{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]],"date-time":"2026-08-22T05:17:23Z","timestamp":1787375843753,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,8]],"date-time":"2022-03-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646697600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,8]],"date-time":"2022-03-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646697600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002957","name":"Technische Universit\u00e4t Dresden","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002957","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is a common severe surgical complication after pancreatic surgery. Current risk stratification systems mostly rely on intraoperatively assessed factors like manually determined gland texture or blood loss. We developed a preoperatively available image-based risk score predicting CR-POPF as a complication of pancreatic head resection. Frequency of CR-POPF and occurrence of salvage completion pancreatectomy during the hospital stay were associated with an intraoperative surgical (sFRS) and image-based preoperative CT-based (rFRS) fistula risk score, both considering pancreatic gland texture, pancreatic duct diameter and pathology, in 195 patients undergoing pancreatic head resection. Based on its association with fistula-related outcome, radiologically estimated pancreatic remnant volume was included in a preoperative (preFRS) score for POPF risk stratification. Intraoperatively assessed pancreatic duct diameter (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001), gland texture (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001) and high-risk pathology (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001) as well as radiographically determined pancreatic duct diameter (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001), gland texture (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001), high-risk pathology (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.001), and estimated pancreatic remnant volume (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001) correlated with the risk of CR-POPF development. PreFRS predicted the risk of CR-POPF development (AUC\u2009=\u20090.83) and correlated with the risk of rescue completion pancreatectomy. In summary, preFRS facilitates preoperative POPF risk stratification in patients undergoing pancreatic head resection, enabling individualized therapeutic approaches and optimized perioperative management.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-07970-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,8]],"date-time":"2022-03-08T10:03:34Z","timestamp":1646733814000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["The image-based preoperative fistula risk score (preFRS) predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreatic head resection"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Fiona R.","family":"Kolbinger","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julia","family":"Lambrecht","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefan","family":"Leger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Till","family":"Ittermann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefanie","family":"Speidel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J\u00fcrgen","family":"Weitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ralf-Thorsten","family":"Hoffmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marius","family":"Distler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jens-Peter","family":"K\u00fchn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"7970_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1076","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.8784","volume":"99","author":"C Ansorge","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ansorge, C. et al. Structured intraoperative assessment of pancreatic gland characteristics in predicting complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br. J. Surg. 99, 1076\u20131082 (2012).","journal-title":"Br. J. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR2","first-page":"584","volume":"161","author":"C Bassi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bassi, C. et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery (United States) 161, 584\u2013591 (2017).","journal-title":"Surgery (United States)"},{"key":"7970_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002","volume":"216","author":"MP Callery","year":"2013","unstructured":"Callery, M. P. et al. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 216, 1\u201314 (2013).","journal-title":"J. Am. Coll. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.21037\/gs-20-670","volume":"10","author":"AM Luu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Luu, A. M. et al. Is primary total pancreatectomy in patients with high-risk pancreatic remnant justified and preferable to pancreaticoduodenectomy? \u2014a matched-pairs analysis of 200 patients. Gland Surg. 10, 618\u2013628 (2021).","journal-title":"Gland Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.21037\/tgh.2017.11.14","volume":"2","author":"A Pulvirenti","year":"2017","unstructured":"Pulvirenti, A., Ramera, M. & Bassi, C. Modifications in the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Transl. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2, 107 (2017).","journal-title":"Transl. Gastroenterol. Hepatol."},{"key":"7970_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1550","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-015-2969-9","volume":"39","author":"MF Nentwich","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nentwich, M. F. et al. Salvage completion pancreatectomies as damage control for post-pancreatic surgery complications: A single-center retrospective analysis. World J. Surg. 39, 1550\u20131556 (2015).","journal-title":"World J. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surge.2017.07.005","volume":"16","author":"YM Zhou","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhou, Y. M., Zhou, X., Wan, T., Xu, D. & Si, X. Y. An evidence-based approach to the surgical interventions for severe pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgeon 16, 119\u2013124 (2018).","journal-title":"Surgeon"},{"key":"7970_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002620","volume":"269","author":"TH Mungroop","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mungroop, T. H. et al. Alternative fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy (a-FRS): Design and international external validation. Ann. Surg. 269, 937\u2013943 (2019).","journal-title":"Ann. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g7594","volume":"350","author":"GS Collins","year":"2015","unstructured":"Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G. & Moons, K. G. M. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement. BMJ 350, 148\u2013158 (2015).","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"7970_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.21873\/anticanres.13140","volume":"39","author":"M Di Martino","year":"2019","unstructured":"Di Martino, M. et al. Predictive factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy and external validation of predictive scores. Anticancer Res. 39, 499\u2013504 (2019).","journal-title":"Anticancer Res."},{"key":"7970_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.638","volume":"26","author":"Y Ryu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ryu, Y. et al. Validation of original and alternative fistula risk scores in postoperative pancreatic fistula. J. Hepatobiliary. Pancreat. Sci. 26, 354\u2013359 (2019).","journal-title":"J. Hepatobiliary. Pancreat. Sci."},{"key":"7970_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2015.05.011","volume":"221","author":"CR Shubert","year":"2015","unstructured":"Shubert, C. R. et al. Clinical risk score to predict pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: Independent external validation for open and laparoscopic approaches. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 221, 689\u2013698 (2015).","journal-title":"J. Am. Coll. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hpb.2017.01.021","volume":"19","author":"J Grendar","year":"2017","unstructured":"Grendar, J. et al. Validation of fistula risk score calculator in diverse north American HPB practices. HPB 19, 508\u2013514 (2017).","journal-title":"HPB"},{"key":"7970_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2422","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-014-2556-5","volume":"38","author":"F Frozanpor","year":"2014","unstructured":"Frozanpor, F. et al. Correlation between preoperative imaging and intraoperative risk assessment in the prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy. World J. Surg. 38, 2422\u20132429 (2014).","journal-title":"World J. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1858","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-012-1567-3","volume":"36","author":"F Frozanpor","year":"2012","unstructured":"Frozanpor, F. et al. Preoperative pancreas CT\/MRI characteristics predict fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J. Surg. 36, 1858\u20131865 (2012).","journal-title":"World J. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1625","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-015-2855-7","volume":"19","author":"S Yardimci","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yardimci, S. et al. A simple method to evaluate whether pancreas texture can be used to predict pancreatic fistula risk after pancreatoduodenectomy. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 19, 1625\u20131631 (2015).","journal-title":"J. Gastrointest. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/sla.0000000000003234","author":"TH Mungroop","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mungroop, T. H. et al. Updated alternative fistula risk score (ua-FRS) to include minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/sla.0000000000003234 (2019).","journal-title":"Ann. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2873","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-014-3722-6","volume":"21","author":"W Wu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wu, W. et al. The impact of postoperative complications on the administration of adjuvant therapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 21, 2873\u20132881 (2014).","journal-title":"Ann. Surg. Oncol."},{"key":"7970_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2019.2272","volume":"154","author":"T Hank","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hank, T. et al. Association between pancreatic fistula and long-term survival in the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. JAMA Surg. 154, 943\u2013951 (2019).","journal-title":"JAMA Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1038\/s41575-018-0005-x","volume":"15","author":"JP Neoptolemos","year":"2018","unstructured":"Neoptolemos, J. P. et al. Therapeutic developments in pancreatic cancer: Current and future perspectives. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15, 333\u2013348 (2018).","journal-title":"Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol."},{"key":"7970_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-021-02157-1","volume":"406","author":"G Capretti","year":"2021","unstructured":"Capretti, G. et al. Total pancreatectomy as alternative to pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis in patients with high fistula risk score: The choice of the fearful or of the wise?. Langenbeck\u2019s Arch. Surg. 406, 713\u2013719 (2021).","journal-title":"Langenbeck\u2019s Arch. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/sla.0000000000004840","author":"G Marchegiani","year":"2021","unstructured":"Marchegiani, G. et al. High-risk pancreatic anastomosis vs. total pancreatectomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/sla.0000000000004840 (2021).","journal-title":"Ann. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/JAMASURG.2021.5834","author":"M Loos","year":"2021","unstructured":"Loos, M. et al. Categorization of differing types of total pancreatectomy. JAMA Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/JAMASURG.2021.5834 (2021).","journal-title":"JAMA Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8309","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-021-10292-8","volume":"28","author":"S Hempel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hempel, S. et al. More is more? Total pancreatectomy for periampullary cancer as an alternative in patients with high-risk pancreatic anastomosis: A propensity score-matched analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 28, 8309\u20138317 (2021).","journal-title":"Ann. Surg. Oncol."},{"key":"7970_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000000806","volume":"261","author":"B Menahem","year":"2015","unstructured":"Menahem, B., Guittet, L., Mulliri, A., Alves, A. & Lubrano, J. Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann. Surg. 261, 882\u2013887 (2015).","journal-title":"Ann. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR26","first-page":"1796","volume":"11","author":"X Liu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Liu, X. et al. Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drainage after pancreatic resection: An updated meta-analysis. Front. Oncol. 11, 1796 (2021).","journal-title":"Front. Oncol."},{"key":"7970_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1159\/000381032","volume":"32","author":"K Jin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jin, K. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of somatostatin analogues in the prevention of postoperative complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig. Surg. 32, 196\u2013207 (2015).","journal-title":"Dig. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1097\/MPA.0b013e3182072032","volume":"40","author":"MF Philippe","year":"2011","unstructured":"Philippe, M. F. et al. Pancreatic volume and endocrine and exocrine functions in patients with diabetes. Pancreas 40, 359\u2013363 (2011).","journal-title":"Pancreas"},{"key":"7970_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001537","volume":"264","author":"MT McMillan","year":"2016","unstructured":"McMillan, M. T. et al. Risk-adjusted outcomes of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: A model for performance evaluation. Ann. Surg. 264, 344\u2013352 (2016).","journal-title":"Ann. Surg."},{"key":"7970_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics10070445","volume":"10","author":"K Yamao","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yamao, K. et al. Partial pancreatic parenchymal atrophy is a new specific finding to diagnose small pancreatic cancer (\u226410 mm) including carcinoma in situ: Comparison with localized benign main pancreatic duct stenosis patients. Diagnostics 10, 445 (2020).","journal-title":"Diagnostics"},{"key":"7970_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1177\/001316446002000104","volume":"20","author":"J Cohen","year":"1960","unstructured":"Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 37\u201346 (1960).","journal-title":"Educ. Psychol. Meas."},{"key":"7970_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-017-13448-3","volume":"7","author":"S Leger","year":"2017","unstructured":"Leger, S. et al. A comparative study of machine learning methods for time-To-event survival data for radiomics risk modelling. Sci. Rep. 7, 11 (2017).","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"7970_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radonc.2018.07.020","volume":"130","author":"S Leger","year":"2019","unstructured":"Leger, S. et al. CT imaging during treatment improves radiomic models for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 130, 10\u201317 (2019).","journal-title":"Radiother. Oncol."},{"key":"7970_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers12103047","volume":"12","author":"S Leger","year":"2020","unstructured":"Leger, S. et al. Comprehensive analysis of tumour sub-volumes for radiomic risk modelling in locally advanced HNSCC. Cancers (Basel). 12, 1\u201327 (2020).","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)."},{"key":"7970_CR35","first-page":"507","volume":"6683","author":"F Hutter","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hutter, F., Hoos, H. H. & Leyton-Brown, K. Sequential model-based optimization for general algorithm configuration. LNCS 6683, 507\u2013523 (2011).","journal-title":"LNCS"},{"key":"7970_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x","volume":"57","author":"Y Benjamini","year":"1995","unstructured":"Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289\u2013300 (1995).","journal-title":"J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B"}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-022-07970-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-022-07970-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-022-07970-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,19]],"date-time":"2024-09-19T22:23:14Z","timestamp":1726784594000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-022-07970-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,8]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["7970"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-022-07970-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 July 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 February 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 March 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"4064"}}