{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,3]],"date-time":"2026-11-03T07:31:08Z","timestamp":1793691068933,"version":"4.5.1"},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,17]],"date-time":"2021-05-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621209600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,17]],"date-time":"2021-05-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621209600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000265","name":"Medical Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["MR\/T03095X\/1"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["MR\/T03095X\/1"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000265","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000265","name":"Medical Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["G101400"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["G101400"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000265","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Cochlear implants (CIs) are neuroprostheses that partially restore hearing for people with severe-to-profound hearing loss. While CIs can provide good speech perception in quiet listening situations for many, they fail to do so in environments with interfering sounds for most listeners. Previous research suggests that this is due to detrimental interaction effects between CI electrode channels, limiting their function to convey frequency-specific information, but evidence is still scarce. In this study, an experimental manipulation called spectral blurring was used to increase channel interaction in CI listeners using Advanced Bionics devices with HiFocus 1J and MS electrode arrays to directly investigate its causal effect on speech perception. Instead of using a single electrode per channel as in standard CI processing, spectral blurring used up to 6 electrodes per channel simultaneously to increase the overlap between adjacent frequency channels as would occur in cases with severe channel interaction. Results demonstrated that this manipulation significantly degraded CI speech perception in quiet by 15% and speech reception thresholds in babble noise by 5\u00a0dB when all channels were blurred by a factor of 6. Importantly, when channel interaction was increased just on a subset of electrodes, speech scores were mostly unaffected and were only significantly degraded when the 5 most apical channels were blurred. These apical channels convey information up to 1\u00a0kHz at the apical end of the electrode array and are typically located at angular insertion depths of about 250 up to 500\u00b0. These results confirm and extend earlier findings indicating that CI speech perception may not benefit from deactivating individual channels along the array and that efforts should instead be directed towards reducing channel interaction per se and in particular for the most-apical electrodes. Hereby, causal methods such as spectral blurring could be used in future research to control channel interaction effects within listeners for evaluating compensation strategies.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-89932-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,17]],"date-time":"2021-05-17T10:04:53Z","timestamp":1621245893000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":44,"title":["The effect of increased channel interaction on speech perception with cochlear implants"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Tobias","family":"Goehring","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alan W.","family":"Archer-Boyd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julie G.","family":"Arenberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robert P.","family":"Carlyon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"89932_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1150","DOI":"10.1121\/1.1381538","volume":"110","author":"LM Friesen","year":"2001","unstructured":"Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Baskent, D. & Wang, X. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1150\u20131163 (2001).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1121\/1.2805617","volume":"123","author":"HE Cullington","year":"2008","unstructured":"Cullington, H. E. & Zeng, F.-G. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 450\u2013461 (2008).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7","volume":"34","author":"LK Holden","year":"2013","unstructured":"Holden, L. K. et al. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 34, 342 (2013).","journal-title":"Ear Hear."},{"key":"89932_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1097\/mao.0b013e318162512c","volume":"29","author":"A B\u00fcchner","year":"2008","unstructured":"B\u00fcchner, A., Nogueira, W., Edler, B., Battmer, R.-D. & Lenarz, T. Results from a psychoacoustic model-based strategy for the nucleus-24 and freedom cochlear implants. Otol. Neurotol. 29, 189\u2013192 (2008).","journal-title":"Otol. Neurotol."},{"key":"89932_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lamping, W., Goehring, T., Marozeau, J. & Carlyon, R. P. The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users. Hear. Res. 391, 107969 (2020).","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2020.107969"},{"key":"89932_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233121651665338","DOI":"10.1177\/2331216516653389","volume":"20","author":"JA Bierer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bierer, J. A. & Litvak, L. Reducing channel interaction through cochlear implant programming may improve speech perception: Current focusing and channel deactivation. Trends Hear. 20, 2331216516653389 (2016).","journal-title":"Trends Hear."},{"key":"89932_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2013.02.004","volume":"299","author":"AG Srinivasan","year":"2013","unstructured":"Srinivasan, A. G., Padilla, M., Shannon, R. V. & Landsberger, D. M. Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users. Hear. Res. 299, 29\u201336 (2013).","journal-title":"Hear. Res."