{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,12]],"date-time":"2025-07-12T01:23:57Z","timestamp":1752283437300},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,19]],"date-time":"2024-02-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1708300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,19]],"date-time":"2024-02-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1708300800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Bioactive glass\u2013ceramic (BGC) cage is a substitute for polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Only a few comparative studies exist using PEEK and non-window-type BGC cages (CaO\u2013SiO<jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\u2013P<jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>O<jats:sub>5<\/jats:sub>\u2013B<jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3<\/jats:sub>) in single-level ACDF. This study compared PEEK cages filled with autologous iliac bone grafts and BGC cages regarding clinical safety and effectiveness. A retrospective case series was performed on 40 patients who underwent single-level ACDF between October 2020 and July 2021 by a single orthopedic spine surgeon. The spacers used in each ACDF were a PEEK cage with a void filled with an autologous iliac bone graft and a non-window-type BGC cage in 20 cases. The grafts were compared pre-operatively and post-operatively at 6\u00a0weeks and 3, 6, and 12\u00a0months. Post-operative complications were investigated in each group. Clinical outcome was measured, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores of neck and arm pains, Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Dynamic lateral radiographs were used to assess the inter-spinous motion (ISM) between the fusion segment and subsidence. The fusion status was evaluated using a computed tomography (CT) scan. Overall, 39 patients (19 and 20 patients in the PEEK and BGC groups, respectively) were recruited. Eighteen (94.7%) and 19 (95.0%) patients in the PEEK and BGC groups, respectively, were fused 12\u00a0months post-operatively, as assessed by ISM in dynamic lateral radiograph and bone bridging formation proven in CT scan. The PEEK and BGC groups showed substantial improvement in neck and arm VAS, JOA, and NDI scores. No substantial difference was found in clinical and radiological outcomes between the PEEK and BGC groups. However, the operation time was considerably shorter in the BGC group than in the PEEK group. In conclusion, a non-window-type BCG cage is a feasible substitute for a PEEK cage with an autologous iliac bone graft in single-level ACDF.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-54786-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,19]],"date-time":"2024-02-19T03:02:33Z","timestamp":1708311753000},"update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Clinical and radiological outcomes of non-window-type bioactive glass\u2013ceramic cage in single-level ACDF versus PEEK cage filled with autologous bone"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Ji-Won","family":"Kwon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yong Ho","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Byung Ho","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jae Hong","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kyung Soo","family":"Suk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"54786_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1097\/brs.0000000000002273","volume":"43","author":"GR Buttermann","year":"2018","unstructured":"Buttermann, G. R. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion outcomes over 10 years: A prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43, 207\u2013214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/brs.0000000000002273 (2018).","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"54786_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-195840030-00009","volume":"40-a","author":"GW Smith","year":"1958","unstructured":"Smith, G. W. & Robinson, R. A. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 40-a, 607\u2013624 (1958).","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am."},{"key":"54786_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2021.0209","volume":"16","author":"JK Sharma","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sharma, J. K. et al. Two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus hybrid total disc replacement for bilevel pathology with cervical radiculopathy\/myelopathy: A comparative study with a minimum 2-year follow-up in an Indian population. Asian Spine J. 16, 493\u2013501. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31616\/asj.2021.0209 (2022).","journal-title":"Asian Spine J."},{"key":"54786_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2022.0295","author":"M Lin","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lin, M. et al. A review of finite element modeling for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Asian Spine J. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31616\/asj.2022.0295 (2023).","journal-title":"Asian Spine J."},{"key":"54786_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-008-0648-3","volume":"17","author":"R Pollock","year":"2008","unstructured":"Pollock, R. et al. Donor site morbidity following iliac crest bone harvesting for cervical fusion: A comparison between minimally invasive and open techniques. Eur. Spine J. 17, 845\u2013852. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-008-0648-3 (2008).","journal-title":"Eur. Spine J."},{"key":"54786_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200301150-00008","volume":"28","author":"JS Silber","year":"2003","unstructured":"Silber, J. S. et al. Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28, 134\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-200301150-00008 (2003).","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"54786_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2016.12.037","volume":"38","author":"SC Yson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yson, S. C., Sembrano, J. N. & Santos, E. R. Comparison of allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage subsidence rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). J. Clin. Neurosci. 38, 118\u2013121. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jocn.2016.12.037 (2017).","journal-title":"J. Clin. Neurosci."},{"key":"54786_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-023-07530-w","volume":"32","author":"UK Dhar","year":"2023","unstructured":"Dhar, U. K. et al. Factors influencing cage subsidence in anterior cervical corpectomy and discectomy: A systematic review. Eur. Spine J. 32, 957\u2013968. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-023-07530-w (2023).","journal-title":"Eur. Spine J."},{"key":"54786_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568217699201","volume":"7","author":"SA Zadegan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zadegan, S. A. et al. Clinical application of ceramics in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A review and update. Glob. Spine J. 7, 343\u2013349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2192568217699201 (2017).","journal-title":"Glob. Spine J."},{"key":"54786_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1446","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.08.030","volume":"15","author":"RF Kersten","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kersten, R. F., van Gaalen, S. M., de Gast, A. & \u00d6ner, F. C. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in cervical applications: A systematic review. Spine J. 15, 1446\u20131460. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.08.030 (2015).","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"key":"54786_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4069","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12124069","volume":"12","author":"J Park","year":"2023","unstructured":"Park, J. et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion performed using a CaO\u2013SiO2\u2013P2O5\u2013B2O3 bioactive glass ceramic or polyetheretherketone cage filled with hydroxyapatite\/\u03b2-tricalcium phosphate: A prospective randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Med. 12, 4069. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm12124069 (2023).","journal-title":"J. Clin. Med."},{"key":"54786_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4651","DOI":"10.3390\/ma16134651","volume":"16","author":"FG Mecca","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mecca, F. G., Bellucci, D. & Cannillo, V. Effect of thermal treatments and ion substitution on sintering and crystallization of bioactive glasses: A review. Materials (Basel) 16, 4651. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ma16134651 (2023).","journal-title":"Materials (Basel)"},{"key":"54786_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e358","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2020.05.143","volume":"141","author":"S Park","year":"2020","unstructured":"Park, S. et al. Feasibility of CaO\u2013SiO2\u2013P2O5\u2013B2O3 bioactive glass ceramic cage in anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. World Neurosurg. 141, e358\u2013e366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2020.05.143 (2020).","journal-title":"World Neurosurg."},{"key":"54786_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1423","DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-019-01225-x","volume":"43","author":"HC Kim","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kim, H. C. et al. Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of bioactive glass ceramic to allograft bone for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plate fixation. Neurosurg. Rev. 43, 1423\u20131430. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10143-019-01225-x (2020).","journal-title":"Neurosurg. Rev."},{"key":"54786_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1111\/aor.12040","volume":"37","author":"JH Lee","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lee, J. H. et al. In vivo evaluation of CaO\u2013SiO2\u2013P2O5\u2013B2O3 glass-ceramics coating on Steinman pins. Artif. Organs 37, 656\u2013662. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aor.12040 (2013).","journal-title":"Artif. Organs"},{"key":"54786_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.05.034","volume":"180","author":"ML Jo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Jo, M. L. et al. Subsidence performance of the bioactive glass-ceramic (CaO\u2013SiO2\u2013P2O5\u2013B2O3) spacer in terms of modulus of elasticity and contact area: Mechanical test and finite element analysis. World Neurosurg. 180, e1\u2013e10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.05.034 (2023).","journal-title":"World Neurosurg."},{"key":"54786_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1100462","DOI":"10.3389\/fbioe.2023.1100462","volume":"11","author":"S Ryu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ryu, S., Ryu, D. S. & Kim, K. S. Long-term results comparison after anterior cervical discectomy with BGS-7 spacer (NOVOMAX\u00ae-C) and allograft spacer: A prospective observational study. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11, 1100462. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fbioe.2023.1100462 (2023).","journal-title":"Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol."},{"key":"54786_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.5.Spine1732","volume":"28","author":"A MacDowall","year":"2018","unstructured":"MacDowall, A., Skeppholm, M., Robinson, Y. & Olerud, C. Validation of the visual analog scale in the cervical spine. J. Neurosurg. Spine 28, 227\u2013235. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2017.5.Spine1732 (2018).","journal-title":"J. Neurosurg. Spine"},{"key":"54786_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1890","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200109010-00014","volume":"26","author":"K Yonenobu","year":"2001","unstructured":"Yonenobu, K., Abumi, K., Nagata, K., Taketomi, E. & Ueyama, K. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese orthopaedic association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26, 1890\u20131894. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-200109010-00014 (2001).","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"54786_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2022.0027","volume":"17","author":"MR Patel","year":"2023","unstructured":"Patel, M. R. et al. Does baseline severity of arm pain influence outcomes following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?. Asian Spine J. 17, 500\u2013510. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31616\/asj.2022.0027 (2023).","journal-title":"Asian Spine J."},{"key":"54786_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2021.0414","volume":"17","author":"CE Geoghegan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Geoghegan, C. E. et al. Validation of neck disability index severity among patients receiving one or two-level anterior cervical surgery. Asian Spine J. 17, 86\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31616\/asj.2021.0414 (2023).","journal-title":"Asian Spine J."},{"key":"54786_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.M.00167","volume":"96","author":"KS Song","year":"2014","unstructured":"Song, K. S. et al. Dynamic radiographic criteria for detecting pseudarthrosis following anterior cervical arthrodesis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 96, 557\u2013563. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.M.00167 (2014).","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am."},{"key":"54786_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-018-3490-3","volume":"160","author":"I Noordhoek","year":"2018","unstructured":"Noordhoek, I., Koning, M. T., Jacobs, W. C. H. & Vleggeert-Lankamp, C. L. A. Incidence and clinical relevance of cage subsidence in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A systematic review. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 160, 873\u2013880. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00701-018-3490-3 (2018).","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir. (Wien)"},{"key":"54786_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310","volume":"33","author":"JR Landis","year":"1977","unstructured":"Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159\u2013174 (1977).","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"54786_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2020.0463","volume":"16","author":"M Alhashash","year":"2022","unstructured":"Alhashash, M., Allouch, H., Boehm, H. & Shousha, M. Results of four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using stand-alone interbody titanium cages. Asian Spine J. 16, 82\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31616\/asj.2020.0463 (2022).","journal-title":"Asian Spine J."},{"key":"54786_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-014-2047-z","volume":"134","author":"TH Kao","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kao, T. H. et al. Risk factors for subsidence in anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: A review of 82 cases and 182 levels. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 134, 1343\u20131351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-014-2047-z (2014).","journal-title":"Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg."},{"key":"54786_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.21037\/jss-20-645","volume":"7","author":"G Gomez","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gomez, G. & Westerlund, L. E. Clinical and radiographic outcomes using third-generation bioactive glass as a bone graft substitute for multi-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion-a retrospective case series study. J. Spine Surg. 7, 124\u2013131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/jss-20-645 (2021).","journal-title":"J. Spine Surg."},{"key":"54786_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-015-0546-x","volume":"16","author":"E Chong","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chong, E., Pelletier, M. H., Mobbs, R. J. & Walsh, W. R. The design evolution of interbody cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 16, 99. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-015-0546-x (2015).","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet. Disord."},{"key":"54786_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-022-03239-6","volume":"17","author":"Z Wang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Wang, Z. et al. Low cervical vertebral CT value increased early subsidence of titanium mesh cage after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 17, 355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-022-03239-6 (2022).","journal-title":"J. Orthop. Surg. Res."