{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,9]],"date-time":"2025-12-09T08:28:57Z","timestamp":1765268937799,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,5]],"date-time":"2024-03-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709596800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,5]],"date-time":"2024-03-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709596800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft,Germany","award":["FOR5177"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["FOR5177"]}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002839","name":"Charit\u00e9 - Universit\u00e4tsmedizin Berlin","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002839","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The Schober test is considered reliable in evaluating lumbar mobility and its impairment. Especially in patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) identification of functional restriction is important. We aimed to investigate whether the 5 cm Schober cut-off provides a valid distinction between unrestricted and restricted mobility in participants with and without cLBP (18\u201365 years). cLBP is defined as LBP persisting for\u2009\u2265\u200912 weeks. We analyzed agreement between the Schober test with two measurement devices (Epionics SPINE<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>; Idiag M360<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>) and the influence of lumbar lordosis (LL) on their agreement. Also, the sensitivity and specificity of the Schober test was evaluated. For 187 participants (49.6%) Epionics SPINE<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> RoF and Schober test matched (either\u2009\u2265\u20095 cm;\u2009&gt;\u200940.8\u00b0 RoF or\u2009\u2264\u20095 cm;\u2009&lt;\u200940.8\u00b0 RoF), for 190 participants (50.4%) the two measurements did not. Idiag M360<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> RoF of 190 participants (50.4%) showed corresponding results (either\u2009\u2265\u20095 cm;\u2009&gt;\u200946.0\u00b0 RoF or\u2009\u2264\u20095 cm;\u2009&lt;\u200946.0\u00b0 RoF). Non-agreement was seen in 187 participants (49.6%). LL differed significantly in the Epionics SPINE<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> cohort (p\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Regarding the Epionics SPINE<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> cohort, Schober test showed a sensitivity of 79.6% with a specificity of 36.1%. For the Idiag M360<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> cohort, Schober test showed a sensitivity of 68.2% and a specificity of 46.6%. Our results do not establish a consistent matching between Schober test and the device measurements. Therefore, Schober test may not be valid to predict impairment of lumbar mobility. We recommend Schober test as an add-on in monitoring of an individual relative to its case.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-54787-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,5]],"date-time":"2024-03-05T14:02:11Z","timestamp":1709647331000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Nima","family":"Taheri","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Luis","family":"Becker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sandra","family":"Reitmaier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maximilian","family":"Muellner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Friederike","family":"Sch\u00f6mig","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Matthias","family":"Pumberger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hendrik","family":"Schmidt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,5]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"54787_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198101000-00013","volume":"6","author":"GB Andersson","year":"1981","unstructured":"Andersson, G. B. Epidemiologic aspects on low-back pain in industry. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 6(1), 53\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-198101000-00013 (1981).","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"54787_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1590\/S0034-8910.2015049005874","volume":"49","author":"RD Meucci","year":"2015","unstructured":"Meucci, R. D., Fassa, A. G. & Faria, N. M. Prevalence of chronic low back pain: Systematic review. Rev. Saude Publ. 49, 1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/S0034-8910.2015049005874 (2015) (Epub 2015 Oct 20).","journal-title":"Rev. Saude Publ."},{"issue":"9859","key":"54787_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2163","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)61729-2","volume":"380","author":"T Vos","year":"2012","unstructured":"Vos, T. et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990\u20132010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380(9859), 2163\u20132196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)61729-2 (2012) (Erratum in: Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):628. AlMazroa, Mohammad A [added]; Memish, Ziad A [added]).","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"54787_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.humov.2004.03.004","volume":"23","author":"TK Wong","year":"2004","unstructured":"Wong, T. K. & Lee, R. Y. Effects of low back pain on the relationship between the movements of the lumbar spine and hip. Hum. Mov. Sci. 23(1), 21\u201334 (2004).","journal-title":"Hum. Mov. Sci."