{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,28]],"date-time":"2026-03-28T07:25:19Z","timestamp":1774682719393,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,26]],"date-time":"2021-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621987200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,26]],"date-time":"2021-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621987200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>To propose a new method of reducing the scan length of head trauma while keeping the diagnostic efficiency of the examination in order to develop DRL in an African context. This is a retrospective single-center study including 145 patients who had cranial examinations on a 64-barettes scanner. All head trauma cases were selected. The interpretations of these CT scanners by the three radiologists of the service were noted to determine the acquisition limit. All patient acquisition lengths have been recorded. The acquisition limit for head trauma ended in clinical routine at cervical spine 4 (C4). The average scan length was 23.03\u00a0cm. Out of the CT scan results for 145 patients, only 2 (1.37%) had a C3 level cervical spine fracture and 2 (1.37%) at C4. By respecting the principles of radiation protection, this result has shown us that it is possible to limit the acquisition length of the CT scanners indicated for head trauma. The limit of the optimized scan length that we proposed is at cervical spine 2 (98.62%). Now, all head trauma are limited on cervical vertebra 2 in our hospital. The use of this new method is beneficial when the clinical indication of the examination and the type of trauma (multi-trauma) are taken into account. Based on the principles of radiation protection and the clinical indication for the examination, reducing the scan length from C4 to C2 is an effective way to reduce the dose absorbed by the patient.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-90529-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,26]],"date-time":"2021-05-26T10:03:33Z","timestamp":1622023413000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Optimization of the scan length of head traumas on the pediatric and adult CT scan and proposition of a new acquisition limit"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Fotso Kamdem","family":"Eddy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Samba Odette","family":"Ngano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fotue Alain","family":"Jerv\u00e9","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Abogo","family":"Serge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"90529_CR1","unstructured":"SFIPP. Crit\u00e8res de Qualit\u00e9 et Optimisation des Doses en Scanographie chez l\u2019enfant (2006). http:\/\/www.sfipradiopediatrie.org\/images\/stories\/docs_telechargement\/guideprocedurestdmpedi06.pdf (Accessed 19 March 2020)."},{"key":"90529_CR2","unstructured":"SFR. Guide Pratique \u00e0 l'usage des M\u00e9decins Radiologues (2009). http:\/\/www.sfrnet.org\/sfr\/societe\/2-publications\/publications-sfr\/01Guides2009\/index.phtml (Accessed 19 March 2020)."},{"key":"90529_CR3","volume-title":"Radiation Risks and Pediatric Computed Tomography (CT): A Guide for Health Care Providers","author":"National Cancer Institute","year":"2008","unstructured":"National Cancer Institute. Radiation Risks and Pediatric Computed Tomography (CT): A Guide for Health Care Providers (National Cancer Institute, 2008)."},{"key":"90529_CR4","first-page":"2","volume-title":"Recommandations of the ICRP. IRCP Publication 103 Annals of the ICRP","author":"International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)","year":"2007","unstructured":"International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Recommandations of the ICRP. IRCP Publication 103 Annals of the ICRP Vol. 37, 2\u20134 (Pergamon Press, 2007)."},{"key":"90529_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12112470","volume":"265","author":"NM Kulkarni","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kulkarni, N. M., Uppot, R. N., Eisner, B. H. & Sahani, D. V. Radiation dose reduction at multidetector CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urolithiasis: How low can we go?. Radiology 265, 158\u2013166 (2012).","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"90529_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.13.11350","volume":"202","author":"A Gervaise","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gervaise, A. et al. Low-dose CT with automatic tube current modulation, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and low tube voltage for the diagnosis of renal colic: Impact of body mass index. Am. J. Roentgenol. 202, 553\u2013560 (2014).","journal-title":"Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"90529_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2015141287","volume":"276","author":"M Fontarensky","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fontarensky, M. et al. Reduced radiation dose with model-based iterative reconstruction versus standard dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT for diagnosis of acute renal colic. Radiology 276, 156\u2013166 (2015).","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"90529_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1007\/s13244-014-0310-z","volume":"5","author":"PD McLaughlin","year":"2014","unstructured":"McLaughlin, P. D. et al. Noncontrast CT at comparable dose to an abdominal radiograph in patients with acute renal colic; impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and diagnostic performance. Insights Imaging 5, 217\u2013230 (2014).","journal-title":"Insights Imaging"},{"key":"90529_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1255","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-014-0264-0","volume":"40","author":"J Wang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wang, J. et al. Half-dose noncontrast CT in the investigation of urolithiasis: image quality improvement with third-generation integrated circuit CT detectors. Abdom. Imaging 40, 1255\u20131262 (2015).","journal-title":"Abdom. Imaging"},{"key":"90529_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1230","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.13.12271","volume":"203","author":"DI Glazer","year":"2014","unstructured":"Glazer, D. I. et al. Assessment of 1 mSv urinary tract stone CT with model-based iterative reconstruction. Am. J. Roentgenol. 203, 1230\u20131235 (2014).","journal-title":"Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"90529_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1429","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2013.08.009","volume":"20","author":"A Winklehner","year":"2013","unstructured":"Winklehner, A. et al. Iterative reconstructions versus filtered back-projection for urinary stone detection in low-dose CT. Acad. Radiol. 20, 1429\u20131435 (2013).","journal-title":"Acad. Radiol."},{"key":"90529_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.180.2.1800305","volume":"180","author":"D Tack","year":"2003","unstructured":"Tack, D., Sourtzis, S., Delpierre, I., de Maertelaer, V. & Gevenois, P. A. Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic. Am. J. Roentgenol. 