{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T21:52:07Z","timestamp":1787003527059,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,28]],"date-time":"2021-01-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1611792000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,28]],"date-time":"2021-01-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1611792000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"the project of Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan","award":["109-wf-eva-19"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["109-wf-eva-19"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal fractures. Diagnosing scaphoid fractures is challenging. Recently, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been shown to be a promising strategy for diagnosing scaphoid fractures. The diagnostic performance of CBCT remains inconclusive in the literature. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, our study aims to determine the diagnostic performance of CBCT for diagnosing scaphoid fractures. Five databases were searched up to March 25, 2020. We included prospective and retrospective studies describing the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for scaphoid fractures in adult patients. QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Four studies (n\u2009=\u2009350) were included in the meta-analysis. Three of the four studies had high bias risk. The result showed that CBCT had a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 and a pooled specificity of 0.99 for scaphoid fracture diagnosis. The heterogeneities of sensitivity and specificity were substantial. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98. No significant publication bias was observed. The result suggested that the diagnostic performance of CBCT for scaphoid fracture was excellent. The certainty of current evidence is low. Further well-designed studies with large sample sizes are warranted to confirm this finding.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-82351-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,28]],"date-time":"2021-01-28T06:04:39Z","timestamp":1611813879000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Diagnostic performance of cone-beam computed tomography for scaphoid fractures: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Ta-Wei","family":"Yang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yen-Yue","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shih-Chang","family":"Hsu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karen Chia-Wen","family":"Chu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chih-Wei","family":"Hsiao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chin-Wang","family":"Hsu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chyi-Huey","family":"Bai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cheng-Kuang","family":"Chang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yuan-Pin","family":"Hsu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"82351_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1080\/02844319950159145","volume":"33","author":"LM Hove","year":"1999","unstructured":"Hove, L. M. Epidemiology of scaphoid fractures in Bergen, Norway. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg. 33, 423\u2013426 (1999).","journal-title":"Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg."},{"key":"82351_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B5.36938","volume":"98","author":"K Garala","year":"2016","unstructured":"Garala, K., Taub, N. A. & Dias, J. J. The epidemiology of fractures of the scaphoid: Impact of age, gender, deprivation and seasonality. Bone Joint J. 98, 654\u2013659 (2016).","journal-title":"Bone Joint J."},{"key":"82351_CR3","volume-title":"Scaphoid Fractures: Evidence-based Management","author":"G Buijze","year":"2017","unstructured":"Buijze, G. & Jupiter, J. B. Scaphoid Fractures: Evidence-based Management (Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam, 2017)."},{"key":"82351_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-011-9072-0","volume":"4","author":"LA Hackney","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hackney, L. A. & Dodds, S. D. Assessment of scaphoid fracture healing. Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med. 4, 16\u201322 (2011).","journal-title":"Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med."},{"key":"82351_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"768","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2008.01.003","volume":"39","author":"PJ Jenkins","year":"2008","unstructured":"Jenkins, P. J., Slade, K., Huntley, J. S. & Robinson, C. M. A comparative analysis of the accuracy, diagnostic uncertainty and cost of imaging modalities in suspected scaphoid fractures. Injury 39, 768\u2013774 (2008).","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"82351_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-018-2931-7","volume":"47","author":"RM Kwee","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kwee, R. M. & Kwee, T. C. Ultrasound for diagnosing radiographically occult scaphoid fracture. Skeletal Radiol. 47, 1205\u20131212 (2018).","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol."},{"key":"82351_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.15557\/JoU.2018.0047","volume":"18","author":"M Ali","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ali, M., Ali, M., Mohamed, A., Mannan, S. & Fallahi, F. The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures. J. Ultrason. 18, 325\u2013331 (2018).","journal-title":"J. Ultrason."},{"key":"82351_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1693147","volume":"9","author":"HC Backer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Backer, H. C., Wu, C. H. & Strauch, R. J. Systematic review of diagnosis of clinically suspected scaphoid fractures. J. Wrist Surg. 9, 81\u201389 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Wrist Surg."},{"key":"82351_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1098","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/73145885","volume":"85","author":"AD De Zwart","year":"2012","unstructured":"De Zwart, A. D. et al. MRI as a reference standard for suspected scaphoid fractures. Br. J. Radiol. 85, 1098\u20131101 (2012).","journal-title":"Br. J. Radiol."},{"key":"82351_CR10","first-page":"010023","volume":"1","author":"WH Mallee","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mallee, W. H. et al. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, 010023 (2015).","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"key":"82351_CR11","first-page":"446","volume":"22","author":"M Loubele","year":"2007","unstructured":"Loubele, M., Guerrero, M. E., Jacobs, R., Suetens, P. & van Steenberghe, D. A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multi-slice spiral CT. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants 22, 446\u2013454 (2007).","journal-title":"Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"82351_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-015-2290-6","volume":"45","author":"R Edlund","year":"2016","unstructured":"Edlund, R., Skorpil, M., Lapidus, G. & Backlund, J. Cone-Beam CT in diagnosis of scaphoid fractures. Skeletal Radiol. 45, 197\u2013204 (2016).","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol."},{"key":"82351_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.10.010","volume":"97","author":"C Borel","year":"2017","unstructured":"Borel, C. et al. Diagnostic value of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in occult scaphoid and wrist fractures. Eur. J. Radiol. 97, 59\u201364 (2017).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Radiol."},{"key":"82351_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3906","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-018-22331-8","volume":"8","author":"J Neubauer","year":"2018","unstructured":"Neubauer, J. et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and radiography for scaphoid fractures. Sci. Rep. 8, 3906 (2018).","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"82351_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1117","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.19.21478","volume":"213","author":"B Gibney","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gibney, B. et al. Incorporating cone-beam CT into the diagnostic algorithm for suspected radiocarpal fractures: A new standard of care?. Am. J. Roentgenol. 213, 1117\u20131123 (2019).","journal-title":"Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"82351_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejro.2019.01.009","volume":"6","author":"PM Ricci","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ricci, P. M. et al. Cone-beam computed tomography compared to X-ray in diagnosis of extremities bone fractures: A study of 198 cases. Eur. J. Radiol. Open 6, 119\u2013121 (2019).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Radiol. Open"},{"key":"82351_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","volume":"6","author":"D Moher","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D. G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6, e1000097 (2009).","journal-title":"PLoS Med."},{"key":"82351_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009","volume":"155","author":"PF Whiting","year":"2011","unstructured":"Whiting, P. F. et al. QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann. Intern. Med. 155, 529\u2013536 (2011).","journal-title":"Ann. Intern. Med."},{"key":"82351_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016","volume":"58","author":"JJ Deeks","year":"2005","unstructured":"Deeks, J. J., Macaskill, P. & Irwig, L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 58, 882\u2013893 (2005).","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"82351_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1111\/acem.12317","volume":"21","author":"CR Carpenter","year":"2014","unstructured":"Carpenter, C. R. et al. Adult scaphoid fracture. Acad. Emerg. Med. 21, 101\u2013121 (2014).","journal-title":"Acad. Emerg. Med."},{"key":"82351_CR21","volume-title":"Making the Best Use of a Department of Clinical Radiology: Guidelines for Doctors","author":"RW Party","year":"2003","unstructured":"Party, R. W. Making the Best Use of a Department of Clinical Radiology: Guidelines for Doctors (Royal College of Radiologists, London, 2003)."},{"key":"82351_CR22","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging ACR Appropriateness Criteria","author":"ACO Radiology","year":"2001","unstructured":"Radiology, A. C. O. Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging ACR Appropriateness Criteria 1\u20137 (American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, 2001)."},{"key":"82351_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0000000000000042","volume":"49","author":"J Neubauer","year":"2014","unstructured":"Neubauer, J. et al. Comparing the image quality of a mobile flat-panel computed tomography and a multidetector computed tomography: A phantom study. Invest. Radiol. 49, 491\u2013497 (2014).","journal-title":"Invest. Radiol."},{"key":"82351_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1742","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3546-6","volume":"25","author":"S Demehri","year":"2015","unstructured":"Demehri, S. et al. Assessment of image quality in soft tissue and bone visualization tasks for a dedicated extremity cone-beam CT system. Eur. Radiol. 25, 1742\u20131751 (2015).","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"key":"82351_CR25","first-page":"e778","volume":"8","author":"L Lechuga","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lechuga, L. & Weidlich, G. A. Cone beam CT vs. fan beam CT: A comparison of image quality and dose delivered between two differing CT imaging modalities. Cureus 8, e778 (2016).","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"82351_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"649","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-012-1516-0","volume":"42","author":"SK Koskinen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Koskinen, S. K. et al. CT arthrography of the wrist using a novel, mobile, dedicated extremity cone-beam CT (CBCT). Skeletal Radiol. 42, 649\u2013657 (2013).","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol."},{"key":"82351_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2009.09.023","volume":"77","author":"H Watanabe","year":"2011","unstructured":"Watanabe, H., Honda, E., Tetsumura, A. & Kurabayashi, T. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use. Eur. J. Radiol. 77, 397\u2013402 (2011).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Radiol."