaluated. The rate of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) positivity at radical surgery was significantly higher in patients with positive margins (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.017) than in those with negative margins, although there was no significant difference in the rate of pelvic lymph node metastasis (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.155). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the overall survival or progression-free survival between the two groups (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.332 and 0.200, respectively). A positive margin at conization presented no significant prognostic disadvantage; thus, diagnostic conization is one of the most suitable treatment options for early-stage cervical cancer that is difficult to accurately assess.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-02635-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,2]],"date-time":"2021-12-02T11:03:04Z","timestamp":1638442984000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Clinical effects of cervical conization with positive margins in cervical cancer"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Yukari","family":"Nagao","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Akira","family":"Yokoi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kosuke","family":"Yoshida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Masanori","family":"Sumi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Masato","family":"Yoshihara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Satoshi","family":"Tamauchi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yoshiki","family":"Ikeda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nobuhisa","family":"Yoshikawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kimihiro","family":"Nishino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kaoru","family":"Niimi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hiroaki","family":"Kajiyama","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"2635_CR1","unstructured":"Cancer, I. A. F. R. O. GLOBOCAN2020, Cervix uteri, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Statistics Worldwide and by Region (2020). https:\/\/gco.iarc.fr\/today\/data\/factsheets\/cancers\/23-Cervix-uteri-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed  20 February 2021."},{"key":"2635_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2144","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.32014","volume":"144","author":"M Utada","year":"2019","unstructured":"Utada, M. et al. Increasing risk of uterine cervical cancer among young Japanese women: Comparison of incidence trends in Japan, South Korea and Japanese-Americans between 1985 and 2012. Int. J. Cancer 144, 2144\u20132152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijc.32014 (2019).","journal-title":"Int. J. Cancer"},{"key":"2635_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1016\/s1470-2045(16)00147-9","volume":"17","author":"Y Tanaka","year":"2016","unstructured":"Tanaka, Y. et al. Outcomes for girls without HPV vaccination in Japan. Lancet Oncol. 17, 868\u2013869. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1470-2045(16)00147-9 (2016).","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol."},{"key":"2635_CR4","unstructured":"Ministry of Health, L. A. W. Cancer Registry and Statistics. Cancer Information Service, National Cancer Center, Japan (Survey of Cancer Screening Status by Prefecture) (2015\u20132018). https:\/\/ganjoho.jp\/reg_stat\/statistics\/dl_screening\/index.html."},{"key":"2635_CR5","unstructured":"Ministry of Health, L. A. W. Cancer Registry and Statistics. Cancer Information Service, National Cancer Center, Japan (Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ)) (1975\u20132015). https:\/\/ganjoho.jp\/reg_stat\/statistics\/dl\/index.html. Accessed  02 August 2021."},{"key":"2635_CR6","unstructured":"Ministry of Health, L. A. W. Cancer Registry and Statistics. Cancer Information Service, National Cancer Center, Japan (National Cancer Registry) (2016\u20132018). https:\/\/ganjoho.jp\/reg_stat\/statistics\/dl\/index.html. Accessed  02 August 2021."},{"key":"2635_CR7","unstructured":"Ministry of Health, L. A. W. Cancer Registry and Statistics. Cancer Information Service, National Cancer Center, Japan (Vital Statistics of Japan) (1958\u20132019). https:\/\/ganjoho.jp\/reg_stat\/statistics\/dl\/index.html. Accessed  02 August 2021."},{"key":"2635_CR8","unstructured":"Network, N. C. C. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Version 4.2019 Cervical Cancer (2019). https:\/\/www.nccn.org\/professionals\/physician_gls\/default.aspx. Accessed  02 August 2021."},{"key":"2635_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-8258(89)90070-x","volume":"35","author":"G Delgado","year":"1989","unstructured":"Delgado, G. et al. A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol. Oncol. 35, 314\u2013320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0090-8258(89)90070-x (1989).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"2635_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1998.4943","volume":"68","author":"LD Roman","year":"1998","unstructured":"Roman, L. D. et al. Influence of quantity of lymph-vascular space invasion on the risk of nodal metastases in women with early-stage squamous cancer of the cervix. Gynecol. Oncol. 68, 220\u2013225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/gyno.1998.4943 (1998).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"2635_CR11","first-page":"S31","volume":"88","author":"A Chandacham","year":"2005","unstructured":"Chandacham, A. et al. Extent of lymphovascular space invasion and risk of pelvic lymph node metastases in stage IB1 cervical cancer. J. Med. Assoc. Thai 88(Suppl 2), S31\u2013S36 (2005).","journal-title":"J. Med. Assoc. Thai"},{"key":"2635_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.04.010","volume":"106","author":"MR Milam","year":"2007","unstructured":"Milam, M. R. et al. Preoperative lymph-vascular space invasion is associated with nodal metastases in women with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 106, 12\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.04.010 (2007).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"2635_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.5732\/cjc.009.10528","volume":"29","author":"M Yan","year":"2010","unstructured":"Yan, M., Zhang, Y. N., He, J. H., Sun, J. R. & Sun, X. M. Influence of lymph vascular space invasion on prognosis of patients with early-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Chin. J. Cancer 29, 425\u2013430. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5732\/cjc.009.10528 (2010).","journal-title":"Chin. J. Cancer"},{"key":"2635_CR14","volume-title":"Guidelines for Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer 2017 Edition","author":"Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology","year":"2017","unstructured":"Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Guidelines for Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer 2017 Edition (Kanehara & Co., 2017)."},{"key":"2635_CR15","volume-title":"The General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Management of Uterine Cervical Cancer Clinical Edition","author":"Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology","year":"2020","unstructured":"Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japan Radiological Society, Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. The General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Management of Uterine Cervical Cancer Clinical Edition (Kanehara & Co, 2020)."