},{"issue":"9","key":"54787_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1080","DOI":"10.1016\/j.medengphy.2010.07.011","volume":"32","author":"WR Taylor","year":"2010","unstructured":"Taylor, W. R., Consmuller, T. & Rohlmann, A. A novel system for the dynamic assessment of back shape. Med. Eng. Phys. 32(9), 1080\u20131083 (2010).","journal-title":"Med. Eng. Phys."},{"issue":"6","key":"54787_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e060950","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-060950","volume":"12","author":"KL Kowalski","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kowalski, K. L., Lukacs, M. J., Mistry, J., Goodman, M. & Rushton, A. B. Physical functioning outcome measures in the lumbar spinal surgery population and measurement properties of the physical outcome measures: Protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open 12(6), e060950. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-060950 (2022).","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"11","key":"54787_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2170","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-012-2312-1","volume":"21","author":"T Consmuller","year":"2012","unstructured":"Consmuller, T. et al. Comparative evaluation of a novel measurement tool to assess lumbar spine posture and range of motion. Eur. Spine J. 21(11), 2170\u20132180 (2012).","journal-title":"Eur. Spine J."},{"issue":"6","key":"54787_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.2519\/jospt.2007.2498","volume":"37","author":"JM Fritz","year":"2007","unstructured":"Fritz, J. M., Cleland, J. A. & Childs, J. D. Subgrouping patients with low back pain: Evolution of a classification approach to physical therapy. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 37(6), 290\u2013302 (2007).","journal-title":"J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther."},{"key":"54787_CR9","first-page":"20","volume":"20","author":"D Enix","year":"2020","unstructured":"Enix, D. et al. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for multidisciplinary spine care: Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. N. Am. Spine Soc. 20, 20 (2020).","journal-title":"N. Am. Spine Soc."},{"issue":"11","key":"54787_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1566","DOI":"10.1053\/apmr.2001.26064","volume":"82","author":"C Perret","year":"2001","unstructured":"Perret, C. et al. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the fingertip-to-floor test. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 82(11), 1566\u20131570 (2001).","journal-title":"Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil."},{"key":"54787_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"256365","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/256365","volume":"2015","author":"YR Yen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yen, Y. R., Luo, J. F., Liu, M. L., Lu, F. J. & Wang, S. R. The anthropometric measurement of Schober\u2019s test in normal Taiwanese population. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 256365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2015\/256365 (2015) (Epub 2015 Jul 27).","journal-title":"Biomed. Res. Int."},{"key":"54787_CR12","first-page":"336","volume":"84","author":"P Schober","year":"1937","unstructured":"Schober, P. Lendenwirbels\u00e4ule und Kreuzschmerzen. Munch MedWochenschr. 84, 336\u2013338 (1937).","journal-title":"Munch MedWochenschr."},{"issue":"4","key":"54787_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E270","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000131","volume":"39","author":"HS Robinson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Robinson, H. S. & Mengshoel, A. M. Assessments of lumbar flexion range of motion: Intertester reliability and concurrent validity of 2 commonly used clinical tests. Spine 39(4), E270\u2013E275 (2014).","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"8","key":"54787_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2265","DOI":"10.1007\/s00296-011-1953-4","volume":"32","author":"M Cidem","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cidem, M., Karacan, I. & Uludag, M. Normal range of spinal mobility for healthy young adult Turkish men. Rheumatol. Int. 32(8), 2265\u20132269. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00296-011-1953-4 (2012) (Epub 2011 May 5).","journal-title":"Rheumatol. Int."},{"key":"54787_CR15","first-page":"20","volume":"20","author":"S Ramiro","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ramiro, S., van Tubergen, A., Stolwijk, C., Van der Heijde, D. & Landewe, R. Reference intervals of spinal mobility measures in normal individuals: The Mobility Study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 20, 20 (2014).","journal-title":"Ann. Rheum. Dis."},{"issue":"5","key":"54787_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2001-18152","volume":"11","author":"C Uhlemann","year":"2001","unstructured":"Uhlemann, C., Schreiber, T. U. & Sarafowa, A. Reliabilit\u00e4t klinischer Wirbels\u00e4ulenbewegungsma\u00dfe bei Probanden Physikalische Medizin. Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin 11(5), 165\u2013170. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-2001-18152 (2001).","journal-title":"Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin"},{"issue":"4","key":"54787_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1002\/acr.22464","volume":"67","author":"C Stolwijk","year":"2015","unstructured":"Stolwijk, C. et al. Comparison of tests for lumbar flexion and hip function in patients with and without axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. (Hoboken) 67(4), 538\u2013545. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/acr.22464 (2015).","journal-title":"Arthritis Care Res. (Hoboken)"},{"issue":"6","key":"54787_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1136\/ard.28.6.584","volume":"28","author":"IF Macrae","year":"1969","unstructured":"Macrae, I. F. & Wright, V. Measurement of back movement. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 28(6), 584\u2013589. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/ard.28.6.584 (1969).","journal-title":"Ann. Rheum. Dis."},{"issue":"2","key":"54787_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.3109\/03009747309098823","volume":"2","author":"JA van Adrichem","year":"1973","unstructured":"van Adrichem, J. A. & van der Korst, J. K. Assessment of the flexibility of the lumbar spine. A pilot study in children and adolescents. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2(2), 87\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/03009747309098823 (1973).","journal-title":"Scand. J. Rheumatol."},{"issue":"1","key":"54787_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-021-04352-z","volume":"22","author":"JC Snow","year":"2021","unstructured":"Snow, J. C., Simpson, K., Rahman, P., Howarth, S. & De Carvalho, D. Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: Criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 22(1), 464. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-021-04352-z (2021).","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet. Disord."},{"issue":"8","key":"54787_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.2174\/1874325001408010355","volume":"17","author":"JC MacDermid","year":"2014","unstructured":"MacDermid, J. C., Arumugam, V., Vincent, J. I. & Carroll, K. L. The reliability and validity of the computerized double inclinometer in measuring lumbar mobility. Open Orthop. J. 17(8), 355\u2013360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2174\/1874325001408010355 (2014).","journal-title":"Open Orthop. J."},{"issue":"1","key":"54787_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.3390\/healthcare11010105","volume":"11","author":"Z Dimitriadis","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dimitriadis, Z. et al. Reliability and validity of the double inclinometer method for assessing thoracolumbar joint position sense and range of movement in patients with a recent history of low back pain. Healthcare (Basel) 11(1), 105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/healthcare11010105 (2022).","journal-title":"Healthcare (Basel)"},{"issue":"19","key":"54787_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1189","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31825ef954","volume":"37","author":"A Rezvani","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rezvani, A., Ergin, O., Karacan, I. & Oncu, M. Validity and reliability of the metric measurements in the assessment of lumbar spine motion in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Spine (Phila Pa, 1976) 37(19), E1189\u2013E1196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31825ef954 (2012).","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa, 1976)"},{"issue":"23","key":"54787_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6895","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm11236895","volume":"11","author":"O Hershkovich","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hershkovich, O., Grevitt, M. P. & Lotan, R. Schober test and its modifications revisited-what are we actually measuring? Computerized tomography-based analysis. J. Clin. Med. 11(23), 6895. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm11236895 (2022).","journal-title":"J. Clin. Med."},{"issue":"9","key":"54787_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1605","DOI":"10.1080\/00140139.2015.1019938","volume":"58","author":"E Pries","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pries, E., Dreischarf, M., Bashkuev, M. & Schmidt, H. Application of a novel spinal posture and motion measurement system in active and static sitting. Ergonomics 58(9), 1605\u20131610. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00140139.2015.1019938 (2015) (Epub 2015 Mar 20).","journal-title":"Ergonomics"},{"issue":"3","key":"54787_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-004-0641-1","volume":"124","author":"RB Post","year":"2004","unstructured":"Post, R. B. & Leferink, V. J. Spinal mobility: Sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 124(3), 187\u2013192. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-004-0641-1 (2004) (Epub 2004 Feb 14).","journal-title":"Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg."},{"key":"54787_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-003-0618-8","volume":"13","author":"AF Mannion","year":"2004","unstructured":"Mannion, A. F., Knecht, K., Balaban, G., Dvorak, J. & Grob, D. A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: Reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature. Eur. Spine J. 13, 122\u2013136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-003-0618-8 (2004).","journal-title":"Eur. Spine J."