},{"key":"82351_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"963","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-011-1305-1","volume":"41","author":"R Ramdhian-Wihlm","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ramdhian-Wihlm, R. et al. Cone-beam computed tomography arthrography: An innovative modality for the evaluation of wrist ligament and cartilage injuries. Skeletal Radiol. 41, 963\u2013969 (2012).","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol."},{"key":"82351_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1581548","volume":"188","author":"J Neubauer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Neubauer, J. et al. Comparison of the radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in examinations of the hand. Rofo 188, 488\u2013493 (2016).","journal-title":"Rofo"},{"key":"82351_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-013-0948-9","volume":"18","author":"E Hofmann","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hofmann, E. et al. Comparative study of image quality and radiation dose of cone beam and low-dose multislice computed tomography\u2013an in-vitro investigation. Clin. Oral Investig. 18, 301\u2013311 (2014).","journal-title":"Clin. Oral Investig."},{"key":"82351_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0178747","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0178747","volume":"12","author":"S Tschauner","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tschauner, S. et al. Surface radiation dose comparison of a dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) machine in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms. PLoS ONE 12, e0178747 (2017).","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"82351_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1097\/RCT.0000000000000843","volume":"43","author":"T Dubreuil","year":"2019","unstructured":"Dubreuil, T. et al. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography in the assessment of extremity fractures. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 43, 372\u2013378 (2019).","journal-title":"J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr."},{"key":"82351_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1177\/1753193418758846","volume":"43","author":"P Honigmann","year":"2018","unstructured":"Honigmann, P. & Frueh, F. S. Letter about a published paper. J. Hand. Surg. Eur. 43, 451 (2018).","journal-title":"J. Hand. Surg. Eur."},{"key":"82351_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1007\/s13244-017-0582-1","volume":"9","author":"M Posadzy","year":"2018","unstructured":"Posadzy, M., Desimpel, J. & Vanhoenacker, F. Cone beam CT of the musculoskeletal system: Clinical applications. Insights Imaging 9, 35\u201345 (2018).","journal-title":"Insights Imaging"},{"key":"82351_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20180013","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20180013","volume":"47","author":"R Spin-Neto","year":"2018","unstructured":"Spin-Neto, R., Matzen, L. H., Schropp, L. W., Sorensen, T. S. & Wenzel, A. An ex vivo study of automated motion artefact correction and the impact on cone beam CT image quality and interpretability. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 47, 20180013 (2018).","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol."},{"key":"82351_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1081","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhsa.2019.07.014","volume":"44","author":"A Pallaver","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pallaver, A. & Honigmann, P. The role of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan for detection and follow-up of traumatic wrist pathologies. J. Hand Sur. Am. 44, 1081\u20131087 (2019).","journal-title":"J. Hand Sur. Am."},{"key":"82351_CR37","first-page":"67","volume":"12","author":"J Salimi","year":"2009","unstructured":"Salimi, J. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CT scan in abdominal blunt trauma. Chin. J. Traumatol. 12, 67\u201370 (2009).","journal-title":"Chin. J. Traumatol."},{"key":"82351_CR38","first-page":"265","volume":"8","author":"C Liguori","year":"2015","unstructured":"Liguori, C. et al. Emerging clinical applications of computed tomography. Med. Devices 8, 265\u2013278 (2015).","journal-title":"Med. Devices"},{"key":"82351_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.94B7.28704","volume":"94","author":"AD Duckworth","year":"2012","unstructured":"Duckworth, A. D. et al. Predictors of fracture following suspected injury to the scaphoid. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 94, 961\u2013968 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Bone Joint Surg. Br."},{"key":"82351_CR40","first-page":"U1296","volume":"118","author":"S Kumar","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kumar, S., O\u2019Connor, A., Despois, M. & Galloway, H. Use of early magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures: The CAST Study (Canberra Area Scaphoid Trial). N. Z. Med. J. 118, U1296 (2005).","journal-title":"N. Z. Med. J."},{"key":"82351_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1002\/jmrs.153","volume":"63","author":"T Kelson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kelson, T., Davidson, R. & Baker, T. Early MRI versus conventional management in the detection of occult scaphoid fractures: What does it really cost? A rural pilot study. J. Med. Radiat. Sci. 63, 9\u201316 (2016).","journal-title":"J. Med. Radiat. Sci."},{"key":"82351_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1002\/jmrs.302","volume":"66","author":"AR Wijetunga","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wijetunga, A. R., Tsang, V. H. & Giuffre, B. The utility of cross-sectional imaging in the management of suspected scaphoid fractures. J. Med. Radiat. Sci. 66, 30\u201337 (2019).","journal-title":"J. Med. Radiat. Sci."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-82351-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-82351-9","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-82351-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,2]],"date-time":"2022-12-02T21:54:03Z","timestamp":1670018043000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-82351-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,28]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["82351"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-82351-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 June 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 January 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 January 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"2587"}}