{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T20:34:22Z","timestamp":1777494862737,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,6]],"date-time":"2024-03-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709683200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,6]],"date-time":"2024-03-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709683200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Disagreement over divergent viewpoints seems like an ever-present feature of American life\u2014but how common is debate and with whom do debates most often occur? In the present research, we theorize that the landscape of debate is distorted by social media and the salience of negativity present in high-profile spats. To understand the true landscape of debate, we conducted three studies (<jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20092985) across online and lab samples. In contrast to the high-profile nature of negative debates with strangers, we found that people most commonly debate close contacts, namely family members and good friends. In addition, they often report feeling positive after engaging in debate. We then directly measured misperceptions regarding debate in a representative sample of Americans (<jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20091991). We found that Americans systematically overestimated how often others engage in debate. This overestimation extended across debate partners (family members, good friends, acquaintances, coworkers, and strangers) and contexts (in-person and online; <jats:italic>p\u2019<\/jats:italic>s\u2009&lt;\u20090.001, <jats:italic>d\u2019<\/jats:italic>s\u2009&gt;\u20090.98), most strongly overestimating how often Americans debate strangers online. This misprediction may be psychologically costly: overestimating how often Americans debate strangers online significantly predicted greater hopelessness in the future of America. Together, our findings suggest that Americans may experience a false reality about the landscape of debate which can unnecessarily undermine their hope about the future.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-55131-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,6]],"date-time":"2024-03-06T17:02:35Z","timestamp":1709744555000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Americans misperceive the frequency and format of political debate"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Erica R.","family":"Bailey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael W.","family":"White","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sheena S.","family":"Iyengar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Modupe","family":"Akinola","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"55131_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836","volume":"11","author":"MP Fiorina","year":"2008","unstructured":"Fiorina, M. P. & Abrams, S. J. Political polarization in the American public. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 11, 563\u2013588 (2008).","journal-title":"Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci."},{"key":"55131_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.1038\/s44159-022-00093-5","volume":"1","author":"JT Jost","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S. & Druckman, J. N. Cognitive\u2013motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 1, 560\u2013576 (2022).","journal-title":"Nat. Rev. Psychol."},{"key":"55131_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1177\/0003122420922989","volume":"85","author":"D DellaPosta","year":"2020","unstructured":"DellaPosta, D. Pluralistic collapse: The \u201coil spill\u201d model of mass opinion polarization. Am. Sociol. Rev. 85, 507\u2013536 (2020).","journal-title":"Am. Sociol. Rev."},{"key":"55131_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-019-0541-6","volume":"3","author":"F Shi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Shi, F., Teplitskiy, M., Duede, E. & Evans, J. A. The wisdom of polarized crowds. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 329\u2013336 (2019).","journal-title":"Nat. Hum. Behav."},{"key":"55131_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-soc-073018-022342","volume":"45","author":"E Amenta","year":"2019","unstructured":"Amenta, E. & Polletta, F. The cultural impacts of social movements. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 45, 279\u2013299 (2019).","journal-title":"Annu. Rev. Sociol."},{"key":"55131_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4135\/9781483326061","volume-title":"Public Opinion","author":"V Prince","year":"1992","unstructured":"Prince, V. Public Opinion Vol. 4 (Sage, 1992)."},{"key":"55131_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0250817","volume":"16","author":"J Lang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lang, J., Erickson, W. W. & Jing-Schmidt, Z. #MaskOn! #MaskOff! Digital polarization of mask-wearing in the United States during COVID-19. PLoS One 16, e0250817 (2021).","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"55131_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socnet.2017.02.002","volume":"50","author":"M Del Vicario","year":"2017","unstructured":"Del Vicario, M., Zollo, F., Caldarelli, G., Scala, A. & Quattrociocchi, W. Mapping social dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit debate. Soc. Netw. 50, 6\u201316 (2017).","journal-title":"Soc. Netw."},{"key":"55131_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0206841","volume":"13","author":"M Bastos","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bastos, M., Mercea, D. & Baronchelli, A. The geographic embedding of online echo chambers: Evidence from the Brexit campaign. PLoS One 13, e0206841 (2018).","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"55131_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/14614448231172963","author":"A Kasimov","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kasimov, A., Johnston, R. & Heer, T. \u201cPepe the frog, the greedy merchant and #stopthesteal\u201d: A comparative study of discursive and memetic communication on Twitter and 4chan\/pol during the insurrection on the US Capitol. New Media Soc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/14614448231172963 (2023).","journal-title":"New Media Soc."