{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]],"date-time":"2025-12-05T01:05:13Z","timestamp":1764896713639,"version":"3.46.0"},"reference-count":58,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,3]],"date-time":"2025-12-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1764720000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,3]],"date-time":"2025-12-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1764720000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009827","name":"Alexandria University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009827","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    Bar substructures may be utilized for fixed full-arch implant-supported restorations, where suprastructures are cemented as prosthetic shells. Certain clinical situations may necessitate intraoral scanning of the bar substructures. However, the scannability and the accuracy of the intraoral scans remain unclear. This study aimed to compare and assess the scannability and the scan accuracy of two different bar materials used for implant-supported prostheses. Two maxillary implant-supported substructures (bars) were milled from 2 different materials. Group I from titanium and Group II from poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK). The substructures were digitized by using a desktop scanner (Medit MD-1D0410, Medit Corp). The STL file produced was considered the reference. Each substructure was scanned intraorally (\n                    <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u200910) by using an intraoral scanner (IOS) (Medit i700; Medit Corp). The non-captured surface area in a preset time limit of 15\u00a0s (scannability) was assessed in (mm\n                    <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                    ). To evaluate the scanning accuracy, all STL files were imported into a surface-matching software program (Medit Design v3.0.6 Build 286; Medit Corp), where overall RMS (root mean square) deviations in (\u00b5m) were calculated. The Shapiro\u2013Wilk test of normality was used. A comparison between the study groups was done by using an independent samples t-test. Significance was set at\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u2009.05. The titanium substructure demonstrated better trueness and precision concerning deviation analysis (202.40\u2009\u00b1\u200927.57 and 197.50\u2009\u00b1\u200924.69, respectively) than the PEEK substructure (262.20\u2009\u00b1\u200930.87 and 244.1\u2009\u00b1\u20099.18, respectively) (\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u2009.001). Regarding scannability, significantly more surface area was captured when scanning the PEEK substructure (985.42\u2009\u00b1\u20097.22) than titanium (951.15\u2009\u00b1\u200912.16) (\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u2009.001). PEEK was more scannable. The titanium bar demonstrated significantly higher accuracy than the PEEK bar, which was more scannable than the titanium bar.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>This trial, number NCT06423482, is registered at Clinical.gov. Its start date was May 14, 2024.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-025-28419-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,3]],"date-time":"2025-12-03T21:32:55Z","timestamp":1764797575000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Influence of substructure material on the scanning accuracy and scannability of implant-supported full arch bar substructures"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Nourhan S.","family":"Emam","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nayrouz Adel","family":"Metwally","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mohamed Moataz","family":"Khamis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"28419_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1922\/EJPRD_01752Abduo21","volume":"26","author":"J Abduo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Abduo, J. & Elseyoufi, M. Accuracy of intraoral scanners: A systematic review of influencing factors. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent. 26, 101\u2013121. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1922\/EJPRD_01752Abduo21 (2018).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2022.01.012","volume":"130","author":"M Revilla-Le\u00f3n","year":"2023","unstructured":"Revilla-Le\u00f3n, M. et al. Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy. J. Prosthet. Dent. 130, 755\u2013760. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2022.01.012 (2023).","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.06.003","volume":"124","author":"M Revilla-Le\u00f3n","year":"2020","unstructured":"Revilla-Le\u00f3n, M. et al. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. J. Prosthet. Dent. 124, 372\u2013378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.06.003 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13276","volume":"30","author":"M Revilla-Le\u00f3n","year":"2021","unstructured":"Revilla-Le\u00f3n, M., Subramanian, S. G., Att, W. & Krishnamurthy, V. R. Analysis of different illuminance of the room lighting condition on the accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an intraoral scanner. J. Prosthodont. 30, 157\u2013162. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13276 (2021).","journal-title":"J. Prosthodont."},{"key":"28419_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13135","volume":"29","author":"M Revilla-Le\u00f3n","year":"2020","unstructured":"Revilla-Le\u00f3n, M., Subramanian, S. G., \u00d6zcan, M. & Krishnamurthy, V. R. Clinical study of the influence of ambient light scanning conditions on the accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an intraoral scanner. J. Prosthodont. 29, 107\u2013113. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13135 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Prosthodont."},{"key":"28419_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104114","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2022.104114","volume":"120","author":"M Revilla-Le\u00f3n","year":"2022","unstructured":"Revilla-Le\u00f3n, M., Young, K., Sicilia, E., Cho, S. H. & Kois, J. C. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner. J. Dent. 120, 104114. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2022.104114 (2022).","journal-title":"J. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"929","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2009.01.100","volume":"25","author":"AS Persson","year":"2009","unstructured":"Persson, A. S., Od\u00e9n, A., Andersson, M. & Sandborgh-Englund, G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent. Mater. 25, 929\u2013936. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2009.01.100 (2009).","journal-title":"Dent. Mater."},{"key":"28419_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2035","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-015-1440-5","volume":"19","author":"M Kurz","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kurz, M., Attin, T. & Mehl, A. Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free 3D measuring system. Clin. Oral Investig. 19, 2035\u20132043. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-015-1440-5 (2015).","journal-title":"Clin. Oral Investig"},{"key":"28419_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.11607\/ijp.7297","volume":"35","author":"G Michelinakis","year":"2022","unstructured":"Michelinakis, G., Apostolakis, D., Tsagarakis, A. & Lampropoulos, P. Influence of different material substrates on the accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study. Int. J. Prosthodont. 35, 82\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/ijp.7297 (2022).","journal-title":"Int. J. Prosthodont."},{"key":"28419_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2019.06.001","volume":"64","author":"L Arcuri","year":"2020","unstructured":"Arcuri, L. et al. Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: A randomized in vitro trial. J. Prosthodont. Res. 64, 128\u2013136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpor.2019.06.001 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Prosthodont. Res."},{"key":"28419_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8543","DOI":"10.3390\/app11188543","volume":"11","author":"A Shely","year":"2021","unstructured":"Shely, A. et al. The influence of laboratory scanner versus intra-oral scanner on determining the implant axis by using three different scan abutments. Appl. Sci. 11, 8543 (2021).","journal-title":"Appl. Sci."},{"key":"28419_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21892","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-01442-9","volume":"11","author":"JH Lee","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lee, J. H., Bae, J. H. & Lee, S. Y. Trueness of digital implant impressions based on implant angulation and scan body materials. Sci. Rep. 11, 21892. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-01442-9 (2021).","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"28419_CR13","first-page":"29","volume":"27","author":"S Holst","year":"2012","unstructured":"Holst, S., Persson, A., Wichmann, M. & Karl, M. Digitizing implant position locators on master casts: comparison of a noncontact scanner and a contact-probe scanner. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 27, 29\u201335 (2012).","journal-title":"Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants"},{"key":"28419_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2017.10.029","volume":"120","author":"RM Mizumoto","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mizumoto, R. M. & Yilmaz, B. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 120, 343\u2013352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2017.10.029 (2018).","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR15","first-page":"155","volume":"5","author":"H Rudolph","year":"2002","unstructured":"Rudolph, H., Quaas, S. & Luthardt, R. G. Matching point clouds: limits and possibilities. Int. J. Comput. Dent. 5, 155\u2013164 (2002).","journal-title":"Int. J. Comput. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR16","unstructured":"International Organization for Standardization ISO 10477. Dentistry d polymer-based crown and bridge materials. (2022). Available at: https:\/\/www.iso.org\/standard\/80007.html"},{"key":"28419_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2017.04.017","volume":"119","author":"C Arnold","year":"2018","unstructured":"Arnold, C., Hey, J., Schweyen, R. & Setz, J. M. Accuracy of CAD-CAM-fabricated removable partial dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent. 119, 586\u2013592. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2017.04.017 (2018).","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR18","unstructured":"International Organization for Standardization I-D-. D. I. D., - Part 1: Methods for Assessing Accuracy I, o. f. s. S. & 2023, H. w. i. o. s. H. A. F."},{"key":"28419_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252e251","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.05.032","volume":"130","author":"NS Emam","year":"2023","unstructured":"Emam, N. S., Khamis, M. M., Abdelhamid, A. M. & Ezzelarab, S. Digitization accuracy and scannability of different prosthodontic materials: an in vitro trial. J. Prosthet. Dent. 130, 252e251. 252.e258 (2023).","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1186\/s13005-019-0212-x","volume":"15","author":"LM Ritschl","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ritschl, L. M., Wolff, K. D., Erben, P. & Grill, F. D. Simultaneous, radiation-free registration of the Dentoalveolar position and the face by combining 3D photography with a portable scanner and impression-taking. Head Face Med. 15, 28. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13005-019-0212-x (2019).","journal-title":"Head Face Med."