{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T16:53:08Z","timestamp":1781628788896,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1766966400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1766966400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Accurate imaging of displaced dental materials (DMs) in soft tissues is critical for diagnosis, treatment planning, and preventing complications. The aim of this study was to compare the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and ultrasonography (USG) in detecting DMs embedded in soft tissues, as well as to characterize their imaging features. Fifteen DMs used in restorative, endodontic, orthodontic, and prosthetic procedures were placed in the alveolar mucosa and muscles. CBCT and USG images of DMs were obtained. Two dentomaxillofacial radiologists independently evaluated the images for detectability, radiopacity, echogenicity, and artifact presence. USG demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity compared to CBCT, particularly for low-radiopacity and superficial materials, such as paper points, wax, alginate, and acrylic. While CBCT effectively visualized high-density materials, such as amalgam, metal seramic crowns, Ni-Ti wires, and metal brackets, it failed to detect low-density objects, like paper points and wax. Intra- and interobserver agreements were excellent for both modalities. Posterior acoustic shadowing and comet-tail patterns were observed in USG. It was concluded that USG is effective for detecting superficial, low-radiopacity DMs, while CBCT excels in evaluating high-density materials, highlighting their complementary roles in managing foreign bodies in hard and soft oral tissues. These results may help clinicians select appropriate imaging modalities based on material characteristics, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing unnecessary radiation exposure. In addition, the study provides a useful reference for clinicians by outlining the ultrasonographic features of DMs.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-025-29235-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T16:21:07Z","timestamp":1767025267000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["In vitro comparison of the imaging properties of dental materials in soft tissue using ultrasonography and cone beam computed tomography"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"\u00c7i\u011fdem","family":"\u015eeker","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ebru Y\u00fcksel","family":"Kaya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gediz","family":"Geduk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Orhan","family":"Cicek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Murat","family":"\u0130\u00e7en","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]]},"reference":[{"issue":"Suppl","key":"29235_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.34108\/eujhs.1309050","volume":"32","author":"N Ersu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ersu, N., Kayg\u0131s\u0131z Yi\u011fit, M., Tanyeri, F. Z., Yalva\u00e7, B. & Canger, E. M. Evaluation of the image properties of foreign bodies and dental materials with different imaging techniques. J. Health Sci. 32 (Suppl), 51\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.34108\/eujhs.1309050 (2023).","journal-title":"J. Health Sci."},{"key":"29235_CR2","first-page":"100","volume-title":"Oral anatomy, histology and embryology","author":"BKB Berkovitz","year":"2009","unstructured":"Berkovitz, B. K. B., Holland, G. R. & Moxham, B. J. Oral anatomy, histology and embryology 4th edn, 100\u2013135 (Elsevier Health Sciences, 2009).","edition":"4"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"29235_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.52037\/eads.2023.0031","volume":"50","author":"Y Deniz","year":"2023","unstructured":"Deniz, Y., Sessiz, R. & Eren, H. Ultrasound examination of various dental materials and foreign bodies. Eur. Ann. Dent. Sci. 50 (Suppl 1), 19\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.52037\/eads.2023.0031 (2023).","journal-title":"Eur. Ann. Dent. Sci."},{"key":"29235_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.1111\/acem.12714","volume":"22","author":"J Davis","year":"2015","unstructured":"Davis, J., Czerniski, B., Au, A., Adhikari, S., Farrell, I. & Fields, J. M. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in retained soft tissue foreign bodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad. Emerg. Med. 22, 777\u2013787. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/acem.12714 (2015).","journal-title":"Acad. Emerg. Med."},{"key":"29235_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.11152\/mu-1562","volume":"20","author":"KO Demiralp","year":"2018","unstructured":"Demiralp, K. O., Orhan, K., Kur\u015fun \u00c7akmak, E. \u015e., Gorurgoz, C. & Bayrak, S. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and ultrasonography with two types of probes in the detection of opaque and non-opaque foreign bodies. Med. Ultrason. 20, 467\u2013474. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11152\/mu-1562 (2018).","journal-title":"Med. Ultrason."},{"key":"29235_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr\/68589458","volume":"39","author":"MH Aras","year":"2010","unstructured":"Aras, M. H., Miloglu, O., Barutcugil, C., Kantarci, M., Ozcan, E. & Harorli, A. Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 39, 72\u201378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/dmfr\/68589458 (2010).","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol."},{"key":"29235_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20210182","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20210182","volume":"51","author":"F \u00c7a\u011flayan","year":"2022","unstructured":"\u00c7a\u011flayan, F. & Yozgat \u0130lba\u015f, F. N. Sonographic features of various dental materials and foreign bodies. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 51, 20210182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/dmfr.20210182 (2022).","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol."},{"key":"29235_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"TC15","DOI":"10.7860\/jcdr\/2017\/24523.9736","volume":"11","author":"A Shokri","year":"2017","unstructured":"Shokri, A., Jamalpour, M., Jafariyeh, B., Poorolajal, J. & Sabet, N. K. Comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and cone beam computed tomography for detection of foreign bodies in maxillofacial region. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 11, TC15\u2013TC19. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7860\/jcdr\/2017\/24523.9736 (2017).","journal-title":"J. Clin. Diagn. Res."},{"key":"29235_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1007\/s11282-021-00537-3","volume":"37","author":"O Isman","year":"2021","unstructured":"Isman, O. & Isman, E. Identification of various orthodontic materials as foreign bodies via panoramic radiography, cone beam computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography: an in vitro study. Oral Radiol. 37, 524\u2013530. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11282-021-00537-3 (2021).","journal-title":"Oral Radiol."},{"key":"29235_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e37265","DOI":"10.5812\/iranjradiol.37265","volume":"13","author":"S Valizadeh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Valizadeh, S., Pouraliakbar, H., Kiani, L., Safi, Y. & Alibakhshi, L. Evaluation of visibility of foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region: comparison of computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Iran. J. Radiol. 13, e37265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5812\/iranjradiol.37265 (2016).","journal-title":"Iran. J. Radiol."},{"key":"29235_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.3390\/jimaging7110238","volume":"7","author":"R Reda","year":"2021","unstructured":"Reda, R. et al. Ultrasound imaging in dentistry: a literature overview. J. Imaging. 7, 238. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jimaging7110238 (2021).","journal-title":"J. Imaging"},{"key":"29235_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1384","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-025-06758-w","volume":"25","author":"H Yuce","year":"2025","unstructured":"Yuce, H. & Acikgoz, G. Ultrasonographic CBCT analysis of foreign bodies and dental materials. BMC Oral Health. 25, 1384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12903-025-06758-w (2025).","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"29235_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20140229","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20140229","volume":"44","author":"R Javadrashid","year":"2015","unstructured":"Javadrashid, R. et al. Visibility of different foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region using plain radiography, CT, MRI and ultrasonography: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 44, 20140229. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/dmfr.20140229 (2015).","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol."},{"key":"29235_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rx.2019.05.009","volume":"62","author":"EM D\u00edez","year":"2020","unstructured":"D\u00edez, E. M., \u00c1lvaro, R. L., Obreg\u00f3n, A. L., Esteban, M. P. & \u00c1lvaro, E. L. Ultrasonography of subcutaneous foreign bodies: differences depending on their nature, complications, and potential diagnostic errors. Radiologia 62, 3\u201312 (2020).","journal-title":"Radiologia"},{"key":"29235_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1186\/s13244-021-00969-9","volume":"12","author":"JO Voss","year":"2021","unstructured":"Voss, J. O. et al. Imaging foreign bodies in head and neck trauma: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 12, 20. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13244-021-00969-9 (2021).","journal-title":"Insights Imaging"},{"key":"29235_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annemergmed.2015.07.499","volume":"66","author":"HJ Tseng","year":"2015","unstructured":"Tseng, H. J.,\u00a0Hanna, T. N., Shuaib, W., Aized, M., Khosa, F. & Linnau, K. F. Imaging foreign bodies: ingested, aspirated, and inserted. Ann. Emerg. Med. 66, 570\u2013582. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.annemergmed.2015.07.499 (2015).","journal-title":"Ann. Emerg. Med."},{"key":"29235_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1408","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.2017160175","volume":"37","author":"M Baad","year":"2017","unstructured":"Baad, M., Lu, Z. F., Reiser, I. & Paushter, D. Clinical significance of US artifacts. Radiographics 37, 1408\u20131423 (2017).","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"key":"29235_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1097\/AAP.0b013e31820d4207","volume":"36","author":"G Hocking","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hocking, G., Hebard, S. & Mitchell, C. H. A review of the benefits and pitfalls of phantoms in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 36, 162\u2013170 (2011).","journal-title":"Reg. Anesth. Pain Med."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-29235-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-29235-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-29235-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T15:56:02Z","timestamp":1781625362000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-025-29235-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["29235"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-025-29235-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 August 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 November 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 December 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"The animal material utilized in this study was not obtained from a living animal. Instead, tissues were harvested from an animal post-mortem. Animals were slaughtered for consumption. It was obtained from a butcher. Therefore, ethical approval is not applied.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}}],"article-number":"44928"}}