{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]],"date-time":"2026-07-03T00:42:27Z","timestamp":1783039347200,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,11]],"date-time":"2021-02-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1613001600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,11]],"date-time":"2021-02-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1613001600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The second-generation laryngeal mask airway (LMA) provides a higher sealing pressure than classical LMA and can insert the gastric drainage tube. We investigated the difference in respiratory variables according to the use of second-generation LMA and endotracheal tube (ETT) in laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy (LLDH). In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, intraoperative arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure at 2\u00a0h after the airway devices insertion (P<jats:sub>a<\/jats:sub>CO<jats:sub>2_<\/jats:sub>2h) was compared as a primary outcome. Participants were randomly assigned to the following groups: Group LMA (n\u2009=\u200945, used Protector LMA), or Group ETT (n\u2009=\u200943, used cuffed ETT). Intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory variables including mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) were compared. Postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and pulmonary aspiration were recorded. The P<jats:sub>a<\/jats:sub>CO<jats:sub>2_<\/jats:sub>2h were equally effective between two groups (mean difference: 0.99\u00a0mmHg, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.003; 90% confidence limits:\u2009\u2212\u20090.22, 2.19). The intraoperative change in MBP, HR, and PIP were differed over time between two groups (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.015, and <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.039, respectively). There were no differences of the incidence of postoperative complications at 24\u00a0h following LLDH (sore throat and hoarseness: <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&gt;\u20090.99, PONV: <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&gt;\u20090.99, and <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.65, respectively). No case showed pulmonary aspiration in both groups. Compared with endotracheal tube, second-generation LMA is equally efficient during LLDH. The second-generation LMA can be considered as the effective airway devices for securing airway in patients undergoing prolonged laparoscopic surgery.\n<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Trial Registration<\/jats:bold> This study was registered at the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea (<jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https:\/\/cris.nih.go.kr\">https:\/\/cris.nih.go.kr<\/jats:ext-link>. CRiS No. KCT0003711).<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-83173-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,11]],"date-time":"2021-02-11T11:05:48Z","timestamp":1613041548000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Second generation laryngeal mask airway during laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Doyeon","family":"Kim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sukhee","family":"Park","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jong Man","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gyu Seong","family":"Choi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gaab Soo","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"83173_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/55.8.801","volume":"55","author":"AI Brain","year":"1983","unstructured":"Brain, A. I. The laryngeal mask\u2014A new concept in airway management. Br. J. Anaesth. 55, 801\u2013805. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bja\/55.8.801 (1983).","journal-title":"Br. J. Anaesth."},{"key":"83173_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1097\/aco.0000000000000262","volume":"28","author":"A Timmermann","year":"2015","unstructured":"Timmermann, A., Bergner, U. A. & Russo, S. G. Laryngeal mask airway indications: New frontiers for second-generation supraglottic airways. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 28, 717\u2013726. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aco.0000000000000262 (2015).","journal-title":"Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol."},{"key":"83173_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1183","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0b013e318255e6cb","volume":"116","author":"T Asai","year":"2012","unstructured":"Asai, T. Complications with supraglottic airways: something to worry about or much ado about nothing?. Anesthesiology 116, 1183\u20131185. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ALN.0b013e318255e6cb (2012).","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"83173_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1217","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0b013e318255e6ab","volume":"116","author":"SK Ramachandran","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ramachandran, S. K., Mathis, M. R., Tremper, K. K., Shanks, A. M. & Kheterpal, S. Predictors and clinical outcomes from failed laryngeal mask airway unique: A study of 15,795 patients. Anesthesiology 116, 1217\u20131226. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ALN.0b013e318255e6ab (2012).","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"83173_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.10.004","volume":"36","author":"BF van Esch","year":"2017","unstructured":"van Esch, B. F., Stegeman, I. & Smit, A. L. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway vs tracheal intubation: A systematic review on airway complications. J. Clin. Anesth. 36, 142\u2013150. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.10.004 (2017).","journal-title":"J. Clin. Anesth."},{"key":"83173_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1007\/bf03020191","volume":"50","author":"JR Maltby","year":"2003","unstructured":"Maltby, J. R., Beriault, M. T., Watson, N. C., Liepert, D. J. & Fick, G. H. LMA-ClassicTM and LMA-ProSealTM are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy. Can. J. Anesth. 50, 71\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/bf03020191 (2003).","journal-title":"Can. J. Anesth."},{"key":"83173_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.17085\/apm.2018.13.4.423","volume":"13","author":"J Kim","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kim, J., Kim, G.-S., Kim, D. K., Shin, H. J. A. & Medicine, P. Successful use of supraglottic airway in a professional singer undergoing laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy: A case report. Anesth. Pain Med. 13, 423\u2013426 (2018).","journal-title":"Anesth. Pain Med."},{"key":"83173_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/81.2.186","volume":"81","author":"C Keller","year":"1998","unstructured":"Keller, C., Puhringer, F. & Brimacombe, J. R. Influence of cuff volume on oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position with the laryngeal mask airway. Br. J. Anaesth. 81, 186\u2013187. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bja\/81.2.186 (1998).","journal-title":"Br. J. Anaesth."