},{"key":"55131_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9216","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1804840115","volume":"115","author":"CA Bail","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bail, C. A. et al. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, 9216\u20139221 (2018).","journal-title":"Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A."},{"key":"55131_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1002\/1944-2866.POI354","volume":"6","author":"A Gruzd","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gruzd, A. & Roy, J. Investigating political polarization on Twitter: A Canadian perspective. Policy Internet 6, 28\u201345 (2014).","journal-title":"Policy Internet"},{"key":"55131_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1177\/0270467610380011","volume":"30","author":"S Yardi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Yardi, S. & Boyd, D. Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 30, 316\u2013327 (2010).","journal-title":"Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc."},{"key":"55131_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0249241","volume":"16","author":"F Gaisbauer","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gaisbauer, F., Pournaki, A., Banisch, S. & Olbrich, E. Ideological differences in engagement in public debate on Twitter. PLoS One 16, e0249241 (2021).","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"55131_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205316801772000","DOI":"10.1177\/2053168017720008","volume":"4","author":"J Mellon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mellon, J. & Prosser, C. Twitter and Facebook are not representative of the general population: Political attitudes and demographics of British social media users. Res. Polit. 4, 2053168017720008 (2017).","journal-title":"Res. Polit."},{"key":"55131_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"554","DOI":"10.1609\/icwsm.v5i1.14168","volume":"5","author":"A Mislove","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mislove, A., Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y.-Y., Onnela, J.-P. & Rosenquist, J. Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media 5, 554\u2013557 (2011).","journal-title":"Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media"},{"key":"55131_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0115545","volume":"10","author":"L Sloan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sloan, L., Morgan, J., Burnap, P. & Williams, M. Who tweets? Deriving the demographic characteristics of age, occupation and social class from Twitter user meta-data. PLoS One 10, e0115545 (2015).","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"55131_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1177\/0894439313490405","volume":"31","author":"MA Bekafigo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bekafigo, M. A. & McBride, A. Who tweets about politics? Political participation of Twitter users during the 2011gubernatorial elections. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 31, 625\u2013643 (2013).","journal-title":"Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev."},{"key":"55131_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"729","DOI":"10.1080\/1369118X.2018.1428656","volume":"21","author":"E Dubois","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dubois, E. & Blank, G. The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Inf. Commun. Soc. 21, 729\u2013745 (2018).","journal-title":"Inf. Commun. Soc."},{"key":"55131_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-023-01538-4","author":"CE Robertson","year":"2023","unstructured":"Robertson, C. E. et al. Negativity drives online news consumption. Nat. Hum. Behav. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-023-01538-4 (2023).","journal-title":"Nat. Hum. Behav."},{"key":"55131_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1509\/jmr.10.0353","volume":"49","author":"J Berger","year":"2012","unstructured":"Berger, J. & Milkman, K. L. What makes online content viral?. J. Mark. Res. 49, 192\u2013205 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Mark. Res."},{"key":"55131_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7313","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1618923114","volume":"114","author":"WJ Brady","year":"2017","unstructured":"Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A. & Van Bavel, J. J. Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 7313\u20137318 (2017).","journal-title":"Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci."},{"key":"55131_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12435","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1803470115","volume":"115","author":"M Stella","year":"2018","unstructured":"Stella, M., Ferrara, E. & De Domenico, M. Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 12435\u201312440 (2018).","journal-title":"Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci."},{"key":"55131_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-023-01582-0","author":"WJ Brady","year":"2023","unstructured":"Brady, W. J. et al. Overperception of moral outrage in online social networks inflates beliefs about intergroup hostility. Nat. Hum. Behav. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-023-01582-0 (2023).","journal-title":"Nat. Hum. Behav."},{"key":"55131_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"887","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.75.4.887","volume":"75","author":"TA Ito","year":"1998","unstructured":"Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K. & Cacioppo, J. T. Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 75, 887\u2013900 (1998).","journal-title":"J. Personal. Soc. Psychol."},{"key":"55131_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1037\/1089-2680.5.4.323","volume":"5","author":"RF Baumeister","year":"2001","unstructured":"Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C. & Vohs, K. D. Bad is stronger than good. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 5, 323\u2013370 (2001).","journal-title":"Rev. Gen. Psychol."},{"key":"55131_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/S0028-3932(02)00147-1","volume":"41","author":"NK Smith","year":"2003","unstructured":"Smith, N. K., Cacioppo, J. T., Larsen, J. T. & Chartrand, T. L. May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. Neuropsychologia 41, 171\u2013183 (2003).","journal-title":"Neuropsychologia"},{"key":"55131_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.2307\/3235238","volume":"31","author":"M Button","year":"1999","unstructured":"Button, M. & Mattson, K. Deliberative democracy in practice: Challenges and prospects for civic deliberation. Polity 31, 609\u2013637 (1999).","journal-title":"Polity"},{"key":"55131_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1080\/105846000198468","volume":"17","author":"T Mendelberg","year":"2000","unstructured":"Mendelberg, T. & Oleske, J. Race and public deliberation. Polit. Commun. 17, 169\u2013191 (2000).","journal-title":"Polit. Commun."},{"key":"55131_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-8500.00259","volume":"61","author":"C Hendriks","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hendriks, C. Institutions of deliberative democratic processes and interest groups: Roles, tensions and incentives. Aust. J. Public Adm. 61, 64\u201375 (2002).","journal-title":"Aust. J. Public Adm."},{"key":"55131_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1080\/00224545.1978.9924116","volume":"105","author":"S Long","year":"1978","unstructured":"Long, S. Political hopelessness: A new dimension of systematic disaffection. J. Soc. Psychol. 105, 205\u2013211 (1978).","journal-title":"J. Soc. Psychol."},{"key":"55131_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1177\/19485506221107261","volume":"14","author":"J Maffly-Kipp","year":"2022","unstructured":"Maffly-Kipp, J. et al. Civic hope and the perceived authenticity of democratic participation. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 14, 419\u2013427. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/19485506221107261 (2022).","journal-title":"Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci."},{"key":"55131_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jesp.2018.03.016","volume":"77","author":"S Cohen-Chen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cohen-Chen, S. & Van Zomeren, M. Yes we can? Group efficacy beliefs predict collective action, but only when hope is high. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 77, 50\u201359 (2018).","journal-title":"J. Exp. Soc. Psychol."},{"key":"55131_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633","volume":"8","author":"DM Ryfe","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ryfe, D. M. Does deliberative democracy work?. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 8, 49\u201371 (2005).","journal-title":"Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci."},{"key":"55131_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/9781108912495","volume-title":"What Goes Without Saying","author":"TN Carlson","year":"2022","unstructured":"Carlson, T. N. & Settle, J. E. What Goes Without Saying (Cambridge University Press, 2022)."},{"key":"55131_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2308938120","volume":"120","author":"JN Druckman","year":"2023","unstructured":"Druckman, J. N. Correcting misperceptions of the other political party does not robustly reduce support for undemocratic practices or partisan violence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2308938120 (2023).","journal-title":"Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci."},{"key":"55131_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-2508.00115","volume":"64","author":"R Huckfeldt","year":"2002","unstructured":"Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E. & Sprague, J. Political environments, political dynamics, and the survival of disagreement. J. Polit. 64, 1\u201321 (2002).","journal-title":"J. Polit."},{"key":"55131_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1080\/105846002317246506","volume":"19","author":"V Price","year":"2002","unstructured":"Price, V., Cappella, J. N. & Nir, L. Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion?. Polit. Commun. 19, 95\u2013112 (2002).","journal-title":"Polit. Commun."},{"key":"55131_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"861","DOI":"10.1037\/h0037562","volume":"42","author":"AT Beck","year":"1974","unstructured":"Beck, A. T., Weissman, A., Lester, D. & Trexler, L. The measurement of pessimism: The hopelessness scale. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42, 861\u2013865 (1974).","journal-title":"J. Consult. Clin. Psychol."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-55131-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-55131-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-55131-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,6]],"date-time":"2024-03-06T17:06:39Z","timestamp":1709744799000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-55131-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,6]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["55131"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-024-55131-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 July 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 February 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 March 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"5565"}}