{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,25]],"date-time":"2026-09-25T15:57:52Z","timestamp":1790351872064,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,24]],"date-time":"2021-05-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621814400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,24]],"date-time":"2021-05-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621814400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Accurately predicting the probability of live birth and multiple gestations is important for determining a safe number of embryos to transfer after in vitro fertilization. We developed a model that can be fit to individual clinic data for predicting singleton, twin, and total live birth rates after human embryo transfer. The predicted and observed rates of singleton and twin deliveries were compared in a tenfold cross-validation study using data from a single clinic. The model presented accounts for patient age, embryo stage (cleavage or blastocyst), type of transfer cycle (fresh or frozen) and uterine\/universal factors. The standardized errors for rates of singleton and twin deliveries were normally distributed and the mean errors were not significantly different from zero (all <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&gt;\u20090.05). The live birth rates per embryo varied from as high as 43% for fresh blastocysts in the 35-year-old age group to as low as 1% for frozen cleavage stage embryos in the 43-year-old age group. This quantitative model or a simplified version can be used for clinics to generate and analyze their own data to guide the number of embryos to transfer to limit the risk of multiple gestations.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-90254-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,24]],"date-time":"2021-05-24T10:02:53Z","timestamp":1621850573000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["A validated model for predicting live birth after embryo transfer"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"11","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8910-7434","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael S.","family":"Awadalla","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kristin A.","family":"Bendikson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6853-2981","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jacqueline R.","family":"Ho","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7910-9655","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lynda K.","family":"McGinnis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6290-9450","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ali","family":"Ahmady","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"90254_CR1","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2016 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report. Atlanta (GA): US Dept of Health and Human Services. 5\u201318 (2018)."},{"key":"90254_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"825","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.11.048","volume":"97","author":"S Pfeifer","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pfeifer, S. et al. Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: An American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 97, 825\u2013834 (2012).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"90254_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"901","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.02.107","volume":"107","author":"A Penzias","year":"2017","unstructured":"Penzias, A. et al. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 107, 901\u2013903 (2017).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"90254_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)46933-5","volume":"39","author":"AL Speirs","year":"1983","unstructured":"Speirs, A. L., Lopata, A., Gronow, M. J., Kellow, G. N. & Johnston, W. I. Analysis of the benefits and risks of multiple embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 39, 468\u2013471 (1983).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"90254_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2020","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90790-E","volume":"163","author":"RJ Paulson","year":"1990","unstructured":"Paulson, R. J., Sauer, M. V. & Lobo, R. A. Factors affecting embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: A hypothesis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 163, 2020\u20132023 (1990).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"90254_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"448","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138526","volume":"9","author":"A Bouckaert","year":"1994","unstructured":"Bouckaert, A., Psalti, I., Loumaye, E., De Cooman, S. & Thomas, K. The probability of a successful treatment of infertility by in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 9, 448\u2013455 (1994).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"90254_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(98)00220-9","volume":"70","author":"PM Martin","year":"1998","unstructured":"Martin, P. M. & Welch, H. G. Probabilities for singleton and multiple pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 70, 478\u2013481 (1998).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"90254_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2923","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei129","volume":"20","author":"R Matorras","year":"2005","unstructured":"Matorras, R. et al. The implantation of every embryo facilitates the chances of the remaining embryos to implant in an IVF programme: A mathematical model to predict pregnancy and multiple pregnancy rates. Hum. Reprod. 20, 2923\u20132931 (2005).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"90254_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"782","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.10.028","volume":"83","author":"SP Torsky","year":"2005","unstructured":"Torsky, S. P. et al. Algorithm to predict assisted reproductive technology pregnancy outcome reveals minimal embryo synergy. Fertil. Steril. 83, 782\u2013784 (2005).