{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,10]],"date-time":"2026-11-10T14:19:46Z","timestamp":1794320386816,"version":"4.9.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,23]],"date-time":"2021-03-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1616457600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,23]],"date-time":"2021-03-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1616457600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100007065","name":"Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Salerno","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["FARB"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["FARB"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100007065","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study compared corneal thickness (CT) changes obtained with specular microscopy (SM) and a rotating Scheimpflug camera (RSC) after conventional phacoemulsification surgery (PS). One hundred sixty six eyes of 83 patients were analyzed before and one month after PS. One eye underwent PS, while the fellow phakic one was used as control. CT was measured with SM at the center of the cornea and with RSC at the pupil center, at the corneal apex and at the thinnest point. In the operated eye, SM showed a larger CT mean increase than those one detected at the three different measurements\u2019 points evaluated by RSC. Inversely, in the fellow phakic eye, SM showed a greater CT mean decrease than those one registered by RSC at its three measurement\u2019s points. Thus, one month after surgery, even if cornea appears clear at the slit-lamp, a significant thickness increase is still present. This is even more evident if the slight decrease of the fellow phakic eye is considered. The differences between the two devices are probably related to the different measured areas.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-86158-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,23]],"date-time":"2021-03-23T11:04:44Z","timestamp":1616497484000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Comparison between two devices in the detection of corneal thickness changes after cataract surgery"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Maddalena","family":"De Bernardo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Livio","family":"Vitiello","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giulia","family":"Abbinante","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ilaria","family":"De Pascale","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Luigi","family":"Capasso","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giuseppe","family":"Marotta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicola","family":"Rosa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"86158_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2783","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S263856","volume":"14","author":"M De Bernardo","year":"2020","unstructured":"De Bernardo, M., Cembalo, G. & Rosa, N. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometry after refractive surgery: a review of different correction formulas. Clin. Ophthalmol. 14, 2783\u20132788 (2020).","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"86158_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s40123-020-00281-7","author":"G Cennamo","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cennamo, G. et al. Twenty-year follow-up of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy: a retrospective observational study. Ophthalmol. Ther. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40123-020-00281-7 (2020).","journal-title":"Ophthalmol. Ther."},{"key":"86158_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/658350","author":"M De Bernardo","year":"2014","unstructured":"De Bernardo, M., Capasso, L., Caliendo, L., Paolercio, F. & Rosa, N. IOL power calculation after corneal refractive surgery. Biomed. Res. Int. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2014\/658350 (2014).","journal-title":"Biomed. Res. Int."},{"key":"86158_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0237990","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0237990","volume":"15","author":"N Rosa","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rosa, N., Cione, F., Pepe, A., Musto, S. & De Bernardo, M. An advanced lens measurement approach (ALMA) in post refractive surgery IOL power calculation with unknown preoperative parameters. PLoS ONE 15, e0237990. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0237990 (2020).","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"86158_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20140120-07","volume":"30","author":"A Magli","year":"2014","unstructured":"Magli, A., Forte, R., Gallo, F. & Carelli, R. Refractive surgery for accommodative esotropia: 5-year follow-up. J. Refract. Surg. 30, 116\u2013120 (2014).","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"86158_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jbio.202000138","author":"D Montorio","year":"2020","unstructured":"Montorio, D. et al. Evaluation of corneal structures in myopic eyes more than twenty-two years after photorefractive keratectomy. J. Biophoton. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jbio.202000138 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Biophoton."