},{"key":"89932_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2016.11.012","volume":"344","author":"T Goehring","year":"2017","unstructured":"Goehring, T. et al. Speech enhancement based on neural networks improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users. Hear. Res. 344, 183\u2013194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2016.11.012 (2017).","journal-title":"Hear. Res."},{"key":"89932_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1121\/1.5119226","volume":"146","author":"T Goehring","year":"2019","unstructured":"Goehring, T., Keshavarzi, M., Carlyon, R. P. & Moore, B. C. J. Using recurrent neural networks to improve the perception of speech in non-stationary noise by people with cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146, 705\u2013718 (2019).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-004-5024-3","volume":"6","author":"Q-J Fu","year":"2005","unstructured":"Fu, Q.-J. & Nogaki, G. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: The role of spectral resolution and smearing. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 6, 19\u201327 (2005).","journal-title":"J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol."},{"key":"89932_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-006-0068-1","volume":"8","author":"RP Carlyon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Carlyon, R. P., Long, C. J., Deeks, J. M. & McKay, C. M. Concurrent sound segregation in electric and acoustic hearing. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 8, 119\u2013133 (2007).","journal-title":"J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol."},{"key":"89932_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mao.0000185060.74339.9d","volume":"26","author":"LHM Mens","year":"2005","unstructured":"Mens, L. H. M. & Berenstein, C. K. Speech perception with mono-and quadrupolar electrode configurations: A crossover study. Otol. Neurotol. 26, 957\u2013964 (2005).","journal-title":"Otol. Neurotol."},{"key":"89932_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e3181645336","volume":"29","author":"CK Berenstein","year":"2008","unstructured":"Berenstein, C. K., Mens, L. H. M., Mulder, J. J. S. & Vanpoucke, F. J. Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: Comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations. Ear Hear. 29, 250\u2013260. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AUD.0b013e3181645336 (2008).","journal-title":"Ear Hear."},{"key":"89932_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2017.01.010","volume":"345","author":"F Langner","year":"2017","unstructured":"Langner, F., Saoji, A. A., B\u00fcchner, A. & Nogueira, W. Adding simultaneous stimulating channels to reduce power consumption in cochlear implants. Hear. Res. 345, 96\u2013107. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2017.01.010 (2017).","journal-title":"Hear. Res."},{"key":"89932_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1136","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0000000000000566","volume":"39","author":"JG Arenberg","year":"2018","unstructured":"Arenberg, J. G. et al. A dynamically focusing cochlear implant strategy can improve vowel identification in noise. Ear Hear 39, 1136\u20131145. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AUD.0000000000000566 (2018).","journal-title":"Ear Hear"},{"key":"89932_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0000000000000593","volume":"40","author":"MAM de Jong","year":"2019","unstructured":"de Jong, M. A. M., Briaire, J. J. & Frijns, J. H. M. Dynamic current focusing: A novel approach to loudness coding in cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 40, 34\u201344 (2019).","journal-title":"Ear Hear."},{"key":"89932_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3673","DOI":"10.1121\/1.420401","volume":"102","author":"TA Zwolan","year":"1997","unstructured":"Zwolan, T. A., Collins, L. M. & Wakefield, G. H. Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 3673\u20133685 (1997).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1159\/000351302","volume":"18","author":"SN Garadat","year":"2013","unstructured":"Garadat, S. N., Zwolan, T. A. & Pfingst, B. E. Using temporal modulation sensitivity to select stimulation sites for processor maps in cochlear implant listeners. Audiol. Neurotol. 18, 247\u2013260. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000351302 (2013).","journal-title":"Audiol. Neurotol."},{"key":"89932_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"820","DOI":"10.1109\/TNSRE.2013.2253333","volume":"21","author":"JH Noble","year":"2013","unstructured":"Noble, J. H., Labadie, R. F., Gifford, R. H. & Dawant, B. M. Image-guidance enables new methods for customizing cochlear implant stimulation strategies. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 21, 820\u2013829 (2013).","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng."},{"key":"89932_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E243","DOI":"10.1121\/1.4977235","volume":"141","author":"N Zhou","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zhou, N. Deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds improves spectral ripple and speech reception thresholds in cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 141, E243\u2013E248. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.4977235 (2017).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-019-00724-4","author":"T Goehring","year":"2019","unstructured":"Goehring, T., Archer-Boyd, A., Deeks, J. M., Arenberg, J. G. & Carlyon, R. P. A site-selection strategy based on polarity sensitivity for cochlear implants: Effects on spectro-temporal resolution and speech perception. JARO J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-019-00724-4 (2019).","journal-title":"JARO J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol."},{"key":"89932_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-25474-6_13","volume":"894","author":"D Vickers","year":"2016","unstructured":"Vickers, D., Degun, A., Canas, A., Stainsby, T. & Vanpoucke, F. Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes based on pitch information for users of the ACE strategy. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 894, 115\u2013123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-25474-6_13 (2016).","journal-title":"Adv. Exp. Med. Biol."