{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,5]],"date-time":"2025-11-05T11:24:14Z","timestamp":1762341854243},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,15]],"date-time":"2022-04-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1649980800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,15]],"date-time":"2022-04-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1649980800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Hip hemiarthroplasty is considered the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly less active patients. One important complication of this procedure is an intraoperative periprosthetic femur fracture (IPF), which may lead to poor functional outcome and may increase morbidity and mortality. Our primary aim in this study is to compare between Austin-Moore and Corail prosthesis regarding IPFs. Our secondary aim is to assess patient and surgical technique related risk factors for the development of this complication. Inclusion criteria included patients older than 65\u00a0years of age who had a displaced femoral neck fracture and were operated for hip hemiarthroplasty between the years 2014\u20132018. Patient-specific data was collected retrospectively including age, gender, comorbidities, pre-injury ambulatory status, duration of surgery, surgical approach, use of Austin-Moore or Corail prosthesis, surgeon\u2019s experience and type of anesthesia applied. In addition, radiographs were reviewed for measurement of calcar to canal ratio (CDR) and classification of Dorr canal type. 257 patients with an average age of 83.7\u00a0years were enrolled in the study. 118 patients (46%) were treated with an Austin-Moore prosthesis, while 139 (54%) were treated with a Corail prosthesis. A total of 22 patients (8.6%) had intraoperative fractures. Fracture prevalence was significantly higher in the Corail group compared with the Austin-Moore group (12.2% vs. 4.2%, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.025). The majority of patients had a Dorr A type femoral canal, while the rest had Dorr B type canal (70% vs. 30%). There was no difference in fracture prevalence between Dorr A and B canal type patients. We didn\u2019t find any significant risk factor for developing an IPF, neither patient wise (age, gender, and comorbidities) nor surgical technique related (surgical approach, type of anesthesia, and surgeon\u2019s experience). Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture prevalence was significantly higher in the Corail patient group compared with the Austin-Moore group. This may be an important advantage of the Austin-Moore prosthesis over the Corail prosthesis.\n<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-10384-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,15]],"date-time":"2022-04-15T18:03:48Z","timestamp":1650045828000},"update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["A comparison between Austin-Moore and Corail prosthesis regarding intraoperative periprosthetic femur fractures in hip hemiarthroplasty"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Elias","family":"Mazzawi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nabil","family":"Ghrayeb","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Farouk","family":"Khury","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Doron","family":"Norman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yaniv","family":"Keren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,15]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10384_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1079\/PNS2002160","volume":"61","author":"R Eastell","year":"2002","unstructured":"Eastell, R. & Lambert, H. Strategies for skeletal health in the elderly. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 61(2), 173\u2013180 (2002).","journal-title":"Proc. Nutr. Soc."},{"issue":"5","key":"10384_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1007\/PL00004148","volume":"7","author":"B Gullberg","year":"1997","unstructured":"Gullberg, B., Johnel, O. & Kanis, J. A. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 7(5), 407\u2013413 (1997).","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int."},{"issue":"1S","key":"10384_CR3","first-page":"95","volume":"105","author":"O Guyen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Guyen, O. Hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty in recent femoral neck fractures?. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 105(1S), 95\u2013101 (2018).","journal-title":"Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res."},{"key":"10384_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2009.10.024","volume":"40","author":"PV Giannoudis","year":"2009","unstructured":"Giannoudis, P. V. et al. Management, complications and clinical results of femoral head fractures. Injury 40, 1245\u20131251 (2009).","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"10384_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2235","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-012-2293-8","volume":"470","author":"L Yu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Yu, L., Wang, Y. & Chen, J. Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral-neck fractures: metaanalysis of randomized trials. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 470, 2235\u20132243 (2012).","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"10384_CR6","first-page":"CD000337","volume":"3","author":"HHG Handoll","year":"2008","unstructured":"Handoll, H. H. G. & Parker, M. J. Conservative versus operative treatment for hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 3, CD000337 (2008).","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev."},{"issue":"1","key":"10384_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.92B1.22753","volume":"92","author":"MI Parker","year":"2010","unstructured":"Parker, M. I., Pryor, G. & Gurusamy, K. Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures. A randomised controlled trial in 400 patients. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 92(1), 116\u2013122 (2010).","journal-title":"J. Bone Joint Surg. Br."},{"issue":"4","key":"10384_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.11622\/smedj.2016071","volume":"57","author":"E Tay","year":"2016","unstructured":"Tay, E. Hip fractures in the elderly. Operative versus nonoperative management. Singapore Med. J. 57(4), 178\u2013181 (2016).","journal-title":"Singapore Med. J."},{"key":"10384_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2122","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.E.00535","volume":"87","author":"M Bhandari","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bhandari, M. et al. Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: an international survey. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87, 2122\u20132130 (2005).","journal-title":"J. Bone Joint Surg. Am."