{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]],"date-time":"2026-09-04T00:51:04Z","timestamp":1788483064576,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,4]],"date-time":"2021-02-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1612396800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,4]],"date-time":"2021-02-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1612396800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Concomitant apical suspension should be performed at the time of hysterectomy for uterine prolapse to reduce the risk of recurrent prolapse. Native tissue repair (NTR) and sacrocolpopexy (SCP) are commonly used apical suspension procedures; however, it remains unclear which one is preferred. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of NTR and SCP in terms of surgical failure, complication and reoperation rates. Surgical failure was defined as the presence of vaginal bulge symptoms, any prolapse beyond the hymen, or retreatment for prolapse. This retrospective cohort study included 523 patients who had undergone NTR (n\u2009=\u2009272) or SCP (n\u2009=\u2009251) along with hysterectomy for uterine prolapse and who had at least 4-month follow-up visits. During the median 3-year follow-up period, the surgical failure rate was higher in the NTR group (21.3% vs 6.4%, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.01), with a low rate of retreatment in both groups. Overall complication rates were similar, but complications requiring surgical correction under anesthesia were more common in the SCP group (7.2% vs 0.4%, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.01). As a result, the total reoperation rate was significantly higher in the SCP group (8.0% vs 2.6%, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.02). Taken together, NTR may be a preferred option for apical suspension when hysterectomy is performed for uterine prolapse.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-82732-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,4]],"date-time":"2021-02-04T11:08:10Z","timestamp":1612436890000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Comparison of treatment outcomes for native tissue repair and sacrocolpopexy as apical suspension procedures at the time of hysterectomy for uterine prolapse"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Sumin","family":"Oh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E. Kyung","family":"Shin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sowoon","family":"Hyun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Myung Jae","family":"Jeon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"82732_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.3349\/ymj.2018.59.4.539","volume":"59","author":"YW Jung","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jung, Y. W., Pak, H., Lee, I. & Kim, E. H. The effect of diagnosis-related group payment system on quality of care in the field of obstetrics and gynecology among Korean Tertiary hospitals. Yonsei Med. J. 59, 539\u2013545. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3349\/ymj.2018.59.4.539 (2018).","journal-title":"Yonsei Med. J."},{"key":"82732_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b","volume":"110","author":"JM Wu","year":"2007","unstructured":"Wu, J. M., Wechter, M. E., Geller, E. J., Nguyen, T. V. & Visco, A. G. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet. Gynecol. 110, 1091\u20131095. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b (2007).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"82732_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-012-0249-x","volume":"13","author":"Y Barbalat","year":"2012","unstructured":"Barbalat, Y. & Tunuguntla, H. S. Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a historical perspective. Curr. Urol. Rep. 13, 256\u2013261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11934-012-0249-x (2012).","journal-title":"Curr. Urol. Rep."},{"key":"82732_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"649459","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/649459","volume":"2012","author":"KT Downing","year":"2012","unstructured":"Downing, K. T. Uterine prolapse: from antiquity to today. Obstet. Gynecol. Int. 2012, 649459. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2012\/649459 (2012).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol. Int."},{"key":"82732_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"981","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a8a5e4","volume":"122","author":"KS Eilber","year":"2013","unstructured":"Eilber, K. S. et al. Outcomes of vaginal prolapse surgery among female Medicare beneficiaries: the role of apical support. Obstet. Gynecol. 122, 981\u2013987. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a8a5e4 (2013).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"82732_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"0012376","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD012376","volume":"10","author":"C Maher","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maher, C. et al. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 10, 0012376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD012376 (2016).","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"key":"82732_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000570","volume":"125","author":"NY Siddiqui","year":"2015","unstructured":"Siddiqui, N. Y. et al. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 125, 44\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000570 (2015).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"688","key":"82732_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e681","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.07.029","volume":"199","author":"GW Cundiff","year":"2008","unstructured":"Cundiff, G. W. et al. Risk factors for mesh\/suture erosion following sacral colpopexy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 199(688), e681-685. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.07.029 (2008).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"82732_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.051","volume":"194","author":"JM Wu","year":"2006","unstructured":"Wu, J. M. et al. Mesh erosion in abdominal sacral colpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 194, 1418\u20131422. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.051 (2006).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"82732_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2094","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.07.066","volume":"193","author":"G Bensinger","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bensinger, G., Lind, L., Lesser, M., Guess, M. & Winkler, H. A. Abdominal sacral suspensions: analysis of complications using permanent mesh. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 193, 2094\u20132098. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.07.066 (2005).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"82732_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1265-3","volume":"22","author":"J Tan-Kim","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tan-Kim, J., Menefee, S. A., Luber, K. M., Nager, C. W. & Lukacz, E. S. Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Int. Urogynecol. J. 22, 205\u2013212. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-010-1265-3 (2011).","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"82732_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1368","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12363","volume":"40","author":"A Akyol","year":"2014","unstructured":"Akyol, A. et al. Additional surgical risk factors and patient characteristics for mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 40, 1368\u20131374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.12363 (2014).","journal-title":"J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res."},{"key":"82732_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b2b1ae","volume":"114","author":"MD Barber","year":"2009","unstructured":"Barber, M. D. et al. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet. Gynecol. 114, 600\u2013609. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b2b1ae (2009).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"82732_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1101","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3666-7","volume":"29","author":"RG Rogers","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rogers, R. G. et al. Open sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical repair: retrospective comparison of success and serious complications. Int. Urogynecol. J. 29, 1101\u20131110. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3666-7 (2018).","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"82732_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2016","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.4919","volume":"309","author":"I Nygaard","year":"2013","unstructured":"Nygaard, I. et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA 309, 2016\u20132024. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2013.4919 (2013).","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"82732_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1554","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.2827","volume":"319","author":"JE Jelovsek","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jelovsek, J. E. et al. Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the optimal randomized clinical trial. JAMA 319, 1554\u20131565. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2018.2827 (2018).","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"82732_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000139514.90897.07","volume":"104","author":"IE Nygaard","year":"2004","unstructured":"Nygaard, I. E. et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 104, 805\u2013823. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000139514.90897.07 (2004).","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"82732_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(99)80078-6","volume":"171","author":"HJ Sugerman","year":"1996","unstructured":"Sugerman, H. J. et al. Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid-dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh. Am. J. Surg. 171, 80\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0002-9610(99)80078-6 (1996).","journal-title":"Am. J. Surg."},{"key":"82732_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1673","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2758-x","volume":"26","author":"F Alhalabi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Alhalabi, F., Bacsu, C. D., Gulpinar, O., Scott, D. J. & Zimmern, P. E. Are women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse treated by open mesh sacrocolpopexy at risk of secondary incisional hernia?. Int. Urogynecol. J. 26, 1673\u20131677. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2758-x (2015).","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"issue":"174","key":"82732_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e171","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.08.008","volume":"212","author":"R Liang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Liang, R., Zong, W., Palcsey, S., Abramowitch, S. & Moalli, P. A. Impact of prolapse meshes on the metabolism of vaginal extracellular matrix in rhesus macaque. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 212(174), e171-177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.08.008 (2015).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"82732_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2069","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04260-1","volume":"31","author":"E Illiano","year":"2020","unstructured":"Illiano, E., Giannitsas, K. & Costantini, E. Comparison between laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy wih hysterectomy and hysteropexy in advanced urogenital prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. 31, 2069\u20132074. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04260-1 (2020).","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"issue":"489","key":"82732_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e481","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.07.007","volume":"205","author":"DD Antosh","year":"2011","unstructured":"Antosh, D. D., Iglesia, C. B., Vora, S. & Sokol, A. I. Outcome assessment with blinded versus unblinded POP-Q exams. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 205(489), e481-484. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.07.007 (2011).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"82732_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000452","volume":"24","author":"PJ Durst","year":"2018","unstructured":"Durst, P. J. & Heit, M. H. Polypropylene mesh predicts mesh\/suture exposure after sacrocolpopexy independent of known risk factors: a retrospective case-control study. Female Pelvic. Med. Reconstr. Surg. 24, 360\u2013366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000452 (2018).","journal-title":"Female Pelvic. Med. Reconstr. Surg."},{"key":"82732_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000632","volume":"26","author":"AL Askew","year":"2020","unstructured":"Askew, A. L. et al. Does mesh weight affect time to failure after robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy?. Female Pelvic. Med. Reconstr. Surg. 26, 536\u2013540. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000632 (2020).","journal-title":"Female Pelvic. Med. Reconstr. Surg."},{"key":"82732_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.5468\/ogs.2013.56.5.330","volume":"56","author":"EH Yoo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Yoo, E. H., Jeon, M. J., Ahn, K. H. & Bai, S. W. Translation and linguistic validation of Korean version of short form of pelvic floor distress inventory-20, pelvic floor impact questionnaire-7. Obstet. Gynecol. Sci. 56, 330\u2013332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5468\/ogs.2013.56.5.330 (2013).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol. Sci."},{"key":"82732_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9378(96)70243-0","volume":"175","author":"RC Bump","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bump, R. C. et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 175, 10\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0002-9378(96)70243-0 (1996).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"82732_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0228566","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0228566","volume":"15","author":"TY Kim","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kim, T. Y. & Jeon, M. J. Risk factors for vaginal mesh erosion after sacrocolpopexy in Korean women. PLoS ONE 15, e0228566. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0228566 (2020).","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"82732_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.05.001","volume":"225","author":"DH Suh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Suh, D. H. & Jeon, M. J. Risk factors for the failure of iliococcygeus suspension for uterine prolapse. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 225, 210\u2013213. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.05.001 (2018).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"key":"82732_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2043","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04229-0","volume":"31","author":"SY Lee","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lee, S. Y. & Jeon, M. J. Anterior repair versus no anterior repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse resolved under simulated apical support at the time of uterosacral ligament suspension. Int. Urogynecol. J. 31, 2043\u20132049. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04229-0 (2020).","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"82732_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2003.12.001","volume":"45","author":"E Delorme","year":"2004","unstructured":"Delorme, E., Droupy, S., de Tayrac, R. & Delmas, V. Transobturator tape (Uratape): a new minimally-invasive procedure to treat female urinary incontinence. Eur. Urol. 45, 203\u2013207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2003.12.001 (2004).","journal-title":"Eur. Urol."},{"key":"82732_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","volume":"240","author":"D Dindo","year":"2004","unstructured":"Dindo, D., Demartines, N. & Clavien, P. A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 240, 205\u2013213. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae (2004).","journal-title":"Ann. Surg."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-82732-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-82732-0","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-82732-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]],"date-time":"2022-12-03T03:26:26Z","timestamp":1670037986000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-82732-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,4]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["82732"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-82732-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 June 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 January 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 February 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"3119"}}