{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]],"date-time":"2026-09-11T19:08:41Z","timestamp":1789153721614,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,9]],"date-time":"2025-12-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1765238400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,9]],"date-time":"2025-12-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1765238400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-025-19898-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,9]],"date-time":"2025-12-09T15:24:19Z","timestamp":1765293859000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Blastulation and ploidy prediction using morphology assessment in 33,999\u00a0day-3 embryos"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Ibrahim","family":"Elkhatib","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Erkan","family":"Kalafat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A\u015fina","family":"Bayram","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrea","family":"Abdala","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alberto","family":"Linan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Laura","family":"Melado","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Baris","family":"Ata","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Barbara","family":"Lawrenz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Human M.","family":"Fatemi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniela","family":"Nogueira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"19898_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)56048-8","volume":"60","author":"A Shulman","year":"1993","unstructured":"Shulman, A. et al. Relationship between embryo morphology and implantation rate after in vitro fertilization treatment in conception cycles. Fertil. Steril. 60, 123\u2013126 (1993).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"621221","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2021.621221","volume":"12","author":"J Ai","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ai, J. et al. The morphology of inner cell mass is the strongest predictor of live birth after a Frozen-Thawed single embryo transfer. Front. Endocrinol. 12, 621221 (2021).","journal-title":"Front. Endocrinol."},{"key":"19898_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1186\/s13048-021-00770-8","volume":"14","author":"H Lou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lou, H. et al. Association between morphologic grading and implantation rate of euploid blastocyst. J. Ovarian Res. 14, 18 (2021).","journal-title":"J. Ovarian Res."},{"key":"19898_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2658","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der256","volume":"26","author":"M Meseguer","year":"2011","unstructured":"Meseguer, M. et al. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum. Reprod. 26, 2658\u20132671 (2011).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"19898_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmm011","volume":"13","author":"K Diedrich","year":"2007","unstructured":"Diedrich, K., Fauser, B. C. J. M., Devroey, P. & Griesinger, G. The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation. Hum. Reprod. Update. 13, 365\u2013377 (2007).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"19898_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-015-0460-z","volume":"32","author":"I Campos-Galindo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Campos-Galindo, I. et al. Molecular analysis of products of conception obtained by hysteroembryoscopy from infertile couples. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 32, 839\u2013848 (2015).","journal-title":"J. Assist. Reprod. Genet."},{"key":"19898_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"896","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.06.021","volume":"110","author":"SA Neal","year":"2018","unstructured":"Neal, S. A. et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage. Fertil. Steril. 110, 896\u2013904 (2018).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.07.052","volume":"115","author":"AW Tiegs","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tiegs, A. W. et al. A multicenter, prospective, blinded, nonselection study evaluating the predictive value of an aneuploid diagnosis using a targeted next-generation sequencing\u2013based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy assay and impact of biopsy. Fertil. Steril. 115, 627\u2013637 (2021).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmac022","volume":"28","author":"T Bamford","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bamford, T. et al. Morphological and morphokinetic associations with aneuploidy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update. 28, 656\u2013686 (2022).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"19898_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"995","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2022.01.001","volume":"44","author":"E Clua","year":"2022","unstructured":"Clua, E. et al. Blastocyst versus cleavage embryo transfer improves cumulative live birth rates, time and cost in oocyte recipients: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 44, 995\u20131004 (2022).","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"},{"key":"19898_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.01.087","volume":"99","author":"Blastocyst culture","year":"2013","unstructured":"Blastocyst culture. And transfer in clinical-assisted reproduction: a committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 99, 667\u2013672 (2013).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.06.029","volume":"106","author":"D Glujovsky","year":"2016","unstructured":"Glujovsky, D. & Farquhar, C. Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms? Fertil. Steril. 106, 244\u2013250 (2016).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp14X676609","volume":"64","author":"N O\u2019Flynn","year":"2014","unstructured":"O\u2019Flynn, N. Assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems: NICE guideline. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 64, 50\u201351 (2014).","journal-title":"Br. J. Gen. Pract."},{"key":"19898_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glujovsky, D. et al. Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2022). (2022).","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD002118.pub6"},{"key":"19898_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-017-0255-4","volume":"15","author":"X Wang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang, X. et al. Comparative neonatal outcomes in Singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 15, 36 (2017).","journal-title":"Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol."},{"key":"19898_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18942","volume":"51","author":"C Alviggi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Alviggi, C. et al. Influence of cryopreservation on perinatal outcome after blastocyst- vs cleavage\u2010stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta\u2010analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gyne. 51, 54\u201363 (2018).","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gyne"},{"key":"19898_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Raja, E. A., Bhattacharya, S., Maheshwari, A. & McLernon, D. J. A comparison of perinatal outcomes following fresh blastocyst or cleavage stage embryo transfer in singletons and twins and between singleton siblings. Human Reproduction Open hoad003 (2023). (2023).","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoad003"},{"key":"19898_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.03.030","volume":"89","author":"M Luna","year":"2008","unstructured":"Luna, M. et al. Human blastocyst morphological quality is significantly improved in embryos classified as fast on Day-3 (\u2265\u200910 cells), bringing into question current embryological dogma. Fertil. Steril. 89, 358\u2013363 (2008).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2019.03.039","volume":"38","author":"JH Tan","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tan, J. H., Chen, J. J., Lim, L. J. & Wong, P. S. The impact of in vitro human embryo fragmentation on blastocyst development and ploidy using Next-Generation sequencing (NGS). Reprod. Biomed. Online. 38, e23 (2019).","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"},{"key":"19898_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1132-6","volume":"35","author":"C Yu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yu, C., Zhang, R. & Li, J. A, Z.-C. A predictive model for high-quality blastocyst based on blastomere number, fragmentation, and symmetry. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 35, 809\u2013816 (2018).","journal-title":"J. Assist. Reprod. Genet."},{"key":"19898_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1060","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dead058","volume":"38","author":"MA Valera","year":"2023","unstructured":"Valera, M. A. et al. Clinical validation of an automatic classification algorithm applied on cleavage stage embryos: analysis for blastulation, euploidy, implantation, and live-birth potential. Hum. Reprod. 38, 1060\u20131075 (2023).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"19898_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4235","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-023-31136-3","volume":"13","author":"J Theilgaard Lassen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Theilgaard Lassen, J., Fly Kragh, M., Rimestad, J., Nyg\u00e5rd Johansen, M. & Berntsen, J. Development and validation of deep learning based embryo selection across multiple days of transfer. Sci. Rep. 13, 4235 (2023).","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"19898_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(99)00586-5","volume":"73","author":"BS Shapiro","year":"2000","unstructured":"Shapiro, B. S., Harris, D. C. & Richter, K. S. Predictive value of 72-hour blastomere cell number on blastocyst development and success of subsequent transfer based on the degree of blastocyst development. Fertil. Steril. 73, 582\u2013586 (2000).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1512","volume":"87","author":"MC Magli","year":"2007","unstructured":"Magli, M. C. et al. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement. Fertil. Steril. 87, 534\u2013541 (2007).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1270","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der037","volume":"26","author":"Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Me","year":"2011","unstructured":"Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology et al. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum. Reprod. 26, 1270\u20131283 (2011).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"19898_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.12.090","volume":"103","author":"LL Kroener","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kroener, L. L. et al. Increased blastomere number in cleavage-stage embryos is associated with higher aneuploidy. Fertil. Steril. 103, 694\u2013698 (2015).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu295","volume":"30","author":"A Rhenman","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rhenman, A. et al. Which set of embryo variables is most predictive for live birth? A prospective study in 6252 single embryo transfers to construct an embryo score for the ranking and selection of embryos. Hum. Reprod. 30, 28\u201336 (2015).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"19898_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(01)01904-5","volume":"76","author":"T Ebner","year":"2001","unstructured":"Ebner, T. et al. Embryo fragmentation in vitro and its impact on treatment and pregnancy outcome. Fertil. Steril. 76, 281\u2013285 (2001).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1349","DOI":"10.3390\/ijms23031349","volume":"23","author":"A Cecchele","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cecchele, A., Cermisoni, G. C., Giacomini, E., Pinna, M. & Vigano, P. Cellular and molecular nature of fragmentation of human embryos. IJMS 23, 1349 (2022).","journal-title":"IJMS"},{"key":"19898_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"848","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmab016","volume":"27","author":"G Coticchio","year":"2021","unstructured":"Coticchio, G. et al. Plasticity of the human preimplantation embryo: developmental dogmas, variations on themes and self-correction. Hum. Reprod. Update. 27, 848\u2013865 (2021).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"19898_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1781","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.8.1781","volume":"15","author":"MC Magli","year":"2000","unstructured":"Magli, M. C. Chromosome mosaicism in Day-3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro. Hum. Reprod. 15, 1781\u20131786 (2000).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"19898_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1954","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.9.1954","volume":"16","author":"M Sandalinas","year":"2001","unstructured":"Sandalinas, M. et al. Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage. Hum. Reprod. 16, 1954\u20131958 (2001).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"19898_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg015","volume":"18","author":"C Rubio","year":"2003","unstructured":"Rubio, C. et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples. Hum. Reprod. 18, 182\u2013188 (2003).