},{"key":"89932_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-020-00773-0","volume":"22","author":"T Brochier","year":"2021","unstructured":"Brochier, T. et al. Evaluating and comparing behavioural and electrophysiological estimates of neural health in cochlear implant users. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 22, 67\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-020-00773-0 (2021).","journal-title":"J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol."},{"key":"89932_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1121\/1.1579009","volume":"114","author":"MK Qin","year":"2003","unstructured":"Qin, M. K. & Oxenham, A. J. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 446\u2013454 (2003).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1121\/1.2749413","volume":"122","author":"LM Litvak","year":"2007","unstructured":"Litvak, L. M., Spahr, A. J., Saoji, A. A. & Fridman, G. Y. Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 982\u2013991 (2007).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2008.04.012","volume":"241","author":"M Bingabr","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bingabr, M., Espinoza-Varas, B. & Loizou, P. C. Simulating the effect of spread of excitation in cochlear implants. Hear. Res. 241, 73\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2008.04.012 (2008).","journal-title":"Hear. Res."},{"key":"89932_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2331216514553783","volume":"18","author":"AJ Oxenham","year":"2014","unstructured":"Oxenham, A. J. & Kreft, H. A. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing. Trends Hear. 18, 1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2331216514553783 (2014).","journal-title":"Trends Hear."},{"key":"89932_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1121\/1.4941451","volume":"139","author":"Q Mesnildrey","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mesnildrey, Q., Hilkhuysen, G. & Macherey, O. Pulse-spreading harmonic complex as an alternative carrier for vocoder simulations of cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139, 986\u2013991 (2016).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2014.11.001","volume":"319","author":"Q Mesnildrey","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mesnildrey, Q. & Macherey, O. Simulating the dual-peak excitation pattern produced by bipolar stimulation of a cochlear implant: Effects on speech intelligibility. Hear. Res. 319, 32\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2014.11.001 (2015).","journal-title":"Hear. Res."},{"key":"89932_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-020-00758-z","volume":"21","author":"T Goehring","year":"2020","unstructured":"Goehring, T., Arenberg, J. G. & Carlyon, R. P. Using spectral blurring to assess effects of channel interaction on speech-in-noise perception with cochlear implants. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 21, 353\u2013371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-020-00758-z (2020).","journal-title":"J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol."},{"key":"89932_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1159\/000448581","volume":"21","author":"MA van der Jagt","year":"2016","unstructured":"van der Jagt, M. A., Briaire, J. J., Verbist, B. M. & Frijns, J. H. Comparison of the HiFocus mid-scala and HiFocus 1J electrode array: Angular insertion depths and speech perception outcomes. Audiol. Neurootol. 21, 316\u2013325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000448581 (2016).","journal-title":"Audiol. Neurootol."},{"key":"89932_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1269","DOI":"10.1121\/1.1287711","volume":"108","author":"BA Henry","year":"2000","unstructured":"Henry, B. A., McKay, C. M., McDermott, H. J. & Clark, G. M. The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1269\u20131280. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.1287711 (2000).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3718","DOI":"10.1121\/1.4967298","volume":"140","author":"AK Bosen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bosen, A. K. & Chatterjee, M. Band importance functions of listeners with cochlear implants using clinical maps. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 140, 3718. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.4967298 (2016).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1007\/s101620020021","volume":"3","author":"RV Shannon","year":"2002","unstructured":"Shannon, R. V., Galvin, J. J. 3rd. & Baskent, D. Holes in hearing. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3, 185\u2013199. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s101620020021 (2002).","journal-title":"J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol."},{"key":"89932_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1097\/00003446-199908000-00006","volume":"20","author":"QJ Fu","year":"1999","unstructured":"Fu, Q. J. & Shannon, R. V. Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 20, 332\u2013344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00003446-199908000-00006 (1999).","journal-title":"Ear Hear."},{"key":"89932_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1007\/s101620020013","volume":"3","author":"MW Skinner","year":"2002","unstructured":"Skinner, M. W. et al. CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3, 332\u2013350 (2002).","journal-title":"J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol."},{"key":"89932_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001125","volume":"37","author":"BP O'Connell","year":"2016","unstructured":"O\u2019Connell, B. P. et al. Electrode location and angular insertion depth are predictors of audiologic outcomes in cochlear implantation. Otol. Neurotol. 37, 1016 (2016).","journal-title":"Otol. Neurotol."