},{"key":"83173_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeq223","volume":"105","author":"M Carron","year":"2010","unstructured":"Carron, M., Freo, U. & Ori, C. Usefulness of spirometry in air leak evaluation during laparoscopic surgery in an obese patient with laryngeal mask airway SupremeTM. Br. J. Anaesth. 105, 387\u2013389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bja\/aeq223 (2010).","journal-title":"Br. J. Anaesth."},{"key":"83173_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"822","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03021710","volume":"54","author":"K Goldmann","year":"2007","unstructured":"Goldmann, K., Dieterich, J. & Roessler, M. Laryngopharyngeal mucosal injury after prolonged use of the ProSeal LMA in a porcine model: a pilot study. Can. J. Anaesth. 54, 822\u2013828 (2007).","journal-title":"Can. J. Anaesth."},{"key":"83173_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.4103\/0019-5049.79891","volume":"55","author":"N Saraswat","year":"2011","unstructured":"Saraswat, N. et al. The comparison of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia. Indian J. Anaesth. 55, 129\u2013134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0019-5049.79891 (2011).","journal-title":"Indian J. Anaesth."},{"key":"83173_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057x0703500106","volume":"35","author":"Y Lim","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lim, Y., Goel, S. & Brimacombe, J. R. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is an effective alternative to laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesth. Intens. Care 35, 52\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0310057x0703500106 (2007).","journal-title":"Anaesth. Intens. Care"},{"key":"83173_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2009.02095.x","volume":"54","author":"W Abdi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Abdi, W. et al. Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: A randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme and the ETT. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 54, 141\u2013146. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2009.02095.x (2010).","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand."},{"key":"83173_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aem096","volume":"99","author":"M Hohlrieder","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hohlrieder, M., Brimacombe, J., von Goedecke, A. & Keller, C. Postoperative nausea, vomiting, airway morbidity, and analgesic requirements are lower for the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway than the tracheal tube in females undergoing breast and gynaecological surgery. Br. J. Anaesth. 99, 576\u2013580. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bja\/aem096 (2007).","journal-title":"Br. J. Anaesth."},{"key":"83173_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1007\/bf03016565","volume":"52","author":"TM Cook","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cook, T. M., Lee, G. & Nolan, J. P. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A review of the literature. Can. J. Anaesth. 52, 739\u2013760. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/bf03016565 (2005).","journal-title":"Can. J. Anaesth."},{"key":"83173_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/0952-8180(95)00228-6","volume":"8","author":"AN Akbar","year":"1996","unstructured":"Akbar, A. N., Muzi, M., Lopatka, C. W. & Ebert, T. J. Neurocirculatory responses to intubation with either an endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway in humans. J. Clin. Anesth. 8, 194\u2013197 (1996).","journal-title":"J. Clin. Anesth."},{"key":"83173_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1389","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-199906000-00035","volume":"88","author":"W Oczenski","year":"1999","unstructured":"Oczenski, W. et al. Hemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to insertion of the Combitube, laryngeal mask airway or tracheal intubation. Anesth. Analg. 88, 1389\u20131394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00000539-199906000-00035 (1999).","journal-title":"Anesth. Analg."},{"key":"83173_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2006.04548.x","volume":"61","author":"AA Dahaba","year":"2006","unstructured":"Dahaba, A. A. et al. Haemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to the laryngeal tube-suction airway and the proseal laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 61, 330\u2013334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2006.04548.x (2006).","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"83173_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0b013ef31825b6a80","volume":"117","author":"M Carron","year":"2012","unstructured":"Carron, M. et al. Hemodynamic and hormonal stress responses to endotracheal tube and ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for laparoscopic gastric banding. Anesthesiology 117, 309\u2013320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ALN.0b013ef31825b6a80 (2012).","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"83173_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-019-0792-9","volume":"19","author":"WY Yao","year":"2019","unstructured":"Yao, W. Y. et al. Comparison of supreme laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation for airway management during general anesthesia for cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 19, 123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12871-019-0792-9 (2019).","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol."},{"key":"83173_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199902000-00011%JAnesthesiology","volume":"90","author":"A Berry","year":"1999","unstructured":"Berry, A., Brimacombe, J., Keller, C. & Verghese, C. Pulmonary airway resistance with the endotracheal tube versus laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients. Anesthesiology 90, 395\u2013397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00000542-199902000-00011%JAnesthesiology (1999).","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"83173_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-016-0291-1","volume":"17","author":"C-J Lai","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lai, C.-J. et al. I-Gel is a suitable alternative to endotracheal tubes in the laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum and trendelenburg position. BMC Anesthesiol. 17, 3 (2017).","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-83173-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-83173-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-83173-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]],"date-time":"2022-12-03T03:44:05Z","timestamp":1670039045000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-83173-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,11]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["83173"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-83173-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"17 February 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 January 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 February 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"3532"}}