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"19898_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1395","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2005.04.068","volume":"84","author":"M Li","year":"2005","unstructured":"Li, M. et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization reanalysis of day-6 human blastocysts diagnosed with aneuploidy on Day-3. Fertil. Steril. 84, 1395\u20131400 (2005).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2183","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-021-02147-8","volume":"38","author":"N De Munck","year":"2021","unstructured":"De Munck, N. et al. Segmental duplications and monosomies are linked to in vitro developmental arrest. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 38, 2183\u20132192 (2021).","journal-title":"J. Assist. Reprod. Genet."},{"key":"19898_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3434","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.12.3434","volume":"13","author":"DK Gardner","year":"1998","unstructured":"Gardner, D. K. et al. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in- vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 13, 3434\u20133440 (1998).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"19898_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3198","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei217","volume":"20","author":"EG Papanikolaou","year":"2005","unstructured":"Papanikolaou, E. G. Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on Day-3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study. Hum. Reprod. 20, 3198\u20133203 (2005).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"19898_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa053524","volume":"354","author":"EG Papanikolaou","year":"2006","unstructured":"Papanikolaou, E. G. et al. In vitro fertilization with single Blastocyst-Stage versus single Cleavage-Stage embryos. N Engl. J. Med. 354, 1139\u20131146 (2006).","journal-title":"N Engl. J. Med."},{"key":"19898_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3285","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.12.3285","volume":"13","author":"M Tsirigotis","year":"1998","unstructured":"Tsirigotis, M. Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits. Too soon to abandon current practice? Hum. Reprod. 13, 3285\u20133289 (1998).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"19898_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(99)00409-4","volume":"72","author":"D Marek","year":"1999","unstructured":"Marek, D. et al. Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil. Steril. 72, 1035\u20131040 (1999).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.01.169","volume":"89","author":"SE Moayeri","year":"2008","unstructured":"Moayeri, S. E. et al. Day-3 embryo morphology predicts euploidy among older subjects. Fertil. Steril. 89, 118\u2013123 (2008).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.04.021","volume":"100","author":"J Conaghan","year":"2013","unstructured":"Conaghan, J. et al. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus Day-3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial. Fertil. Steril. 100, 412\u2013419e5 (2013).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2478","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa209","volume":"35","author":"J Wu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wu, J., Zhang, J., Kuang, Y., Chen, Q. & Wang, Y. The effect of Day-3 cell number on pregnancy outcomes in vitrified-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles. Hum. Reprod. 35, 2478\u20132487 (2020).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"19898_CR44","unstructured":"Bettina Frank, M. Kg. Merck Serono Introduces New Eeva Test Version Aiming for Optimized Assisted Reproductive Outcomes. (2015)."},{"key":"19898_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103408","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103408","volume":"47","author":"A Ahlstr\u00f6m","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ahlstr\u00f6m, A. et al. Correlations between a deep learning-based algorithm for embryo evaluation with cleavage-stage cell numbers and fragmentation. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 47, 103408 (2023).","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"},{"key":"19898_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"g7594","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g7594","volume":"350","author":"GS Collins","year":"2015","unstructured":"Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G. & Moons, K. G. M. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 350, g7594\u2013g7594 (2015).","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"19898_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1608","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.05.037","volume":"86","author":"AE Baxter Bendus","year":"2006","unstructured":"Baxter Bendus, A. E., Mayer, J. F., Shipley, S. K. & Catherino, W. H. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in Day-3 embryo grading. Fertil. Steril. 86, 1608\u20131615 (2006).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"19898_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"The ESHRE Guideline Group on Ovarian Stimulation et al. ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF\/ICSI\u2020. Human Reproduction Open et al. hoaa009 (2020). (2020).","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa067"},{"key":"19898_CR49","unstructured":"Gardner, D. K. & Wbg, S. D. In-Vitro Culture of Human Blastocysts (Parthenon, 1999)."},{"key":"19898_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu033","volume":"29","author":"A Capalbo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Capalbo, A. et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum. Reprod. 29, 1173\u20131181 (2014).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"19898_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chen, T., Guestrin, C. & XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 785\u2013794ACM, San Francisco California USA, (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2939672.2939785","DOI":"10.1145\/2939672.2939785"}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-19898-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-19898-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-19898-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,9]],"date-time":"2025-12-09T17:02:10Z","timestamp":1765299730000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-19898-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,9]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["19898"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-025-19898-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 June 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 September 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 December 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"43475"}}