{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,30]],"date-time":"2026-10-30T16:49:21Z","timestamp":1793378961341,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,18]],"date-time":"2024-05-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1715990400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,18]],"date-time":"2024-05-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1715990400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>This article aims to report the comprehensive and up-to-date analysis and evidence of the insertion rate, expulsion rate, removal rate, and utilization rate of immediate placement of intrauterine devices (IUDs) versus delayed placement after artificial abortion. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were comprehensively searched up to January 12, 2024 for studies that compared immediate versus delayed insertion of IUDs after abortion. The evaluation metrics included the number of IUD insertion after surgical or medical abortions, the frequency of expulsion and removal at 6 months or 1 year, the number of continued usage, pain intensity scores, the number of infections, the duration of bleeding, and instances of uterine perforation during or after IUD insertion. Ten randomized controlled articles were eligible, comprising 11 research projects, of which 3 projects involved the placement of an IUD after surgical abortion, and 8 projects involved the placement of an IUD after medical abortion. This included 2025 patients (977 in the immediate insertion group and 1,048 in the delayed insertion group). We summarized all the extracted evidence. The meta-analysis results indicated that for post-surgical abortions, the immediate insertion group exhibited a higher IUD placement rate than the delayed insertion group. After medical abortions, the immediate insertion group showed higher rates of IUD placement, utilization, and expulsion at 6 months or 1 year. The two groups showed no statistically significant differences in the removal rate, post-insertion infection rate, pain scores during insertion, and days of bleeding during the follow-up period. Compared to delayed placement, immediate insertion of IUDs can not only increase the usage rate at 6 months or 1 year but also enhance the placement rate.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-62327-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,18]],"date-time":"2024-05-18T10:01:27Z","timestamp":1716026487000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Immediate and delayed placement of the intrauterine device after abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Ying","family":"Lou","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shanshan","family":"Tang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhumei","family":"Sheng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hongqin","family":"Lian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jingjing","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xuejing","family":"Jin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"62327_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-021-01739-w","volume":"10","author":"F Ishola","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ishola, F., Ukah, U. V. & Nandi, A. Impact of abortion law reforms on women\u2019s health services and outcomes: A systematic review protocol. Syst. Rev. 10, 192. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13643-021-01739-w (2021).","journal-title":"Syst. Rev."},{"key":"62327_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"885","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.765851","volume":"26","author":"BO Okusanya","year":"2013","unstructured":"Okusanya, B. O., Aigere, E. O., Abe, A., Ibrahim, H. M. & Salawu, R. A. Maternal deaths: initial report of an on-going monitoring of maternal deaths at the Federal Medical Centre Katsina, Northwest Nigeria. J. Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med. 26, 885\u2013888. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/14767058.2013.765851 (2013).","journal-title":"J. Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med."},{"issue":"24","key":"62327_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2015.5191","volume":"2002","author":"NE Birgisson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Birgisson, N. E., Zhao, Q., Secura, G. M., Madden, T. & Peipert, J. F. Preventing unintended pregnancy: The contraceptive CHOICE project in review. J. Women\u2019s Health 2002(24), 349\u2013353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/jwh.2015.5191 (2015).","journal-title":"J. Women's Health"},{"key":"62327_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bahamondes, L., Fernandes, A., Monteiro, I. & Bahamondes, M. V. Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARCs) methods. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 66, 28\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.12.002 (2020).","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.12.002"},{"key":"62327_CR5","first-page":"445","volume":"89","author":"J Hardeman","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hardeman, J. & Weiss, B. D. Intrauterine devices: An update. Am. Family Phys. 89, 445\u2013450 (2014).","journal-title":"Am. Family Phys."},{"key":"62327_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sothornwit, J., Kaewrudee, S., Lumbiganon, P., Pattanittum, P. & Averbach, S. H. Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant and IUD for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 10, Cd011913. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD011913.pub3 (2022).","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD011913.pub3"},{"key":"62327_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1286","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000265336.14160.cc","volume":"109","author":"MF Reeves","year":"2007","unstructured":"Reeves, M. F., Smith, K. J. & Creinin, M. D. Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: A decision analysis. Obstetr. Gynecol. 109, 1286\u20131294. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000265336.14160.cc (2007).","journal-title":"Obstetr. Gynecol."},{"issue":"53","key":"62327_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.07.063","volume":"228","author":"S Hogmark","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hogmark, S., Liljeblad, K. L., Envall, N., Gemzell-Danielsson, K. & Kallner, H. K. Placement of an intrauterine device within 48 hours after early medical abortion\u2014a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. 228(53), e51-53.e59. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.07.063 (2023).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstetr. Gynecol."},{"key":"62327_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2208","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1011600","volume":"364","author":"PH Bednarek","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bednarek, P. H. et al. Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 2208\u20132217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1011600 (2011).","journal-title":"N. Engl. J. Med."},{"key":"62327_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.007","volume":"84","author":"MW Steenland","year":"2011","unstructured":"Steenland, M. W., Tepper, N. K., Curtis, K. M. & Kapp, N. Intrauterine contraceptive insertion postabortion: A systematic review. Contraception 84, 447\u2013464. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.007 (2011).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"71","key":"62327_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2021","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2020","unstructured":"Page, M. J. et al. statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clin. Res. ed.) 372(71), 2021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n71 (2020).","journal-title":"BMJ (Clin. Res. ed.)"},{"key":"62327_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Grimes, D., Schulz, K. & Stanwood, N. Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. Cd001777. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.Cd001777 (2002).","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.Cd001777"},{"key":"62327_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.018","volume":"84","author":"SP Hou","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hou, S. P. et al. Termination of second-trimester pregnancy by mifepristone combined with misoprostol versus intra-amniotic injection of ethacridine lactate (Rivanol\u00ae): A systematic review of Chinese trials. Contraception 84, 214\u2013223. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.018 (2011).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"62327_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","volume":"14","author":"X Wan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wan, X., Wang, W., Liu, J. & Tong, T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and\/or interquartile range. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 14, 135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135 (2014).","journal-title":"BMC Med. Res. Methodol."},{"key":"62327_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1785","DOI":"10.1177\/0962280216669183","volume":"27","author":"D Luo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Luo, D., Wan, X., Liu, J. & Tong, T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and\/or mid-quartile range. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 27, 1785\u20131805. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0962280216669183 (2018).","journal-title":"Stat. Methods Med. Res."},{"key":"62327_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cumpston, M. et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: A new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 10, Ed000142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.Ed000142 (2019).","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.Ed000142"},{"key":"62327_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","volume":"21","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2002","unstructured":"Higgins, J. P. & Thompson, S. G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 21, 1539\u20131558. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.1186 (2002).","journal-title":"Stat. Med."},{"key":"62327_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M. & Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 315, 629\u2013634. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629 (1997).","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629"},{"key":"62327_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Myer, L., S\u00e4\u00e4v, I., Stephansson, O. & Gemzell-Danielsson, K. Early versus delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after medical abortion\u2014a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0048948 (2012).","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0048948"},{"key":"62327_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200932","volume":"48","author":"D Constant","year":"2022","unstructured":"Constant, D., Endler, M., Grossman, D., Petro, G. & Patel, M. Immediate versus delayed insertion of the copper intrauterine device after medical abortion at 17\u201320 gestational weeks: A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Sex. Reprod. Health 48, 28\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200932 (2022).","journal-title":"BMJ Sex. Reprod. Health"},{"key":"62327_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cremer, M. et al. Immediate vs. delayed post-abortal copper T 380A IUD insertion in cases over 12 weeks of gestation. Contraception 83, 522\u2013527. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.10.005 (2011).","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.10.005"},{"key":"62327_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.08.002","volume":"85","author":"HL Hohmann","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hohmann, H. L. et al. Immediate versus delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device following dilation and evacuation: A randomized controlled trial. Contraception 85, 240\u2013245. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.08.002 (2012).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"62327_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Korjamo, R., Mentula, M. & Heikinheimo, O. Immediate versus delayed initiation of the levonorgestrel\u2010releasing intrauterine system\u00a0following medical termination of pregnancy\u20141\u00a0year continuation rates: A randomised controlled trial. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 124, 1957\u20131964. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14802 (2017).","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14802"},{"key":"62327_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Korjamo, R., Mentula, M. & Heikinheimo, O. Expulsions and adverse events following immediate and later insertion of a levonorgestrel\u2010releasing intrauterine system after medical termination of late first\u2010 and second\u2010trimester pregnancy: A randomised controlled trial. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 124, 1965\u20131972. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14813 (2017).","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14813"},{"key":"62327_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Korjamo, R., Mentula, M. & Heikinheimo, O. Fast-track vs. delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system after early medical abortion\u2014a randomized trial. Contraception 96, 344\u2013351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008 (2017).","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008"},{"key":"62327_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shimoni, N. A., Davis, A., Ramos, M. E., Rosario, L. & Westhoff, C. Timing of Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion After Medical Abortion. Obstet. Gynecol. 118, 623\u2013628. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822ade67 (2011).","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822ade67"},{"issue":"599","key":"62327_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e591","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.003","volume":"224","author":"MS Anthony","year":"2021","unstructured":"Anthony, M. S. et al. Design of the association of uterine perforation and expulsion of intrauterine device study: A multisite retrospective cohort study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 224(599), e591-599.e518. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.003 (2021).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"62327_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2103","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(22)00015-0","volume":"399","author":"SD Reed","year":"2022","unstructured":"Reed, S. D. et al. Intrauterine device-related uterine perforation incidence and risk (APEX-IUD): A large multisite cohort study. Lancet (London, England) 399, 2103\u20132112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0140-6736(22)00015-0 (2022).","journal-title":"Lancet (London, England)"},{"key":"62327_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.006","volume":"95","author":"TC Jatlaoui","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jatlaoui, T. C., Riley, H. E. M. & Curtis, K. M. The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: A systematic review. Contraception 95, 17\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.006 (2017).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"62327_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sothornwit, J. et al. Immediate versus delayed postabortal insertion of contraceptive implant. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 5, Cd013565. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD013565.pub2 (2022).","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD013565.pub2"},{"key":"62327_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2015.08.002","volume":"42","author":"E Patil","year":"2015","unstructured":"Patil, E. & Bednarek, P. H. Immediate intrauterine device insertion following surgical abortion. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 42, 583\u2013591. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ogc.2015.08.002 (2015).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am."},{"key":"62327_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Grimes, D., Schulz, K. & Stanwood, N. Immediate post-abortal insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Datab. Syst. Rev. Cd001777. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.Cd001777 (2000).","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.Cd001777"},{"key":"62327_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.003","volume":"78","author":"S Goodman","year":"2008","unstructured":"Goodman, S., Hendlish, S. K., Reeves, M. F. & Foster-Rosales, A. Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion. Contraception 78, 143\u2013148. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.003 (2008).","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"62327_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lopez, L. M., Bernholc, A., Hubacher, D., Stuart, G. & Van Vliet, H. A. Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, Cd003036. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD003036.pub3 (2015).","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003036.pub3"},{"key":"62327_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmz040","volume":"26","author":"M Schmidt-Hansen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Schmidt-Hansen, M. et al. Long-acting reversible contraception immediately after medical abortion: Systematic review with meta-analyses. Hum. Reprod. Update 26, 141\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmz040 (2020).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"62327_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ramanadhan, S. et al. Progestin intrauterine devices versus copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, Cd013744. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD013744.pub2 (2023).","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD013744.pub2"},{"key":"62327_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hofmeyr, G. J., Singata, M. & Lawrie, T. A. Copper containing intra-uterine devices versus depot progestogens for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010, Cd007043. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD007043.pub2 (2010).","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007043.pub2"},{"key":"62327_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Papaikonomou, K., Kopp Kallner, H., S\u00f6derdahl, F. & Gemzell-Danielsson, K. Mifepristone treatment prior to insertion of a levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system for improved bleeding control - a randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod. 33, 2002\u20132009. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dey296 (2018).","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey296"},{"key":"62327_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-022-01246-0","volume":"74","author":"SG Vitale","year":"2022","unstructured":"Vitale, S. G. et al. In-office hysteroscopic removal of retained or fragmented intrauterine device without anesthesia: A cross-sectional analysis of an international survey. Updates Surg. 74, 1079\u20131085. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13304-022-01246-0 (2022).","journal-title":"Updates Surg."},{"key":"62327_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1546","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det074","volume":"28","author":"J Kaislasuo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kaislasuo, J., Suhonen, S., Gissler, M., L\u00e4hteenm\u00e4ki, P. & Heikinheimo, O. Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: Clinical course and treatment. Hum. Reprod. (Oxford, England) 28, 1546\u20131551. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/det074 (2013).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. (Oxford, England)"},{"key":"62327_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.005","volume":"118","author":"S Jaber","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jaber, S., Gilad, R., Bauman, D., Levin, G. & Voss, E. Outpatient hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine devices in early pregnancy: Feasibility and outcomes. Fertil. Steril. 118, 797\u2013803. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.005 (2022).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"62327_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-020-00712-x","volume":"72","author":"P T\u00f6r\u00f6k","year":"2020","unstructured":"T\u00f6r\u00f6k, P. et al. Fallopian tubal obstruction is associated with increased pain experienced during office hysteroscopy: a retrospective study. Updates in surgery 72, 213\u2013218. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13304-020-00712-x (2020).","journal-title":"Updates in surgery"}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-62327-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-62327-1","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-62327-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,18]],"date-time":"2024-05-18T10:09:53Z","timestamp":1716026993000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-62327-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,18]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["62327"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-024-62327-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"28 August 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 May 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 May 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"11385"}}