},{"key":"54786_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.4055\/cios.2011.3.1.16","volume":"3","author":"JJ Yang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Yang, J. J. et al. Subsidence and nonunion after anterior cervical interbody fusion using a stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. Clin. Orthop. Surg. 3, 16\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4055\/cios.2011.3.1.16 (2011).","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Surg."},{"key":"54786_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2015.07.017","volume":"24","author":"K Phan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Phan, K., Hogan, J. A., Assem, Y. & Mobbs, R. J. PEEK-Halo effect in interbody fusion. J. Clin. Neurosci. 24, 138\u2013140. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jocn.2015.07.017 (2016).","journal-title":"J. Clin. Neurosci."},{"key":"54786_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E322","DOI":"10.1097\/bsd.0000000000000950","volume":"33","author":"JH Lee","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lee, J. H. et al. A long-term follow-up, multicenter, comparative study of the radiologic, and clinical results between a CaO\u2013SiO2\u2013P2O5\u2013B2O3 bioactive glass ceramics (BGS-7) intervertebral spacer and titanium cage in 1-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin. Spine Surg. 33, E322-e329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/bsd.0000000000000950 (2020).","journal-title":"Clin. Spine Surg."},{"key":"54786_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bas.2022.100923","volume":"2","author":"JL Goldberg","year":"2022","unstructured":"Goldberg, J. L. et al. Titanium versus polyetheretherketone versus structural allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A systematic review. Brain Spine 2, 100923. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bas.2022.100923 (2022).","journal-title":"Brain Spine"},{"key":"54786_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.3.Spine181416","author":"S Park","year":"2019","unstructured":"Park, S. et al. Feasibility of local bone dust as a graft material in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J. Neurosurg. Spine https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2019.3.Spine181416 (2019).","journal-title":"J. Neurosurg. Spine"},{"key":"54786_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"896","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2040216.108","volume":"17","author":"M Marrache","year":"2020","unstructured":"Marrache, M. et al. Synthetic cages associated with increased rates of revision surgery and higher costs compared to allograft in ACDF in the nonelderly patient. Neurospine 17, 896\u2013901. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14245\/ns.2040216.108 (2020).","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"key":"54786_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1215","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568220942217","volume":"11","author":"N Menon","year":"2021","unstructured":"Menon, N., Turcotte, J. & Patton, C. Structural allograft versus synthetic interbody cage for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A comparison of 1-year outcomes from a national database. Glob. Spine J. 11, 1215\u20131222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2192568220942217 (2021).","journal-title":"Glob. Spine J."},{"key":"54786_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"410","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568217699200","volume":"7","author":"ST Yoon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yoon, S. T. et al. ACDF graft selection by surgeons: Survey of AOSpine members. Glob. Spine J. 7, 410\u2013416. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2192568217699200 (2017).","journal-title":"Glob. Spine J."},{"key":"54786_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2022.0261","author":"AJ Rodrigues","year":"2023","unstructured":"Rodrigues, A. J. et al. clinical outcomes and cost profiles for cage and allograft anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures in the adult population: A propensity score-matched study. Asian Spine J. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31616\/asj.2022.0261 (2023).","journal-title":"Asian Spine J."},{"key":"54786_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1501","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-022-05217-7","volume":"164","author":"B Godlewski","year":"2022","unstructured":"Godlewski, B. et al. PEEK versus titanium-coated PEEK cervical cages: Fusion rate. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 164, 1501\u20131507. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00701-022-05217-7 (2022).","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir. (Wien)"}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-54786-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-54786-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-54786-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,22]],"date-time":"2024-02-22T07:10:26Z","timestamp":1708585826000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-54786-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,19]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["54786"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-024-54786-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 September 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 February 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 February 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"4035"}}