{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,9]],"date-time":"2026-01-09T22:57:29Z","timestamp":1767999449168,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,3]],"date-time":"2021-06-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622678400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,3]],"date-time":"2021-06-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622678400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare the safety and efficacy of various surgical modalities to manage large (&gt;\u20091\u00a0cm) upper ureter stones. Systematic literature search was conducted to include all randomized studies comparing various treatment options for large (&gt;\u20091\u00a0cm) upper ureteric stones. This review included 13 randomized studies with 1871 patients. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LUL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) were superior to ureteroscopy (URS) and shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for stone-free rates and need for auxiliary treatments. LUL and PNL were equally effective for stone-free rates and the need for auxiliary treatments. According to SUCRA values for stone-free rates and the need for auxiliary treatments, LUL was the best, followed by PNL. For the duration of surgery, there was no significant difference among all the techniques on network analyses, and SWL was the best according to SUCRA values. Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter for URS than LUL and PNL from network analysis, but there was no significant difference for the rest of the comparisons. Overall complications were similar in all the groups. According to the CINeMa approach, the confidence rating ranged from \u201cvery low\u201d to \u201cmoderate\u201d for various comparisons. LUL followed by PNL is the most efficacious treatment modality for upper ureteric stones compared to SWL and URS in terms of stone-free rates. However, due to the poor quality of included studies, further high-quality randomized studies are needed.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-91364-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,3]],"date-time":"2021-06-03T10:14:48Z","timestamp":1622715288000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Comparison of efficacy and safety of various management options for large upper ureteric stones a systematic review and network meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Gopal","family":"Sharma","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tarun","family":"Pareek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shantanu","family":"Tyagi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pawan","family":"Kaundal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anuj Kumar","family":"Yadav","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yashasvi","family":"Thummala","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sudheer Kumar","family":"Devana","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"91364_CR1","unstructured":"T\u00fcrk, C., Neisius, A., Pet\u0159\u00edk, A., Seitz, C., Thomas, K. & Skolarikos, A. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis 2020. European Association of Urology Guidelines. 2020 Edition. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. The European Association of Urology Guidelines Office; 2020."},{"key":"91364_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shim S, Yoon BH, Shin IS, Bae JM. Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata. Epidemiol Health. 2017;39:e2017047.","DOI":"10.4178\/epih.e2017047"},{"key":"91364_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.7326\/M14-2385","volume":"162","author":"B Hutton","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hutton, B. et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann. Intern. Med. 162, 777\u2013784 (2015).","journal-title":"Ann. Intern. Med."},{"key":"91364_CR4","unstructured":"StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 16. StataCorp LLC (2019)."},{"key":"91364_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1045","volume":"3","author":"IR White","year":"2012","unstructured":"White, I. R., Barrett, J. K., Jackson, D. & Higgins, J. P. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression. Res. Synth. Methods 3, 111\u2013125 (2012).","journal-title":"Res. Synth. Methods"},{"key":"91364_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1177\/1536867X1501500403","volume":"15","author":"I White","year":"2015","unstructured":"White, I. Network meta-analysis. Stata J. 15, 951\u2013985 (2015).","journal-title":"Stata J."},{"key":"91364_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e76654","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0076654","volume":"8","author":"A Chaimani","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chaimani, A., Higgins, J. P., Mavridis, D., Spyridonos, P. & Salanti, G. Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS ONE 8, e76654 (2013).","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"91364_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e99682","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0099682","volume":"9","author":"G Salanti","year":"2014","unstructured":"Salanti, G., Del Giovane, C., Chaimani, A., Caldwell, D. M. & Higgins, J. P. Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9, e99682 (2014).","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"91364_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1003082","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003082","volume":"17","author":"A Nikolakopoulou","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nikolakopoulou, A. et al. CINeMA: an approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 17, e1003082 (2020).","journal-title":"PLoS Med."},{"key":"91364_CR10","first-page":"S150-S4","volume":"100","author":"C Tiloklurs","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tiloklurs, C. et al. Comparison of successful treatment between ureteroscopic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteric calculi. J. Med. Assoc. Thailand 100, S150\u2013S4 (2017).","journal-title":"J. Med. Assoc. Thailand"},{"key":"91364_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2011.09.054","volume":"187","author":"AC Lopes Neto","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lopes Neto, A. C. et al. Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy. J. Urol. 187, 164\u2013168 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Urol."},{"key":"91364_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.01.04","volume":"39","author":"H Karami","year":"2013","unstructured":"Karami, H., Mazloomfard, M. M., Lotfi, B., Alizadeh, A. & Javanmard, B. Ultrasonography-guided PNL in comparison with laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the management of large proximal ureteral stone. Int. Braz. J. 39, 22\u201328 (2013).","journal-title":"Int. Braz. J."