},{"key":"86158_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2336","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(02)01276-9","volume":"109","author":"SC Pflugfelder","year":"2002","unstructured":"Pflugfelder, S. C., Liu, Z., Feuer, W. & Verm, A. Corneal thickness indices discriminate between keratoconus and contact lens-induced corneal thinning. Ophthalmology 109, 2336\u20132341 (2002).","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"86158_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2017.06.039","volume":"181","author":"M De Bernardo","year":"2017","unstructured":"De Bernardo, M., Cornetta, P. & Rosa, N. Safety and efficacy of sequential intracorneal ring segment implantation and cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 181, 182\u2013183 (2017).","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"86158_CR9","first-page":"261","volume":"31","author":"A Magli","year":"2016","unstructured":"Magli, A. et al. Long-term follow-up after surgery for congenital and developmental cataracts. Semin. Ophthalmol. 31, 261\u2013265 (2016).","journal-title":"Semin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"86158_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.7.6.34","volume":"7","author":"M De Bernardo","year":"2018","unstructured":"De Bernardo, M., Salerno, G., Cornetta, P. & Rosa, N. Axial length shortening after cataract surgery: new approach to solve the question. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 7, 34 (2018).","journal-title":"Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol."},{"key":"86158_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6257(00)00110-7","volume":"44","author":"MJ Doughty","year":"2000","unstructured":"Doughty, M. J. & Zaman, M. L. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv. Ophthalmol. 44, 367\u2013408 (2000).","journal-title":"Surv. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"86158_CR12","first-page":"233","volume":"31","author":"M De Bernardo","year":"2016","unstructured":"De Bernardo, M., Capasso, L., Caliendo, L., Vosa, Y. & Rosa, N. Intraocular pressure evaluation after myopic refractive surgery: a comparison of methods in 121 eyes. Semin. Ophthalmol. 31, 233\u2013242 (2016).","journal-title":"Semin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"86158_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"640","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e3182114303","volume":"88","author":"N Rosa","year":"2011","unstructured":"Rosa, N., De Bernardo, M., Borrelli, M., Filosa, M. L. & Lanza, M. Effect of oxybuprocaine eye drops on corneal volume and thickness measurements. Optom. Vis. Sci. 88, 640\u2013644 (2011).","journal-title":"Optom. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"86158_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1906","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.07.013","volume":"34","author":"T Paul","year":"2008","unstructured":"Paul, T. et al. Central corneal thickness measured by the Orbscan II system, contact ultrasound pachymetry, and the Artemis 2 system. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 34, 1906\u20131912 (2008).","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"86158_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1097\/01.opx.0000254045.62252.b4","volume":"84","author":"S Jonuscheit","year":"2007","unstructured":"Jonuscheit, S. & Doughty, M. J. Regional repeatability measures of corneal thickness: orbscan II and ultrasound. Optom. Vis. Sci. 84, 52\u201358 (2007).","journal-title":"Optom. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"86158_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2017.01.007","volume":"176","author":"M De Bernardo","year":"2017","unstructured":"De Bernardo, M. & Rosa, N. Central corneal thickness after cross-linking using high-definition optical coherence tomography, ultrasound, and dual scheimpflug tomography: a comparative study over one year. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 176, 254 (2017).","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"86158_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0300060519892385","author":"M De Bernardo","year":"2020","unstructured":"De Bernardo, M. et al. Measurement of corneal thickness using pentacam HR versus nidek CEM-530 specular microscopy. J. Int. Med. Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0300060519892385 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Int. Med. Res."},{"key":"86158_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0000000000000635","volume":"31","author":"C Sarnicola","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sarnicola, C., Sarnicola, E., Panico, E., Panico, C. & Sarnicola, V. Cataract surgery in corneal transplantation. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 31, 23\u201327 (2020).","journal-title":"Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"86158_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"971","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.82.8.971","volume":"82","author":"IE Murdoch","year":"1998","unstructured":"Murdoch, I. E., Morris, S. S. & Cousens, S. N. People and eyes: statistical approaches in ophthalmology. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 82, 971\u2013973 (1998).","journal-title":"Br. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"86158_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90837-8","volume":"1","author":"JM Bland","year":"1986","unstructured":"Bland, J. M. & Altman, D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307\u2013310 (1986).","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"86158_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1177\/096228029900800204","volume":"8","author":"JM Bland","year":"1999","unstructured":"Bland, J. M. & Altman, D. G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 8, 135\u2013160 (1999).","journal-title":"Stat. Methods Med. Res."