},{"key":"28419_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics13213291","author":"LA Alkadi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Alkadi, L. A. Comprehensive review of factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanners. Diagnostics (Basel) https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics13213291 (2023).","journal-title":"Diagnostics (Basel)"},{"key":"28419_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1461","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2014.05.027","volume":"112","author":"RG Nedelcu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nedelcu, R. G. & Persson, A. S. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 112, 1461\u20131471. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2014.05.027 (2014).","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2060","DOI":"10.3390\/ma14082060","volume":"14","author":"JH Lim","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lim, J. H. et al. A comparison of accuracy of different dental restorative materials between intraoral scanning and conventional Impression-Taking: an in vitro study. Mater. (Basel). 14, 2060. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ma14082060 (2021).","journal-title":"Mater. (Basel)"},{"key":"28419_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1111\/jerd.12528","volume":"32","author":"E Dutton","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dutton, E. et al. The effect different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different intraoral scanners. J. Esthet Restor. Dent. 32, 204\u2013218. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jerd.12528 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Esthet Restor. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/dj12120408","author":"FO Froimovici","year":"2024","unstructured":"Froimovici, F. O., Butn\u0103ra\u0219u, C. C., Montanari, M. & S\u0103ndulescu, M. Fixed full-arch implant-supported restorations: techniques review and proposal for improvement. Dent. J. (Basel) https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/dj12120408 (2024).","journal-title":"Dent. J. (Basel)"},{"key":"28419_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12137","volume":"23","author":"P Mal\u00f3","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mal\u00f3, P. et al. Individual lithium disilicate crowns in a full-arch, implant-supported rehabilitation: a clinical report. J. Prosthodont. 23, 495\u2013500. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.12137 (2014).","journal-title":"J. Prosthodont."},{"key":"28419_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-022-02262-7","author":"HI Nassar","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nassar, H. I. & Abdelaziz, M. S. Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture. BMC Oral Health https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12903-022-02262-7 (2022).","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"28419_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13830","author":"M Borga Donmez","year":"2024","unstructured":"Borga Donmez, M., \u00c7akmak, G., Schimmel, M. & Yilmaz, B. Implementation of triple-scan protocol to evaluate the fit of complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses. J. Prosthodont. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13830 (2024).","journal-title":"J. Prosthodont."},{"key":"28419_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.59987\/ads\/2018.4.146-161","volume":"9","author":"E Moglioni","year":"2018","unstructured":"Moglioni, E. et al. Intra-oral scanning and CAD\/CAM prosthesis fabrication. Ann. Stomatol. 9, 146\u2013161 (2018).","journal-title":"Ann. Stomatol."},{"key":"28419_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13492","volume":"32","author":"P Papaspyridakos","year":"2023","unstructured":"Papaspyridakos, P., AlFulaij, F., Bokhary, A., Sallustio, A. & Chochlidakis, K. Complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication with double digital scanning: accuracy of fit assessment. J. Prosthodont. 32, 49\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13492 (2023).","journal-title":"J. Prosthodont."},{"key":"28419_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1444","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13844","volume":"32","author":"V Rutkunas","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rutkunas, V. et al. In vitro and in vivo accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 32, 1444\u20131454. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/clr.13844 (2021).","journal-title":"Clin. Oral Implants Res."},{"key":"28419_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2015.01.014","volume":"113","author":"WS Lin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lin, W. S., Chou, J. C., Metz, M. J., Harris, B. T. & Morton, D. Use of intraoral digital scanning for a CAD\/CAM-fabricated milled bar and superstructure framework for an implant-supported, removable complete dental prosthesis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 113, 509\u2013515. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2015.01.014 (2015).","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"692","DOI":"10.1111\/cid.12662","volume":"20","author":"P Mal\u00f3","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mal\u00f3, P. et al. Short-term report of an ongoing prospective cohort study evaluating the outcome of full-arch implant-supported fixed hybrid polyetheretherketone-acrylic resin prostheses and the All-on-Four concept. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 20, 692\u2013702. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/cid.12662 (2018).","journal-title":"Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res."},{"key":"28419_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-019-0988-x","volume":"19","author":"A Scarano","year":"2019","unstructured":"Scarano, A., Stoppaccioli, M. & Casolino, T. Zirconia crowns cemented on titanium bars using CAD\/CAM: a five-year follow-up prospective clinical study of 9 patients. BMC Oral Health. 