180, 305\u2013311 (2003).","journal-title":"Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"90529_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1097\/01.rct.0000191685.58838.ef","volume":"30","author":"C Kluner","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kluner, C. et al. Does ultra-lowdose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi?. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 30, 44\u201350 (2006).","journal-title":"J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr."},{"key":"90529_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.06.0793","volume":"188","author":"PA Poletti","year":"2007","unstructured":"Poletti, P. A. et al. Lowdose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. Am. J. Roentgenol. 188, 927\u2013933 (2007).","journal-title":"Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"90529_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1097\/00004728-200009000-00023","volume":"24","author":"J Diel","year":"2000","unstructured":"Diel, J. et al. Unenhanced helical CT using increased pitch for suspected renal colic: An effective technique for radiation dose reduction?. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 24, 795\u2013801 (2000).","journal-title":"J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr."},{"key":"90529_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.05.1863","volume":"188","author":"TH Mulkens","year":"2007","unstructured":"Mulkens, T. H. et al. Urinary stone disease: Comparison of standard-dose and low-dose with 4D MDCT tube current modulation. Am. J. Roentgenol. 188, 553\u2013562 (2007).","journal-title":"Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"issue":"1","key":"90529_CR17","first-page":"4","volume":"4","author":"FK Eddy","year":"2019","unstructured":"Eddy, F. K. et al. Reduce absorbed doses and protection of radiosensitive organs of children exposed to ionizing radiation on adult scanners. Insights Med. Phys. 4(1), 4 (2019).","journal-title":"Insights Med. Phys."},{"key":"90529_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20160931","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20160931","volume":"90","author":"X Li","year":"2017","unstructured":"Li, X., Yang, K., DeLorenzo, M. C. & Liu, B. Assessment of radiation dose from abdominal quantitative CT with short scan length. Br. J. Radiol. 90, 20160931 (2017).","journal-title":"Br. J. Radiol."},{"key":"90529_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20160197","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20160197","volume":"89","author":"A Gervaise","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gervaise, A., Teixeira, P., Hossu, G., Blum, A. & Lapierre-Combes, M. Optimizing z-axis coverage of abdominal CT scans of the urinary tract: A proposed alternative proximal landmark for acquisition planning. Br. J. Radiol. 89, 20160197 (2016).","journal-title":"Br. J. Radiol."},{"issue":"7","key":"90529_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0180671","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0180671","volume":"12","author":"J Weiss","year":"2017","unstructured":"Weiss, J. et al. Effect of reduced z-axis scan coverage on diagnostic performance and radiation dose of neck computed tomography in patients with suspected cervical abscess. PLoS ONE 12(7), e0180671. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0180671 (2017).","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"90529_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ongolo-Zogo, P., Nguehouo, B. S., Yomi, J. & Nkoo Amvene, S. Connaissances en mati\u00e8re de radioprotection: Enqu\u00eate aupr\u00e8s des personnels des services hospitaliers de radiodiagnostic, radioth\u00e9rapie et m\u00e9decine nucl\u00e9aire \u00e0 Yaound\u00e9. Communication orale Journ\u00e9es Fran\u00e7aises de Radiologie 21\u201325 Octobre 2011 (2011).","DOI":"10.1051\/radiopro\/2012017"},{"key":"90529_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1177","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-014-0280-0","volume":"40","author":"MT Corwin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Corwin, M. T., Chang, M., Fananapazir, G., Seibert, A. & Lamba, R. Accuracy and radiation dose reduction a limited abdominopelvic CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Abdom. Imaging 40, 1177\u20131182 (2015).","journal-title":"Abdom. Imaging"},{"key":"90529_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1525","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.04.1512","volume":"185","author":"J Campbell","year":"2005","unstructured":"Campbell, J., Kalra, M. K., Rizzo, S., Maher, M. M. & Shepard, J. A. Scanning beyond anatomic limits of the thorax in chest CT: Findings, radiation dose and automatic tube current modulation. Am. J. Roentgenol. 185, 1525\u20131530 (2005).","journal-title":"Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"90529_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2421051350","volume":"242","author":"AJ Van der Molen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Van der Molen, A. J. & Geleijns, J. (2007) Overranging in multisection CT: Quantification and relative contribution to dose\u2014Comparison of four 16-section CT scanners. Radiology 242, 208 (2007).","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"90529_CR25","unstructured":"Gervaise, A., Kortesniemi, M. & Pekarovic, D. Optimization of scan length to reduce CT radiation dose. European society of\nradiologie. Ask EuroSafe Imaging. Tips & Tricks. CT Working Group. Accessed March 19, 2020."},{"key":"90529_CR26","volume-title":"D\u00e9cision du 11 Mars 2011 Modifiant la D\u00e9cision du 22 Novembre 2007 Fixant les Modalit\u00e9s du Contr\u00f4le de Qualit\u00e9 des Scanographes","author":"JORF","year":"2011","unstructured":"JORF. D\u00e9cision du 11 Mars 2011 Modifiant la D\u00e9cision du 22 Novembre 2007 Fixant les Modalit\u00e9s du Contr\u00f4le de Qualit\u00e9 des Scanographes (JORF, 2011)."},{"issue":"4","key":"90529_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1051\/radiopro\/2016078","volume":"51","author":"S Esseghaier","year":"2016","unstructured":"Esseghaier, S., Ben Mabrouk, A., Mrabet, A. & Daghfous, M. H. \u00c9valuation de la dose patient au scanner multicoupe dans un centre hospitalo-universitaire tunisien: Etude de 250 patients adultes. Radioprotection 51(4), 271\u2013277 (2016).","journal-title":"Radioprotection"}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-90529-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-90529-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-90529-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]],"date-time":"2022-12-03T08:46:07Z","timestamp":1670057167000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-90529-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,26]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["90529"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-90529-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 July 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 May 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 May 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"10958"}}