{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]],"date-time":"2025-12-02T11:03:47Z","timestamp":1764673427188,"version":"3.46.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]],"date-time":"2025-12-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1764633600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]],"date-time":"2025-12-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1764633600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-025-24347-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]],"date-time":"2025-12-02T03:35:52Z","timestamp":1764646552000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of perinatal outcomes in small-for-gestational-age newborns in breech presentation near term by delivery mode: a multicenter retrospective study"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Marion","family":"Bordas-Fournel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Desseauve","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Emmanuel","family":"Decroisette","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pierre-Louis","family":"Forey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marion","family":"Le Hegarat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Benedicte","family":"Breton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alexandre","family":"Buisson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Didier","family":"Riethmuller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"24347_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e233","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2021.06.011","volume":"35","author":"S Morris","year":"2022","unstructured":"Morris, S., Geraghty, S. & Sundin, D. Breech presentation management: A critical review of leading clinical practice guidelines. Women Birth J. Aust Coll. Midwives. 35 (3), e233\u2013e242 (2022).","journal-title":"Women Birth J. Aust Coll. Midwives"},{"issue":"2","key":"24347_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.07.002","volume":"107","author":"A Kotaska","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kotaska, A. et al. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 107 (2), 169\u2013176 (2009).","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"issue":"3","key":"24347_CR3","first-page":"390","volume":"76","author":"S Achanna","year":"2021","unstructured":"Achanna, S., Nanda, J. & Paramjothi, P. Reconsideration of planned vaginal breech delivery in selected cases. Med. J. Malaysia. 76 (3), 390\u2013394 (2021).","journal-title":"Med. J. Malaysia"},{"issue":"6","key":"24347_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14333","volume":"101","author":"J W\u00e4ngberg Nordborg","year":"2022","unstructured":"W\u00e4ngberg Nordborg, J., Svanberg, T., Strandell, A. & Carlsson, Y. Term breech presentation-Intended Cesarean section versus intended vaginal delivery-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 101 (6), 564\u2013576 (2022).","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"key":"24347_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hannah, M. E. et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 356 (2000).","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3"},{"issue":"5","key":"24347_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9","volume":"121","author":"ACOG Practice bulletin no","year":"2013","unstructured":"ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet. Gynecol. 121 (5), 1122\u20131133 (2013).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"24347_CR7","unstructured":"RCOG. [cited 2024 Oct 14]. Management of Breech Presentation (Green-top Guideline No. 20b). https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/guidance\/browse-all-guidance\/green-top-guidelines\/management-of-breech-presentation-green-top-guideline-no-20b\/"},{"key":"24347_CR8","unstructured":"Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricans and Gynaecologists. Breech deliveries at term. College statement n\u00b0 C. Obs 11. Victoria, Australia RANZCOG 2005."},{"issue":"2","key":"24347_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00317.x","volume":"112","author":"CCT Rietberg","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rietberg, C. C. T., Elferink-Stinkens, P. M. & Visser, G. H. A. The effect of the term breech trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in the netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 112 (2), 205\u2013209 (2005).","journal-title":"BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"24347_CR10","first-page":"1","volume":"52","author":"JA Martin","year":"2003","unstructured":"Martin, J. A. et al. Births: final data for 2002. Natl. Vital Stat. Rep. 52, 1\u201313 (2003).","journal-title":"Natl. Vital Stat. Rep."},{"issue":"1","key":"24347_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.017","volume":"132","author":"M Carayol","year":"2007","unstructured":"Carayol, M., Blondel, B., Zeitlin, J., Breart, G. & Goffinet, F. Changes in the rates of caesarean delivery before labour for breech presentation at term in france: 1972\u20132003. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 132 (1), 20\u201326 (2007).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"issue":"5","key":"24347_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34875-7","volume":"33","author":"K Devarajan","year":"2011","unstructured":"Devarajan, K., Gareth Seaward, P. & Farine, D. Attitudes among Toronto obstetricians towards vaginal breech delivery. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 33 (5), 437\u2013442 (2011).","journal-title":"J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can."},{"issue":"1","key":"24347_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.08.039","volume":"194","author":"M Glezerman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Glezerman, M. Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 194 (1), 20\u201325 (2006).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"24347_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Goffinet, F. et al. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. (2006).","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817"},{"issue":"1","key":"24347_CR15","first-page":"63","volume":"48","author":"L Sentilhes","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sentilhes, L. et al. Breech presentation: CNGOF guidelines for clinical practice-Short Text. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. Senol. 48 (1), 63\u201369 (2020).","journal-title":"Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. Senol"},{"issue":"2","key":"24347_CR16","first-page":"124","volume":"101","author":"I D\u00edez L\u00f3pez","year":"2024","unstructured":"D\u00edez L\u00f3pez, I. et al. Small for gestational age: concept, diagnosis and neonatal characterization, follow-up and recommendations. Pediatr. 101 (2), 124\u2013131 (2024).","journal-title":"Pediatr."},{"issue":"3","key":"24347_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1210\/endrev\/bnad002","volume":"44","author":"ACS Hokken-Koelega","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hokken-Koelega, A. C. S. et al. International consensus guideline on small for gestational age: etiology and management from infancy to early adulthood. Endocr. Rev. 44 (3), 539\u2013565 (2023).","journal-title":"Endocr. Rev."},{"issue":"1","key":"24347_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02389605","volume":"252","author":"E Weiss","year":"1992","unstructured":"Weiss, E., Ulrich, S. & Berle, P. Condition at birth of infants with previously absent or reverse umbilical artery end-diastolic flow velocities. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 252 (1), 37\u201343 (1992).","journal-title":"Arch. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"issue":"8938","key":"24347_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1664","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(94)90457-X","volume":"344","author":"VH Karsdorp","year":"1994","unstructured":"Karsdorp, V. H. et al. Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery. Lancet Lond. Engl. 344 (8938), 1664\u20131668 (1994).","journal-title":"Lancet Lond. Engl."},{"issue":"1","key":"24347_CR20","first-page":"61","volume":"25","author":"N Mamelle","year":"1996","unstructured":"Mamelle, N., Munoz, F. & Grandjean, H. Fetal growth from the AUDIPOG study. I. Establishment of reference curves. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris). 25 (1), 61\u201370 (1996).","journal-title":"J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris)"},{"key":"24347_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chakkarapani, E., de Vries, L. S., Ferriero, D. M. & Gunn, A. J. Neonatal encephalopathy and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: the state of the art. Pediatr. Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41390-025-03986-2 (2025).","DOI":"10.1038\/s41390-025-03986-2"},{"key":"24347_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"c1471","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c1471","volume":"340","author":"GL Malin","year":"2010","unstructured":"Malin, G. L., Morris, R. K. & Khan, K. S. Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 340, c1471. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.c1471 (2010).","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"24347_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"969","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05091-2","volume":"299","author":"P Hinnenberg","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hinnenberg, P., Toijonen, A., Gissler, M., Heinonen, S. & Macharey, G. Outcome of small for gestational age-fetuses in breech presentation at term according to mode of delivery: a nationwide, population-based record linkage study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 299 (4), 969\u2013974 (2019).","journal-title":"Arch. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"issue":"4","key":"24347_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2006.05.040","volume":"149","author":"CPF O\u2019Donnell","year":"2006","unstructured":"O\u2019Donnell, C. P. F., Kamlin, C. O. F., Davis, P. G., Carlin, J. B. & Morley, C. J. Interobserver variability of the 5-minute Apgar score. J. Pediatr. 149 (4), 486\u2013489 (2006).","journal-title":"J. Pediatr."},{"issue":"9","key":"24347_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1473","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1519799","volume":"33","author":"RD Eden","year":"2020","unstructured":"Eden, R. D., Evans, M. I., Britt, D. W., Evans, S. M. & Schifrin, B. S. Safely Lowering the emergency cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates using the fetal reserve index. J. Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 33 (9), 1473\u20131479 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Matern Fetal Neonatal Med."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-24347-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-24347-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-24347-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]],"date-time":"2025-12-02T10:59:21Z","timestamp":1764673161000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-24347-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["24347"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-025-24347-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2045-2322"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 July 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 October 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 December 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"42950"}}