},{"key":"91364_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"480","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2005.09.067","volume":"67","author":"YH Lee","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lee, Y. H., Tsai, J. Y., Jiaan, B. P., Wu, T. & Yu, C. C. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones. Urology 67, 480\u2013484 (2006).","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"91364_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2007.0230","volume":"22","author":"X Sun","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sun, X. et al. Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy. J. Endourol. Endourol. Soc.y. 22, 913\u2013917 (2008).","journal-title":"J. Endourol. Endourol. Soc.y."},{"key":"91364_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-017-0236-0","volume":"17","author":"Y Wang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang, Y. et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol. 17, 50 (2017).","journal-title":"BMC Urol."},{"key":"91364_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2012.08.045","volume":"80","author":"Z Yang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Yang, Z. et al. Comparative study of outcome in treating upper ureteral impacted stones using minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with aid of patented system or transurethral ureteroscopy. Urology 80, 1192\u20131197 (2012).","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"91364_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E673","DOI":"10.5489\/cuaj.346","volume":"7","author":"U Ozturk","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ozturk, U. et al. The comparison of laparoscopy, shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for large proximal ureteral stones. J. Can. Urol. Assoc. 7, E673\u2013E676 (2013).","journal-title":"J. Can. Urol. Assoc."},{"key":"91364_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2677","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2008.0095","volume":"22","author":"A Basiri","year":"2008","unstructured":"Basiri, A. et al. Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the management of large, proximal ureteral stones: a randomized clinical trial. J. Endourol. 22, 2677\u20132680 (2008).","journal-title":"J. Endourol."},{"key":"91364_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1590\/S0102-86502012000300011","volume":"27","author":"Y Fang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fang, Y., Qiu, J., Wang, D., Zhan, H. & Situ, J. Comparative study on ureteroscopic lithotripsy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for treatment of unilateral upper ureteral stones. Acta Cirurgica Bras. 27, 266\u2013270 (2012).","journal-title":"Acta Cirurgica Bras."},{"key":"91364_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1841","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-015-1545-0","volume":"33","author":"Y Shao","year":"2015","unstructured":"Shao, Y., Wang, D. W., Lu, G. L. & Shen, Z. J. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in comparison with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 12 mm. World J. Urol. 33, 1841\u20131845 (2015).","journal-title":"World J. Urol."},{"key":"91364_CR21","first-page":"S135","volume":"31","author":"B Kadyan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kadyan, B. et al. A Prospective randomized study of large proximal ureteral stones: ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy. Indian J. Urol. 31, S135 (2015).","journal-title":"Indian J. Urol."},{"key":"91364_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1248","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2013.0791","volume":"29","author":"A Kumar","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kumar, A. et al. A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones >2cm: a single-center experience. J. Endourol. Endourol. Soc. 29, 1248\u20131252 (2015).","journal-title":"J. Endourol. Endourol. Soc."},{"key":"91364_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1605","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-013-1026-2","volume":"31","author":"G Xiao-jian","year":"2013","unstructured":"Xiao-jian, G., Jian Lin, L. & Yan, X. Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy. World J. Urol. 31, 1605\u20131610 (2013).","journal-title":"World J. Urol."},{"key":"91364_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.07.041","volume":"69","author":"C T\u00fcrk","year":"2016","unstructured":"T\u00fcrk, C. et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur. Urol. 69, 475\u2013482 (2016).","journal-title":"Eur. Urol."},{"key":"91364_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2007.09.107","volume":"178","author":"GM Preminger","year":"2007","unstructured":"Preminger, G. M. et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J. Urol. 178, 2418\u20132434 (2007).","journal-title":"J. Urol."},{"key":"91364_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410x.1999.00287.x","volume":"84","author":"FX Keeley","year":"1999","unstructured":"Keeley, F. X., Gialas, I., Pillai, M., Chrisofos, M. & Tolley, D. A. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: the Edinburgh experience. Bju Int. 84, 765\u2013769 (1999).","journal-title":"Bju Int."},{"key":"91364_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"554","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2017.04.006","volume":"3","author":"P Kallidonis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kallidonis, P. et al. Minimally invasive surgical ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large ureteric stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Eur. Urol. Focus 3, 554\u2013566 (2017).","journal-title":"Eur. Urol. Focus"},{"key":"91364_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0696","volume":"42","author":"FC Torricelli","year":"2016","unstructured":"Torricelli, F. C. et al. Semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 42, 645\u2013654 (2016).","journal-title":"Int. Braz. J. Urol."},{"key":"91364_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0171478","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0171478","volume":"12","author":"Q Wang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang, Q. et al. Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 12, e0171478 (2017).","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-91364-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-91364-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-91364-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]],"date-time":"2022-12-03T09:18:19Z","timestamp":1670059099000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-91364-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,3]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["91364"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-91364-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 June 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 May 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 June 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"11811"}}