},{"key":"86158_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x","volume":"31","author":"C McAlinden","year":"2011","unstructured":"McAlinden, C., Khadka, J. & Pesudovs, K. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 31, 330\u2013338 (2011).","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt."},{"key":"86158_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2598","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2015.06.029","volume":"41","author":"C McAlinden","year":"2015","unstructured":"McAlinden, C., Khadka, J. & Pesudovs, K. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) studies and sample-size calculation. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 41, 2598\u20132604 (2015).","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"86158_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03193146","volume":"39","author":"F Faul","year":"2007","unstructured":"Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods. 39, 175\u2013191 (2007).","journal-title":"Behav. Res. Methods."},{"key":"86158_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.85.1.18","volume":"85","author":"AC Ventura","year":"2001","unstructured":"Ventura, A. C., W\u00e4lti, R. & B\u00f6hnke, M. Corneal thickness and endothelial density before and after cataract surgery. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 85, 18\u201320 (2001).","journal-title":"Br. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"86158_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1426","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.04.010","volume":"33","author":"SM Salvi","year":"2007","unstructured":"Salvi, S. M., Soong, T. K., Kumar, B. V. & Hawksworth, N. R. Central corneal thickness changes after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 33, 1426\u20131428 (2007).","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"86158_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.2010.02078.x","volume":"90","author":"A Kandarakis","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kandarakis, A. et al. Response of corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness following clear corneal cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 90, 526\u2013529 (2012).","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol."},{"key":"86158_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318278fc44","volume":"90","author":"V De Juan","year":"2013","unstructured":"De Juan, V. et al. Refractive stabilization and corneal swelling after cataract surgery. Optom. Vis. Sci. 90, 31\u201336 (2013).","journal-title":"Optom. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"86158_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.3109\/08820538.2015.1115089","volume":"32","author":"C Caglar","year":"2017","unstructured":"Caglar, C., Batur, M., Eser, E., Demir, H. & Ya\u015far, T. The stabilization time of ocular measurements after cataract surgery. Semin. Ophthalmol. 32, 412\u2013417 (2017).","journal-title":"Semin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"86158_CR30","first-page":"311","volume":"41","author":"M Calabuig-Goena","year":"2016","unstructured":"Calabuig-Goena, M. et al. Early changes in corneal epithelial thickness after cataract surgery-pilot study. Curr. Eye. Res. 41, 311\u2013317 (2016).","journal-title":"Curr. Eye. Res."},{"key":"86158_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2018-313723","volume":"104","author":"D Dzhaber","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dzhaber, D., Mustafa, O., Alsaleh, F., Mihailovic, A. & Daoud, Y. J. Comparison of changes in corneal endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness between conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: a randomised, controlled clinical trial. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 104, 225\u2013229 (2020).","journal-title":"Br. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"86158_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1601","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-017-0630-3","volume":"38","author":"I Karaca","year":"2018","unstructured":"Karaca, I., Yilmaz, S. G., Palamar, M. & Ates, H. Comparison of central corneal thickness and endothelial cell measurements by Scheimpflug camera system and two noncontact specular microscopes. Int. Ophthalmol. 38, 1601\u20131609 (2018).","journal-title":"Int. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"86158_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"970","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.02.037","volume":"32","author":"OO U\u00e7akhan","year":"2006","unstructured":"U\u00e7akhan, O. O., Ozkan, M. & Kanpolat, A. Corneal thickness measurement in normal and keratoconic eyes: pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 32, 970\u2013977 (2006).","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-86158-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-86158-6","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-86158-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]],"date-time":"2022-12-03T05:39:30Z","timestamp":1670045970000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-86158-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,23]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["86158"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-86158-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 November 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 March 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 March 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"6709"}}