},{"issue":"1","key":"54787_CR28","first-page":"117","volume":"16","author":"A Topalidou","year":"2014","unstructured":"Topalidou, A., Tzagarakis, G., Souvatzis, X., Kontakis, G. & Katonis, P. Evaluation of the reliability of a new non-invasive method for assessing the functionality and mobility of the spine. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 16(1), 117\u2013124 (2014).","journal-title":"Acta Bioeng. Biomech."},{"issue":"1","key":"54787_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.math.2013.09.003","volume":"19","author":"E Barrett","year":"2014","unstructured":"Barrett, E., McCreesh, K. & Lewis, J. Reliability and validity of non-radiographic methods of thoracic kyphosis measurement: A systematic review. Man Ther. 19(1), 10\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.math.2013.09.003 (2014) (Epub 2013 Oct 26).","journal-title":"Man Ther."},{"issue":"3","key":"54787_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1016\/0268-0033(86)90002-1","volume":"1","author":"MA Adams","year":"1986","unstructured":"Adams, M. A., Dolan, P., Marx, C. & Hutton, W. C. An electronic inclinometer technique for measuring lumbar curvature. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). 1(3), 130\u2013134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0268-0033(86)90002-1 (1986).","journal-title":"Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon)."},{"issue":"4","key":"54787_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annrmp.2006.03.001","volume":"49","author":"M Guermazi","year":"2006","unstructured":"Guermazi, M. et al. Validit\u00e9 et reproductibilit\u00e9 du Spinal Mouse pour l\u2019\u00e9tude de la mobilit\u00e9en flexion du rachis lombaire [Validity and reliability of Spinal Mouse to assess lumbar flexion]. Ann. Readapt Med. Phys. 49(4), 172\u2013177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.annrmp.2006.03.001 (2006) (Epub 2006 Mar 20).","journal-title":"Ann. Readapt Med. Phys."},{"issue":"4","key":"54787_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198705000-00009","volume":"12","author":"IA Stokes","year":"1987","unstructured":"Stokes, I. A., Bevins, T. M. & Lunn, R. A. Back surface curvature and measurement of lumbar spinal motion. Spine (Phila Pa, 1976) 12(4), 355\u2013361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-198705000-00009 (1987).","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa, 1976)"},{"issue":"1","key":"54787_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10222","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-13891-x","volume":"12","author":"B Dreischarf","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dreischarf, B. et al. Comparison of three validated systems to analyse spinal shape and motion. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 10222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-022-13891-x (2022).","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"issue":"3","key":"54787_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199203000-00017","volume":"17","author":"SA Miller","year":"1992","unstructured":"Miller, S. A., Mayer, T., Cox, R. & Gatchel, R. J. Reliability problems associated with the modified Sch\u00f6ber technique for true lumbar flexion measurement. Spine (Phila Pa, 1976) 17(3), 345\u2013348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-199203000-00017 (1992).","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa, 1976)"},{"issue":"4","key":"54787_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"492","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199502001-00015","volume":"20","author":"JV Viitanen","year":"1995","unstructured":"Viitanen, J. V., Kokko, M. L., Lehtinen, K., Suni, J. & Kautiainen, H. Correlation between mobility restrictions and radiologic changes in ankylosing spondylitis. Spine (Phila Pa, 1976) 20(4), 492\u2013496. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-199502001-00015 (1995).","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa, 1976)"},{"issue":"3","key":"54787_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1093\/rheumatology\/14.3.180","volume":"14","author":"PM Reynolds","year":"1975","unstructured":"Reynolds, P. M. Measurement of spinal mobility: A comparison of three methods. Rheumatol. Rehabil. 14(3), 180\u2013185. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rheumatology\/14.3.180 (1975).","journal-title":"Rheumatol. Rehabil."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-54787-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-54787-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-54787-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,8]],"date-time":"2024-03-08T20:19:34Z","timestamp":1709929174000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-54787-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,5]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["54787"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-024-54787-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2045-2322"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 September 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 February 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 March 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"5451"}}