},{"key":"2635_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000388","volume":"29","author":"C Kohler","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kohler, C. et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff\u2014A multicenter analysis. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 29, 845\u2013850. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000388 (2019).","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer"},{"key":"2635_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1895","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1806395","volume":"379","author":"PT Ramirez","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ramirez, P. T. et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 1895\u20131904. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1806395 (2018).","journal-title":"N. Engl. J. Med."},{"key":"2635_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1039","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05835-5","volume":"303","author":"A Kavallaris","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kavallaris, A., Chalvatzas, N., Gkoutzioulis, A. & Zygouris, D. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: Description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 303, 1039\u20131047. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05835-5 (2021).","journal-title":"Arch. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"key":"2635_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e33","DOI":"10.3802\/jgo.2020.31.e33","volume":"31","author":"C K\u00f6hler","year":"2020","unstructured":"K\u00f6hler, C., Schneider, A., Marnitz, S. & Plaikner, A. The basic principles of oncologic surgery during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 31, e33. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3802\/jgo.2020.31.e33 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"2635_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1864","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2020-001816","volume":"30","author":"A Nica","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nica, A. et al. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: Is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame? Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 30, 1864\u20131870. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/ijgc-2020-001816 (2020).","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer"},{"key":"2635_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.01.013","author":"Y Liu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Liu, Y., Huang, S., Ming, X., Jing, H. & Li, Z. Surgical approach and use of uterine manipulator are not associated with LVSI in surgery for early-stage cervical cancer. J. Minim. Invas. Gynecol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.01.013 (2021).","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invas. Gynecol."},{"key":"2635_CR22","first-page":"200","volume":"44","author":"HX Lu","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lu, H. X. et al. Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 44, 200\u2013203 (2009).","journal-title":"Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi"},{"key":"2635_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.3892\/etm.2012.748","volume":"5","author":"X Cheng","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cheng, X. et al. The effectiveness of conization treatment for post-menopausal women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Exp. Ther. Med. 5, 185\u2013188. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3892\/etm.2012.748 (2013).","journal-title":"Exp. Ther. Med."},{"key":"2635_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2419","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14118","volume":"45","author":"R Yamamoto","year":"2019","unstructured":"Yamamoto, R. et al. Value and limitation of conization as a diagnostic procedure for cervical neoplasm. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 45, 2419\u20132424. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.14118 (2019).","journal-title":"J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res."},{"key":"2635_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2013.11.019","volume":"132","author":"ES Diaz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Diaz, E. S. et al. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins. Gynecol. Oncol. 132, 76\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ygyno.2013.11.019 (2014).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"2635_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-021-09656-x","author":"G Baiocchi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Baiocchi, G. et al. Predictive factors for residual disease after conization in cervical cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-021-09656-x (2021).","journal-title":"Ann. Surg. Oncol."},{"key":"2635_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2016.11.029","volume":"144","author":"B Smith","year":"2017","unstructured":"Smith, B. et al. Less radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: Can conization specimens help identify patients at low risk for parametrial involvement? Gynecol. Oncol. 144, 290\u2013293. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ygyno.2016.11.029 (2017).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"2635_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-021-09695-4","author":"N Bizzarri","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bizzarri, N. et al. Protective role of conization before radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A propensity-score matching study. Ann. Surg. Oncol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-021-09695-4 (2021).","journal-title":"Ann. Surg. Oncol."},{"key":"2635_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(19920101)69:1<181::aid-cncr2820690130>3.0.co;2-b","volume":"69","author":"T Kamura","year":"1992","unstructured":"Kamura, T. et al. Multivariate analysis of the histopathologic prognostic factors of cervical cancer in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. Cancer 69, 181\u2013186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/1097-0142(19920101)69:1%3c181::aid-cncr2820690130%3e3.0.co;2-b (1992).","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"2635_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"458","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2004.01.026","volume":"93","author":"CM Ho","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ho, C. M. et al. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors and outcomes in early cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. Gynecol. Oncol. 93, 458\u2013464. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ygyno.2004.01.026 (2004).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-02635-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-02635-y","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-02635-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]],"date-time":"2022-12-03T17:47:25Z","timestamp":1670089645000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-02635-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,2]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2635"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-02635-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 June 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 November 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 December 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"23288"}}