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"90254_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1474","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.08.014","volume":"98","author":"Z Williams","year":"2012","unstructured":"Williams, Z. et al. Reducing multiples: A mathematical formula that accurately predicts rates of singletons, twins, and higher-order multiples in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 98, 1474\u20131480 (2012).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"90254_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/11.suppl_5.187","volume":"11","author":"AL Speirs","year":"1996","unstructured":"Speirs, A. L., Baker, H. W. G. & Abdullah, N. Analysis of factors affecting embryo implantation. Hum. Reprod. 11, 187\u2013191 (1996).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"90254_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1286","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(01)02915-6","volume":"76","author":"JR Trimarchi","year":"2001","unstructured":"Trimarchi, J. R. A mathematical model for predicting which embryos to transfer\u2014An illusion of control or a powerful tool? [letter]. Fertil. Steril. 76, 1286\u20131287 (2001).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"90254_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.04.039","volume":"100","author":"RT Scott","year":"2013","unstructured":"Scott, R. T., Upham, K. M., Forman, E. J., Zhao, T. & Treff, N. R. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: A randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil. Steril. 100, 624\u2013630 (2013).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"90254_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.213","volume":"112","author":"AW Tiegs","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tiegs, A. W. et al. Does preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) harm embryos? no\u2014a multi-center, prospective, blinded, non-selection study evaluating the predictive value of an aneuploid diagnosis and impact of biopsy. Fertil. Steril. 112, e31 (2019).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"90254_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346","volume":"112","author":"S Munn\u00e9","year":"2019","unstructured":"Munn\u00e9, S. et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil. Steril. 112, 1071\u20131079 (2019).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"90254_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1007\/s00439-017-1797-4","volume":"136","author":"E Fragouli","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fragouli, E. et al. Analysis of implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates following the transfer of mosaic diploid\u2013aneuploid blastocysts. Hum. Genet. 136, 805\u2013819 (2017).","journal-title":"Hum. Genet."},{"key":"90254_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"870","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.01.104","volume":"97","author":"RT Scott","year":"2012","unstructured":"Scott, R. T. et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: A prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertil. Steril. 97, 870\u2013875 (2012).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"90254_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMc1500421","volume":"373","author":"E Greco","year":"2015","unstructured":"Greco, E., Minasi, M. & Fiorentino, F. Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts [letter]. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 2089\u20132090 (2015).","journal-title":"N. Engl. J. Med."},{"key":"90254_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-020-00249-9","volume":"28","author":"M Awadalla","year":"2021","unstructured":"Awadalla, M., Vestal, N., McGinnis, L. & Ahmady, A. Effect of age and morphology on live birth rate after cleavage stage embryo transfer. Reprod. Sci. 28, 43\u201351 (2021).","journal-title":"Reprod. Sci."},{"key":"90254_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Awadalla, M. S. MATLAB code for \u2018a validated model for predicting live birth after embryo transfer.\u2019 Mendeley Data, V1 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17632\/mg8b5nv3g5.1.","DOI":"10.17632\/mg8b5nv3g5.1"},{"key":"90254_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Awadalla, M., Kim, A., Vestal, N., Ho, J. & Bendikson, K. Effect of age and embryo morphology on live birth rate after transfer of unbiopsied blastocysts. JBRA Assist. Reprod. (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5935\/1518-0557.20200101.","DOI":"10.5935\/1518-0557.20200101"},{"key":"90254_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1338","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1242","volume":"102","author":"B Luke","year":"2014","unstructured":"Luke, B. et al. Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil. Steril. 102, 1338\u20131344 (2014).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"issue":"676","key":"90254_CR23","first-page":"e1","volume":"212","author":"B Luke","year":"2015","unstructured":"Luke, B. et al. Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: Comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 212(676), e1-7 (2015).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"90254_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1577","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-013-0100-4","volume":"30","author":"SM Thompson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Thompson, S. M., Onwubalili, N., Brown, K., Jindal, S. K. & McGovern, P. G. Blastocyst expansion score and trophectoderm morphology strongly predict successful clinical pregnancy and live birth following elective single embryo blastocyst transfer (eSET): A national study. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 30, 1577\u20131581 (2013).","journal-title":"J. Assist. Reprod. Genet."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-90254-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-90254-y","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-90254-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]],"date-time":"2022-12-03T08:29:14Z","timestamp":1670056154000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-90254-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,24]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["90254"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-90254-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"28 June 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 May 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 May 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"10800"}}