19, 286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12903-019-0988-x (2019).","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"28419_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104675","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2023.104675","volume":"137","author":"E Mijiritsky","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mijiritsky, E., Elad, A., Krausz, R., Ivanova, V. & Zlatev, S. Clinical performance of full-arch implant-supported fixed restorations made of monolithic zirconia luted to a titanium bar: A retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 16 months. J. Dent. 137, 104675. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2023.104675 (2023).","journal-title":"J. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm9072187","author":"M de Ara\u00fajo Nobre","year":"2020","unstructured":"de Ara\u00fajo Nobre, M., Moura Guedes, C., Almeida, R., Silva, A. & Sereno, N. Hybrid polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-acrylic resin prostheses and the all-on-4 concept: a full-arch implant-supported fixed solution with 3 years of follow-up. J. Clin. Med. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm9072187 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Clin. Med."},{"key":"28419_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1700","DOI":"10.1007\/s42452-020-03492-6","volume":"2","author":"C Finger","year":"2020","unstructured":"Finger, C. et al. Effect of sandblasting on the surface roughness and residual stress of 3Y-TZP (zirconia). SN Appl. Sci. 2, 1700. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s42452-020-03492-6 (2020).","journal-title":"SN Appl. Sci."},{"key":"28419_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jivraj, S. Graftless Solutions for the Edentulous Patient (Springer Nature, 2023).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-32847-3"},{"key":"28419_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.01.027","volume":"131","author":"FZ Jamjoom","year":"2024","unstructured":"Jamjoom, F. Z., Aldghim, A., Aldibasi, O. & Yilmaz, B. Impact of intraoral scanner, scanning strategy, and scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches: an in vitro study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 131, 1218\u20131225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.01.027 (2024).","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1044","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.01.025","volume":"132","author":"H Button","year":"2024","unstructured":"Button, H. et al. Scanning accuracy and scanning area discrepancies of intraoral digital scans acquired at varying scanning distances and angulations among 4 different intraoral scanners. J. Prosthet. Dent. 132, 1044\u20131060. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.01.025 (2024).","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13358","volume":"31","author":"Y Chen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chen, Y. et al. Influence of liquid on the tooth surface on the accuracy of intraoral scanners: an in vitro study. J. Prosthodont. 31, 59\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13358 (2022).","journal-title":"J. Prosthodont."},{"key":"28419_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2018.04.012","volume":"121","author":"W Wang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wang, W., Yu, H., Liu, Y., Jiang, X. & Gao, B. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. J. Prosthet. Dent. 121, 285\u2013291. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2018.04.012 (2019).","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103933","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2021.103933","volume":"118","author":"B Yilmaz","year":"2022","unstructured":"Yilmaz, B. et al. Influence of 3D analysis software on measured deviations of CAD-CAM resin crowns from virtual design file: an in-vitro study. J. Dent. 118, 103933. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2021.103933 (2022).","journal-title":"J. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2013.07.010","volume":"111","author":"FS Andriessen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Andriessen, F. S., Rijkens, D. R., van der Meer, W. J. & Wismeijer, D. W. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 111, 186\u2013194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2013.07.010 (2014).","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1016\/s0022-3913(13)60028-1","volume":"109","author":"A Ender","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ender, A. & Mehl, A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J. Prosthet. Dent. 109, 121\u2013128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0022-3913(13)60028-1 (2013).","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2018.01.003","volume":"62","author":"H Hayama","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hayama, H., Fueki, K., Wadachi, J. & Wakabayashi, N. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible. J. Prosthodont. Res. 62, 347\u2013352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpor.2018.01.003 (2018).","journal-title":"J. Prosthodont. Res."},{"key":"28419_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0163107","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0163107","volume":"11","author":"FG Mangano","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mangano, F. G., Veronesi, G., Hauschild, U., Mijiritsky, E. & Mangano, C. Trueness and precision of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: A comparative in vitro study. PLoS One. 11, e0163107. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0163107 (2016).","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"28419_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/5189761","author":"H Mutwalli","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mutwalli, H., Braian, M., Mahmood, D. & Larsson, C. Trueness and precision of three-dimensional digitizing intraoral devices. Int. J. Dent. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2018\/5189761 (2018).","journal-title":"Int. J. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104697","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2023.104697","volume":"138","author":"B Yilmaz","year":"2023","unstructured":"Yilmaz, B. et al. Comparison of intraoral and laboratory scanners to an industrial-grade scanner while analyzing the fabrication trueness of polymer and titanium complete-arch implant-supported frameworks. J. Dent. 138, 104697. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2023.104697 (2023).","journal-title":"J. Dent."},{"key":"28419_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2013.04.017","volume":"144","author":"TV Fl\u00fcgge","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fl\u00fcgge, T. V., Schlager, S., Nelson, K., Nahles, S. & Metzger, M. C. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 144, 471\u2013478. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajodo.2013.04.017 (2013).","journal-title":"Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop."},{"key":"28419_CR51","unstructured":"https:\/\/support.medit.com\/hc\/en-us\/articles\/360020924592--colLab-The-substructure-of-an-implant-bar., M. h. c. c. T. s. o. a. i. b. o. A. a."},{"issue":"Suppl 16","key":"28419_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13273","volume":"29","author":"T Fl\u00fcgge","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fl\u00fcgge, T. et al. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 29 (Suppl 16), 374\u2013392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/clr.13273 (2018).","journal-title":"Clin. Oral Implants Res."},{"key":"28419_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1563\/aaid-joi-D-24-00054","volume":"50","author":"T Sezer","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sezer, T., Esim, E. & Y\u0131lmaz, E. Trueness of intraoral scanners in different scan patterns for Full-Arch digital implant impressions. J. Oral Implantol. 50, 426\u2013430. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1563\/aaid-joi-D-24-00054 (2024).","journal-title":"J. Oral Implantol"},{"key":"28419_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.10882","volume":"39","author":"T Sezer","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sezer, T., Y\u0131lmaz, E. & Esim, E. Comparison of intraoral scanning modes in three distinct Full- arch digital implant impression scenarios: an in vitro study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 39, 217\u2013222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/jomi.10882 (2024).","journal-title":"Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants"},{"key":"28419_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1453","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics14131453","volume":"14","author":"LT Ciocan","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ciocan, L. T. et al. Comparative analysis of four different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study. Diagnostics (Basel Switzerland). 14, 1453. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics14131453 (2024).","journal-title":"Diagnostics (Basel Switzerland)"},{"key":"28419_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.4047\/jap.2025.17.3.125","volume":"17","author":"JH Baranowski","year":"2025","unstructured":"Baranowski, J. H., Stenport, V. F., Braian, M. & Wennerberg, A. Effects of scan body material, length and top design on digital implant impression accuracy and usability: an in vitro study. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 17, 125\u2013136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4047\/jap.2025.17.3.125 (2025).","journal-title":"J. Adv. Prosthodont."},{"key":"28419_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.11607\/ijp.8565","volume":"37","author":"L Azevedo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Azevedo, L. et al. Influence of implant scanbody material and intraoral scanners on the accuracy of Complete-Arch digital implant impressions. Int. J. Prosthodont. 37, 575\u2013582. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/ijp.8565 (2024).","journal-title":"Int. J. Prosthodont."},{"key":"28419_CR58","first-page":"157","volume":"14","author":"YJ Zhang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhang, Y. J., Shi, J. Y., Qian, S. J., Qiao, S. C. & Lai, H. C. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review. Int. J. Oral Implantol (Berl). 14, 157\u2013179 (2021).","journal-title":"Int. J. Oral Implantol (Berl)"}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-28419-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-28419-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-28419-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]],"date-time":"2025-12-05T01:02:22Z","timestamp":1764896542000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-28419-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,3]]},"references-count":58,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["28419"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-025-28419-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2045-2322"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 August 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 November 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 December 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"Informed consent for sharing clinical data and images for scientific purposes was collected from all patients prior to commencement of the study, which was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was reviewed and approved by the Alexandria University ethics review committee) with approval reference number of 0796_11\/2023.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"\u201cWritten informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.\u201d","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"for sharing clinical data and images for scientific purposes was collected from all patients prior to commencement of the study, which was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was reviewed and approved by the Alexandria University ethics review committee) with approval reference number of 0796_11\/2023.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}],"article-number":"43110"}}