},{"key":"89932_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1159\/000377616","volume":"20","author":"KS van der Marel","year":"2015","unstructured":"van der Marel, K. S., Briaire, J. J., Verbist, B. M., Muurling, T. J. & Frijns, J. H. The influence of cochlear implant electrode position on performance. Audiol Neurootol 20, 202\u2013211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000377616 (2015).","journal-title":"Audiol Neurootol"},{"key":"89932_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1121\/1.1579009","volume":"114","author":"MK Qin","year":"2003","unstructured":"Qin, M. K. & Oxenham, A. J. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 446\u2013454. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.1579009 (2003).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1729","DOI":"10.1121\/1.1687425","volume":"115","author":"CW Turner","year":"2004","unstructured":"Turner, C. W., Gantz, B. J., Vidal, C., Behrens, A. & Henry, B. A. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 1729\u20131735. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.1687425 (2004).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1159\/000027695","volume":"61","author":"C von Ilberg","year":"1999","unstructured":"von Ilberg, C. et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec. 61, 334\u2013340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000027695 (1999).","journal-title":"ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec."},{"key":"89932_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2598","DOI":"10.1109\/TBME.2006.883793","volume":"53","author":"JE Chang","year":"2006","unstructured":"Chang, J. E., Bai, J. Y. & Zeng, F.-G. Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53, 2598\u20132601 (2006).","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng."},{"key":"89932_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-018-37186-2","volume":"9","author":"MD Fletcher","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fletcher, M. D., Hadeedi, A., Goehring, T. & Mills, S. R. Electro-haptic enhancement of speech-in-noise performance in cochlear implant users. Sci. Rep. 9, 1\u20138 (2019).","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"89932_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233121651879783","DOI":"10.1177\/2331216518797838","volume":"22","author":"MD Fletcher","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fletcher, M. D., Mills, S. R. & Goehring, T. Vibro-tactile enhancement of speech intelligibility in multi-talker noise for simulated cochlear implant listening. Trends Hear. 22, 2331216518797838 (2018).","journal-title":"Trends Hear."},{"key":"89932_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3717","DOI":"10.1121\/1.2717408","volume":"121","author":"YY Kong","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kong, Y. Y. & Carlyon, R. P. Improved speech recognition in noise in simulated binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 3717\u20133727. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.2717408 (2007).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e3181ab2b87","volume":"30","author":"CA Brown","year":"2009","unstructured":"Brown, C. A. & Bacon, S. P. Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone. Ear Hear. 30, 489\u2013493. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AUD.0b013e3181ab2b87 (2009).","journal-title":"Ear Hear."},{"key":"89932_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3387","DOI":"10.1121\/1.3097493","volume":"125","author":"J Ma","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ma, J., Hu, Y. & Loizou, P. C. Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 3387\u20133405. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.3097493 (2009).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3947","DOI":"10.1121\/1.2997435","volume":"124","author":"N Li","year":"2008","unstructured":"Li, N. & Loizou, P. C. The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 3947. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.2997435 (2008).","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"89932_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1109\/TAU.1969.1162058","volume":"17","author":"E Rothauser","year":"1969","unstructured":"Rothauser, E. IEEE recommended practice for speech quality measurements. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 17, 225\u2013246 (1969).","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust."},{"key":"89932_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.3109\/03005367909078884","volume":"13","author":"J Bench","year":"1979","unstructured":"Bench, J., Kowal, A. & Bamford, J. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. Br. J. Audiol. 13, 108\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/03005367909078884 (1979).","journal-title":"Br. J. Audiol."},{"key":"89932_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.3109\/03005369009077840","volume":"24","author":"A MacLeod","year":"1990","unstructured":"MacLeod, A. & Summerfield, Q. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: Rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. Br. J. Audiol. 24, 29\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/03005369009077840 (1990).","journal-title":"Br. J. Audiol."},{"key":"89932_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1044\/jshr.2803.455","volume":"28","author":"GA Studebaker","year":"1985","unstructured":"Studebaker, G. A. A \u201crationalized\u201d arcsine transform. J. Speech Hear. Res. 28, 455\u2013462. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1044\/jshr.2803.455 (1985).","journal-title":"J. Speech Hear. Res."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-89932-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-89932-8","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-89932-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]],"date-time":"2022-12-03T08:21:07Z","timestamp":1670055667000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-89932-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,17]]},"references-count":52,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["89932"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-89932-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 February 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 April 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 May 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"10383"}}