},{"issue":"12","key":"10384_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2658","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.F.01538","volume":"89","author":"T Bhattacharyya","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bhattacharyya, T., Chang, D., Meigs, J. B., Estok, D. M. 2nd. & Malchau, H. Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 89(12), 2658\u20132662 (2007).","journal-title":"J. Bone Joint Surg. Am."},{"key":"10384_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bellova, P., Baecker, H., Lotzien, S., Brandt, M., Schildhauer, T.A., & Gessmann, J. (2019, December 11). Risk analysis and clinical outcomes of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures: a retrospective study of 481 bipolar hemiarthroplasties. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research., 14(1), 2","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-019-1494-1"},{"issue":"9","key":"10384_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1189","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-018-2952-7","volume":"138","author":"CC Hong","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hong, C. C. et al. Intraoperative periprosthetic femur fracture during bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 138(9), 1189\u20131198 (2018).","journal-title":"Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg."},{"issue":"3","key":"10384_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/00013611-199109000-00002","volume":"6","author":"PH Dossick","year":"1991","unstructured":"Dossick, P. H., Dorrr, L. D., Gruen, T. & Saberi, M. T. Techniques for preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation of noncemented hip arthroplasty. Tech. Orthop. 6(3), 1\u20136 (1991).","journal-title":"Tech. Orthop."},{"key":"10384_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rostislav, N., Nahum, R., David, N., Yaron, B., Sergey, M., Dorron, N., & Yaniv, K. Canal-to-diaphysis ratio as an osteoporosis-related risk factor for hip fractures. Orthopedics 38, e461 (2015).","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20150603-51"},{"key":"10384_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199808000-00010","volume":"353","author":"MS Gilbert","year":"1998","unstructured":"Gilbert, M. S. & Capozzi, J. Unipolar or bipolar prosthesis for the displaced intracapsular hip fracture? An unanswered question. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 353, 81\u201385 (1998).","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"10384_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-199509040-00005","volume":"9","author":"RA Wathne","year":"1995","unstructured":"Wathne, R. A., Koval, K. J., Aharonoff, G. B., Zuckerman, J. D. & Jones, D. A. Corail unipolar versus bipolar prosthesis: a prospective evaluation of functional outcome after femoral neck fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 9, 298\u2013302 (1995).","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma."},{"key":"10384_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2012.04.002","volume":"35","author":"CC Lin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lin, C. C. et al. Survival of patients aged over 80 years after Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty and bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. Asian J Surg. 35, 62\u201366 (2012).","journal-title":"Asian J Surg."},{"key":"10384_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2011.11.022","author":"C Rogmark","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rogmark, C., Leonardsson, O., Garellick, G. & K\u00e4rrholm, J. Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasties for femoral neck fractures\u2013a part of orthopaedic history? Analysis of national registration of hemiarthroplasties 2005\u20132009. Injury https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2011.11.022 (2012).","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"2","key":"10384_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1177\/230949901502300222","volume":"23","author":"CL Kuo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kuo, C. L., Tan, S. H. S. & Lee, H. C. Intra-operative fractures in cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty. J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong). 23(2), 218\u2013222 (2015).","journal-title":"J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong)."},{"key":"10384_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198806000-00016","volume":"231","author":"LA Whiteside","year":"1988","unstructured":"Whiteside, L. A., AmaDorr, D. & Russell, K. The effects of the collar on total hip femoral component subsidence. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 231, 120 (1988).","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"issue":"8","key":"10384_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1549","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2011.03.030","volume":"26","author":"G Demey","year":"2011","unstructured":"Demey, G., Fary, C., Lustig, S., Neyret, P. & A\u00eft si Selmi, T. Does a collar improve the immediate stability of uncemented femoral hip stems in total hip arthroplasty? a bilateral comparative cadaver study. J. Arthroplast. 26(8), 1549\u20132155 (2011).","journal-title":"J. Arthroplast."},{"issue":"1","key":"10384_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.4055\/cios.2018.10.1.14","volume":"10","author":"N Aslam-Pervez","year":"2018","unstructured":"Aslam-Pervez, N., Riaz, O., Gopal, S. & Hossain, F. Predictors of intraoperative fractures during hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of fragility hip fractures. Clin. Orthop. Surg. 10(1), 14\u201319 (2018).","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Surg."},{"key":"10384_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.94B11.30614","volume":"94","author":"RE Mayle","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mayle, R. E. & Della Valle, C. J. Intra-operative fractures during THA: see it before it sees us. J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br) 94, 26 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br)"}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-022-10384-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-022-10384-9","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-022-10384-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,25]],"date-time":"2022-11-25T02:07:15Z","timestamp":1669342035000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-022-10384-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,15]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10384"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-022-10384-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 November 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 April 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 April 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"6340"}}